This is Don Mashak's Hennepin County Minnesota Free Press Blog to Provide Hennepin County Residents with Full and Fair Citizen Reporting of Local, National and World Events. [Bloomington, Brooklyn, Center, Park, Champlin, Corcoran, Crystal, Dayton, Eden Prairie, Edina, Excelsior, Golden Valley, Hamel, Hopkins, Long Lake, Maple Grove, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Medina, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, Mound, New Hope, Osseo, Plymouth, Richfield, Rogers, Saint Louis Park, Shorewood, Wayzata, city ]
Minnesota Lawyers’ Professional Responsibilty Board
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH <> CHINESE BELOW THE SPANISH * APARECE TEXTO SENCILLO DESPUÉS DE LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS *备忘录后显示纯文本 <> 西班牙语之下的中文 * TEXT VERSION MAY BE LONGER THAN MEME VERSION <> LA VERSIÓN DE TEXTO PUEDE SER MÁS LARGA QUE LA VERSIÓN MEME 文本版本可能比MEME版本更长
US Election 2020 Legal Update
US Election 2020 Legal Update
\\ ELECTION INTEGRITY UPDATE The November 3, 2020 presidential election was challenged in 92 courts. 9 are still pending, 83 have resolved.
Of those 83 resolved: 53 were tossed on technicality (re: standing, moot, filing too early or too late etc.)
30 were resolved “On The Merits”. (evidence) Of those 30 decided On The Merits, Trump won 22 (73%).
This Cynical Patriot has previously written about the complicity of our Judiciary complicity in treason. The Progressive Globalist WEF coup is engaged in a “Gradualism” paradigm of warfare. Gradualism calls for slow, covert infiltration of the target society over generations so no one generation experiences enough change to be moved to resist, revolt or mount a counter-revolution. It specific avoids producing the sights, sounds & smells of traditional warfare. As posted previously, our Judges are rewriting Court rules to make it easier to advance the Seditious & treasonous Progressive Globalist WEF agenda. One of these changes is replacing the “Pound Principle” for heavy predisposition for cases to be resolved “ON THE MERITS” rather than on “technicality”. ( On a related issue, some municipalities are allowing non-citizens to vote & government attorneys do nothing, note that per Gradualism Warfare, this is an incremental step towards non-citizens voting in State, then National Elections.) As posted above, Technicality was the Progressive Globalist WEF method of choice for ruling against Lawsuits challenging the 2020 Election results. Technicality is also use to allow Judges to rule in favor of Progressive Allies & against those who oppose said coup. As an Election Judge in MN for more than a decade, this Cynical Patriot also raised the issue of auditing the computer code of the “Electronic Ballot Boxes” before each election from 2012 to 2020. It was made clear to me by the Minnesota Election hierarchy that this issue did not concern. Further, it was also made clear they didn’t want to hear about it anymore. This Cynical Patriot asserts that election fraud is too important an issue to let corrupt judges dismiss on technicality! Being the very foundation of our Republic, such litigation must be resolved ON THE MERITS by a jury. That said, clearly the oath of office to “support & defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign & domestic”, means nothing to the majority of Judges, Government Attorneys & Lawyers. If it did, the majority of judges, Government Attorneys & Lawyers would meet & organize to restore the Constitution, Rule of Law & our Republic. Who is responsible for holding these folks accountable to their oath? Isn’t failing to uphold their oath, the same as treason? Perhaps when WE THE PEOPLE withdraw our CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED, justice & deterrent sentencing would best be served by exiling all of these folks from America, & requiring those who can prove they actually materially & vigorously did work to support & defend the Constitution, & suffered material retaliation, to apply for readmission to our country & restoration of their US citizenship?
Don Mashak, 612-249-3299 Rt. 1 Box 231, Albertville, MN 55301
This Citizen is a Free Person and State National under the Organic, Original Constitution of the United States of America
This composition inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Jeff Blodgett, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
Actualización legal de las elecciones estadounidenses de 2020
Actualización legal de las elecciones estadounidenses de 2020
\\ ACTUALIZACIÓN DE INTEGRIDAD ELECTORAL Las elecciones presidenciales del 3 de noviembre de 2020 fueron impugnadas en 92 tribunales.
9 aún están pendientes, 83 han resuelto.
De los 83 resueltos: 53 fueron descartados por tecnicismos (re: permanente, discutible, presentación demasiado pronto o demasiado tarde, etc.) 30 se resolvieron ‘Sobre el Fondo’. (evidencia) De los 30 decididos por méritos, Trump ganó 22 (73%).
Este patriota cínico ha escrito anteriormente sobre la complicidad de nuestro poder judicial en la traición. El golpe de Estado Progresista Globalista del FEM está inmerso en un paradigma de guerra de ‘gradualismo’. El gradualismo exige una infiltración lenta y encubierta en la sociedad objetivo a lo largo de generaciones, de modo que ninguna generación experimente suficientes cambios como para verse impulsada a resistir, rebelarse o montar una contrarrevolución. Específicamente evita producir las imágenes, sonidos y olores de la guerra tradicional. Como se publicó anteriormente, nuestros jueces están reescribiendo las reglas de la Corte para que sea más fácil avanzar en la agenda sediciosa y traidora del Globalismo Progresista del FEM. Uno de estos cambios es reemplazar el ‘Principio de la Libra’ por una fuerte predisposición a que los casos se resuelvan ‘BAJO EL FONDO’ en lugar de ‘tecnicismos’. (En un tema relacionado, algunos municipios permiten que los no ciudadanos voten y los abogados del gobierno no hacen nada; tenga en cuenta que, según Gradualism Warfare, este es un paso gradual hacia que los no ciudadanos voten en las elecciones estatales y luego en las nacionales). Como se publicó anteriormente, el tecnicismo fue el globalista progresista. Método elegido por el WEF para dictaminar contra demandas que impugnan los resultados de las elecciones de 2020. El tecnicismo también se utiliza para permitir que los jueces fallen a favor de los aliados progresistas y en contra de quienes se oponen a dicho golpe. Como juez electoral en MN durante más de una década, este patriota cínico también planteó la cuestión de la auditoría del código informático de las ‘urnas electrónicas’ antes de cada elección de 2012 a 2020. La jerarquía electoral de Minesota me lo dejó claro. que este tema no concernía. Además, también quedó claro que no querían saber más sobre eso. ¡Este patriota cínico afirma que el fraude electoral es un tema demasiado importante como para permitir que jueces corruptos lo desestimen por tecnicismos! Siendo el fundamento mismo de nuestra República, dichos litigios deben ser resueltos SOBRE EL FONDO por un jurado. Dicho esto, claramente el juramento de ‘apoyar y defender la Constitución de todos los enemigos, nacionales y extranjeros’ no significa nada para la mayoría de jueces, abogados y abogados del gobierno. Si así fuera, la mayoría de los jueces, abogados y abogados del gobierno se reunirían y organizarían para restaurar la Constitución, el Estado de Derecho y nuestra República. ¿Quién es responsable de hacer que estas personas rindan cuentas de su juramento? ¿No es lo mismo no cumplir su juramento que traición? Quizás cuando NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, retiremos nuestro CONSENTIMIENTO PARA SER GOBERNADOS, la mejor manera de lograr justicia y sentencias disuasorias es exiliar a todas estas personas de Estados Unidos y exigir a aquellos que puedan demostrar que realmente trabajaron material y vigorosamente para apoyar y defender la Constitución, y sufrió represalias materiales, para solicitar la readmisión a nuestro país y la restauración de su ciudadanía estadounidense?
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH <> CHINESE BELOW THE SPANISH * APARECE TEXTO SENCILLO DESPUÉS DE LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS *备忘录后显示纯文本 <> 西班牙语之下的中文 * TEXT VERSION MAY BE LONGER THAN MEME VERSION <> LA VERSIÓN DE TEXTO PUEDE SER MÁS LARGA QUE LA VERSIÓN MEME 文本版本可能比MEME版本更长
Propaganda, Social Darwinism, Progressivism, & NAZIs
Propaganda, Social Darwinism, Progressivism, & NAZIs
I often wonder why most Americans do not see the parallels between what the NAZIs did & what the Progressive Globalist WEF Elites, DINOs & RINOs are doing. In case you wonder where Progressive Globalist WEF Elites, DINOs & RINOs got a lot of their “bag of tricks”….
“Let me control the Media & I will turn any nation into a herd of Pigs.” ~ Joseph Goebbels ~ Hitler’s NAZI Propaganda Minister
SOCIAL DARWINISM (1870s) was rejected by the masses around the world.
So, its promoters rebranded as UK FABIAN SOCIALISM (1884), US PROGRESSIVES (1890s) & German NAZIs (1920s) & experimented with different methods to implement their original Social Darwinism. Each rebrand trying different methods.
UK Fabian Socialists adopted a Gradualism paradigm of warfare, which was soon also adopted by US Progressive Globalists.
The NAZIs used propaganda, censorship & indoctrination to rise to power morphing into more traditional methods of warfare.
Tell me again why you are not scared crapless? Please Tell me again why you are letting yourselves, your children & future generations of Americans to be enslaved for eternity without a fight.
Real Men & Real Patriots don’t let their women’s & children’s futures & unalienable Natural Rights be stolen from them without a fight, even if the would-be tyrants are good liars & placate them with free stuff.
As importantly, Real Men & Real Patriots don’t let their own futures & unalienable Natural Rights be stolen from them without a fight, even if the would-be tyrants are good liars & placate them with free stuff.
Please don’t be embarrassing yourself thinking or calling yourselves Real Men &/or Real Patriots just because your sports team won, you have a big boat, you have six pack abs, you score with the opposite sex a lot, you make big bucks, you are a celebrity, or a politician, etc. Real Men & Real Patriots actually defend themselves & those less able to defend themselves, especially in instances of overwhelming odds. Adult Men who think &/or call themselves Real Men for any other reason are Candy-Ass Pretenders.
[Adult Women who want prove they are Real Women &/or Real Patriots & equal to or better than Real Men, now is your chance to step up and prove it. Psst…. Wives & Mothers who encourage & strongly support their Real Men & family, are by default, already Real Women &/or Real Patriots]
Everyone wants to be a patriot until it’s time to do real patriot stuff. It’s time for Real Men to Man-Up.
What should you do? Who should you trust? Turn off Mainstream Media. Stop listening to politicians! Start talking & meeting, in person, with your friends, neighbors, coworkers, & classmates, and exercise your unalienable Natural Right to ESTABLISH TRUTH for yourselves using your own observations & reasoning (in free & unfettered debate). Only by organically ESTABLISHING TRUTH by consensus among those you know and trust, can you reduce the chance of being manipulated, identify the problem(s) we all face, and then make plans to redress the problem issues mutually identified.
Keep Fighting the Good Fight, Fellow Patriots.
Those were my thoughts
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak, 612-249-3299 Rt. 1 Box 231, Albertville, MN 55301
Citizen is a Free Person and State National under the Organic Constitution of the United States of America
This composition inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Jeff Blodgett, Wells Fargo Bank, NA & William Bunker
Propaganda, Darwinismo Social, Progresismo y NAZIs
Propaganda, Darwinismo Social, Progresismo y NAZIs
A menudo me pregunto por qué la mayoría de los estadounidenses no ven los paralelismos entre lo que hicieron los nazis y lo que están haciendo las élites progresistas globalistas del FEM, los DINOs y los RINOs. En caso de que te preguntes de dónde sacaron las élites progresistas globalistas del WEF, DINOs y RINOs su ‘bolsa de trucos’…
‘Déjame controlar los medios de comunicación y convertiré a cualquier nación en una piara de cerdos’. ~ José Goebbels ~ Ministro de propaganda nazi de Hitler
El darwinismo social (década de 1870) fue rechazado por las masas de todo el mundo.
Por lo tanto, sus promotores se rebautizaron como SOCIALISMO FABIANO DEL REINO UNIDO (1884), PROGRESISTAS ESTADOUNIDENSES (década de 1890) y NAZIS alemanes (década de 1920) y experimentaron con diferentes métodos para implementar su darwinismo social original. Cada cambio de marca probando diferentes métodos.
Los socialistas fabianos del Reino Unido adoptaron un paradigma de guerra gradualista, que pronto también fue adoptado por los globalistas progresistas estadounidenses.
Los nazis utilizaron la propaganda, la censura y el adoctrinamiento para llegar al poder, transformándose en métodos de guerra más tradicionales.
Dime de nuevo por qué no tienes miedo. Por favor, díganme de nuevo por qué se están permitiendo a sí mismos, a sus hijos y a las futuras generaciones de estadounidenses ser esclavizados por la eternidad sin luchar.
Los Hombres Reales y los Patriotas Reales no permiten que el futuro de sus mujeres y niños y sus derechos naturales inalienables les sean robados sin luchar, incluso si los aspirantes a tiranos son buenos mentirosos y los aplacan con cosas gratis.
Igual de importante, los Hombres de Verdad y los Patriotas de Verdad no permiten que les roben su propio futuro y sus inalienables Derechos Naturales sin luchar, incluso si los aspirantes a tiranos son buenos mentirosos y los aplacan con cosas gratis.
Por favor, no se avergüencen pensando o llamándose Hombres Reales y/o Patriotas Reales solo porque su equipo deportivo ganó, tienen un barco grande, abdominales marcados, anotan mucho con el sexo opuesto, ganan mucho dinero. , eres una celebridad o un político, etc. Los hombres reales y los patriotas reales en realidad se defienden a sí mismos y a los menos capaces de defenderse, especialmente en casos de probabilidades abrumadoras. Los hombres adultos que piensan y/o se llaman a sí mismos Hombres de verdad por cualquier otro motivo son Pretendientes Candy-Ass.
[Mujeres adultas que quieran demostrar que son mujeres reales y/o patriotas reales e iguales o mejores que los hombres reales, ahora es su oportunidad de dar un paso al frente y demostrarlo. Psst…. Las esposas y madres que alientan y apoyan firmemente a sus hombres y familias reales, ya son, por defecto, mujeres reales y/o patriotas reales.]
Todo el mundo quiere ser patriota hasta que llegue el momento de hacer cosas realmente patriotas. Es hora de que los hombres de verdad se vuelvan hombres.
¿Qué deberías hacer? ¿En quién deberías confiar? Desactiva los medios convencionales. ¡Dejen de escuchar a los políticos! Comience a hablar y reunirse, en persona, con sus amigos, vecinos, compañeros de trabajo y de clase, y ejerza su derecho natural inalienable a ESTABLECER LA VERDAD por sí mismo utilizando sus propias observaciones y razonamientos (en un debate libre y sin restricciones). Sólo ESTABLECIENDO orgánicamente la VERDAD por consenso entre aquellos que conoce y en quienes confía, podrá reducir la posibilidad de ser manipulado, identificar los problemas que todos enfrentamos y luego hacer planes para solucionar los problemas identificados mutuamente.
Sigan peleando la buena batalla, compañeros patriotas.
esos eran mis pensamientos
Gracias por tu tiempo.
en libertad,
Firmado en el condado de Wright MN Don Mashak, 612-249-3299 ruta 1 caja 231, Albertville, MN USA 55301 ciudadano es un, como persona libre y nacional del estado bajo la Constitución Orgánica de los Estados Unidos de América
Esta composición inspirada en Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Jeff Blodgett, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker
* SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH <> CHINESE BELOW THE SPANISH * EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS * 西班牙语之下的中文
Polite Redirect to those who characterize the scripted & choreographed Psy-Ops by the US Progressive Globalist Insurgency as merely silly “Clown” Behavior
Just a quick few words here. Everyone reading this is as smart or smarter than I am. I see too many forces pushing American and the World towards the Progressive Globalists Insurgency’s goals. Those goals being a New World Order under One World Government. Mainstream Media Propaganda, Progressive Common Core Education Indoctrination, Social Media Censorship, uncontrolled Immigration, loss of control of our borders, uncontrolled spending, gun grab legislation, Rigged Elections, and bogus COVID-19 are all creating a “perfect storm” for the collapse of America. So I find it necessary to point out that scripted and choreographed Psychological Warfare of the Progressive Globalist Elites is not merely happenstance Illogical foolishness. The same with calling Progressive RINOs just cowardly; They are NOT cowardly… They are co-conspirators in an unconventional revolution by slow, covert infiltration that the Progressive Globalist Insurgency is involved in. Too many Americans are NOT aware we are in a state of war. If we are going to restore the Constitution, Natural Law, the Rule of Law, Natural Rights of the Individual, and the Sovereignty of WE THE PEOPLE, We must make every American aware that we are in the middle of a nontraditional Revolution. And we must adapt our tactics to defeat this unconventional warfare by Progressive Globalists within our own government. Please make a mental note that every time Mainstream Media and/or Progressive RINOs and DINOs use euphemisms to downplay seditious and treasonous acts, to reinforce in your own mind, and those around you, that our government is trying to hide a revolution that is actually happening in plain sight.
Those were my thoughts.
Keep fighting the good fight.
Thank you for your time.
. In Liberty, Don Mashak The Cynical Patriot
.
This composition inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
Redirigir cortésmente a aquellos que caracterizan a los Guerra Psicológica con guión y coreografía de la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista de los EE. UU. Como simplemente un comportamiento tonto de ‘payaso’
Solo unas pocas palabras aquí. Todos los que leen esto son tan inteligentes o más inteligentes que yo. Veo demasiadas fuerzas que empujan a Estados Unidos y al mundo hacia los objetivos de la insurgencia globalista progresista. Esos objetivos son un Nuevo Orden Mundial bajo un Gobierno Mundial. La propaganda de los medios de comunicación, el adoctrinamiento progresivo de la educación básica común, la censura en las redes sociales, la inmigración incontrolada, la pérdida de control de nuestras fronteras, el gasto descontrolado, la legislación sobre el robo de armas, las elecciones manipuladas y el falso COVID-19 están creando una ‘tormenta perfecta’ para el colapso de América. Así que me parece necesario señalar que la Guerra Psicológica guionizada y coreografiada de las élites progresistas globalistas no es una mera casualidad tontería ilógica. Lo mismo con llamar a los RINO progresivos simplemente cobardes; NO son cobardes … Son co-conspiradores en una revolución no convencional mediante una infiltración lenta y encubierta en la que está involucrada la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista. Demasiados estadounidenses NO saben que estamos en un estado de guerra. Si vamos a restaurar la Constitución, la Ley Natural, el Estado de Derecho, los Derechos Naturales del Individuo y la Soberanía de NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO, debemos concienciar a todos los estadounidenses de que estamos en medio de una Revolución no tradicional. Y debemos adaptar nuestras tácticas para derrotar esta guerra no convencional por parte de los globalistas progresistas dentro de nuestro propio gobierno. Por favor, tome nota mental de que cada vez que Mainstream Media y / o Progressive RINOs y DINOs usan eufemismos para restar importancia a los actos sediciosos y traidores, para reforzar en su propia mente y en los que le rodean, que nuestro gobierno está tratando de ocultar una revolución que en realidad es sucediendo a plena vista.
Esos fueron mis pensamientos.
¡Sigan peleando la buena batalla, compañeros patriotas!
Gracias por tu tiempo.
. En libertad Don Mashak El patriota cínico
.
Esta composición inspirada en Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker
* PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH <> CHINESE BELOW THE SPANISH * APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS *备忘录后显示纯文本 <> 西班牙语之下的中文 * TEXT VERSION MAY BE LONGER THAN MEME VERSION <> LA VERSIÓN DE TEXTO PUEDE SER MÁS LARGA QUE LA VERSIÓN MEME 文本版本可能比MEME版本更长
first posted on Social Media as follows in this meme:
Resolving Cases ‘On The Merits’, Revisited
DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW
Our modern [Judicial] procedural system was built largely on the foundations of Roscoe Pound’s vision.3 That vision, which was first implemented in the Federal Equity Rules in 1912 and then even more fully embraced in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938
3. See Jay Tidmarsh, Pound’s Century, and Ours, 81 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 513, 513 (2006)
407
(Roscoe) “Pound Principle” of Jurisprudence
The fundamental reason for the endurance of Pound’s paradigm is its elegant simplicity: it promises to resolve each claim and each issue on its factual and legal merit, without letting procedural technicalities or traps derail the decision. No other vision—for instance, “decide claims by the most efficient means”—captures this most basic aspiration of an ideal civil justice system. Like any aspiration, resolving cases “on the merits” is never perfectly achievable.6 Nevertheless, this paradigm has continued to battle all other policy objectives—such as achieving efficiency, fostering settlements, preventing jury confusion, and balancing party control against active judicial management—in debates over the architecture of our procedural rules.
When the Social Darwinists (1870s) rebranded as Progressives in the US (1890s), they began an unconventional revolution by slow, covert infiltration. As evinced here, Progressive Elite Judges have been working to slowly change the rules to allow them to more easily fix case outcomes, while still appearing to be acting in the best interest of the masses and our country. Resolving Cases on Technicalities, Summary Judgement and/or Administrative Courts, makes it easier to fix cases and removes the uncertainty of having juries comprised of the allegedly ignorant masses, as part of the process.
Most of the efforts at procedural reform in the past thirty years have been attempts to walk away from, or tamp down the consequences of, Pound’s belief in a simple, uniform, discretionary, “decide each case on its merits” approach to legal procedure.5Although these efforts can loosely be associated with a law-and-economics perspective (in the sense that they are all attempts to rein in perceived excess costs in the present litigation system), it is fair to say that, while we are in the process of rejecting Pound’s paradigm, we have yet to come up with a paradigm to replace it.
408
In this instance, our traitor Progressive Judiciary argues for Court matters to be resolved by Judges on technicality for efficiency; rather than on Merit by Juries comprised of our peers. The pretext for this change being Economics (saving money). (Let me be clear, by technicality violation my interests is in violations of court rules and procedures in civil matters, not violations of constitutional rights in criminal matters.) But, in removing Merit to resolve court matters, Progressive Judges ignore the individuals unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights to Due Process and a Jury Trial. (Apparently, Progressive Judges need a remedial course on what “Unalienable” means.) Progressive Elites have a history of advancing their evil, unconstitutional agenda by making it appear they are acting in the best interests of the masses. [e.g., The Minimum wage was originally conceived as an instrument of Racism. Progressive Elites reasoned that the less productive immigrants, minorities and women would be priced out of the labor market. Progressive Elites sincerely believed only White Men could produce value in excess of the higher Minimum wage. (Page 140, Chapters 5, 7-10, “Illiberal Reformers”, 2016, Thomas Leonard.). Eventually, business would choose to only hire White Men of their own accord, for this reason.]
Most of this thinking flows from the Progressive Elite’s assertions of alleged superiority over the masses (Pages 51-52, Ibid.) Some, but NOT all of the other unconstitutional things Progressive Elites believe, include that the concept of Rights of the Individual is “nonsense” (Page 25, Ibid.), the masses are too ignorant to govern themselves (Pg. 52,) and that the Constitution’s Checks and Balances are outdated and should be ignored (Page 66, Ibid.).
Under Progressive Democratic President Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921), the Progressives created a 4th Branch of Government. This Administrative State was created to spearhead the mostly unconstitutional Progressive Agenda, and to reduce government accountability to the masses by being inserted between WE THE PEOPLE and the original 3 Branches of Government. At the point where Progressive Elites took actions to make their unconstitutional thoughts a reality, their actions became Sedition (US 18 Code 2384), Insurrection (US 18 Code 2383) and TREASON (USC Article III, Section 3; & US 18 Code 2381).
Which brings us to the matter of Election Fraud 2020. As we have demonstrated, the Progressive Globalist Insurgency began in earnest circa 1913. As we introduced earlier, the Progressive Globalists premeditated plan was to overthrow our government via nontraditional revolution by slow, covert infiltration over generations so no one generation would notice enough change to resist, revolt or mount a counter-revolution. More than 100 years later, the Progressive Globalist Insurgency assessed that it had infiltrated enough key government positions and consolidated enough power that it could successfully rig an election without WE THE PEOPLE noticing, or at least NOT noticing enough to mount a counter-revolution. And this is how this final, conclusive grab for power has so far played out
The matter of Election Fraud 2020, was decided in an unconstitutional manner, without Due Process nor a Jury, in violation of each SCOTUS Judges’ oath to support and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Election Fraud 2020 was wrongfully resolved on Technicality rather than the Merits. And, the appearance that this was “lawful” was only made possible by decades of premeditated, duplicitous, criminal change to the Court Rules and Case Law to make such a decision seem “legal”. This premeditated, duplicitous slow change in Court Rules and Case Law replaced the “Rule of Law” with Progressive “Rule of Man” and “Might Makes Right”. These changes further evince the case that the US Supreme Court’s failure to hear Election Fraud 2020 matters was/were/are acts of Conspiracy Against Rights (US 18 Code 241), Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (US 18 Code 241), Sedition (US 18 Code 2384), Rebellion and Insurrection (US 18 Code 2383) and TREASON (USC Article III, Section 3; & US 18 Code 2381).
TO WIT, WE THE PEOPLE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF AN UNCONVENTIONAL REVOLUTION BY SLOW, COVERT INFILTRATION BY THE PROGRESSIVE GLOBALIST INSURGENCY THAT HAS WENT ON FOR MORE THAN 100 YEARS. BY THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED HERE, WE HAVE PROVEN OUR JUDICIARY HAS AIDED AND ABETTED SAID INSURGENCY.
Prove me wrong!
AT THE SAME TIME, PER THE ROADMAP FOR DEALING WITH TYRANNY PROVIDED TO US BY OUR FOUNDERS, WE THE PEOPLE MUST DOCUMENT EXHAUSTING OUR PEACEFUL REMEDIES BEFORE CONTEMPLATING ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES! I ASSERT THAT THE FRAUD OF ELECTION 2020 AND THE FAILURE OF GOVERNMENT AND THE COURTS TO PROPERLY REDRESS THE PROBLEMS WITH ELECTION 2020 DEMONSTRATED THAT ELECTIONS AS A PEACEFUL REMEDY HAVE BEEN LOST TO WE THE PEOPLE. STILL, WE MUST CONTINUE DOCUMENTING ALL REMAINING PEACEFUL REMEDIES BEORE WE CONTEMPLATE IMPLEMENTING ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES. SOME OTHER REMAINING PEACEFUL REMEDIES ARE “CITIZEN GRAND JURIES” AND A NEW DECLARATION OF CAUSES” AS THE FOUNDER’S DID 6JUL1775. (An example of what that might look like appears here.)
I believe that with the recent series of articles I have written, I have irrefutably demonstrated that WE THE PEOPLE can no longer proceed with our lives as though everything is “normal”, or even will be normal if and when this bogus COVID-19 crisis is ever over. WE THE PEOPLE must begin to act to counter this rising despotism now… Now, while the small actions of many citizens acting in unison provides a good chance of restoring our Republic with the least disruption to each of our lives.
While some suggest more traditional, alternative remedies, I advise otherwise. I suggest that before WE THE PEOPLE consider alternative remedies, we must adapt to this new method of revolution the Progressive Globalist insurgency is utilizing. Most fundamentally, I posit we should begin by: 1) Create unity of the masses, to counter Progressive fomented division; 2) Restore First Principles of our Representative, Constitutionally-Limited Republic that have been erased by Progressive “Common Core” Education and Progressive Mainstream Media. As well as restoring our traditions and values; 3) We must counter the infiltration of Progressives into the leadership of institutions that are supposed to “support and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic”. Initially, I think we should concentrate on Law Enforcement and the Military. Perhaps most effective would-be Family members communicating with rank-and-file members in Law Enforcement and the Military during family functions, such as Holidays. For example, discussions about values and expectations of the family if family members in law enforcement and/or the military are UNLAWFULLY ordered to fire upon civilians. Further, asking family members to make sure they Establish Truth for themselves and not to blindly rely upon the representations of superiors (who may be compromised Progressive operatives). And then, to act in a manner they feel best reflects their duty and oath, to support and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
If others disagree, feel free to so advise. And if others have better ideas for restoring the Republic, please communicate them. I have no compelling need to lead this restoration of the Republic… Please someone else step up with a better plan with a greater chance of success, so I can step aside…
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty, Don Mashak The Cynical Patriot
This composition inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
Resolución de Casos ‘Sobre el Fondo’, Revisada
Resolución de Casos ‘Sobre el Fondo’, Revisada
REVISIÓN DE LA LEY DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE DENVER
Nuestro moderno sistema procesal [judicial] se construyó en gran medida sobre los cimientos de la visión de Roscoe Pound.3 Esa visión, que se implementó por primera vez en las Reglas de Equidad Federal en 1912 y luego se adoptó aún más plenamente en las Reglas Federales de Procedimiento Civil en 1938
Ver Jay Tidmarsh, Pound’s Century, and Ours, 81 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 513, 513 (2006)
407
(Roscoe) ‘Principio de libra’ de jurisprudencia
La razón fundamental de la perdurabilidad del paradigma de Pound es su elegante simplicidad: promete resolver cada reclamo y cada problema según su mérito fáctico y legal, sin permitir que los tecnicismos o trampas procesales descarrilen la decisión. Ninguna otra visión, por ejemplo, ‘decidir las reclamaciones por los medios más eficientes’, captura esta aspiración más básica de un sistema de justicia civil ideal. Como cualquier aspiración, la resolución de casos ‘sobre el fondo’ nunca es perfectamente alcanzable.6 Sin embargo, este paradigma ha continuado luchando contra todos los demás objetivos políticos, como lograr la eficiencia, promover acuerdos, evitar la confusión del jurado y equilibrar el control de los partidos con la gestión judicial activa. —En debates sobre la arquitectura de nuestras reglas procesales.
Cuando los darwinistas sociales (década de 1870) se rebautizaron como progresistas en los Estados Unidos (década de 1890), iniciaron una revolución poco convencional mediante una infiltración lenta y encubierta. Como se demuestra aquí, los jueces de élite progresista han estado trabajando para cambiar lentamente las reglas para permitirles arreglar más fácilmente los resultados de los casos, sin dejar de parecer estar actuando en el mejor interés de las masas y de nuestro país. La resolución de casos sobre tecnicismos, juicios sumarios y / o tribunales administrativos, facilita la resolución de casos y elimina la incertidumbre de tener jurados compuestos por las masas supuestamente ignorantes, como parte del proceso.
La mayoría de los esfuerzos de reforma procesal en los últimos treinta años han sido intentos de alejarse o aplastar las consecuencias de la creencia de Pound en un enfoque simple, uniforme y discrecional de “decidir cada caso por sus méritos” del procedimiento legal. 5 Aunque estos esfuerzos pueden asociarse libremente con una perspectiva de derecho y economía (en el sentido de que todos son intentos de controlar los costos excesivos percibidos en el actual sistema de litigios), es justo decir que, mientras estamos en el proceso de rechazar el paradigma de Pound, todavía tenemos que encontrar un paradigma para reemplazarlo.
408
En este caso, nuestro traidor Judicial Progresista aboga por que los asuntos de la Corte sean resueltos por los Jueces en términos de tecnicismo para la eficiencia; en lugar de por el mérito de los jurados compuestos por nuestros pares. El pretexto para este cambio es la Economía (ahorrar dinero). (Permítanme ser claro, por tecnicismo me refiero a violaciones de las reglas y procedimientos judiciales en asuntos civiles, no violaciones de los derechos constitucionales en asuntos penales). Pero, al eliminar el mérito para resolver asuntos judiciales, los jueces progresistas ignoran los derechos naturales y constitucionales inalienables de las personas. al debido proceso y un juicio con jurado. (Aparentemente, los jueces progresistas necesitan un curso correctivo sobre lo que significa “inalienable”). Las élites progresistas tienen un historial de promover su agenda malvada e inconstitucional al hacer parecer que están actuando en el mejor interés de las masas. [Por ejemplo, el salario mínimo fue concebido originalmente como un instrumento de racismo. Las élites progresistas razonaron que los inmigrantes, las minorías y las mujeres menos productivas serían excluidos del mercado laboral. Las élites progresistas creían sinceramente que solo los hombres blancos podían producir un valor superior al salario mínimo más alto. (Página 140, Capítulos 5, 7-10, “Reformadores iliberales”, 2016, Thomas Leonard.). Eventualmente, las empresas optarían por contratar solo a hombres blancos propios, por esta razón].
La mayor parte de este pensamiento se deriva de las afirmaciones de la élite progresista de supuesta superioridad sobre las masas (páginas 51-52, ibid.) Algunas, pero NO todas las otras cosas inconstitucionales que creen las élites progresistas, incluyen que el concepto de derechos del individuo es “ tonterías ”(página 25, ibid.), las masas son demasiado ignorantes para gobernarse a sí mismas (pág. 52,) y que los controles y balances de la Constitución están desactualizados y deben ser ignorados (página 66, ibid.).
Bajo el presidente demócrata progresista Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921), los progresistas crearon una cuarta rama del gobierno. Este Estado Administrativo fue creado para encabezar la Agenda Progresista, en su mayoría inconstitucional, y para reducir la rendición de cuentas del gobierno a las masas al ser insertado entre NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO y las 3 ramas originales del gobierno. En el momento en que las élites progresistas tomaron medidas para hacer realidad sus pensamientos inconstitucionales, sus acciones se convirtieron en Sedición (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2384), Insurrección (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2383) y TREASON (Artículo III, Sección 3 de USC; y Código 18 de EE. UU. 2381). .
Lo que nos lleva al asunto del Fraude Electoral 2020. Como hemos demostrado, la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista comenzó en serio alrededor de 1913. Como presentamos anteriormente, el plan premeditado de los Globalistas Progresistas era derrocar a nuestro gobierno a través de una revolución no tradicional mediante una infiltración lenta y encubierta sobre generaciones para que ninguna generación se diera cuenta de los cambios suficientes para resistir, rebelarse o montar una contrarrevolución. Más de 100 años después, la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista evaluó que se había infiltrado en suficientes posiciones clave del gobierno y consolidado suficiente poder como para poder manipular con éxito una elección sin que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO nos diera cuenta, o al menos NO nos diera cuenta lo suficiente para montar una contrarrevolución. Y así es como se ha desarrollado hasta ahora esta toma de poder final y concluyente.
El asunto del Fraude Electoral 2020, se resolvió de manera inconstitucional, sin el debido proceso ni un jurado, en violación del juramento de cada uno de los jueces de SCOTUS de apoyar y defender la Constitución de todos los enemigos, extranjeros y nacionales. El fraude electoral 2020 se resolvió erróneamente por tecnicismo en lugar de méritos. Y, la apariencia de que esto era ‘legal’ solo fue posible gracias a décadas de cambios premeditados, engañosos y criminales en las Reglas de la Corte y la Jurisprudencia para hacer que tal decisión pareciera ‘legal’. Este cambio lento, premeditado y engañoso en las Reglas de la Corte y La jurisprudencia reemplazó el ‘Estado de derecho’ por el ‘Estado del hombre’ progresivo y ‘Podría hacer lo correcto’. Estos cambios evidencian aún más el caso de que el hecho de que la Corte Suprema de los EE. UU. No haya escuchado los asuntos de Fraude Electoral 2020 fue / fueron / son actos de conspiración contra los derechos (Código 18 de los EE. UU. 241), Privación de derechos bajo el color de la ley (Código 241 de los EE. UU. 18), Sedición (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2384), Rebelión e insurrección (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2383) y TREASON (Artículo III de la USC, Sección 3; y Código de EE. UU. 18 2381).
EN POCAS PALABRAS, NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, ESTAMOS EN MEDIO DE UNA REVOLUCIÓN NO CONVENCIONAL POR LA INFILTRACIÓN LENTA Y CUBIERTA DE LA PROGRESIVA INSURGENCIA GLOBALISTA QUE HACE MÁS DE 100 AÑOS. POR LA PRUEBA PRESENTADA AQUÍ, HEMOS PROBADO QUE NUESTRO PODER JUDICIAL HA AYUDADO Y APOYADO DICHA INSURGENCIA.
¡Prueba que estoy equivocado!
AL MISMO TIEMPO, SEGÚN LA HOJA DE RUTA PARA TRATAR CON LA TIRANÍA QUE NOS PROPORCIONARON NUESTROS FUNDADORES, NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, DEBEMOS DOCUMENTAR EL AGOTAMIENTO DE NUESTROS RECURSOS PACÍFICOS ANTES DE CONTEMPLAR LOS RECURSOS ALTERNATIVOS. AFIRMO QUE EL FRAUDE DE LAS ELECCIONES 2020 Y EL FALLO DEL GOBIERNO Y DE LOS TRIBUNALES DE RESOLVER ADECUADAMENTE LOS PROBLEMAS CON LAS ELECCIONES 2020 DEMOSTRARON QUE LAS ELECCIONES COMO REMEDIO PACÍFICO SE HAN PERDIDO PARA NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO. AÚN, DEBEMOS SEGUIR DOCUMENTANDO TODOS LOS REMEDIOS PACÍFICOS RESTANTES ANTES DE CONTEMPLAR LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE REMEDIOS ALTERNATIVOS. ALGUNOS OTROS REMEDIOS PACÍFICOS RESTANTES SON ‘GRANDES JURADOS CIUDADANOS’ Y UN NUEVO DECLARACIÓN DE CAUSAS ”COMO LO HIZO EL FUNDADOR EL 6 DE JULIO DE 1775. (Aquí aparece un ejemplo de cómo podría verse).
Creo que con la reciente serie de artículos que he escrito, he demostrado de manera irrefutable que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO ya no podemos seguir con nuestras vidas como si todo fuera “normal”, o incluso será normal si y cuando esta falsa crisis de COVID-19. se acaba para siempre. NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO debemos comenzar a actuar para contrarrestar este despotismo creciente ahora … Ahora, mientras las pequeñas acciones de muchos ciudadanos actuando al unísono brindan una buena oportunidad de restaurar nuestra República con la menor perturbación en cada una de nuestras vidas.
Si bien algunos sugieren remedios alternativos más tradicionales, yo recomiendo lo contrario. Sugiero que antes de que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO consideremos remedios alternativos, debemos adaptarnos a este nuevo método de revolución que está utilizando la insurgencia globalista progresista. Fundamentalmente, postulo que deberíamos comenzar por: 1) Crear la unidad de las masas, para contrarrestar la división fomentada por los progresistas; 2) Restaurar los primeros principios de nuestra República representativa, constitucionalmente limitada, que han sido borrados por la educación progresiva de “núcleo común” y los medios progresivos convencionales. Además de restaurar nuestras tradiciones y valores; 3) Debemos contrarrestar la infiltración de los progresistas en el liderazgo de las instituciones que se supone que “apoyan y defienden la Constitución de todos los enemigos, extranjeros y domésticos”. Inicialmente, creo que deberíamos concentrarnos en las fuerzas del orden y las fuerzas armadas. Quizás los posibles miembros de la familia más efectivos se comunican con miembros de base en las fuerzas del orden y las fuerzas armadas durante las funciones familiares, como las vacaciones. Por ejemplo, discusiones sobre los valores y expectativas de la familia si los miembros de la familia en las fuerzas del orden y / o el ejército reciben la orden ILEGAL de disparar contra civiles. Además, pedir a los miembros de la familia que se aseguren de establecer la verdad por sí mismos y que no confíen ciegamente en las representaciones de los superiores (que pueden ser agentes progresistas comprometidos). Y luego, actuar de la manera que consideren que mejor refleja su deber y juramento, de apoyar y defender la Constitución de todos los enemigos, extranjeros y nacionales.
Si otros no están de acuerdo, no dude en avisarnos. Y si otros tienen mejores ideas para restaurar la República, comuníquenlas. No tengo una necesidad imperiosa de liderar esta restauración de la República … Por favor, alguien más dé un paso adelante con un plan mejor con una mayor probabilidad de éxito, para que pueda hacerme a un lado …
Esos fueron mis pensamientos.
Gracias por tu tiempo.
En libertad Don Mashak El patriota cínico
Esta composición inspirada en Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker
在進步民主黨總統伍德羅·威爾遜(Woodrow Wilson)(1913-1921)的領導下,進步黨建立了政府的第四分支。成立這個行政州的目的是帶頭將大多數違憲的進步議程帶入世界,並通過在WE THE PEOPLE和政府的最初三個分支之間插入政府來減少對群眾的問責制。在進步精英採取行動使違憲思想變為現實的時候,他們的行動變成了煽動叛亂(美國18法規2384),暴動(美國18法規2383)和叛國罪(美國法規第3條第3款;美國18法規2381)。 。
這使我們進入了2020年選舉欺詐問題。正如我們所證明的那樣,漸進的全球主義叛亂始於1913年左右。正如我們早先介紹的那樣,漸進的全球主義者的有預謀的計劃是通過非傳統的革命,通過緩慢的,秘密的滲透來推翻我們的政府。世代相傳,所以沒有哪個世代會注意到足以抵抗,反抗或發動反革命的變化。 100多年後,漸進式全球叛亂組織評估說,它已經滲透了足夠的政府重要職位並鞏固了足夠的權力,以至於在沒有WE THE PEOPLE注意到或至少沒有引起反革命的注意的情況下,它可以成功地進行選舉。到目前為止,這就是最後的決定性權力爭奪的方式。
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS
Harvard Law Dumps US Constitution
PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY HARVARD LAW NO LONGER REQUIRES THE US CONSTITUTION FOR GRADUATION?
Harvard Law Dumps US Constitution
PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY HARVARD LAW NO LONGER REQUIRES THE US CONSTITUTION FOR GRADUATION?
President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan made several changes as Dean of Harvard Law School. Many commentators have focused on her ban on military recruiting but CNS news reports on another major change — eliminating U.S. Constitutional law as a required course:
“As dean, Kagan won approval from the faculty in 2006 to make major changes to the Harvard Law’s curriculum.
“My understanding is that she instituted three new courses to the required curriculum and, in so doing, got rid of a requirement to take constitutional law,” Robert Alt, senior legal fellow and deputy director of the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, told CNSNews.com.
“Currently, at Harvard, constitutional law is not required for first-year law students, or even for graduation,”Alt added.
Indeed, according to Harvard documents, constitutional law is NOT listed among the law school’s academic requirements, though the catalogue for 2010-2011 does list more than a dozen elective courses dealing with some form of constitutional law.
MY TAKE: America was founded upon NATURAL LAW (para 1, Declaration of Independence) & the RULE OF LAW. (The Rule of Law requires one set of laws applied equally to all citizens with no preference for wealth, status or government position) That one set of Laws is our US Constitution. How can you teach the Rule of Law to Lawyers without first teaching them the foundations of the Rule of Law, which is our Constitution? In future CITIZEN GRAND JURY trials [ Read more: https://rebrand.ly/TXCitizenGrandJury ] or conspiracy to commit sedition and treason,and/or in drafting your NEW DECLARATION OF CAUSES [ http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft ] fmake sure to include this chapter of the crime.
This is an example of a battle in the unconventional revolution by slow, covert infiltration by the Progressive Globalist Insurgency, I have long spoken of. As you can see, the Progressives are slowly and covertly infiltrating our Legal System and removing the foundational elements that protect WE THE PEOPLE from the tyranny and despotism of a rogue government.
Those were my thoughts. Thank you for your time.
In Liberty, Don Mashak The Cynical Patriot
This document inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
La ley de Harvard elimina la Constitución de EE. UU.
La ley de Harvard elimina la Constitución de EE. UU.
POR FAVOR EXPLIQUE POR QUÉ LA LEY DE HARVARD YA NO REQUIERE LA CONSTITUCIÓN DE ESTADOS UNIDOS PARA LA GRADUACIÓN
La candidata a la Corte Suprema del presidente Obama, Elena Kagan, hizo varios cambios como decana de la Facultad de Derecho de Harvard. Muchos comentaristas se han centrado en su prohibición del reclutamiento militar, pero las noticias de CNS informan sobre otro cambio importante: eliminar la ley constitucional de los EE. UU. Como un curso obligatorio: “Como decano, Kagan obtuvo la aprobación de la facultad en 2006 para realizar cambios importantes en el plan de estudios de Harvard Law.
‘Tengo entendido que instituyó tres nuevos cursos para el plan de estudios requerido y, al hacerlo, eliminó el requisito de cursar derecho constitucional’, dijo Robert Alt, investigador jurídico senior y subdirector del Centro de Estudios Legales y Judiciales de la Heritage Foundation, le dijo a CNSNews.com.
“Actualmente, en Harvard, la ley constitucional no es un requisito para los estudiantes de derecho de primer año, ni siquiera para la graduación”, agregó Alt.
De hecho, según los documentos de Harvard, el derecho constitucional NO figura entre los requisitos académicos de la facultad de derecho, aunque el catálogo para 2010-2011 enumera más de una docena de cursos electivos que tratan de alguna forma de derecho constitucional.
Pero en un comunicado de prensa de Harvard de 2006 que explica los cambios, Kagan explicó que el alejamiento del derecho constitucional fue deliberado … Leer más: https://rebrand.ly/HarvardLawDumpsConstitution
MI TOMA: Estados Unidos se fundó sobre la LEY NATURAL (párrafo 1, Declaración de Independencia) y el ESTADO DE DERECHO. (El Estado de derecho requiere que un conjunto de leyes se aplique por igual a todos los ciudadanos sin preferencia por la riqueza, el estatus o la posición gubernamental) Ese conjunto de leyes es nuestra Constitución de los Estados Unidos. ¿Cómo se puede enseñar el Estado de derecho a los abogados sin antes enseñarles los fundamentos del Estado de derecho, que es nuestra Constitución? En futuros juicios del GRAN JURADO CIUDADANO [Leer más: https://rebrand.ly/TXCitizenGrandJury] por conspiración para cometer sedición y traición, y / o en la redacción de su NUEVA DECLARACIÓN DE CAUSAS [http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft] haga asegúrese de incluir este capítulo del crimen.
Este es un ejemplo de una batalla en la revolución no convencional por la infiltración lenta y encubierta de la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista, de la que he hablado durante mucho tiempo. Como puede ver, los progresistas se están infiltrando lenta y encubiertamente en nuestro Sistema Legal y eliminando los elementos fundamentales que protegen a NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO de la tiranía y el despotismo de un gobierno canalla.
Esos fueron mis pensamientos. Gracias por tu tiempo.
En libertad Don Mashak El patriota cínico
Este documento inspirado por Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS Sorry, but many sources don’t have Spanish version/subtitles <> Lo siento, pero muchas fuentes no tienen subtítulos o versión en español
2020 US Election Fraud Facts
2020 US Election Fraud Facts
Pillow Man, Mike Lindell, reveals the Election 2020 Fraud Facts that traitor SCOTUS Scehmed to avoid hearing on technicality rather than ruling upon the merits.
So many people ask me to provide proof of 2020 US Election fraud. Here is one source. Remember, the US Supreme Court dismissed all of the Election Fraud Lawsuits on a technicality, instead of ruling on the Merits. All US Judges and Lawyers take oaths to support and defend the US Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And longstanding legal tradition favors courts deciding cases on the merits, not technicality. There is no higher legal issue for the courts to decide in a Representative, Constitutionally limited Republic than the integrity of our Elections. Our US Supreme Court aided and abetted the seditious and treason Progressive Globalist Coup in contriving to dismiss these matters on a technicality. Think about it. There are 1.3 million lawyers in America. 335 of the 555 members of Congress are lawyers. How is it that not one single lawyer could draft a lawsuit that could not be tossed out on a technicality? All those who suppress these facts are guilty of aiding and abetting the seditious and treasonous Progressive Globalist Insurgency. Remember, all who conspired in these matters are motivated to suppress the facts to avoid trials for sedition and treason, a conviction for sedition and treason and hanging for sedition and treason. Pillow Man, Mike Lindell’s documentary is a credible source.
Datos sobre el fraude electoral en EE. UU. 2020
Hombre de almohada, Mike Lindell, revela los hechos fraudulentos de las elecciones de 2020 que el traidor SCOTUS Scehmed para evitar escuchar sobre tecnicismos en lugar de pronunciarse sobre los méritos.
A LOS ADMINISTRADORES DE ELECCIONES PROGRESIVAS NO LE IMPORTA LA INTEGRIDAD REAL DE LAS ELECCIONES; A ELLOS ÚNICAMENTE LE IMPORTA LA ‘APARIENCIA’ DE LA INTEGRIDAD DE LAS ELECCIONES, POR LO QUE LOS VOTANTES NO Cuestionan los resultados de sus elecciones. http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2020/08/12/imho-our-minnesota-elections-are-rigged/ He sido juez electoral durante una década o más. Escribí esto mucho antes de las elecciones Planteé la cuestión del código de computadora manipulado en las urnas electrónicas Atras varias elecciones. Me cerraron a cada paso.
Mucha gente me pide que proporcione pruebas del fraude en las elecciones estadounidenses de 2020. Aquí hay una fuente. Recuerde, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos desestimó todas las Demandas por Fraude Electoral por un tecnicismo, en lugar de fallar sobre el fondo. Todos los jueces y abogados estadounidenses prestan juramento de apoyar y defender la Constitución estadounidense de todos los enemigos, tanto nacionales como extranjeros. Y la tradición legal de larga data favorece a los tribunales que deciden los casos en función del fondo, no del tecnicismo. No hay un asunto legal más importante para que los tribunales decidan en una República Representativa y constitucionalmente limitada que la integridad de nuestras Elecciones. Nuestra Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos ayudó e instigó al sedicioso y traidor Golpe de Estado Globalista Progresista a intentar desestimar estos asuntos por un tecnicismo. Piénsalo. Hay 1,3 millones de abogados en Estados Unidos. 335 de los 555 miembros del Congreso son abogados. ¿Cómo es posible que ni un solo abogado pueda redactar una demanda que no pueda descartarse por un tecnicismo? Todos aquellos que reprimen estos hechos son culpables de ayudar e incitar a la sediciosa y traidora insurgencia globalista progresista. Recuerde, todos los que conspiraron en estos asuntos están motivados a reprimir los hechos para evitar juicios por sedición y traición, una condena por sedición y traición y ahorcamiento por sedición y traición. Pillow Man, el documental de Mike Lindell es una fuente creíble.
This writer’s followers on Twitter and other Social Media are familiar with his intention of uniting rank and file Americans under one common Perspective of Reality. A Perspective of reality far truer than the false Perspective of Reality promoted through the divisive propaganda of the Main Stream Media and the two faux major political parties. With this article, this writer intends to build upon creating that truer, common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our government and hold our government officials accountable for their departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) and betrayals of the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE.
Yesterday morning this writer went to the continuing trial of Sandra Grazzini Rucki in Dakota County MN on various criminal charges relating to allegedly wrongfully depriving her ex husband, David Rucki, of parental rights, etc. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s well-founded and well-recognized affirmative defense is that she was acting to protect her children from what she reasonably believed was danger from their father. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki numerous times went to the appropriate channels to seek the safety of her children, and resorted to helping the girls escape their allegedly abusive father only when the police, the courts and Child Protective Services (CPS) failed her.
This writer does not really know Sandra Grazzini-Rucki from Adam. This writer first became aware of her abuse at the hands of the Dakota County MN Courts and our Government in 2014, through his involvement with the Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) Movement. Judicial TAR is a group of citizens who have sought a hearing before the Minnesota Legislature dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Courts every year from 2005, and every year our requests for said hearing have been denied. From this, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR believe it is reasonable for all American citizens to conclude that Minnesota Government and Courts, at a minimum have something to hide, and more likely are complicit in the Systemic Corruption of the Minnesota Courts. [Systemic Corruption means that the aspects of government that are supposed to prevent & punish corruption instead are complicit in and cover it up] In 2009, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR came to believe it would be unlikely we would ever have our request for said hearing granted. With victims of the Abuse of Power of the Courts and their advocates getting frustrated, becoming disheartened, moving away and dying, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR held an Ad Hoc hearing on the Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Courts to preserve our Petitions for Redress for Posterity:
From this writer’s experience with the Judicial TAR Movement, this writer has learned nuances of the legal profession that most Americans are unaware of. Add to this, this writer’s own experience in his personal civil litigation and 1 bogus criminal charge (eventually dismissed for lack of Probable Cause), and this writer asserts that he is uniquely qualified to understand how our Courts fix the outcomes of Court cases and educate his fellow rank and file citizens of the true nature of their government and courts.
This writer has written previously on the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Matter in Dakota County Minnesota, but your government has seen fit to scrub those articles from the internet. (Main Stream Media (MSM) has seen fit to not publish this writer’s previous articles on the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter.) In total, almost 200 of this writer’s blogs and several hundred of his posts and articles have been scrubbed from the Internet. One gets the sense that our government and courts don’t want rank and file Americans to have the information about their corruption, machinations and duplicity that this writer exposes. Yet, rather than try to recreate and reassert all the facts from those censored articles, this writer is going to focus on the mechanics of various allegations of how the Dakota County MN Courts are trying to fix the outcome of the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki litigation from a succinct, common sense legal perspective. (Fellow Minnesotan, Tim Kinley has a much better knowledge of the all the particular facts in the related previous matters under Judge David Knutson and underlying facts and minutia of the Dakota County MN Court departures from the Rule the Rule (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) under Judge Karen Asphaug which have led to this trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki – His Youtube Channel http://bit.ly/SpeechlessMN) This article is written more from a macro-overview and general mechanics perspective.
This writer wanted to attend this trial yesterday because it was alleged that there were/are departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) occurring intended to fix the outcome of the case, and he wanted to confirm their accuracy. At the same time, recent events provide an opportunity for this writer to build upon the American Public’s current familiarity with the departures from the Rule of Law. Specifically, this writer refers to the FBI’s Comey’s and DOJ’s Lynch’s failure to charge Hillary Clinton over her various State Department Email related crimes despite facts in evidence which required Hillary Clinton to be charged (http://usat.ly/29wwvnV; http://cnn.it/29JlQDO) For those not familiar with the concept of the “Rule of Law”;
It is the concept and requirement embodied in our founding documents that there only be one set of laws for all American citizens and that it be enforced equally on all
citizens without regard to status, wealth or government position.
Additionally, this writer will also build upon recent revelations by Wikileaks (and Edward Snowden) which have revealed to all Americans the lengths to which our government will go to conspire against WE THE PEOPLE’s free will and the Democratic Process. In this instance, this writer is specifically referring to a hack of the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer servers. Subsequently, the disclosed emails and documents from the DNC servers revealed that the level of Systemic Corruption extends not just to suspension of the Rule of Law but also to violations and machinations of the Democratic Process. (http://bit.ly/2afaGro)
In the present matter of the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki trial, it has been alleged:
The jury was tainted with a Newspaper containing an article placed in the jury holding room prior to jury selection;
The Court engaged in jury rigging in that it placed so many biased and/or unqualified potential jurors in the jury pool that the Defense could not eliminate them all with its limited number of “free boots” and Judge Karen Asphaug failed to remove at least two jurors for cause who eventually were empaneled on the jury;
The Court did/is engaging in fact shaping.
Now, as a member of the press, this writer went to the trial yesterday with the specific purpose of ascertaining if any of these allegations were true. This writer was denied the opportunity to make said inquiries.
WARNING – DEPARTURE FROM ACCEPTED DECORUM FOLLOWS
This writer asserts the recent revelations of the magnitude of our government’s departures from the Rule of Law and Democratic Process warrant departures from accepted decorum. In some way, this writer feels he must signal to his fellow citizens that recent events require special attention. This writer will use these departures from decorum to signal to our fellow citizens that they can no longer remain calm and just go along with their normal daily routines; Rather our Government has departed so far from Constitutional and Natural Law, that the time has come for every American to question their blind loyalty to our government and actively work to restore our government’s accountability to WE THE PEOPLE. You have been fore-warned…
At the noon lunch break, as Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena walked by where this writer was seated in the Courtroom gallery, this writer took the opportunity to shake her hand and introduce himself as a member of the Press and a member of the Judicial TAR Movement. Ms. Kathryn M. Keena continued toward the door as this writer began to ask her questions about the allegations. With the rudeness and arrogance of those Progressives who think they are better than all the rest of us (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3), Ms. Kathryn M. Keena continued into a conference room without even the professional courtesy of saying she did not want to hear what this writer had to say nor answering any of this writer’s questions. As Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena entered the conference room, this writer turned to leave the foyer of the courtroom but was blocked by the egress of others from the court room and patiently waited his opportunity to exit the door. While this writer was standing their facing the exit door waiting for an opportunity to leave, the lying POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena made a FALSE REPORT to a Bailiff that I tried to follow her into the conference room. Lying POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena ordered the Bailiff to have me removed. This writer protested that POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena was lying, and that the Bailiff himself and others had this writer standing near them patiently waiting to leave the foyer. Others advised me to give up my protest and this writer left the foyer and the building. Once again, Dakota County MN Courts had succeeded in preventing this writer from verifying the truth of their corruption and publishing it for the world to see.
EXPLAINING THE THREE ELEMENTS OF DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ALLEGEDLY USED TO ATTEMPT TO FIX THE OUTCOME OF THE SANDRA GRAZZIN-RUCKI MATTER
Now, lets revisit the various acts of departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) that have been alleged, in a simple, non-legal gibberish way so the average American can understand it. (See also http://bit.ly/SimulatedLitigationDefined and Proposed Election 2012 caucus resolutions for judicial reform(updated) Part 2of2; Resolution 17 http://bit.ly/2012JudicialTARResolutions2of2)
The alleged Court rules require that a Judge not do anything that might give the appearance of impropriety. Further, there is a requirement in the rules that says the “Finder of Fact” (Judge or Jury) allegedly can only consider facts and evidence on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD. (When this writer says alleged, it mean that, in the writer’s opinion, the Courts so frequently ignore them one must question if they actually are adhered to or not.
DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ARTICLE IN THE PROSPECTIVE JURY WAITING ROOM
In regard to the matter of the newspaper article about Sandra Grazzini-Rucki being in the jury waiting room before jury selection, shouldn’t there be a member of the staff assigned to ensuring that jury tainting evidence is not permitted in the jury waiting area. Of course there is, but in this writer’s experience and knowledge, such methods of tainting juries are common in the courts. To wit, every American has a right to a trial before an IMPARTIAL jury of their peers. To the point, if you were the one on trial how would you feel about a derogatory article about you being made available to potential jurors in the potential jury waiting room, potential jurors admitting they have read it and Judge Karen Asphaug ruling, “Ain’t no big deal”? In your opinion, if you are the Defendant, does Judge Karen Asphaug’s failure to redress this matter in a satisfactory manner give rise to an “appearance of impropriety”? (Untouchables – Switch Jury scene https://youtu.be/5Mbdi_NXweQ)
DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ALLEGED JURY RIGGING
Next, we move to the departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in alleged jury rigging. In jury selection, the judge is supposed to disqualify jurors for a variety of reasons such as they are a friend or relative of one of the parties, that they are already familiar with the case, or they state have already made up their minds as to guilt or innocence, etc. This writer wanted to ask if any of these allegations regarding the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter were true. POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena use the arrogant Progressive tactic (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3) of having reporters not submissive to the Courts, booted. Therefore, it is necessary to say it is alleged Judge Karen Asphaug failed to remove a person who said they read the article, knew about the case, felt that Sandra Grazzinni-Rucki was guilty and would be surprised if she was not found guilty. Another allegation is that a potential juror admitted he had recently attended a party of a relative of David Rucki and was familiar with the case. Judge Karen Asphaug failed to disqualify either prospective juror, in the later case Judge Karen Asphaug said the potential juror’s assurances that they could remain impartial were sufficient to prevent her from disqualifying them. If you are the Defendant, “How impartial do you think these two jurors are going to be?” This is your life on the line here, should you be afforded every appearance of neutrality and fairness?
Now, in addition to the judge disqualifying jurors for cause, the Defense and Prosecution are allowed a small number of “free boots” of any juror for any reason. It is alleged that Dakota County MN Court machinated the jury pool in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case so the Prosecution could get biased jurors on to the final jury panel. It is alleged that the afore-mentioned two particular jurors should have been disqualified by the judge, but were not. It is alleged that so many biased/unqualified jurors had been machinated into the jury pool (stacked) by Dakota County MN Courts, that the Defense would not have enough free boots, to get rid of them all. It is alleged that by the time these two particular prospective jurors turn in the jury selection process came up, the Defense had already expended all of its “free boots”. In an allegedly random process, and with thousands of citizens living in Dakota County MN, what are the chances that 6 or more of about a 25 person jury pool would be biased against the Defense. Now, if you are the Defendant, do you think this was by chance or by deliberate machination of the process by the Dakota County Courts? ]Make sure you factor in your new understanding of your government’s lack of honor and integrity manifests itself in Government’s willingness to manipulate outcomes with recent revelations of its departure from the Rule of Law in the Hillary Clinton State Department Email matter and its willingness to engage in machinations to violate the Democratic Process reveal in the DNC Leaks (http://bit.ly/2afaGro)]
DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ALLEGED FACT/EVIDENCE SHAPING
And lastly, there is the allegation in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter that the Court is Fact/Evidence shaping the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case. As was mentioned earlier, the only facts and evidence the Finder of Fact (in this case the jury) is supposed to use in making its finding is the facts and evidence on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD. Over time our courts have enacted a series of rules and precedents whereby they can include or exclude facts from the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD (let or keep the jury from seeing/hearing). In effect, judges can determine (fix) the outcome of any trial (or any other court proceeding) by only allowing on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD those facts and evidence which support the desired outcome.
In this writer’s long experience with the Judicial TAR Movement, he has became aware of the practice in multiple cases of Judges “telegraphing” to the lawyers on both sides and other court personnel how the Judge would like to rule. The lawyer fraternity (even the lawyer you paid) and other witness like Guardians Ad Litem and CPS, oblige the judge by only placing on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD facts and evidence that will allow the Finder of Fact (Judge or Jury) to rule in the manner the judge has previously “telegraphed” to them. (Remember these judges and lawyers all go to the same continuing education courses, golf courses, country clubs and other social and professional events and speak their own “Legal-ease version of English – wink, wink; nudge, nudge; meaningful glance)
In the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Matter, there is an allegation that Judge Karen Asphaug has purposely and wrongfully excluded and attempted to exclude facts and evidence from the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD which demonstrate Sandra Grazzini-Rucki reasonably feared for the health and safety of her children from their father David Rucki.
The question to you, if you are the Defendant, if Judge Karen Asphaug in fact acted in this matter, did she act in a way that gives an appearance of impropriety in the trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki? Did you get a fair trial? And, even if you have the money and emotional fortitude to appeal and win on appeal, is not the additional money and time spent amount to unjust punishment? (Progressive Conditioning http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27)
One single event/fact has cemented this writer’s belief in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s representation that she feared for the lives and safety of her children. It has been alleged that at some point in all of this David Rucki gathered the family around a kitchen table. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki alleges that David Rucki threatened to kill all of them and then himself. In the opposing version David Rucki only threatened to kill himself in front of the entire family gathered around the kitchen table. In this writer’s humble opinion, regardless of which version is true, this event also cemented the Parental Alienation of David Rucki’s children towards himself. That some version occurred is a matter of relevant fact. You can hear David Rucki in his own words try to spin the event to his best advantage in this newscast. (https://youtu.be/qVaXS_neu2E at 4m 45s to 5m); http://bit.ly/2aeUHWr 4m 50s to 5m 3s) David Rucki’s admission of some version of this event is what cements in this writer’s mind that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki reasonably believed her children were in danger, and when the legal authorities failed to act in accordance with the Rule of Law, Sandra Grazzini-Rucki was forced to assert her own UNALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE and act to protect her children from her reasonably perceived threat from their father.
It is important to remember went to the Courthouse yesterday and tried to make inquiries and ask these questions so he could assert them as facts rather than allegations. But POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena resorted to Progressive tactics to keep rank and file Americans ignorant of the systemic corruption of the Dakota County MN Courts.
What you also don’t know, are the allegations that Judge David Knutson made decisions in prior litigation related to the Rucki Divorce that also depart from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion). (In this writer’s humble opinion; think bribe, other consideration or Teddy Kennedy and Chappaquiddick dynamics) As Judge David Knutson is on the Discipline Review Board, its tough to pursue the truth through that avenue. As the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards is a legal black-hole and essentially a Public Relations firm for Minnesota Judges, no relief is available there either. And, as the Minnesota Legislature for 10+ years has refused to the Judicial TAR Movement a hearing dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of systemic corruption in the Minnesota Courts, no relief will be force coming there. Still, someone should ask Judge David Knutson to explain his departures from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter, and this writer even suggests Judge David Knutson should submit to a polygraph to “avoid the appearance of impropriety”. [Here again, and especially, Tim Kinley has a much better grasp and understanding of the minutia and specifics of the departures from the Rule of Law allegedly committed by Judge David Knutson than does this writer. See his YouTube Channel “Speechless” (http://bit.ly/SpeechlessMN)]
This writer has an additional special qualification in this case of asserting the likely truthfulness of the allegations of departures from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter. Judge Karen Asphaug was one of the Judges in the only criminal matter this writer has ever been charged with (besides minor traffic tickets – No DWIs). In that matter, this writer was in another Dakota County Courtroom in 2014 investigating allegations that Dakota County MN Law Enforcement was complicit in the local Drug Trade. A woman complained that her X-husband was getting special treatment from Dakota County Law Enforcement and the Courts because he was the main supplier of these illegal drugs. The matter was eventually dismissed for LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE(meaning it was BS). But along the way, I told Judge Karen Asphaug as I stood before her, “The charge and being forced to defend one’s self is the intended punishment” Our Government brings bogus charges against people to achieve its agenda because it knows the trauma, time and expense is punishment enough to scare people off or cow them into submission. Behind closed doors our government officials often laugh and think its funny to terrorize citizens. (Progressive Conditioning http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27)
Before the case against this writer was dismissed for being bogus, Judge Karen Asphaug ruled from the bench that the case should be heard by a Judge from a different jurisdiction as it involved Bailiff’s who work closely with Judges. This writer alleges that later Judge Karen Asphaug was instructed by former US MN AG and current MN Supreme Court POS Justice David “The Bag Man” Lillehaug (aka Killehaug) to cooperate in fixing the criminal case against this writer for political reasons and in furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy against this writer. Dakota County lined up 4 Bailiff’s/Sheriff’s Deputies to perjure themselves against this writer by saying he disrupted the Court and was guilty of “Disorderly Conduct”(while they believed no video existed). For months, the POS Prosecutor Dan Fluegel insisted all exculpatory video tape was destroyed. Only when this writer produced written correspondence from the Dakota County Sheriff’s Department confirming this writer demanded the video tape be retained within days of the incident, did some of the exculpatory video tape appear and the 4 Bailiff’s/Sheriff’s Deputies willing to perjure themselves slink away(Yet not fired or punished). Only this writer’s appeal to the Minnesota Appellate Court along with a copy of the Court transcript forced Judge Karen Asphaug to make sure a Judge from another jurisdiction was administratively assigned to this writer’s case. You can read more about that here: Don Mashak Notice of Claims to Dakota County MN 10_09_2015 (http://bit.ly/2aeZfgy) You can also learn how a Sheriff’s Deputy can “Blow someone’s face off and the Union will have him back on the job the next day”. So arrogant and above the law is Dakota County MN, that even though they are required by law to perform an investigation and provide a copy of the findings when a Notice of Claims is filed, they simply refused to comply. And apparently no government agency exists to force them to comply.
[With the topics we have covered in this article in mind, let us take a moment for this writer to acknowledge he sympathizes with the underlying causes of action pursued by “Black Lives Matter” (BLM). Though this writer does not agree with their methods, this writer has reached out to the “Black Lives Matter” Movement, offered them advice and asked them to join the Judicial TAR Movement. (http://bit.ly/29Ae8fH)]
So now, you understand why when Dakota County MN Courts and Judge Karen Asphaug are accused of departing from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion), this writer has special qualifications for assessing the validity of those allegations. Really, Judge Karen Asphaug, you are going to put a woman in jail for being forced to protect her children when the police and legal system failed her? Really Judge Karen Asphaug, you don’t think your oath of office requires you to do something regarding Judge David Knutson requiring Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s Lawyer to defend her client handcuffed to a wheel chair without notes or client her client present? When will you act to “avoid the appearance of impropriety”? Judge Karen Asphaug, there are so many other, “Really?” type posits, but in the end Judge Karen Asphaug, Is this what you really want to be known as?
Its up to you, Judge Karen Asphaug; HON or POS?
It is apparent from my one interaction with POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena, she is in the habit of flippantly lying and ignoring her oath of office and should never be known as HON.
In closing, as I believe that WE THE PEOPLE are in fact the equals of the arrogant Progressive POS’s [despite Progressive Educated Elite assertions to the contrary (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3)], I believe WE THE PEOPLE have the right to judge them for their failure to answer our questions and provide documents we request. And, I further assert WE THE PEOPLE have a right to view these refusals in the manner prescribed by the US Supreme Court.
The Finder of Fact (You and I) may presume that the failure of a person (POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena/Judge Karen Asphaug/Judge David Knutson) to answer questions and/or produce documents may be interpreted as an indication that their truthful responses would have been detrimental to their legal position.
POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena refused to answer my questions and lied, to prevent the Press from exercising its First Amendment Right of Freedom of the Press. This writer never got a chance to query Judge Karen Asphaug. Others have tried to query Judge David Knutson, unsuccessfully.
This writer gives POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena and Judge Karen Asphaug until 6pm CDT 28 JULY 2016 to respond to these allegations or summarily, WE THE PEOPLE may judge them to be accurate and true, in accordance with the rules the US Supreme Court that apply to anyone of WE THE PEOPLE when we appear before them.
Judge Karen Asphaug is aware of my contact information from her previous court related departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion).
My fellow Americans, this writer hopes this article helps you all in forming a truer Perspective of Reality that permits us, as equals, to unite together and make our Government once again accountable to WE THE PEOPLE. Millennials and GenX’rs, as I have promised you elsewhere, you now have a better handle on the true nature of our Government and Courts. Keep fighting the good fight!
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good [people] do nothing”
~ Edmund Burke
Government and Courts; Please take note, WE THE PEOPLE shall include lack of proper redress of our concerns in this matter, and our future Third Declaration of Causes (http://bit.ly/NewDOCRev1), in determining if and when it is appropriate for WE THE PEOPLE to withdraw our CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED.
This article was written by Don Mashak alone without seeking advice, direction or permission of anyone else. I alone am responsible for the content and publication of this article.