This is Don Mashak's Hennepin County Minnesota Free Press Blog to Provide Hennepin County Residents with Full and Fair Citizen Reporting of Local, National and World Events. [Bloomington, Brooklyn, Center, Park, Champlin, Corcoran, Crystal, Dayton, Eden Prairie, Edina, Excelsior, Golden Valley, Hamel, Hopkins, Long Lake, Maple Grove, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Medina, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, Mound, New Hope, Osseo, Plymouth, Richfield, Rogers, Saint Louis Park, Shorewood, Wayzata, city ]
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH <> CHINESE BELOW THE SPANISH * APARECE TEXTO SENCILLO DESPUÉS DE LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS *备忘录后显示纯文本 <> 西班牙语之下的中文 * TEXT VERSION MAY BE LONGER THAN MEME VERSION <> LA VERSIÓN DE TEXTO PUEDE SER MÁS LARGA QUE LA VERSIÓN MEME 文本版本可能比MEME版本更长
2024 MINNESOTA (& ALL OTHER US STATES): PRECINCT CAUCUS SUGGESTIONS (Español, 中文)
2024 MINNESOTA (& ALL OTHER US STATES): PRECINCT CAUCUS SUGGESTIONS (Español, 中文)
Regardless of your political party, a vast majority of Americans realize there something terribly wrong with what is happening in America. But most do not understand exactly what the cause is, as the 2 major political parties pit us against each other to divide and conquer WE THE PEOPLE. To the point, Progressive Globalist WEF rich Elite traitors are behind all of this division & chaos. In the Republican party they are labeled RINOs (Republicans in name only). Democrats refer to these traitors as DINOs. A summary of the Progressive Globalist WEF agenda, taken from a book written by a hardcore, practicing Progressive Professor can be found here > http://rebrand.ly/ProgressiveAgenda. Review them so you may know & realize how vile & evil the intentions of the Progressive Globalist WEF Elites are. The peaceful defeat of those who would overthrow our Constitution, Rule of Law, Natural Law, our individual unalienable rights and our Republic is this easy… Do not vote for anyone who will not swear and pledge, in writing & without reservation, to oppose the entire Progressive Globalist WEF Agenda.
Progressive RINOs & DINOs will respond along the lines, “that was the old Progressives, we got rid of all the bad stuff”. To evaluate this argument and your decision, just ask yourself what your response would be if someone asked you to join the NAZI Party, assuring you they got rid of all the bad stuff. The fact of the matter is the both Progressivism and NAZIism are iterations of Social Darwinism. http://rebrand.ly/SocialDarwinismAgenda. The worlds’ masses rejected Social Darwinism. The rich elites rebranded it as Fabian Socialism (1884), US Progressives (1890s) and, German NAZIs (1920s)
Before you vote for any party delegate, political party officers & all candidates for government office, you must require they pledge to oppose the Progressive Globalist WEF agenda. If you want to avoid violent civil war, this is your last best chance and strategy to peacefully do so.
Keep fighting the good fight, fellow patriots.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak, 612-249-3299 Rt. 1 Box 231, Albertville, MN 55301
This Citizen is a Free Person and State National under the Organic, Original Constitution of the United States of America
2024 MINNESOTA (Y TODOS LOS DEMÁS ESTADOS DE EE. UU.): SUGERENCIAS PARA EL CAUCUS DEL PRECINTO
2024 MINNESOTA (Y TODOS LOS DEMÁS ESTADOS DE EE. UU.): SUGERENCIAS PARA EL CAUCUS DEL PRECINTO
Independientemente de su partido político, una gran mayoría de estadounidenses se dan cuenta de que algo terriblemente malo ocurre en lo que está sucediendo en Estados Unidos. Pero la mayoría no entiende exactamente cuál es la causa, ya que los dos partidos políticos principales nos enfrentan entre sí para dividirnos y conquistarnos a NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO. Al grano, los traidores de élite ricos del FEM globalista progresista están detrás de toda esta división y caos. En el Partido Republicano se les denomina RINO (Republicanos sólo de nombre). Los demócratas se refieren a estos traidores como DINO. Un resumen de la agenda globalista progresista del WEF, tomado de un libro escrito por un profesor progresista practicante y acérrimo, se puede encontrar aquí > http://rebrand.ly/ProgressiveAgenda. Revísalos para que sepas y te des cuenta de cuán viles y malvadas son las intenciones de las élites globalistas progresistas del FEM. La derrota pacífica de aquellos que quieren derrocar nuestra Constitución, el Estado de Derecho, el Derecho Natural, nuestros derechos individuales inalienables y nuestra República es así de fácil… No vote por nadie que no jure ni se comprometa, por escrito y sin reservas, a oponerse a toda la agenda globalista progresista del FEM.
Los RINO y DINO progresistas responderán del siguiente modo: ‘Esos eran los viejos progresistas, nos deshicimos de todas las cosas malas’. Para evaluar este argumento y su decisión, pregúntese cuál sería su respuesta si alguien le pidiera que se uniera al Partido NAZI, asegurándole que se deshizo de todas las cosas malas. El hecho es que tanto el progresismo como el nazismo son iteraciones del darwinismo social. http://rebrand.ly/SocialDarwinismAgenda. Las masas del mundo rechazaron el darwinismo social. Las élites ricas lo rebautizaron como socialismo fabiano (1884), progresistas estadounidenses (década de 1890) y nazis alemanes (década de 1920).
Antes de votar por cualquier delegado de partido, dirigentes de partidos políticos y todos los candidatos a cargos gubernamentales, debe exigirles que se comprometan a oponerse a la agenda globalista progresista del WEF. Si desea evitar una guerra civil violenta, esta es su última mejor oportunidad y estrategia para hacerlo pacíficamente.
Sigan peleando la buena batalla, compañeros patriotas.
Esos fueron mis pensamientos.
Gracias por tu tiempo.
En libertad,
Don Mashak, 612-249-3299 Rt. 1 Caja 231, Albertville, MN 55301
Este Ciudadano es una Persona Libre y Nacional del Estado bajo la Constitución Orgánica Original de los Estados Unidos de América
Esta composición inspirada en Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Jeff Blodgett, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker.
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH <> CHINESE BELOW THE SPANISH * APARECE TEXTO SENCILLO DESPUÉS DE LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS *备忘录后显示纯文本 <> 西班牙语之下的中文 * TEXT VERSION MAY BE LONGER THAN MEME VERSION <> LA VERSIÓN DE TEXTO PUEDE SER MÁS LARGA QUE LA VERSIÓN MEME 文本版本可能比MEME版本更长
US Founders’ Reasoning on Free Speech
US Founders’ Reasoning on Free Speech
America is founded on Natural Law. (Prg. 1, DOI) Per Natural Law (Locke, Two Treatises of Government), the individual has the unalienable Natural Right to ESTABLISH TRUTH for themselves using their own observations & reasoning. Our founder’s assessment of the ‘Nature of Man’ is perhaps best summarized by the ‘Cato Letters’: ” All [people] have free will & are not virtuous by nature”. To wit, our Founders railed that government can’t be trusted, & must be kept very small. In such a reality, no single person can be trusted to ESTABLISH TRUTH for any other person or group of people. With this in mind, the Founders insisted there must be full, fair, free & vigorous debate on all issues of importance to give each individual enough observations & perspectives from which to ESTABLISH TRUTH for themselves. Under the forced Metaphysical paradigm of ‘Divine Right of Kings’, The King/Queen was considered a God, or representative of God, here on earth & therefore no earthly-being could challenge their authority & decisions. The King/Queen & church asserted the right to ESTABLISH TRUTH from the masses because of this alleged divinity. America revolted from the forced metaphysics of ‘Divine Right of Kings’, in favor of the paradigm shift to ‘Natural Law”. Progressive Globalist WEF Elite want to replace the paradigm of ‘Natural Law’, with their owned forced metaphysical paradigm of ‘Progressive Globalism’ paradigm which mirrors ‘Divine Right of Kings’. Where Kings/Queens asserted divinity as the basis for their right to rule, Progressive Globalist WEF Elites assert their greater wealth makes them genetically superior to the masses (Survival of the Fittest) [https://rebrand.ly/SocialDarwinism]. They further state they are superior to the masses because of their superior knowledge & intellect. Progressive Globalist WEF Elites replace the divinity of Kings/Queens, with wealth & intellect as the basis for their right to rule. They go on to assert the right to ESTABLISH TRUTH for the masses alleging the masses are too stupid to govern themselves [https://rebrand.ly/ProgressiveAgenda]. We fought a revolution to depose one form of unaccountable authoritarian government. We must not allow ourselves to be duped into another form of unaccountable authoritarian government just because they are able to lie convincingly. Our Courts have failed us with regard to the protecting the unalienable Natural Right of the individual to ESTABLISH TRUTH for themselves, using their own observations & reasoning as reduced to writing in the US First Amendment. Our Courts & Congress have failed WE THE PEOPLE by not recognizing that the Internet that was created with taxpayer money inherently is subject to the Constitution & Bill of Rights. Our Courts & Congress should have required that any business using the taxpayers’ Internet should comply with our Constitution & Bill of Rights. This, and many other transgressions of Natural Law & our organic original Federal Constitution, are grounds for WE THE PEOPLE to withdraw our ‘Consent to be Governed’. Our government will not fix itself. WE THE PEOPLE must force them to RESTORE OUR REPUBLIC.
Don Mashak, 612-249-3299 Rt. 1 Box 231, Albertville, MN 55301
This Citizen is a Free Person and State National under the Organic, Original Constitution of the United States of America
This composition inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Jeff Blodgett, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
El razonamiento de los fundadores estadounidenses sobre la libertad de expresión
El razonamiento de los fundadores estadounidenses sobre la libertad de expresión
América está fundada sobre la Ley Natural. (Prg. 1, DOI) Según la Ley Natural (Locke, 2 Tratados de Gobierno), el individuo tiene el Derecho Natural inalienable de ESTABLECER LA VERDAD por sí mismo utilizando sus propias observaciones y razonamientos. La evaluación de nuestro fundador sobre la ‘Naturaleza del Hombre’ quizás se resume mejor en las ‘Cartas de Catón’: ‘Todas [las personas] tienen libre albedrío y no son virtuosas por naturaleza’. Es decir, nuestros Fundadores criticaron que no se puede confiar en el gobierno y que éste debe mantenerse muy pequeño. En tal realidad, no se puede confiar en ninguna persona para ESTABLECER LA VERDAD para otra persona o grupo de personas. Con esto en mente, los Fundadores insistieron en que debe haber un debate pleno, justo, libre y vigoroso sobre todos los temas de importancia para brindar a cada individuo suficientes observaciones y perspectivas desde las cuales ESTABLECER LA VERDAD por sí mismo. Bajo el paradigma metafísico forzado del ‘Derecho Divino de los Reyes’, el Rey/Reina era considerado un Dios, o representante de Dios, aquí en la tierra y, por lo tanto, ningún ser terrenal podía desafiar su autoridad y decisiones. El Rey/Reina y la iglesia afirmaron el derecho de ESTABLECER LA VERDAD de las masas debido a esta supuesta divinidad. Estados Unidos se rebeló contra la metafísica forzada del ‘derecho divino de los reyes’ en favor del cambio de paradigma hacia la ‘ley natural’. La élite globalista progresista del FEM quiere reemplazar el paradigma de la ‘Ley Natural’, con su propio paradigma metafísico forzado de ‘Globalismo Progresista’ que refleja el ‘Derecho Divino de los Reyes’. Mientras que los Reyes y Reinas afirmaron la divinidad como la base de su derecho a gobernar, las élites globalistas progresistas del FEM afirman que su mayor riqueza los hace genéticamente superiores a las masas (Survival of the Fittest) [https://rebrand.ly/SocialDarwinism]. Además, afirman que son superiores a las masas debido a su conocimiento e intelecto superiores. Las élites globalistas progresistas del FEM reemplazan la divinidad de los reyes y reinas, con la riqueza y el intelecto como base de su derecho a gobernar. Continúan afirmando el derecho a ESTABLECER LA VERDAD para las masas, alegando que son demasiado estúpidas para gobernarse a sí mismas [https://rebrand.ly/ProgressiveAgenda]. Luchamos en una revolución para derrocar una forma de gobierno autoritario que no rinde cuentas. No debemos permitir que nos engañen con otra forma de gobierno autoritario que no rinde cuentas sólo porque son capaces de mentir de manera convincente. Nuestros tribunales nos han fallado con respecto a la protección del derecho natural inalienable del individuo a ESTABLECER LA VERDAD por sí mismo, utilizando sus propias observaciones y razonamientos reducidos a escrito en la Primera Enmienda de los EE. UU. Nuestros Tribunales y Congreso nos han fallado a NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, al no reconocer que Internet, que fue creada con dinero de los contribuyentes, está inherentemente sujeta a la Constitución y la Declaración de Derechos. Nuestros Tribunales y Congreso deberían haber exigido que cualquier empresa que utilice Internet de los contribuyentes cumpla con nuestra Constitución y Declaración de Derechos. Esta y muchas otras transgresiones de la Ley Natural y de nuestra Constitución Federal orgánica original, son motivo para que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO retiremos nuestro ‘Consentimiento a ser Gobernados’. Nuestro gobierno no se arreglará solo. NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO debemos obligarlos a RESTAURAR NUESTRA REPÚBLICA.
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH <> CHINESE BELOW THE SPANISH * APARECE TEXTO SENCILLO DESPUÉS DE LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS *备忘录后显示纯文本 <> 西班牙语之下的中文 * TEXT VERSION MAY BE LONGER THAN MEME VERSION <> LA VERSIÓN DE TEXTO PUEDE SER MÁS LARGA QUE LA VERSIÓN MEME 文本版本可能比MEME版本更长
DISTRESS AS A WEAPON OF WAR
DISTRESS AS A WEAPON OF WAR
“Rules For Radicals” by Progressive Marxist Saul D. Alinsky Rules For Radicals is a strategy to trick free societies into Progressive Marxism. One of its major premises is as follows:
‘A Society in distress is more receptive to government change. If you distress a society badly enough, for long enough, the majority will vote any person, government &/or reduction of personal liberty promising to end the distress.’
Does any of this seem familiar to your current circumstances? Posit the following: Most of the chaos, turmoil & distress you have been subjected to has been done to you on purpose by your own government. It is intended as a treasonous PsyOp mean to bring about the Progressive Globalist WEF Elites’ New World Order under One World Government.
Don Mashak, 612-249-3299 Rt. 1 Box 231, Albertville, MN 55301
This Citizen is a Free Person and State National under the Organic, Original Constitution of the United States of America
This composition inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Jeff Blodgett, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
LA ANGUSTIA COMO ARMA DE GUERRA
LA ANGUSTIA COMO ARMA DE GUERRA
‘Reglas para los radicales’ del marxista progresista Saul D. Alinsky Rules For Radicals es una estrategia para engañar a las sociedades libres hacia el marxismo progresista. Una de sus principales premisas es la siguiente:
‘Una sociedad en apuros es más receptiva al cambio de gobierno. Si se angustia a una sociedad lo suficiente, durante el tiempo suficiente, la mayoría votará a cualquier persona, gobierno y/o reducción de la libertad personal que prometa poner fin a la angustia.’
¿Algo de esto le parece familiar en sus circunstancias actuales? Plantee lo siguiente: La mayor parte del caos, la agitación y la angustia a la que ha estado sometido se lo ha causado su propio gobierno a propósito. Su objetivo es ser un medio traicionero de PsyOp para lograr el Nuevo Orden Mundial de las Élites Globalistas Progresistas del FEM bajo un Gobierno Mundial Único.
So, my fellow citizens, some of you are all good with trying to redress the injustices of Election 2020, by waiting until the 2022/2024 elections to vote again? Did I get that right?
And that’s without redressing the specific issues that caused the injustices in ELECTION 2020… Some of you are just going to wait until 2022/2024 and hope same/similar injustice does NOT occur again? Really?
TO PUT A FINE POINT ON IT, MULTIPLE LAYERS OF GOVERNMENT, WHO TOOK OATHS TO EITHER ENSURE ELECTION INTEGRITY AND/OR SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION, FAILED TO ADHERE TO THEIR OATHS. And, some of you are just fine with letting that ride without consequence to the perpetrators? How can that be?
Progressive Election Administrators ignored or flaunted the rules. Law Enforcement failed to investigate and charge. Government Attorneys failed prosecute. SCOTUS used technicality to avoid hearing the issue on the merits. And Congress failed to Constitutionally “Check and Balance” SCOTUS for failing to do its job. Again, all of these government employees took oaths that their actions/inactions violated.
And then they all said, “See, inaction by Law Enforcement, SCOTUS and Congress is proof of 2020 Election Integrity”. What part of this non sequitur logic did I miss? It seems our Progressive-usurped Government thinks WE THE PEOPLE are so ignorant that we won’t recognize a seditious and treasonous conspiracy when we see one. Personally, I feel justified in being angry to the point of being moved to action, regardless of whether the rest of you want to roll over and take it, or not.
To wit, Government should consider this my exercise of my Natural Right to Petition Government for Redress as reduced to writing in the First Amendment. And, I formally demand Government act to redress said injustices immediately. If I am wrong in my Establishment of Truth and my resultant course of action, tell me how and why, publicly and in writing.
My fellow citizens, it seems clear that the actions of government described above, combined with Mainstream Media Propaganda, Social Media Censorship, Common Core Indoctrination and COVID-19 Lockdowns, exacerbated by multiple layers of Government officials failing to uphold their oaths to support and defend the Constitution constitute a “a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evincing a design to reduce WE THE PEOPLE under absolute Despotism” (US Declaration of Independence 1776).
Once again, if I am wrong, someone tell me how I am wrong. Government does NOT get to commit crimes against WE THE PEOPLE, and then escape accountability by essentially saying, “because we say so, it wasn’t a crime”. Natural Law and the Constitution make WE THE PEOPLE the Sovereigns, and our public servants accountable to WE THE PEOPLE. Calling those of us who try to hold our government accountable for its crimes, “Domestic Terrorists”, and then holing up behind guns and barb wire (put in place on false pretexts), while failing to address and redress these issues are acts and attitudes of tyrannical Despots who assert unaccountability to anyone.
That said, my fellow citizens, behind closed doors, Progressive RINOs and DINOs in government say you are too ignorant to understand what they have done and are doing. Progressives say they are superior to the ignorant masses and not accountable to them. (Pages 51 & 52) I have personally heard this and I have personally told Progressive Government RINOs and DINOs they are wrong. However, each of you must establish truth for yourselves and act accordingly.
My fellow citizens, what these New World Order Progressives seek is beyond evil. Rather than humanity being comprised of self-Determinant individuals, Progressives say Humanity is a single “Social Organism”. (Pages 101-102) Like a colony of Honeybees, Progressive RINOs and DINOs view the masses as expendable worker bees, with no rights(Page 25), who exist only to serve the Progressive Hive Community as ordered by the Progressive Elite King and Queen bees.(I encourage you to read the entire book, “Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era” 2016 by practicing, hardcore, Progressive Professor, Thomas Leonard <> Borrow at your local library or buy here)
Ladies, please forgive in advance for my breach of political correctness decorum while I attempt to motivate others to fight this injustice. If one of you women want to step up, I am more than happy to step aside. That said, the nature of men to protect those they care about has insured the survival of humanity for thousands of years. American men, if you let this injustice stand and be inflicted on your women, children and the infirm, you are not Real Men nor Patriots; you are cowards and political cuckolds. If you choose to be cowards and cuckolds, “Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.” ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803).
In closing, It is clear government will not redress this injustice, unless WE THE PEOPLE apply enough pressure. If you wish our grievances with Election 2020 to be redressed, WE THE PEOPLE must remain focused on our goal, to the exclusion of almost all other goals. The Progressive Globalist Insurgency traitors are betting that if they can stall long enough, you will just give up and accept your new status as ignorant slaves. If you do not want that for your children and future generations of Americans, Do NOT let them distract you with new issues and new crises. Everyday, contact your oath-breaking traitor elected officials and demand redress on this issue until they comply.
Did I mention I hate politics as much as the next person, but these acts of despotism by our government requires WE THE PEOPLE to hold our government accountable.
Those were my thoughts. Thank you for your time.
Keep fighting the good fight, fellow patriots.
In Liberty, Don Mashak The Cynical Patriot
This document inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
AMERICANOS: POR FAVOR AYUDENME A ENTENDER
AMERICANOS: POR FAVOR AYUDENME A ENTENDER
Entonces, mis conciudadanos, ¿algunos de ustedes están bien tratando de reparar las injusticias de las elecciones de 2020, esperando hasta las elecciones de 2022/2024 para volver a votar? ¿Entendí bien?
Y eso sin corregir los problemas específicos que causaron las injusticias en las ELECCIONES 2020 … ¿Algunos de ustedes simplemente van a esperar hasta 2022/2024 y esperan que NO vuelva a ocurrir la misma injusticia o una injusticia similar? ¿En serio?
PARA PONER UN PUNTO FINO, MÚLTIPLES CAPAS DE GOBIERNO, QUE HICIERON JURAMENTOS PARA ASEGURAR LA INTEGRIDAD DE LAS ELECCIONES Y / O APOYAR Y DEFENDER LA CONSTITUCIÓN, NO CUMPLIMOS CON SUS JURAMOS. ¿Y algunos de ustedes están bien con dejar que eso pase sin consecuencias para los perpetradores? ¿Como puede ser?
Los administradores de elecciones progresivas ignoraron o hicieron alarde de las reglas. La policía no investigó ni presentó cargos. Los abogados del gobierno no procesaron. SCOTUS utilizó tecnicismos para evitar escuchar la cuestión sobre el fondo. Y el Congreso falló en “Controlar y equilibrar” constitucionalmente a SCOTUS por no hacer su trabajo. Una vez más, todos estos empleados del gobierno tomaron juramento de que sus acciones / inacciones violaron.
Y luego todos dijeron: ‘Mira, la inacción de las fuerzas del orden, SCOTUS y el Congreso es una prueba de la integridad de las elecciones de 2020’. ¿Qué parte de esta lógica incongruente me perdí? Parece que nuestro Gobierno usurpado progresista piensa que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO somos tan ignorantes que no reconoceremos una conspiración sediciosa y traidora cuando la veamos. Personalmente, me siento justificado en estar enojado hasta el punto de ser movido a la acción, sin importar si el resto de ustedes quiere darse la vuelta y tomarlo o no.
Es decir, el gobierno debería considerar que este es mi ejercicio de mi derecho natural a solicitar una reparación al gobierno, como se reduce a escrito en la Primera Enmienda. Y exijo formalmente que el gobierno actúe para reparar dichas injusticias de inmediato. Si me equivoco en mi Establecimiento de la Verdad y mi curso de acción resultante, dígame cómo y por qué, públicamente y por escrito.
Mis conciudadanos, parece claro que las acciones del gobierno descritas anteriormente, combinadas con la propaganda de los principales medios de comunicación, la censura en las redes sociales, el adoctrinamiento básico común y los cierres de COVID-19, exacerbados por múltiples capas de funcionarios del gobierno que no cumplen con sus juramentos de apoyar y defender la Constitución constituye una ‘larga serie de abusos y usurpaciones, que persigue invariablemente el mismo Objeto que evidencia un diseño para reducir NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO al Despotismo absoluto ”(Declaración de Independencia de los Estados Unidos 1776).
Una vez más, si me equivoco, alguien me diga en qué me equivoco. El gobierno NO puede cometer crímenes contra NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO, y luego escapar de la rendición de cuentas diciendo esencialmente, ‘porque nosotros lo decimos, no fue un crimen’. La Ley Natural y la Constitución hacen que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO sean los Soberanos, y nuestros servidores públicos rindan cuentas ante NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO. Llamar a aquellos de nosotros que intentamos hacer que nuestro gobierno rinda cuentas por sus crímenes, ‘terroristas domésticos’, y luego escondernos detrás de armas y alambre de púas (implementado con pretextos falsos), mientras no abordamos y reparamos estos problemas son actos y actitudes de déspotas tiránicos que afirman no rendir cuentas a nadie.
Dicho esto, mis conciudadanos, a puerta cerrada, los RINO progresistas y los DINO en el gobierno dicen que son demasiado ignorantes para comprender lo que han hecho y están haciendo. Los progresistas dicen que son superiores a las masas ignorantes y no les rinden cuentas. (Páginas 51 y 52) Personalmente he escuchado esto y personalmente les he dicho a los RINO y DINO del Gobierno Progresista que están equivocados. Sin embargo, cada uno de ustedes debe establecer la verdad por sí mismo y actuar en consecuencia.
Mis conciudadanos, esta búsqueda de los progresistas del Nuevo Orden Mundial está más allá del mal. En lugar de que la humanidad esté compuesta por individuos autodeterminantes, los progresistas dicen que la humanidad es un único “organismo social”. (Páginas 101-102) Como una colonia de abejas, los RINO progresivos y los DINO ven a las masas como abejas obreras prescindibles, sin derechos (Página 25), que existen solo para servir a la Comunidad de la colmena progresiva según lo ordenado por el Rey y la Reina de élite progresiva. abejas. (Le animo a leer el libro completo, ‘Reformadores iliberales: raza, eugenesia y economía estadounidense en la era progresiva’ 2016 por el profesor practicante, incondicional y progresista, Thomas Leonard <> Pida prestado en su biblioteca local o compre aquí)
Señoras, por favor perdonen de antemano mi incumplimiento del decoro de la corrección política mientras intento motivar a otros a luchar contra esta injusticia. Si una de ustedes, las mujeres, quiere dar un paso al frente, estoy más que feliz de hacerme a un lado. Dicho esto, la naturaleza de los hombres para proteger a sus seres queridos ha asegurado la supervivencia de la humanidad durante miles de años. Hombres estadounidenses, si permiten que esta injusticia permanezca y sea infligida a sus mujeres, niños y enfermos, no son Hombres de Verdad ni Patriotas; sois cobardes y cornudos politicos. Si eliges ser cobardes y cornudos, “Agáchate y lame las manos que te alimentan. Que tus cadenas se pongan livianas sobre ti y que la posteridad olvide que eras nuestro compatriota. ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803).
Para terminar, está claro que el gobierno no reparará esta injusticia, a menos que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO apliquemos suficiente presión. Si desea que se resuelvan nuestras quejas con las Elecciones 2020, NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO debemos mantenernos enfocados en nuestro objetivo, con exclusión de casi todos los demás objetivos. Los traidores de la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista están apostando a que si pueden detenerse el tiempo suficiente, simplemente te rendirás y aceptarás tu nuevo estado de esclavos ignorantes. Si no quiere eso para sus hijos y las futuras generaciones de estadounidenses, NO permita que lo distraigan con nuevos problemas y nuevas crisis. Todos los días, comuníquese con los funcionarios electos traidores que rompen el juramento y exija una reparación sobre este tema hasta que cumplan.
¿Mencioné que odio la política tanto como cualquier otra persona, pero estos actos de despotismo por parte de nuestro gobierno requieren que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO hagamos responsable a nuestro gobierno?
Esos fueron mis pensamientos. Gracias por tu tiempo.
Sigan peleando la buena batalla, compañeros patriotas.
En libertad Don Mashak El patriota cínico
Este documento inspirado por Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS
US Election 2020 – How Much Longer?
US Election 2020 – How Much Longer?
How much longer will WETHEPEOPLE let the Political Establishment Pee on our heads and tell us it is raining? Fellow Citizens and Patriots, I say to you, “WE THE PEOPLE must stop waiting for someone to rescue us, WE THE PEOPLE must rescue ourselves.
Many of you speak of redressing the issues of Election 2020 by pushing new Election Integrity Laws to prevent a repeat of the 2020 Election travesty in 2022. And, that is good and necessary, as the Founder’s roadmap for dealing with tyranny requires, WE THE PEOPLE must exhaust our peaceful remedies befoe we consider alternative remedies. But,with due respect, I must point out my belief that the majority of the masses,will not find such remedies adequate, effective or acceptable redress of the true issues which caused the masses to question the integrity of the results of Election 2020.
Unhappily, I must point out the problem with the 2020 Election was not due to the lack of Election Integrity Laws. The real problem of was one of government officials purposely ignoring and/or actively violating Election Integrity Laws. To further elaborate, the real problem was a combination of Progressive Election Administrators, often forcibly ignoring already established rules. , along with Election Integrity Laws and Rules ALREADY ON THE BOOKS. And, the later failure of Law Enforcement, SCOTUS and Congress to act in accordance with the Constitution’s Checks and Balances. Don’t kill the messenger, but what is the point of new & tougher Election Integrity Laws if you don’t address the failure of Election Administrators, Law Enforcement, SCOTUS, State Courts, State Legislators and Congress to enforce them. Later in this article, I will put a finer point on SCOTUS’s role in these matters.
As an election judge, I long warned of potential election fraud, including rigged Electronic Ballot Box Computer Code for many years. [ http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged ] From the treatment I received as an Election Judge from Minnesota Election Administrators, their attempts to hide the issue and their failure to take action, my sense was that Progressive Election Administrators were more interested in the “appearance” of election integrity, rather than actual election integrity. [ http://rebrand.ly/Unmasked2020 & http:// rebrand.ly/BFIN2020ElectionFraudFacts] And, in my opinion, the reason they were concerned only with the appearance of Integrity, was so WE THE PEOPLE (the masses) would just accept whatever fraudulent results Progressive Election Administrators presented us with. As an Election Judge and upon all the facts myself, and my fellow citizens have been witnessing too, I assert to you our government is engaged in sedition and treason evinced by rigging, and covering up the rigging, of Election 2020.
The question is, “What should WE THE PEOPLE believe and what should WE THE PEOPLE do?” We all know Mainstream Media, Social Media and Politicians have been using Propaganda, Indoctrination, Censorship and suspect COVID-19 Quarantine Protocols to prevent WE THE PEOPLE from Establishing Truth for ourselves by discussing matters among ourselves. At the same time, this is a decision that may possibly determine the fate of your children and humanity for eternity. Trust your own gut in Establishing Truth for yourself. But, before anyone establishes truth for themselves on such an important matter, I ask you to read “Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era”. It was first published in 2016 by hardcore, practicing Progressive Professor, Thomas Leonard. (You can check it out from your local library). Once you have established the truth of these matters for yourself, only then can you plot an appropriate course of action.
To summarize, the Progressive Globalist Elites are waging an unconventional Civil War by slow, covert infiltration over generations so no one generation notices enough change to resist, revolt, take up arms and/or mount a counter-revolution. This seditious and treasonous revolution began with the establishment of a 4th Branch of Government (Administrative State) under Progressive President Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921). Among other bullroar, Progressives Elites believe they are genetically and intellectually superior to the masses and should NOT be accountable to the allegedly ignorant masses. Progressive Elites tasked the Administrative State with reducing the accountability of the original 3 branches of government to WE THE PEOPLE and spearheading the advancement of the unconstitutional agenda of the Progressive Globalist Elites. At the moment that the unconstitutional thoughts of the Progressive Globalist Elites turned to action to make them reality, their thoughts and acts became treason and sedition.
Returning to SCOTUS’s role in these matters… To put a finer point on it, the prevailing jurisprudence in deciding matters before the Courts in our country, had been the “(Roscoe)Pound Principle”. The “Pound Principle” gave high preferences for all matters before any court to be decided on the merits, and not on technicality. Over the course of the 100+ years of Progressive Globalist Insurgency’s revolution by slow infiltration, our traitor Judiciary & US BAR replaced the common-sense Pound Principle’s great preference to resolve matters on the merits. Progressive Jurists and Lawyers replaced “great preference for court decisions on the merits” with the Progressive Globalists preference to decide matters on technicality and without a jury comprised of the allegedly ignorant masses. SCOTUS decided NOT to hear the matter of 2020 Election Fraud based on technicality and not the merits. This, despite the fact that the issue of Election Integrity is a matter of the highest importance in a Representative, Constitutionally-Limited Republic. But SCOTUS, overrun by Progressive RINOs and DINOs, chose to aid and abet the Progressive Globalist Insurgency. To repeat, SCOTUS did so by refusing to hear the matter of 2020 Election Fraud on technicality, but used their decision to give the appearance of legitimacy and legality of the 2020 Election. Co conspirator Congress then failed to “Check and Balance” SCOTUS, instead continuing the misrepresentation that the decision of SCOTUS in refusing to hear the matter on technicality, was proof of the legitimacy of the 2020 Election results.
Yes, I know there are still cases pending in the matters of the 2020 Election Fraud. However, this case perhaps more than any other, evinces the adage, “Justice Delayed is Justice denied. Despite this fact, somehow SCOTUS and CONGRESS wants to assert their actions were just and Constitutional. And, still further, use this misrepresentation as a false pretext to punish citizens, who having established truth for themselves, petitioned them for redress of their grievances (Natural Law, 1st Amendment, Declaration of Independence – Long Train of Abuses) in the strongest possible terms and manner.
Natural Law (1st paragraph, Declaration of Independence) and the US Constitution are the established civil authority and government of our Country. Per Merriam-Webster dictionary, the definition of insurrection: “an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government”. Progressive Globalist are the traitors who have been engaged in acts of “Insurrection” for 100+ years.
18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Further consider, that there are 335 members (of 535 members) of Congress who are lawyers. Further still, there are 1.3 million lawyers in the USA. Yet, not one lawyer was able and/or willing to draft a pleading on election fraud that could survive being rejected by SCOTUS on technicality. This further evinces the US BAR and Judiciary as conspirators in this long running, seditious and treasonous coup, and/or the existence of some form of Judicial “Code Red” (see 1992 movie, “A Few Good Men”) rules that punishes lawyers and judges who oppose the Progressive Globalist Insurgency. Either way, how is it possible that NOT one single lawyer in America could draft a rule-conforming lawsuit to the US Supreme Court on the single most important issue in our Representative, Constitutionally-limited Republic? Again, I leave it to you, the reader, to establish truth for yourself.
Based on these facts, I ask all US Law Enforcement and Military personnel to Establish Truth for yourselves and then act, according to the truth you establish for yourselves, to fulfill your oaths to support and defend the US Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Please do so, that WE THE PEOPLE need not be burdened with mounting a Counter-Revolution to the Progressive Globalist Insurgency.
I call upon Law Enforcement and Military to assess and/or reassess the facts for themselves and act accordingly, and not rely upon, nor act upon, the propaganda, spin, perspectives and decisions that compromised government officials have dictated to you. Once again, I demand you uphold your oaths of offices to support and defend the US Constitution, by acting upon the bonafide truth they establish for themselves. (County Sheriffs especially have a Constitutional Authority and Duty to unilaterally support and defend the Constitution and enforce the Law without asking permission of anyone.) At the same time, no one should rely upon the assessment of their superiors. Many or most have been compromised and/or are willing Coconspirators in the nontraditional Progressive Globalist Insurgency. I pray that all US Law Enforcement and Military realize that the fate of humanity may rest in their rugged individualist hands. I say, “may” because WE THE PEOPLE may yet become the final arbitrators of right and wrong.
At the same time, the Founder’s instructed us that WE THE PEOPLE must exhaust our peaceful remedies, before we consider alternate remedies. To wit, I advise you as follows: Your efforts at electing true Constitutional Conservative Candidates and enacting better Election Integrity Law serve a dual purpose of actually trying to peacefully remedy our grievances with government and documenting exhausting of these peaceful remedies. At the same time, I implore you, “Do NOT let the political establishment simply play you by exhausting your physical, emotional and financial resources, leaving you with no energy left to pursue alternative remedies, if and when that time comes”.
My final thought is as follows, I see no way for America nor Humanity to recover if the injustices of US Election 2020 are not redressed and undone, post-haste.
Those were my thoughts
In Liberty, Don Mashak The Cynical Patriot
This document inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
Elecciones estadounidenses de 2020: ¿cuánto más tiempo?
Elecciones estadounidenses de 2020: ¿cuánto más tiempo?
Muchos de ustedes hablan de corregir los problemas de la Elección 2020 impulsando nuevas Leyes de Integridad Electoral para evitar que se repita la parodia de la Elección 2020 en 2022. Y eso es bueno y necesario, como lo requiere la hoja de ruta del Fundador para lidiar con la tiranía, Debemos agotar nuestros remedios pacíficos, consideramos remedios alternativos.
Pero, Con el debido respeto, debo señalar mi creencia de que la mayoría de las masas no encontrarán tales remedios como una reparación adecuada, efectiva o aceptable de los verdaderos problemas que hicieron que las masas cuestionaran la integridad de los resultados de las Elecciones 2020.
Lamentablemente, debo señalar que el problema con las elecciones de 2020 no se debió a la falta de leyes de integridad electoral. El problema real fue uno de los funcionarios del gobierno que deliberadamente ignoraron y / o violaron activamente las Leyes de Integridad Electoral. Para dar más detalles, el problema real fue una combinación de Administradores Electorales Progresistas, a menudo ignorando por la fuerza las reglas ya establecidas. Y, el posterior fracaso de la aplicación de la ley, SCOTUS y el Congreso de actuar de acuerdo con los Controles y Balances de la Constitución, junto con las Leyes y Reglas de Integridad Electoral YA ESTÁN EN LOS LIBROS. No mates al mensajero, pero ¿cuál es el sentido de las leyes de integridad electoral nuevas y más estrictas si no abordas el fracaso de los administradores electorales, las fuerzas del orden, SCOTUS, los tribunales estatales, los legisladores estatales y el Congreso para hacerlas cumplir? Más adelante en este artículo, destacaré el papel de SCOTUS en estos asuntos.
Como juez electoral, advertí durante muchos años sobre un posible fraude electoral, incluido el código informático de urnas electrónicas manipulado. [http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged] Por el trato que recibí como juez electoral de los administradores electorales de Minnesota, sus intentos de ocultar el problema y su falta de acción, mi sensación fue que los administradores electorales progresistas estaban más interesados en “Apariencia” de integridad electoral, más que integridad electoral real. [http://rebrand.ly/Unmasked2020 & http: // rebrand.ly/BFIN2020ElectionFraudFacts ] Y, en mi opinión, la razón por la que solo se preocupaban por la apariencia de integridad, era para que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO (las masas) simplemente aceptar cualquier resultado fraudulento que nos hayan presentado los Administradores Electorales Progresistas. Como Juez de Elecciones y sobre todos los hechos que todos mis conciudadanos y yo también hemos presenciado, les aseguro que nuestro gobierno está involucrado en la sedición y la traición, evidenciada por la manipulación y el encubrimiento de la manipulación de la Elección 2020.
La pregunta es: ‘¿Qué deberíamos creer NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO y qué deberíamos hacer NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO?’ Todos sabemos que los principales medios de comunicación, las redes sociales y los políticos han estado usando propaganda, adoctrinamiento, censura y sospecha de los protocolos de cuarentena COVID-19 para evitar que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO establezcamos la verdad por nosotros mismos al discutir asuntos entre nosotros. Al mismo tiempo, esta es una decisión que posiblemente pueda determinar el destino de sus hijos y la humanidad por la eternidad. Confíe en su propio instinto para establecer la verdad por sí mismo. Pero, antes de que alguien establezca la verdad por sí mismo sobre un asunto tan importante, les pido que lean “Reformadores iliberales: raza, eugenesia y economía estadounidense en la era progresista”. Fue publicado por primera vez en 2016 por el profesor progresista en práctica, Thomas Leonard. (Puede consultarlo en su biblioteca local). Una vez que haya establecido la verdad de estos asuntos por sí mismo, solo entonces podrá trazar un curso de acción apropiado.
En resumen, las élites progresistas globalistas están librando una guerra civil no convencional mediante una infiltración lenta y encubierta durante generaciones, por lo que ninguna generación se da cuenta de los cambios suficientes para resistir, rebelarse, tomar las armas o montar una contrarrevolución. Esta revolución sediciosa y traidora comenzó con el establecimiento de una cuarta rama de gobierno (Estado administrativo) bajo el presidente progresista Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921). Entre otros alborotos, las élites progresistas creen que son genética e intelectualmente superiores a las masas y NO deberían rendir cuentas a las masas supuestamente ignorantes. Las élites progresistas encargaron al estado administrativo reducir la responsabilidad de las 3 ramas originales del gobierno ante NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO y encabezar el avance de la agenda inconstitucional de las élites progresistas globalistas. Ante la idea de que los pensamientos inconstitucionales de las élites progresistas globalistas se conviertan en acciones para hacerlos realidad, sus pensamientos se convirtieron en traición y sedición.
Volviendo al papel de SCOTUS en estos asuntos … Para poner un punto más fino al respecto, la jurisprudencia imperante en la resolución de asuntos ante los Tribunales de nuestro país había sido el “Principio de la Libra (Roscoe)”. El ‘Principio de la libra’ daba grandes preferencias para que todos los asuntos ante cualquier tribunal se decidieran sobre el fondo y no sobre tecnicismos. En el transcurso de los más de 100 años de revolución de la Insurgencia Globalista Progresiva por infiltración lenta, nuestro Poder Judicial traidor y el Colegio de Abogados de los Estados Unidos reemplazaron la gran preferencia del Principio de Libra de sentido común para resolver los asuntos sobre la base de los méritos. Los juristas y abogados progresistas reemplazaron ‘una gran preferencia por la decisión judicial sobre el fondo’ con la preferencia de los globalistas progresistas para decidir los asuntos sobre tecnicismos y sin un jurado compuesto por las masas supuestamente ignorantes. SCOTUS decidió NO escuchar el asunto del Fraude electoral de 2020 por tecnicismos y no por méritos. Esto, a pesar del hecho de que el tema de la Integridad Electoral es un asunto de la mayor importancia en una República Representativa, Constitucionalmente Limitada. Pero SCOTUS, invadido por Progressive RINOs y DINOs, optó por ayudar e instigar a la Insurgencia Progresista Globalista. Repito, SCOTUS lo hizo negándose a escuchar el asunto del Fraude Electoral 2020 por tecnicismos, pero usó su decisión para dar la apariencia de legitimidad y legalidad de las Elecciones 2020. El Congreso Coconspirador luego falló en “Verificar y Equilibrar” a SCOTUS, en lugar de continuar con la tergiversación de que la decisión de SCOTUS de negarse a escuchar el asunto sobre tecnicismos, era prueba de la legitimidad de los resultados de las Elecciones de 2020.
Sí, sé que todavía hay casos pendientes en los asuntos del Fraude Electoral 2020. Sin embargo, este caso quizás más que cualquier otro, evidencia el adagio, “Justicia retrasada es justicia denegada. A pesar de este hecho, de alguna manera SCOTUS y CONGRESS quieren afirmar que sus acciones fueron justas y constitucionales. Y, aún más, use esta tergiversación como un falso pretexto para castigar a los ciudadanos, quienes habiendo establecido la verdad por sí mismos, les solicitaron la reparación de sus agravios (Ley Natural, Primera Enmienda, Declaración de Independencia – Largo Tren de Abusos) en la mayor medida posible. términos y forma.
La Ley Natural (1er párrafo, Declaración de Independencia) y la Constitución de los Estados Unidos son la autoridad civil establecida y el gobierno de nuestro país. Según el diccionario Merriam-Webster, la definición de insurrección: ‘un acto o instancia de rebelión contra la autoridad civil o un gobierno establecido’. Progressive Globalist son los traidores que se han involucrado en actos de “Insurrección” durante más de 100 años.
18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebelión o insurrección Quien incite, ponga en pie, ayude o participe en cualquier rebelión o insurrección contra la autoridad de los Estados Unidos o sus leyes, o le brinde ayuda o consuelo, será multado bajo este título o encarcelado no más de diez años, o ambos; y será incapaz de ocupar ningún cargo en los Estados Unidos.
Considere además que hay 335 abogados (de 535 miembros) en el Congreso que son abogados. Más aún, hay 1,3 millones de abogados en Estados Unidos. Sin embargo, ningún abogado pudo y / o estuvo dispuesto a redactar un alegato sobre fraude electoral que pudiera sobrevivir al rechazo de SCOTUS por tecnicismos. Esto evidencia aún más al Colegio de Abogados de los EE. UU. Y al Poder Judicial como conspiradores en este golpe de estado sedicioso y traidor de larga duración, o la existencia de alguna forma de ‘Código Rojo’ Judicial (ver película de 1992, ‘Algunos hombres buenos’) que castiga a abogados y jueces que se oponen a la Insurgencia Progresista Globalista. De cualquier manera, ¿cómo es posible que NINGÚN abogado en Estados Unidos pueda redactar una demanda de conformidad con las reglas ante la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos sobre el tema más importante en nuestra República representativa, constitucionalmente limitada? Nuevamente, le dejo a usted, el lector, establecer la verdad por sí mismo.
Con base en estos hechos, pido a todo el personal militar y de las fuerzas del orden de los EE. UU. Que establezcan la verdad por sí mismos y luego actúen, de acuerdo con la verdad que establezcan para sí mismos, para cumplir con sus juramentos de apoyar y defender la Constitución de los EE. UU. De todos los enemigos, extranjeros y nacionales. . Por favor, hágalo, para que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO no tengamos que cargar con montar una Contrarrevolución a la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista.
Hago un llamamiento a las fuerzas del orden y las fuerzas armadas para que evalúen y / o reevalúen los hechos por sí mismos y actúen en consecuencia, y no se basen ni actúen sobre la propaganda, los giros, las perspectivas y las decisiones que los funcionarios gubernamentales comprometidos le han dictado. Una vez más, les exijo que cumplan sus juramentos de cargos para apoyar y defender la Constitución de los Estados Unidos, actuando sobre la base de la verdad de buena fe que ellos mismos establecen. (Los alguaciles del condado tienen especialmente la autoridad constitucional y el deber de apoyar y defender unilateralmente la Constitución y hacer cumplir la ley sin pedir permiso a nadie). Al mismo tiempo, nadie debe confiar en la evaluación de sus superiores. Muchos o la mayoría se han comprometido y / o están dispuestos a ser Coconspiradores en la insurgencia globalista progresista no tradicional. Rezo para que todas las fuerzas del orden y las fuerzas armadas de EE. UU. Se den cuenta de que el destino de la humanidad puede estar en sus duras manos individualistas. Digo ‘puede’ porque NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO aún podemos convertirnos en los árbitros finales del bien y del mal.
Al mismo tiempo, el Fundador nos instruyó que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO debemos agotar nuestros remedios pacíficos antes de considerar remedios alternativos. A saber, le aconsejo lo siguiente: sus esfuerzos para elegir verdaderos candidatos conservadores constitucionales y promulgar una mejor ley de integridad electoral tienen el doble propósito de tratar de remediar pacíficamente nuestras quejas con el gobierno y documentar el agotamiento de estos recursos pacíficos. Al mismo tiempo, les imploro, “NO permitan que el establecimiento político simplemente juegue con ustedes agotando sus recursos físicos, emocionales y financieros, dejándolos sin energía para buscar remedios alternativos, cuando llegue ese momento”.
Mi pensamiento final es el siguiente: veo el camino para que Estados Unidos ni la Humanidad se recuperen si las injusticias de las elecciones estadounidenses de 2020 no se corrigen y deshacen de inmediato.
Esos fueron mis pensamientos
En libertad Don Mashak El patriota cínico
Este documento inspirado en Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS Sorry, but many sources don’t have Spanish version/subtitles <> Lo siento, pero muchas fuentes no tienen subtítulos o versión en español
2020 US Election Fraud Facts
2020 US Election Fraud Facts
Pillow Man, Mike Lindell, reveals the Election 2020 Fraud Facts that traitor SCOTUS Scehmed to avoid hearing on technicality rather than ruling upon the merits.
So many people ask me to provide proof of 2020 US Election fraud. Here is one source. Remember, the US Supreme Court dismissed all of the Election Fraud Lawsuits on a technicality, instead of ruling on the Merits. All US Judges and Lawyers take oaths to support and defend the US Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And longstanding legal tradition favors courts deciding cases on the merits, not technicality. There is no higher legal issue for the courts to decide in a Representative, Constitutionally limited Republic than the integrity of our Elections. Our US Supreme Court aided and abetted the seditious and treason Progressive Globalist Coup in contriving to dismiss these matters on a technicality. Think about it. There are 1.3 million lawyers in America. 335 of the 555 members of Congress are lawyers. How is it that not one single lawyer could draft a lawsuit that could not be tossed out on a technicality? All those who suppress these facts are guilty of aiding and abetting the seditious and treasonous Progressive Globalist Insurgency. Remember, all who conspired in these matters are motivated to suppress the facts to avoid trials for sedition and treason, a conviction for sedition and treason and hanging for sedition and treason. Pillow Man, Mike Lindell’s documentary is a credible source.
Datos sobre el fraude electoral en EE. UU. 2020
Hombre de almohada, Mike Lindell, revela los hechos fraudulentos de las elecciones de 2020 que el traidor SCOTUS Scehmed para evitar escuchar sobre tecnicismos en lugar de pronunciarse sobre los méritos.
A LOS ADMINISTRADORES DE ELECCIONES PROGRESIVAS NO LE IMPORTA LA INTEGRIDAD REAL DE LAS ELECCIONES; A ELLOS ÚNICAMENTE LE IMPORTA LA ‘APARIENCIA’ DE LA INTEGRIDAD DE LAS ELECCIONES, POR LO QUE LOS VOTANTES NO Cuestionan los resultados de sus elecciones. http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2020/08/12/imho-our-minnesota-elections-are-rigged/ He sido juez electoral durante una década o más. Escribí esto mucho antes de las elecciones Planteé la cuestión del código de computadora manipulado en las urnas electrónicas Atras varias elecciones. Me cerraron a cada paso.
Mucha gente me pide que proporcione pruebas del fraude en las elecciones estadounidenses de 2020. Aquí hay una fuente. Recuerde, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos desestimó todas las Demandas por Fraude Electoral por un tecnicismo, en lugar de fallar sobre el fondo. Todos los jueces y abogados estadounidenses prestan juramento de apoyar y defender la Constitución estadounidense de todos los enemigos, tanto nacionales como extranjeros. Y la tradición legal de larga data favorece a los tribunales que deciden los casos en función del fondo, no del tecnicismo. No hay un asunto legal más importante para que los tribunales decidan en una República Representativa y constitucionalmente limitada que la integridad de nuestras Elecciones. Nuestra Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos ayudó e instigó al sedicioso y traidor Golpe de Estado Globalista Progresista a intentar desestimar estos asuntos por un tecnicismo. Piénsalo. Hay 1,3 millones de abogados en Estados Unidos. 335 de los 555 miembros del Congreso son abogados. ¿Cómo es posible que ni un solo abogado pueda redactar una demanda que no pueda descartarse por un tecnicismo? Todos aquellos que reprimen estos hechos son culpables de ayudar e incitar a la sediciosa y traidora insurgencia globalista progresista. Recuerde, todos los que conspiraron en estos asuntos están motivados a reprimir los hechos para evitar juicios por sedición y traición, una condena por sedición y traición y ahorcamiento por sedición y traición. Pillow Man, el documental de Mike Lindell es una fuente creíble.
This writer’s followers on Twitter and other Social Media are familiar with his intention of uniting rank and file Americans under one common Perspective of Reality. A Perspective of reality far truer than the false Perspective of Reality promoted through the divisive propaganda of the Main Stream Media and the two faux major political parties. With this article, this writer intends to build upon creating that truer, common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our government and hold our government officials accountable for their departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) and betrayals of the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE.
Yesterday morning this writer went to the continuing trial of Sandra Grazzini Rucki in Dakota County MN on various criminal charges relating to allegedly wrongfully depriving her ex husband, David Rucki, of parental rights, etc. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s well-founded and well-recognized affirmative defense is that she was acting to protect her children from what she reasonably believed was danger from their father. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki numerous times went to the appropriate channels to seek the safety of her children, and resorted to helping the girls escape their allegedly abusive father only when the police, the courts and Child Protective Services (CPS) failed her.
This writer does not really know Sandra Grazzini-Rucki from Adam. This writer first became aware of her abuse at the hands of the Dakota County MN Courts and our Government in 2014, through his involvement with the Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) Movement. Judicial TAR is a group of citizens who have sought a hearing before the Minnesota Legislature dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Courts every year from 2005, and every year our requests for said hearing have been denied. From this, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR believe it is reasonable for all American citizens to conclude that Minnesota Government and Courts, at a minimum have something to hide, and more likely are complicit in the Systemic Corruption of the Minnesota Courts. [Systemic Corruption means that the aspects of government that are supposed to prevent & punish corruption instead are complicit in and cover it up] In 2009, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR came to believe it would be unlikely we would ever have our request for said hearing granted. With victims of the Abuse of Power of the Courts and their advocates getting frustrated, becoming disheartened, moving away and dying, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR held an Ad Hoc hearing on the Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Courts to preserve our Petitions for Redress for Posterity:
From this writer’s experience with the Judicial TAR Movement, this writer has learned nuances of the legal profession that most Americans are unaware of. Add to this, this writer’s own experience in his personal civil litigation and 1 bogus criminal charge (eventually dismissed for lack of Probable Cause), and this writer asserts that he is uniquely qualified to understand how our Courts fix the outcomes of Court cases and educate his fellow rank and file citizens of the true nature of their government and courts.
This writer has written previously on the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Matter in Dakota County Minnesota, but your government has seen fit to scrub those articles from the internet. (Main Stream Media (MSM) has seen fit to not publish this writer’s previous articles on the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter.) In total, almost 200 of this writer’s blogs and several hundred of his posts and articles have been scrubbed from the Internet. One gets the sense that our government and courts don’t want rank and file Americans to have the information about their corruption, machinations and duplicity that this writer exposes. Yet, rather than try to recreate and reassert all the facts from those censored articles, this writer is going to focus on the mechanics of various allegations of how the Dakota County MN Courts are trying to fix the outcome of the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki litigation from a succinct, common sense legal perspective. (Fellow Minnesotan, Tim Kinley has a much better knowledge of the all the particular facts in the related previous matters under Judge David Knutson and underlying facts and minutia of the Dakota County MN Court departures from the Rule the Rule (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) under Judge Karen Asphaug which have led to this trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki – His Youtube Channel http://bit.ly/SpeechlessMN) This article is written more from a macro-overview and general mechanics perspective.
This writer wanted to attend this trial yesterday because it was alleged that there were/are departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) occurring intended to fix the outcome of the case, and he wanted to confirm their accuracy. At the same time, recent events provide an opportunity for this writer to build upon the American Public’s current familiarity with the departures from the Rule of Law. Specifically, this writer refers to the FBI’s Comey’s and DOJ’s Lynch’s failure to charge Hillary Clinton over her various State Department Email related crimes despite facts in evidence which required Hillary Clinton to be charged (http://usat.ly/29wwvnV; http://cnn.it/29JlQDO) For those not familiar with the concept of the “Rule of Law”;
It is the concept and requirement embodied in our founding documents that there only be one set of laws for all American citizens and that it be enforced equally on all
citizens without regard to status, wealth or government position.
Additionally, this writer will also build upon recent revelations by Wikileaks (and Edward Snowden) which have revealed to all Americans the lengths to which our government will go to conspire against WE THE PEOPLE’s free will and the Democratic Process. In this instance, this writer is specifically referring to a hack of the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer servers. Subsequently, the disclosed emails and documents from the DNC servers revealed that the level of Systemic Corruption extends not just to suspension of the Rule of Law but also to violations and machinations of the Democratic Process. (http://bit.ly/2afaGro)
In the present matter of the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki trial, it has been alleged:
The jury was tainted with a Newspaper containing an article placed in the jury holding room prior to jury selection;
The Court engaged in jury rigging in that it placed so many biased and/or unqualified potential jurors in the jury pool that the Defense could not eliminate them all with its limited number of “free boots” and Judge Karen Asphaug failed to remove at least two jurors for cause who eventually were empaneled on the jury;
The Court did/is engaging in fact shaping.
Now, as a member of the press, this writer went to the trial yesterday with the specific purpose of ascertaining if any of these allegations were true. This writer was denied the opportunity to make said inquiries.
WARNING – DEPARTURE FROM ACCEPTED DECORUM FOLLOWS
This writer asserts the recent revelations of the magnitude of our government’s departures from the Rule of Law and Democratic Process warrant departures from accepted decorum. In some way, this writer feels he must signal to his fellow citizens that recent events require special attention. This writer will use these departures from decorum to signal to our fellow citizens that they can no longer remain calm and just go along with their normal daily routines; Rather our Government has departed so far from Constitutional and Natural Law, that the time has come for every American to question their blind loyalty to our government and actively work to restore our government’s accountability to WE THE PEOPLE. You have been fore-warned…
At the noon lunch break, as Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena walked by where this writer was seated in the Courtroom gallery, this writer took the opportunity to shake her hand and introduce himself as a member of the Press and a member of the Judicial TAR Movement. Ms. Kathryn M. Keena continued toward the door as this writer began to ask her questions about the allegations. With the rudeness and arrogance of those Progressives who think they are better than all the rest of us (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3), Ms. Kathryn M. Keena continued into a conference room without even the professional courtesy of saying she did not want to hear what this writer had to say nor answering any of this writer’s questions. As Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena entered the conference room, this writer turned to leave the foyer of the courtroom but was blocked by the egress of others from the court room and patiently waited his opportunity to exit the door. While this writer was standing their facing the exit door waiting for an opportunity to leave, the lying POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena made a FALSE REPORT to a Bailiff that I tried to follow her into the conference room. Lying POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena ordered the Bailiff to have me removed. This writer protested that POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena was lying, and that the Bailiff himself and others had this writer standing near them patiently waiting to leave the foyer. Others advised me to give up my protest and this writer left the foyer and the building. Once again, Dakota County MN Courts had succeeded in preventing this writer from verifying the truth of their corruption and publishing it for the world to see.
EXPLAINING THE THREE ELEMENTS OF DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ALLEGEDLY USED TO ATTEMPT TO FIX THE OUTCOME OF THE SANDRA GRAZZIN-RUCKI MATTER
Now, lets revisit the various acts of departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) that have been alleged, in a simple, non-legal gibberish way so the average American can understand it. (See also http://bit.ly/SimulatedLitigationDefined and Proposed Election 2012 caucus resolutions for judicial reform(updated) Part 2of2; Resolution 17 http://bit.ly/2012JudicialTARResolutions2of2)
The alleged Court rules require that a Judge not do anything that might give the appearance of impropriety. Further, there is a requirement in the rules that says the “Finder of Fact” (Judge or Jury) allegedly can only consider facts and evidence on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD. (When this writer says alleged, it mean that, in the writer’s opinion, the Courts so frequently ignore them one must question if they actually are adhered to or not.
DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ARTICLE IN THE PROSPECTIVE JURY WAITING ROOM
In regard to the matter of the newspaper article about Sandra Grazzini-Rucki being in the jury waiting room before jury selection, shouldn’t there be a member of the staff assigned to ensuring that jury tainting evidence is not permitted in the jury waiting area. Of course there is, but in this writer’s experience and knowledge, such methods of tainting juries are common in the courts. To wit, every American has a right to a trial before an IMPARTIAL jury of their peers. To the point, if you were the one on trial how would you feel about a derogatory article about you being made available to potential jurors in the potential jury waiting room, potential jurors admitting they have read it and Judge Karen Asphaug ruling, “Ain’t no big deal”? In your opinion, if you are the Defendant, does Judge Karen Asphaug’s failure to redress this matter in a satisfactory manner give rise to an “appearance of impropriety”? (Untouchables – Switch Jury scene https://youtu.be/5Mbdi_NXweQ)
DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ALLEGED JURY RIGGING
Next, we move to the departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in alleged jury rigging. In jury selection, the judge is supposed to disqualify jurors for a variety of reasons such as they are a friend or relative of one of the parties, that they are already familiar with the case, or they state have already made up their minds as to guilt or innocence, etc. This writer wanted to ask if any of these allegations regarding the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter were true. POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena use the arrogant Progressive tactic (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3) of having reporters not submissive to the Courts, booted. Therefore, it is necessary to say it is alleged Judge Karen Asphaug failed to remove a person who said they read the article, knew about the case, felt that Sandra Grazzinni-Rucki was guilty and would be surprised if she was not found guilty. Another allegation is that a potential juror admitted he had recently attended a party of a relative of David Rucki and was familiar with the case. Judge Karen Asphaug failed to disqualify either prospective juror, in the later case Judge Karen Asphaug said the potential juror’s assurances that they could remain impartial were sufficient to prevent her from disqualifying them. If you are the Defendant, “How impartial do you think these two jurors are going to be?” This is your life on the line here, should you be afforded every appearance of neutrality and fairness?
Now, in addition to the judge disqualifying jurors for cause, the Defense and Prosecution are allowed a small number of “free boots” of any juror for any reason. It is alleged that Dakota County MN Court machinated the jury pool in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case so the Prosecution could get biased jurors on to the final jury panel. It is alleged that the afore-mentioned two particular jurors should have been disqualified by the judge, but were not. It is alleged that so many biased/unqualified jurors had been machinated into the jury pool (stacked) by Dakota County MN Courts, that the Defense would not have enough free boots, to get rid of them all. It is alleged that by the time these two particular prospective jurors turn in the jury selection process came up, the Defense had already expended all of its “free boots”. In an allegedly random process, and with thousands of citizens living in Dakota County MN, what are the chances that 6 or more of about a 25 person jury pool would be biased against the Defense. Now, if you are the Defendant, do you think this was by chance or by deliberate machination of the process by the Dakota County Courts? ]Make sure you factor in your new understanding of your government’s lack of honor and integrity manifests itself in Government’s willingness to manipulate outcomes with recent revelations of its departure from the Rule of Law in the Hillary Clinton State Department Email matter and its willingness to engage in machinations to violate the Democratic Process reveal in the DNC Leaks (http://bit.ly/2afaGro)]
DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ALLEGED FACT/EVIDENCE SHAPING
And lastly, there is the allegation in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter that the Court is Fact/Evidence shaping the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case. As was mentioned earlier, the only facts and evidence the Finder of Fact (in this case the jury) is supposed to use in making its finding is the facts and evidence on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD. Over time our courts have enacted a series of rules and precedents whereby they can include or exclude facts from the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD (let or keep the jury from seeing/hearing). In effect, judges can determine (fix) the outcome of any trial (or any other court proceeding) by only allowing on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD those facts and evidence which support the desired outcome.
In this writer’s long experience with the Judicial TAR Movement, he has became aware of the practice in multiple cases of Judges “telegraphing” to the lawyers on both sides and other court personnel how the Judge would like to rule. The lawyer fraternity (even the lawyer you paid) and other witness like Guardians Ad Litem and CPS, oblige the judge by only placing on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD facts and evidence that will allow the Finder of Fact (Judge or Jury) to rule in the manner the judge has previously “telegraphed” to them. (Remember these judges and lawyers all go to the same continuing education courses, golf courses, country clubs and other social and professional events and speak their own “Legal-ease version of English – wink, wink; nudge, nudge; meaningful glance)
In the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Matter, there is an allegation that Judge Karen Asphaug has purposely and wrongfully excluded and attempted to exclude facts and evidence from the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD which demonstrate Sandra Grazzini-Rucki reasonably feared for the health and safety of her children from their father David Rucki.
The question to you, if you are the Defendant, if Judge Karen Asphaug in fact acted in this matter, did she act in a way that gives an appearance of impropriety in the trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki? Did you get a fair trial? And, even if you have the money and emotional fortitude to appeal and win on appeal, is not the additional money and time spent amount to unjust punishment? (Progressive Conditioning http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27)
One single event/fact has cemented this writer’s belief in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s representation that she feared for the lives and safety of her children. It has been alleged that at some point in all of this David Rucki gathered the family around a kitchen table. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki alleges that David Rucki threatened to kill all of them and then himself. In the opposing version David Rucki only threatened to kill himself in front of the entire family gathered around the kitchen table. In this writer’s humble opinion, regardless of which version is true, this event also cemented the Parental Alienation of David Rucki’s children towards himself. That some version occurred is a matter of relevant fact. You can hear David Rucki in his own words try to spin the event to his best advantage in this newscast. (https://youtu.be/qVaXS_neu2E at 4m 45s to 5m); http://bit.ly/2aeUHWr 4m 50s to 5m 3s) David Rucki’s admission of some version of this event is what cements in this writer’s mind that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki reasonably believed her children were in danger, and when the legal authorities failed to act in accordance with the Rule of Law, Sandra Grazzini-Rucki was forced to assert her own UNALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE and act to protect her children from her reasonably perceived threat from their father.
It is important to remember went to the Courthouse yesterday and tried to make inquiries and ask these questions so he could assert them as facts rather than allegations. But POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena resorted to Progressive tactics to keep rank and file Americans ignorant of the systemic corruption of the Dakota County MN Courts.
What you also don’t know, are the allegations that Judge David Knutson made decisions in prior litigation related to the Rucki Divorce that also depart from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion). (In this writer’s humble opinion; think bribe, other consideration or Teddy Kennedy and Chappaquiddick dynamics) As Judge David Knutson is on the Discipline Review Board, its tough to pursue the truth through that avenue. As the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards is a legal black-hole and essentially a Public Relations firm for Minnesota Judges, no relief is available there either. And, as the Minnesota Legislature for 10+ years has refused to the Judicial TAR Movement a hearing dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of systemic corruption in the Minnesota Courts, no relief will be force coming there. Still, someone should ask Judge David Knutson to explain his departures from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter, and this writer even suggests Judge David Knutson should submit to a polygraph to “avoid the appearance of impropriety”. [Here again, and especially, Tim Kinley has a much better grasp and understanding of the minutia and specifics of the departures from the Rule of Law allegedly committed by Judge David Knutson than does this writer. See his YouTube Channel “Speechless” (http://bit.ly/SpeechlessMN)]
This writer has an additional special qualification in this case of asserting the likely truthfulness of the allegations of departures from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter. Judge Karen Asphaug was one of the Judges in the only criminal matter this writer has ever been charged with (besides minor traffic tickets – No DWIs). In that matter, this writer was in another Dakota County Courtroom in 2014 investigating allegations that Dakota County MN Law Enforcement was complicit in the local Drug Trade. A woman complained that her X-husband was getting special treatment from Dakota County Law Enforcement and the Courts because he was the main supplier of these illegal drugs. The matter was eventually dismissed for LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE(meaning it was BS). But along the way, I told Judge Karen Asphaug as I stood before her, “The charge and being forced to defend one’s self is the intended punishment” Our Government brings bogus charges against people to achieve its agenda because it knows the trauma, time and expense is punishment enough to scare people off or cow them into submission. Behind closed doors our government officials often laugh and think its funny to terrorize citizens. (Progressive Conditioning http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27)
Before the case against this writer was dismissed for being bogus, Judge Karen Asphaug ruled from the bench that the case should be heard by a Judge from a different jurisdiction as it involved Bailiff’s who work closely with Judges. This writer alleges that later Judge Karen Asphaug was instructed by former US MN AG and current MN Supreme Court POS Justice David “The Bag Man” Lillehaug (aka Killehaug) to cooperate in fixing the criminal case against this writer for political reasons and in furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy against this writer. Dakota County lined up 4 Bailiff’s/Sheriff’s Deputies to perjure themselves against this writer by saying he disrupted the Court and was guilty of “Disorderly Conduct”(while they believed no video existed). For months, the POS Prosecutor Dan Fluegel insisted all exculpatory video tape was destroyed. Only when this writer produced written correspondence from the Dakota County Sheriff’s Department confirming this writer demanded the video tape be retained within days of the incident, did some of the exculpatory video tape appear and the 4 Bailiff’s/Sheriff’s Deputies willing to perjure themselves slink away(Yet not fired or punished). Only this writer’s appeal to the Minnesota Appellate Court along with a copy of the Court transcript forced Judge Karen Asphaug to make sure a Judge from another jurisdiction was administratively assigned to this writer’s case. You can read more about that here: Don Mashak Notice of Claims to Dakota County MN 10_09_2015 (http://bit.ly/2aeZfgy) You can also learn how a Sheriff’s Deputy can “Blow someone’s face off and the Union will have him back on the job the next day”. So arrogant and above the law is Dakota County MN, that even though they are required by law to perform an investigation and provide a copy of the findings when a Notice of Claims is filed, they simply refused to comply. And apparently no government agency exists to force them to comply.
[With the topics we have covered in this article in mind, let us take a moment for this writer to acknowledge he sympathizes with the underlying causes of action pursued by “Black Lives Matter” (BLM). Though this writer does not agree with their methods, this writer has reached out to the “Black Lives Matter” Movement, offered them advice and asked them to join the Judicial TAR Movement. (http://bit.ly/29Ae8fH)]
So now, you understand why when Dakota County MN Courts and Judge Karen Asphaug are accused of departing from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion), this writer has special qualifications for assessing the validity of those allegations. Really, Judge Karen Asphaug, you are going to put a woman in jail for being forced to protect her children when the police and legal system failed her? Really Judge Karen Asphaug, you don’t think your oath of office requires you to do something regarding Judge David Knutson requiring Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s Lawyer to defend her client handcuffed to a wheel chair without notes or client her client present? When will you act to “avoid the appearance of impropriety”? Judge Karen Asphaug, there are so many other, “Really?” type posits, but in the end Judge Karen Asphaug, Is this what you really want to be known as?
Its up to you, Judge Karen Asphaug; HON or POS?
It is apparent from my one interaction with POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena, she is in the habit of flippantly lying and ignoring her oath of office and should never be known as HON.
In closing, as I believe that WE THE PEOPLE are in fact the equals of the arrogant Progressive POS’s [despite Progressive Educated Elite assertions to the contrary (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3)], I believe WE THE PEOPLE have the right to judge them for their failure to answer our questions and provide documents we request. And, I further assert WE THE PEOPLE have a right to view these refusals in the manner prescribed by the US Supreme Court.
The Finder of Fact (You and I) may presume that the failure of a person (POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena/Judge Karen Asphaug/Judge David Knutson) to answer questions and/or produce documents may be interpreted as an indication that their truthful responses would have been detrimental to their legal position.
POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena refused to answer my questions and lied, to prevent the Press from exercising its First Amendment Right of Freedom of the Press. This writer never got a chance to query Judge Karen Asphaug. Others have tried to query Judge David Knutson, unsuccessfully.
This writer gives POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena and Judge Karen Asphaug until 6pm CDT 28 JULY 2016 to respond to these allegations or summarily, WE THE PEOPLE may judge them to be accurate and true, in accordance with the rules the US Supreme Court that apply to anyone of WE THE PEOPLE when we appear before them.
Judge Karen Asphaug is aware of my contact information from her previous court related departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion).
My fellow Americans, this writer hopes this article helps you all in forming a truer Perspective of Reality that permits us, as equals, to unite together and make our Government once again accountable to WE THE PEOPLE. Millennials and GenX’rs, as I have promised you elsewhere, you now have a better handle on the true nature of our Government and Courts. Keep fighting the good fight!
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good [people] do nothing”
~ Edmund Burke
Government and Courts; Please take note, WE THE PEOPLE shall include lack of proper redress of our concerns in this matter, and our future Third Declaration of Causes (http://bit.ly/NewDOCRev1), in determining if and when it is appropriate for WE THE PEOPLE to withdraw our CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED.
This article was written by Don Mashak alone without seeking advice, direction or permission of anyone else. I alone am responsible for the content and publication of this article.
The Progressive Rag, the Minneapolis Star and Sickle, earlier this week wrote an article on the return of citizens to Police Review Committees. Apparently it was so controversial, they have made it extremely difficult to find online. Lets take a moment to work on creating a truer common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our Government and hold it accountable.
About the time of the American Revolution (1776), the Country’s Founders warned that government must be constructed with the nature of man in mind or it was doomed to failure.
John Locke summed up the nature of man as:
“being tolerance with a tendancy towards reason, but who can be selfish”
The Founders’ perception of the nature of man perhaps is best summed up in the Cato Letters:
“All People[men] have free will and are not virtuous by nature”
Thus our Founder’s constructed our government with “Checks and Balances, Transparency and Accountability”
Enter the Progressives, circa 1900.
Similar to how the “Left” accused the TEA Party Movement of being funded and the brainchild of the Koch Brothers, The Progressive Movement was actually the brainchild of the Wealthy. The Wealthy grew tired of government being transparent and accountable to the masses. The Media “MuckRakers” of the day, drove the Wealthy Trusts up the wall.
The wealthy trusts had the Progressive Movement promote the idea that:
“The Nature of Man is to be trustworthy and altruistic”
From this pile of manure came the idea that the Progressive educated elite, being trustworthy and altruistic, should be allowed to make decisions on behalf of the masses without accountability to the masses. (See also Social Darwinism)
This began a long trend of removing transparency and accountability to the masses in a wide variety of Government Agencies. The Police, Judges and Lawyers among them.
Of course, in much the same way a dam built on the premise that water runs up hill must fail, so must a government based on some other than actual human nature.
Without the transparency and accountability of citizen oversight, Law Enforcement across the country fell into systemic corruption. Its only human nature to protect those who you work with everyday, especially when one day you might need some “quid pro quo”. See the movies “The Untouchables”, “Lawless” and “Serpico” as evidence of this writer’s assertions.
With tensions rising and the two alleged major political parties using them for political purposes, American Law Enforcement has been forced to consider returning to a large presence of civilians to rebuild trust between Law Enforcement and the Civilian Community.
It just is Common Sense that average citizens, being outside, impartial “Finders of Fact” will most often find the actual truth, rather than cave to politically machinated results.
This writer would just ask you to never forget that it was the Progressives that removed the civilian oversight in the first place. And if the Founders were still around, they would be able to say, “We told you so.”
One last quick comment, shame on the American Main Stream Media not covering this in a color blind manner. And shame to the politicians that try to spin these events for political gain. In each of these events the the only possible results should be right, wrong and honest mistake/human error.
There are good and bad people in every group of people, regardless of what characteristics you use to define it. Once the honest and truthful determination of what happened is determined, the only way the event should be framed is in a colorblind manner of good people against bad people, and/or sadness for tragedy out of honest human error and a resolve to work to avoid future tragedy.
Nice speech last night. Take heart in allegations that portions of your speech were plagiarized. You are in good company. Thomas Jefferson was accused of plagiarizing John Locke in drafting the American Declaration of Independence, the most famous document in American History. In my estimation, this caused no significant nor lasting damage to his reputation. Nor will similar allegations have any lasting affect on you.
In my opinion, you plagiarized no one, the thoughts were your own. You were speaking to universal memes of American Culture. Memes of Natural Rights like self-ownership, self-determination and Individualism and traits of American rugged Individualism like self-sufficiency, self-reliance, tenacity and perseverance.
When Jefferson was confronted with the allegation of plagiarizing John Locke, he responded along these lines. There are only so many ways you can state certain absolute truths relating to Natural Rights and Natural Law. (Proof our Country & Constitution founded upon Natural Law http://bit.ly/1PbViKr) The English language is finite and if someone has succinctly well defined and explained a fundamental concept its likely a person approaching the same fundamental concept on their own with a fresh perspective will use some or many of the same English words as those who first broached the topic before.
Further, as a legal immigrant learning “English as a Second Language” (ESL) you may have a smaller working English vocabulary than someone who has a life time of speaking English as a first language. Brains tend to remember “concepts” not words, and convert concept to words to communicate to others. Without 13+ years of cultural immersion on American Memes in American schools, your brain drew upon words it knew and understood, and/or suggested to it by others, to express your thoughts. And experience I am pretty sure is common to all immigrants to America.
Still further, in some instances, its harder or “clunkier” to express universal truths and/or fundamental and/or seminal concepts in different words. Can you imagine the Declaration of Independence (http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/document/) without phrases like
“that all men are created equal…….certain unalienable rights, among these being life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”
Compare that with Locke’s
“that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.“.
(http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/497)
Or compare Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence (#DOI):
“long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism“
with Locke’s:
“long train of abuses, prevarications, and artifices, all tending the same way, make the design visible to the people, and they cannot but feel what they lie under, and see whither they are going, it is not to be wondered that they should then rouse themselves” (http://www.anesi.com/q0033.htm)
The Enlightenment (1650-1800AD), was an attempt to order the metaphysical nature of man. It attempted to do so in much the same way Sir Isaac Newton, and his scholarly contemporaries, attempted to make order out of the natural physical world during the European Renaissance(1300-1600AD). With that in mind, I like to summarize Jefferson’s explanation of the similarities of his writing in the Declaration of Independence to that of Locke’s in his 2nd Treatise of Civil Government with this analogy:
“There simply are a very limited number of ways you can state the Natural Law and absolute truth that the freezing point of pure water at sea level is 32F. Such also are the characteristics of certain unalienable Natural Rights.”
In my humble opinion, the memes of American culture you were discussing (self-ownership, self-determination, self-reliance, self-sufficiency, tenacity and perseverance), being themselves based in Natural Law and Natural Rights, share the same characteristic of having a limited number of ways and words which adequately and/or magnificently express them.
I believe the more important point to be made is that you, as immigrant to America, have embraced them and can express them in a manner all Americans can understand and appreciate. And we can further extrapolate that since you came to America as a legal immigrant speaking English as a 2nd language your knowledge of these American ideals and memes is largely attributable to those you chose to surround yourself, including and especially your husband Donald Trump and the Americans you two chose to surround yourselves with. Kudos!
“If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader”
~ John Adams
In my humble opinion you should stand proud in the company of Thomas Jefferson as two people who were merely trying to express their interpretations of various aspects of Natural Law, Natural Rights and American exceptionalism, but whose detractors chose to ungraciously ridicule and/or malign you. I would argue that your and Jefferson detractors should have instead celebrated the aspects of Natural Law, Natural Rights and American Exceptionalism for which you were both expressing your understanding, love and admiration.
This was the object of the Declaration of Independence. Not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before;but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take. Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing,it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion.
Thomas Jefferson
Letter to Henry Lee
May 8, 1825
It is unfortunate that your detractors chose to divide the country with their criticism for their own personal gain, rather than unite the country and make America Great Again by joining you in your celebration of Natural Law, Natural Rights and American Exceptionalism. In my humble opinion, there are too many people placing their own selfish personal gain above the best’s interests of our county.
Oh No, Did I just Plagiarize JFK?
“And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.”
~ John F. Kennedy 1961
Good luck with the election.
I think you would make a great First Lady.
Psst, tell you husband I need clarification and more details of his vision before I can switch from being a “Against Killary” voter to a “For Trump” voter.
This article was originally published on Examiner.com on July 3, 2013. (see original print graphic at end of article) This writer’s entire column on Examiner.com was CENSORED within 24-48 hours of this writer submitting a credible petition on 11/06/2015 to the Minnesota Supreme Court to Remove a Minnesota District Court Judge from the bench for conspiring to perpetrate a fraud upon the Court.(An additional almost 200 blogs of this writer have been censored since 2012) The Minnesota Establishment has also taken other unlawful and unconstitutional punitive actions against this writer. I put it to you that your government is trying to erase your knowledge of Natural Law and Natural Rights to make you less able to resist their attempts at enslaving you. This writer leaves it to reader to deduce for themselves who wanted these articles CENSORED, and why the US Government wants this writer silenced.
As the day of this Country’s 237th Anniversary of our Declaration of Independence approaches, let us take this opportunity to revisit and discuss the events and circumstances that inspired the subjects of the American Colonies to revolt and declare independence from King George of England.
This won’t be the same old, dull rehash of the enumerated list of grievances the colonists had petitioned King George for relief from and were denied. You know that list from primary and secondary school: the King’s failure to enact laws necessary for the fair and proper governing of the colonies, the King’s failure to listen to and act upon the Colonists Petitions for Redress of Grievances, the King’s punishment and reprisal of those involved in said Petitions, the King’s failure to provide the colonies with adequate protection from external invasion and internal strife, No Due Process and the King’s failure to establish a Colonial Judiciary and his refusal to abide by the Rule of Law, the King forcing American Colonists to quarter large numbers of military troops and failing to adequately supervise them, his cutting off the Colonist’s trade with the rest of the world and inflicting other economic unfairness, taxation without representation, unreasonable searches and seizures and restrictions on free speech, free press and freedom of assembly [(and a host of other grievances). You can view the entire list by reading the Declaration of Independence [http://goo.gl/buq6I]
While these individual trespasses, that partially explain what happened on the 4th of July, 1776, are important to acknowledge, focusing on them obscures the bigger picture of a series philosophical epiphanies, enlightenments and events that would alter the future trajectory of humankind. While you watch fireworks this 4th of July, ponder this: The American Revolution was an intellectual revolution as much as it was a military revolution. The entire oppressive, overwhelming, all consuming Socio-economic-political status quo of the Old World was overthrown and cast off.
The new Socio-economic-political paradigm that replaced the old status quo resulted in the tremendous expansion of individual freedom and liberty as well as great improvement in the quality of life for each individual. On the 4th of July, 1776, 13 American colonies had trembled at the thought of declaring independence from what was then the greatest power in the world. However, these enhancements to the lives of every individual under the new American Socio-Economic-Political Perspective of Reality allowed the 13 American colonies to rise 170 years later as the greatest socio-economic-military power on earth.
The American Declaration of Independence on the 4th of July, 1776 was not just a Declaration of Independence from King George of England. It was also a Declaration of Independence by every American Colonial Subject from King George’s Perspective of Reality on the Nature of Mankind and the proper relationship of the between government and the governed.
“Huh? What the heck is he talking about?”, you are thinking to yourself. Relax and get ready to enjoy the wild ride adventure that led to our American Declaration of Independence and the formation of a new country. A country made up of former subjects, now self proclaimed citizens acting with their own Self-Determination. And, within a newly realized Perspective of Reality regarding the Nature of Mankind and the proper relationship between government and the governed.
This wild ride begins by recalling the fall of the Roman Empire and the descent of the Western World into the “Dark Ages”. Out of the political and economic chaos of the Dark Ages arose a Socio-Economic-Political system known as Feudalism [http://goo.gl/QqbHt] and the institutionalization of a Governance Doctrine known as the “Divine Right of Kings” [http://goo.gl/BHJHt].
The Governance Doctrine of the “Divine Right of Kings” meant that the King/Queen/Head of State (hereafter “King”) was a God or the representative of God here on earth. As such, no earthly being had the right to challenge the King’s authority or decisions, as they were a god or divinely inspired. Quite simply, the King was never wrong. Your parents may have declared to you, “My roof, My rules”, but King’s essentially declared, “My Country, My rules.”
Further, the King owned all the Land. No Person could be upon the King’s Land without the permission of the King or his representatives. No person on the King’s land had any rights, instead they had permissions and privileges; The King’s Permission (and privileges as he so desired). And the King’s permission (and privileges granted), including the permission to simply be on his land, could be revoked at the Kings discretion (whim). And that is why such persons are called subjects (as we shall more dramatically demonstrate later in this good read).
The King allowed certain persons the privilege to manage portions of his lands. These persons had a wide variety of titles, but for our purposes we will just refer to them as “Nobles”, “Lords” or “Aristocrats”. In exchange for being given the privilege to “manage” a portion of the King’s land, the Nobles were required to supply the King with Tax money and soldiers for the King’s Army. In turn, the Nobles collected taxes from anyone who lived upon the land the King had granted to the Noble and paid the King his required portion. And, when necessary the Noble pressed into military service some the subjects, when insufficient volunteers could be found to meet the Kings requirements for soldiers.
And with that foundation laid, the writer entices you to read onward with this teaser. Perhaps you did not notice this writers phrasing of the first paragraph of this writing:
“…that inspired the subjects of the American Colonies to revolt and declare independence from King George of England.”
It is impossible to fully grasp the perspective of reality of a person living under feudalism and the “Divine Right of Kings”. However, to more fully appreciate the scope of change the American Revolution represents, it is important that you try to intimately understand the “Perspective of Reality” of a “subject”. That is to say, a person living under the Socio-Political Governance Doctrine of the “Divine Right of Kings” and the Socio-Economic System of Feudalism. To do so, this writer asks you to participate in the following exercise.
To avoid unnecessarily offending any particular Nationality, you are going to envision yourself as the subject of an unnamed Country whose rules are an amalgamation of the written and unwritten rules that existed in the many countries of Old World Europe and the American Colonies during the Renaissance (1300-1700AD)[Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1492 (AD “discovers islands near America) [http://goo.gl/LSf05] This exercise requires you to “inhabit and visualize the internal pressures, restrictions and constraints subjects living under the Government Doctrine of the “Divine Right of Kings” would have had to place upon themselves at all times in order to survive and avoid consequences”. (For the younger among you, think of this like setting up your character for a computer role-playing game. Your goal here is to survive.) Are you ready to start?
OK? First add each of the following rules to your Feudal Subject Perspective of Reality:
The King’s power is absolute. It cannot be questioned or overturned;
Only the King can own land, you can’t.
You have no rights, You have only the permissions and privileges from the King and/or the King’s designated privileged representatives (Noble or Lord);
It is by the King’s ultimate permission alone that you can do anything in or upon the King’s land, even simply walk. Your family and your friends also are allowed to be on the King’s land only by permission of the King and/or his designated representatives;
You can use some of the King’s land with the kings permission, but only as long as you pay the homage and taxes the king demands to the King and/or his designated representatives;
By the King’s word alone, you, your family and your friends can be thrown off the land upon which you reside and even out of the Country(or worse);
The King is the final arbitrator of justice. The king can search the place where you reside and/or work anytime. The King can detain and/or imprison you anytime. If the King says you are guilty, you are guilty. If the King wants to punish your family and or friends for your crime, they are punished. If the King commands your torture, you are tortured. If the King sentences you to death, you die. There is no Due Process of Law(even more so if you are a serf and not a freeman afforded justice through the “Law of the Land”;
The King can establish a religion and make the practice of any other religion a crime. The King can let a religion punish any person for anything a church calls heresy;
The Printing Press (1439AD) [http://goo.gl/FAIpQ] [http://goo.gl/4amhR] has not been yet been introduced into the Western World, or at least there are not enough of them to have any great impact on society yet. At this time, almost no one goes to school and more than half the population is totally or functionally illiterate. All of your knowledge comes to you from persons with wealth and time to provide you whatever knowledge they care to provide you. And this boils down to the Church, the King and the King’s loyal, privileged Aristocrats and Nobles. If somehow you learn information or form ideas contrary to the beliefs and positions of the Church and/or the King and dare to speak them out loud, you may be charged with treason or heresy. And therefore, the King, the Church, the Nobles and the Aristocrats provide almost all of the information which forms your personal perspective of reality. And this collective Aristocracy only gives you information which ensures the continuity of the status quo.
Now add to this that you and your family are living on the edge of survival. Missing one day’s wages can mean death. You do not have the resources and/or wherewithal to survive moving from here to someplace else within the country, let alone to another country. Being forced to leave where you currently reside will result in great hardship which you and your family may, or may not, survive. And the Black Plague is still strikes fear in the population.
Now that you have immersed yourself in your role as a “Subject” Perspective of Reality, let us take it out for a test drive. Wake up!
Ok, you have just woken up and are setting on the edge of your straw filled mattress… What else would it be filled with, you’re the town thatcher. You fix the lower middle class folk’s flats and huts that have thatched roofs made of straw and mud (or worse). As you sit there, you reflect on your life. You thank God you were born a freeman and not a serf. [In your country’s recent history, 60% of the population were serfs. Serfs were “peasants legally bound to the land. Serfs had to provide labor services, pay rents and be subject to the lord’s control.” – essentially slaves. (http://goo.gl/EGBr4)]
You have your own luxurious 2 room flat/hut. ( no running water, sanitation or refrigeration mind you) You are one lucky man [Sorry, you have to be a man – if you are a woman living in these times statistically you would likely be doing whatever your father or the man who paid the largest dowry for your hand in marriage wanted you to do [At this point in time the invention of the Western Notion of Romantic Love born of the French Troubadours (@1250AD) applies only for aristocratic women and was not practiced in the same way then as it traditionally supposed to be practiced today]
You are a skilled laborer; instead of an oaf or serf bound to the land and only qualified to work as unskilled labor at much lower wages. You are a thatcher because your dad was a thatcher. As a skilled thatcher you make a far better living than a serf or an oaf. Another thatcher tried to move into town but the Sheriff urged him out of town at the Noble’s direction. You are a thatcher because both you and your father have always demonstrated loyalty and respect toward the king and the Noble upon whose land you live and work (and paid your taxes).
You have a wife (who you purchased with a very small dowry) Her appearance is commensurate with your small dowry. She was also was born into the lower class. You have 3 children – 2 boys ages 14 and 5 and a daughter age 13. You would have 6 children, but 3 died of disease before the age of 5 despite the Noble guaranteeing the doctor’s fees. [You are living towards the end of the Renaissance (1300-1699AD) http://goo.gl/q0tKI. It is important to remember that during your lifetime, children of your socio-economic status are considered adults at age 14 (except during the 16th century children did not become adults until their father’s went before a Judge and had them declared adults). [http://goo.gl/nko7U]
You are thankful to your God because the Church, King and Nobles tell you to be. You know the earth is the center of the Universe and that the Sun revolves around the Earth because the Church tells you so. You go to that Church because the King and Nobles tell you to. You know the king is the representative of your God here on earth because the Church, King and Nobles tell you so.
You have all that you have because you know all the written and unwritten rules to obey in order to not have some or all your permissions and/or privileges from your King and your Noble terminated.
What follows is your list of activities for the day. Along the way, you will encounter some “Termination of Permissions/Privileges” Landmines. You must navigate around these landmines to maintain your family’s standard of living and quality of life:
Now that you are awake and your wife and children have served you breakfast. Afterwards you instruct your wife to tend the garden and then to take your daughter and youngest son out to the forest to pick berries to supplement the family’s diet. You do not worry for their safety, because everyone relies upon your trade and they know you are in good standing with the Nobles. Strangers can’t freely come to your area because the Sheriff is enforcing a quarantine as a result of nearby out break of the Black Plague.
You and your oldest son (almost a man himself) are off to your first job of the day. Your son has already loaded your tools and materials on your cart and is ready pull it to your destination.
You tell your son to take the most direct route to the job as you are going to go a couple blocks out of the way to drop off taxes at the Sheriff’s office. (Without your son, you would be pulling the cart yourself.)
At the Sheriff’s office you pay what you can and ask if you can pay 2 chickens to make up the difference. You explain it has been a particularly dry summer with much fewer calls for roof repair. The Sheriff agrees. However, the Sheriff also informs you taxes are going up next month to fund the King’s new war. The Sheriff also warns you that your jealous neighbors have started a rumor that your wife is a witch. Not to worry though; as you are a good, loyal subject the Noble assures you he will see to it the rumors are nipped in the bud.
You rush back to catch up with your oldest son before he reaches the first job. You must catch up to him before your son reaches the job because these folks live next to the Noble’s castle. They are complaining about the repair job your son previously did on his own.
You catch up to your son. He has stopped to flirt with the fruit and vegetable girl. You weigh the pros and cons of that relationship and then you disapprovingly interrupt them. You need to get your son’s botched thatch repair inspected and fixed before a rumor starts and your good reputation is destroyed.
As you continue, your son complains he does not want to be a thatcher; he wants to be a Knight and compete in jousting tournaments. You weigh the pros and the cons, and then tell him it simply is not in his stars. [A Knights Tale http://goo.gl/9fgfg](In your mind you determine that his slight build due to malnutrition, makes wasting a favor from the noble for a dream your son is not well suited for, imprudent)
Your son then mentions to you that the 14 year old daughter of the Noble flirted with him while he was performing the botched repair. In your son’s wild, unbridled naïve exuberance of youth, he speculates that the two might marry allowing him to study and train to be a Knight or even a Noble. Knowing the precarious position this encounter exposes your permissions and privileges to, you scold your son to know his place in the world and never speak to the Noble’s daughter again. You tell him the whole thing was just his imagination. Nobles do not marry commoners, period! You are horrified by the thought of your son being caught having sex with the Noble’s daughter. With the monumental consequences of this landmine in mind you bark at your son, “Do you understand? Tell me you understand the consequences and will have nothing further to do with the Noble’s daughter!” Your son nods yes with that reluctant look of defiance teenage boys emote so well.
You arrive at the job. You greet the home dweller’s wife and ask her to apologize to her husband on your behalf for your son’s lack of craftsmanship. But, you explain, “It’s the only way he will learn”. You and your son climb on the roof and inspect the repair. It’s certainly not as good as one of your own, but it got the job done. You go through the motions of re-repair anyhow for appearances sake. You scold your son in front of the home dweller’s wife again for appearances sake. The home dweller’s wife feels guilty and admits she complained at the Noble’s daughter’s request and with some small compensation. She explains that the Noble’s daughter wanted to see your son again. You spy the Noble’s daughter hiding around a nearby corner. Your son does not see her or pretends not to see her. You and your son leave for your next job.
A short distance away, you run into the Noble riding horseback. After the initial greetings, the noble invites you to lunch with him at a nearby shop. You send your son with the cart ahead and onto the next job. You offer apologies and try to excuse yourself with pressing job demands and inability to pay. The Noble insists and says “my treat”. You know you can’t refuse without risking your permissions and privileges. And off to the local coffee house you go. Over lunch, the Noble informs you that his people advise him that you handled the situation between your son and his daughter to his great satisfaction. The fact that you know, not only your place, but also your son’s place, pleases him greatly. Further, the Noble advises you that the King needs more men for his war. He advises you that he was going to suggest to you that your son might make a good pike-man in the King’s army. However, in light of how you handled this young love situation, he has reconsidered. He notes that as you are getting older, you will come to rely on your son more and more to assist you in your profession. (A none to subtle hint as to part of what will happen should your son forget his place again) Next, in what the Noble intends as good news, the Noble asks what dowry amount you were asking for your daughter. He indicates that the Sheriff’s son has taken an interest in her. Flabbergasted, you reply that you don’t know what a proper amount would be and ask the Noble his advice. (All the while, you feel your 13 year old daughter is too young for such talk but feel trapped by the implied consequences of refusing or not skillfully maneuvering yourself out of the implicit command. Bulkier dresses, no more hair ribbons and more time in church for her you think to yourself) The Noble’s 1st response is, “Wouldn’t it be nice to have an ox or a mule to pull around that cart of yours?” Yet, as you have proven your loyalty to the Noble, he does not press the matter. You thank the Noble for lunch and part on good terms. One Landmine avoided but one still smoldering.
You hurry to catch up with your son, afraid that he is not thinking with his head and has forgotten his place. (No need to worry though; unknown to you the Noble has already had his people pick up his daughter and take her to the local Nun Cloister)
On the way to catch up with your son, you hear the Town Crier announcing the general tax increase, the call for volunteers for the King’s Army, and the new tax and a permit required to hunt deer, trap rabbits and/or pick berry’s in the King’s forest;
You are happy to find that your son has stopped half way up the hill to the next job to rest and not gotten into mischief. You are glad that the steep hill has sapped his energy and dampened his ardor. You help him pull the cart to the top of the hill while thinking to yourself how hard it would be to do this every day by yourself (and how nice it would be to have an ox or a mule). You also think to yourself how lucky you are that the Noble did not force your oldest son to join the king’s army.
You arrive at and finish your second job without much problem. And also your third and fourth job of the day.
Despite how tired you are, you decide you are going to stop by the church to make a contribution, thank God for your good fortune, ask the priest for advice about your son and your daughter and to have the priest talk to your son about his lustful urges and knowing his place in the world.
Outside the Church a group is discussing the fate that awaits some fool by the name of Galileo (1633AD) [http://goo.gl/7hsNr]. The fool is under house arrest for teaching the heretical and ridiculous notion that the Earth is not the Center of the Universe and the Earth revolves around the sun. “Pure heresy” you think to yourself, “If this guy was a nameless commoner they would just draw and quarter him”. Another person commnets, “Kepler got off easy. The Catholic church only made that Protestant bastard keep moving from place to place” for asserting a similar heresy. Meanwhile, someone continues, “Even if you accept his ludicrous proposition, after Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake in Rome (1600AD) [http://goo.gl/HPdKf], only a fool or an idiot would persist”. Everyone agrees that the heretic deserves such a fate for his blasphemy. You scuttle by to avoid the conversation so you won’t have to assess its potential as permission termination landmine. But as you make your way to the Church door you wonder, “Did those men really believe what they were saying or were they hoping to maintain their permissions and/or privileges and/or gain favor by siding with the ruling class position?”;
Inside the Church you make sure a priest sees you make your tithing [(donation) http://goo.gl/OYNOm]. You send your son off to pray while you go speak to the priest about your concerns. The priest says he will talk to your daughter after Sunday Mass but will speak to your son now. He will also make the appropriate inquiries about the situation with your daughter. The priest suggests your daughter could become a nun and join the cloister to avoid the situation, if necessary. But on the other hand, he continues, would it be so bad to be father in law to the Sheriff’s son? While the priest talks to your son, you pray. You thank God for your good fortune, ask for divine guidance in matters of your son and daughter and dare to pray for more rain (so more roofs will need repair).
You leave the church, with your now sullen son. He does not want to speak about his conversation with the priest;
Outside you overhear a group of people talking about the Sheriff running someone out of town. Someone who lived near the Noble’s castle. You see a familiar face. You ask who got run out of town and learn it was the family who claimed your son botched the roof repair so the Noble’s daughter could see your son again. (You recoil at the thought of that particular permissions terminating landmine.)
The group turns to the topic of the King’s new taxes. (You think to yourself, “This is just the reason I don’t join group discussions – This discussion is definitely a Permissions Terminating landmine – Must make excuse to abruptly leave”) Your son starts to speak but you sternly interrupt and send your son home, instructing him to tell your wife you will be home shortly. Meanwhile, from within the group you hear, “Tomorrow, a group known as the “Men of Letter’s” [http://goo.gl/PDGZd] [http://goo.gl/KyNMN] is meeting with the local debating club at the local coffeehouse to discuss the King’s new taxes. (You think to yourself, “Note to self – No Coffeehouse tomorrow – Are these folks all mad? Do they not realize the permissions/privileges termination landmine attending this debate will be?) You announce you must leave because you don’t want to eat your wife’s cooking cold. And then make your exit.
You get home only to find your wife tear-stained and supper not ready. Your wife explains that she and your children just got home a little while ago. They were jailed for picking berries without a permit. Your eldest son interjects that the King is a jerk for raising taxes and tyrant for taxing the natural bounty of the forest. You sternly and forcefully admonish your son to never speak ill of the King again. Your submissive wife, knowing her place, has held her tongue during your tirade against the words of your eldest son. When it seems appropriate, your wife continues. “When the Sheriff came in, he asked his deputies why they had locked us up. When the Sheriff learned I was the thatcher’s wife and these were your children, he flew into a rage and immediately released us. Then the Sheriff made his deputies apologize to all of us. And then he told the Deputies that for any infraction, short of murder, treason or Court order, we were to be allowed to go home while they immediately informed him of the situation. The Sheriff told us he knew the lack of rain had been bad for your business. He told me we could pick berries without a permit until the end of the month, but then even he had to submit to the will of the King and the Nobles.” Your wife continues by admiringly saying, “Husband, I had no idea what a powerful and respected man you are. This entire family and I are lucky to have you as father and husband. Our eldest son can learn from your manly example. I will get a meal on the table just as quick as possible.” “If she knew the truth…” you think to yourself, ”Does a real man let himself be treated like this ?”(but then again, how do you even know there is any different possible reality).
Before supper, you wife says the blessing. She thanks God for the great man and provider you are. During supper you inform your family that no one is to go near the coffee house tomorrow. You regale them with the Noble having bought you lunch today which further enhances your image to them. (Even if their image of you is based on a flawed perception of reality, you still enjoy the feeling.) You edit the conversation greatly. You tell the family the King is looking for Pikeman for his army, in the most discouraging, but not Permission and/or Privilege terminating, way possible. You do not mention the issue of the Sheriff’s son being interested in your daughter because you are waiting to hear back from the Priest. You announce that next Sunday you all will be attending church in your best clothes.
With the Children in bed, you and your wife go to bed. You reject your wife’s amorous overtures motivated by her false perception of your manliness. Today’s hard work and difficult maneuvering through the permissions and privileges terminating minefield has left you exhausted. As you lie in bed, you thank god for the permissions and privileges terminating landmines he helped you to avoid today. But you are tormented by those landmines left smoldering from today and the new landmines you will face tomorrow. You know the precarious reality in which you live. At the King’s, the Noble’s or the Sheriff’s whim, all that you and your family have could be gone. It is with this depressing, distressing Perception of Reality that you fall in to a restless, fitful sleep. “But at least you are a free man”, you console yourself.
Your are awakened by the nightmare of your family being run out of town by the Sheriff. You roll over and spoon cuddle with your wife. And you try to go back to sleep. All the while the truth gnaws at you, “My family sees me as a great and powerful man; How pitiful they do not know my true plight. I can only hope that they never find out that their Perception of Reality of me as a great and powerful man is simply false. It is built upon my pathetic total submissiveness to the King, the Noble, the Sheriff and the rest of the powers that be in this apparently godforsaken country.”
But wait, you cannot have such thoughts because you are unaware that any other form of existence exists. All you know is what the King, the Noble, the Sheriff and the Town Crier tell you… Strike all that enlightened thinking… You have no way of knowing there can be any other Perspective of Reality. You King tells you it is his law and Your Church tells you “It is God’s will”. And with all of your sources of information are controlled by your king or your church, you only know the Perspective of Reality they want you to know.
So instead of thinking of yourself as a pitiful, submissive man you just thank God you are a freeman and a serf or an oaf. You are a lucky man doing the best you can in world of God’s design… You are just happy to be a free man.
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than they who falsely believe they are free”
Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe
Now that we are done with the exercise, “How fun was that?” For you younger folks who viewed this as computer role playing game, how did you like playing the role of a “subject” Is this writer correct in presuming that “subject” character and the choices this “subject” was faced with character weren’t very fun nor exciting? And you were only imagining it, imagine living it. And you only know how enslaved the thatcher subject character was because you have been exposed to the American Perception of Reality based on…. Wait, hold that thought for a while.
WHAT DID YOU LEARN FROM THE “SUBJECT” ROLE PLAY EXERCISE?
With this immersion in the life of a subject through this exercise, you now have an inkling of what it was to be a Subject living under the Governance Doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings. Similarly, you know what a bleak, repressed, restrained, constrained, forlorn, hopeless, resigned, frustrated happiness-stifling Perception of Reality Subjects operated under within such governance doctrine.
Under the Governance Doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings, subjects had little or no control over their own lives:
You had no rights – You had only permissions and privileges that could be revoked upon the whim of the King and/or his privileged Nobles;
There was no right to be “Secure in your person”.
You had no control over your personal destiny. Your social class at birth would most likely be your social class at death; Your occupation would likely be that of your father, if the King and his Noble’s permitted it;
Justice was often arbitrary. Injustice and/or amoral government acts were given the appearance of legitimacy as institutionalized and government sanctioned acts;
There was little freedom of thought. You only knew what the King, Aristocrats and the Church wanted you to know. And any belief or idea that was not sanctioned by the King and/or Church that you dared to utter, or put in writing, was subject to brutal reprisal and/or punishment;
There was no free speech nor freedom of assembly;
There was no government transparency nor accountability;
There was no freedom of Religion;
Your standard of living and quality of life were contingent on your perceived absolute loyalty to the King and his representatives;
And if you were a woman, for most the situation was far worse.
This was the Perception of Reality that inhabited the minds of the American colonist until a relatively short while before they Declared Independence from the King of England. And it is the ability of the American’s colonist to overcome this oppressive Perception of Reality that makes the American Declaration of Independence far more amazing and earth shattering than the mere military fight for Independence that ensued.
And this is where the wild ride to the 4th of July, 1776 really begins. How did the Revolutionary American Colonist overcome this depressing, repressive Divine Right of Kings Perspective of Reality? How did they dare to cast off the only Governance Doctrine they had ever known? How did they create and reduce to writing a Governance Doctrine wholly different from the only one they had ever lived under? How did they cast off a System of Permissions and replace it with a System of Natural Law with individuals having “certain unalienable rights”? How did the Revolutionary American Colonist become the first British Colony to Declare Independence and successfully cast of British rule [http://goo.gl/jchhS]? These points were the “intellectual fireworks” that marked America’s Declaration of Independence on the 4th of July, 1776.
We have already listed and/or referenced the many common complaints of the American colonists in 1776. But now you are about to hear, the rest of the story….
TO CONTINUE READING: Sometime tomorrow a link to part two will appear
If you want to make sure you don’t miss part 2, why don’t you subscribe for free to this writer by email?
If you enjoyed this article, please share it with others. Parents, if this article has enlightened you or has began to inspire a new perception of reality in you, why not share it with your children. Teachers, for the same reasons, why don’t you share this article with your students?
While you are watching the fireworks this 4th of July, why don’t you tell your relatives, friends and neighbors about any change in your perspective of reality that this article may have caused.
(Yes Editor – This writer is exercising his liberty to tell you an article can be both newsworthy and evergreen)
Those were my thoughts.
In Closing:
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
If you seek original thought, read me; If you want the same old, tired false left/right alleged 2 different major political party paradigm propaganda and dogma, read someone else.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph, Declaration of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
The Conundrum: WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy, while our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny.
Critical Thinking Notice – This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author… unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.
This writer’s followers on Twitter and other Social Media are familiar with his intention of uniting rank and file Americans under one common Perspective of Reality. A Perspective of reality far truer than the false Perspective of Reality promoted through the divisive propaganda of the Main Stream Media and the two faux major political parties. With this article, this writer intends to build upon creating that truer, common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our government and hold our government officials accountable for their departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) and betrayals of the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE.
Now, lets revisit the various acts of departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) that have been alleged, in a simple, non-legal gibberish way so the average American can understand it. (See also 
The Progressive Rag, the Minneapolis Star and Sickle, earlier this week wrote an article on the return of citizens to Police Review Committees. Apparently it was so controversial, they have made it extremely difficult to find online. Lets take a moment to work on creating a truer common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our Government and hold it accountable.
Hello Melania Trump:
This article was originally published on Examiner.com on July 3, 2013. (see original print graphic at end of article) This writer’s entire column on Examiner.com was CENSORED within 24-48 hours of this writer submitting a credible petition on 11/06/2015 to the Minnesota Supreme Court to Remove a Minnesota District Court Judge from the bench for conspiring to perpetrate a fraud upon the Court.(An additional almost 200 blogs of this writer have been censored since 2012) The Minnesota Establishment has also taken other unlawful and unconstitutional punitive actions against this writer. I put it to you that your government is trying to erase your knowledge of Natural Law and Natural Rights to make you less able to resist their attempts at enslaving you. This writer leaves it to reader to deduce for themselves who wanted these articles CENSORED, and why the US Government wants this writer silenced.
Don Mashak's Hennepin County MN Free Press News 