Resolving Cases ‘On The Merits’, Revisited & Resolución de Casos ‘Sobre el Fondo’, Revisada

* PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH <> CHINESE BELOW THE SPANISH
* APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS
*备忘录后显示纯文本 <> 西班牙语之下的中文
* TEXT VERSION MAY BE LONGER THAN MEME VERSION <>
LA VERSIÓN DE TEXTO PUEDE SER MÁS LARGA QUE LA VERSIÓN MEME
文本版本可能比MEME版本更长

Read full reference JAY TIDMARSH’s Denver University Law Review article by Clicking
here “RESOLVING CASES “ON THE MERITS”

Resolving Cases ‘On The Merits’, Revisited

first posted on Social Media as follows in this meme:

Resolving Cases ‘On The Merits’, Revisited

DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW

Our modern [Judicial] procedural system was built largely on the foundations of Roscoe Pound’s vision.3 That vision, which was first implemented in the Federal Equity Rules in 1912 and then even more fully embraced in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938

3. See Jay Tidmarsh, Pound’s Century, and Ours, 81 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 513, 513 (2006)

407

Roscoe Pound, Harvard Law Dean 1916-1936

(Roscoe) “Pound Principle” of Jurisprudence

The fundamental reason for the endurance of Pound’s paradigm is its elegant simplicity: it promises to resolve each claim and each issue on its factual and legal merit, without letting procedural technicalities or traps derail the decision. No other vision—for instance, “decide claims by the most efficient means”—captures this most basic aspiration of an ideal civil justice system. Like any aspiration, resolving cases “on the merits” is never perfectly achievable.6 Nevertheless, this paradigm has continued to battle all other policy objectives—such as achieving efficiency, fostering settlements, preventing jury confusion, and balancing party control against active judicial management—in debates over the architecture of our procedural rules.

    When the Social Darwinists (1870s) rebranded as Progressives in the US (1890s), they began an unconventional revolution by slow, covert infiltration. As evinced here, Progressive Elite Judges have been working to slowly change the rules to allow them to more easily fix case outcomes, while still appearing to be acting in the best interest of the masses and our country. Resolving Cases on Technicalities, Summary Judgement and/or Administrative Courts, makes it easier to fix cases and removes the uncertainty of having juries comprised of the allegedly ignorant masses, as part of the process.

Most of the efforts at procedural reform in the past thirty years have been attempts to walk away from, or tamp down the consequences of, Pound’s belief in a simple, uniform, discretionary, “decide each case on its merits” approach to legal procedure.5Although these efforts can loosely be associated with a law-and-economics perspective (in the sense that they are all attempts to rein in perceived excess costs in the present litigation system), it is fair to say that, while we are in the process of rejecting Pound’s paradigm, we have yet to come up with a paradigm to replace it.

408

In this instance, our traitor Progressive Judiciary argues for Court matters to be resolved by Judges on technicality for efficiency; rather than on Merit by Juries comprised of our peers. The pretext for this change being Economics (saving money). (Let me be clear, by technicality violation my interests is in violations of court rules and procedures in civil matters, not violations of constitutional rights in criminal matters.)  But, in removing Merit to resolve court matters, Progressive Judges ignore the individuals unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights to Due Process and a Jury Trial. (Apparently, Progressive Judges need a remedial course on what “Unalienable” means.) Progressive Elites have a history of advancing their evil, unconstitutional agenda by making it appear they are acting in the best interests of the masses. [e.g., The Minimum wage was originally conceived as an instrument of Racism. Progressive Elites reasoned that the less productive immigrants, minorities and women would be priced out of the labor market. Progressive Elites sincerely believed only White Men could produce value in excess of the higher Minimum wage. (Page 140, Chapters 5, 7-10, “Illiberal Reformers”, 2016, Thomas Leonard.). Eventually, business would choose to only hire White Men of their own accord, for this reason.]

Most of this thinking flows from the Progressive Elite’s assertions of alleged superiority over the masses (Pages 51-52, Ibid.) Some, but NOT all of the other unconstitutional things Progressive Elites believe, include that the concept of Rights of the Individual is “nonsense” (Page 25, Ibid.), the masses are too ignorant to govern themselves (Pg. 52,) and that the Constitution’s Checks and Balances are outdated and should be ignored (Page 66, Ibid.).

Under Progressive Democratic President Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921), the Progressives created a 4th Branch of Government. This Administrative State was created to spearhead the mostly unconstitutional Progressive Agenda, and to reduce government accountability to the masses by being inserted between WE THE PEOPLE and the original 3 Branches of Government. At the point where Progressive Elites took actions to make their unconstitutional thoughts a reality, their actions became Sedition (US 18 Code 2384), Insurrection (US 18 Code 2383) and TREASON (USC Article III, Section 3; & US 18 Code 2381).

Which brings us to the matter of Election Fraud 2020. As we have demonstrated, the Progressive Globalist Insurgency began in earnest circa 1913. As we introduced earlier, the Progressive Globalists premeditated plan was to overthrow our government via nontraditional revolution by slow, covert infiltration over generations so no one generation would notice enough change to resist, revolt or mount a counter-revolution. More than 100 years later, the Progressive Globalist Insurgency assessed that it had infiltrated enough key government positions and consolidated enough power that it could successfully rig an election without WE THE PEOPLE noticing, or at least NOT noticing enough to mount a counter-revolution. And this is how this final, conclusive grab for power has so far played out

The matter of Election Fraud 2020, was decided in an unconstitutional manner, without Due Process nor a Jury, in violation of each SCOTUS Judges’ oath to support and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Election Fraud 2020 was wrongfully resolved on Technicality rather than the Merits. And, the appearance that this was “lawful” was only made possible by decades of premeditated, duplicitous, criminal change to the Court Rules and Case Law to make such a decision seem “legal”. This premeditated, duplicitous slow change in Court Rules and Case Law replaced the “Rule of Law” with Progressive “Rule of Man” and “Might Makes Right”. These changes further evince the case that the US Supreme Court’s failure to hear Election Fraud 2020 matters was/were/are acts of Conspiracy Against Rights (US 18 Code 241), Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (US 18 Code 241), Sedition (US 18 Code 2384), Rebellion and Insurrection (US 18 Code 2383) and TREASON (USC Article III, Section 3; & US 18 Code 2381).

TO WIT, WE THE PEOPLE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF AN UNCONVENTIONAL REVOLUTION BY SLOW, COVERT INFILTRATION BY THE PROGRESSIVE GLOBALIST INSURGENCY THAT HAS WENT ON FOR MORE THAN 100 YEARS. BY THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED HERE, WE HAVE PROVEN OUR JUDICIARY HAS AIDED AND ABETTED SAID INSURGENCY.     

Prove me wrong!

AT THE SAME TIME, PER THE ROADMAP FOR DEALING WITH TYRANNY PROVIDED TO US BY OUR FOUNDERS, WE THE PEOPLE MUST DOCUMENT EXHAUSTING OUR PEACEFUL REMEDIES BEFORE CONTEMPLATING ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES! I ASSERT THAT THE FRAUD OF ELECTION 2020 AND THE FAILURE OF GOVERNMENT AND THE COURTS TO PROPERLY REDRESS THE PROBLEMS WITH ELECTION 2020 DEMONSTRATED THAT ELECTIONS AS A PEACEFUL REMEDY HAVE BEEN LOST TO WE THE PEOPLE. STILL, WE MUST CONTINUE DOCUMENTING ALL REMAINING PEACEFUL REMEDIES BEORE WE CONTEMPLATE IMPLEMENTING ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES. SOME OTHER REMAINING PEACEFUL REMEDIES ARE “CITIZEN GRAND JURIES” AND A NEW DECLARATION OF CAUSES” AS THE FOUNDER’S DID 6JUL1775. (An example of what that might look like appears here.)

I believe that with the recent series of articles I have written, I have irrefutably demonstrated that WE THE PEOPLE can no longer proceed with our lives as though everything is “normal”, or even will be normal if and when this bogus COVID-19 crisis is ever over. WE THE PEOPLE must begin to act to counter this rising despotism now… Now, while the small actions of many citizens acting in unison provides a good chance of restoring our Republic with the least disruption to each of our lives.

While some suggest more traditional, alternative remedies, I advise otherwise. I suggest that before WE THE PEOPLE consider alternative remedies, we must adapt to this new method of revolution the Progressive Globalist insurgency is utilizing. Most fundamentally, I posit we should begin by: 1) Create unity of the masses, to counter Progressive fomented division; 2) Restore First Principles of our Representative, Constitutionally-Limited Republic that have been erased by Progressive “Common Core” Education and Progressive Mainstream Media. As well as restoring our traditions and values; 3) We must counter the infiltration of Progressives into the leadership of institutions that are supposed to “support and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic”. Initially, I think we should concentrate on Law Enforcement and the Military. Perhaps most effective would-be Family members communicating with rank-and-file members in Law Enforcement and the Military during family functions, such as Holidays. For example, discussions about values and expectations of the family if family members in law enforcement and/or the military are UNLAWFULLY ordered to fire upon civilians. Further, asking family members to make sure they Establish Truth for themselves and not to blindly rely upon the representations of superiors (who may be compromised Progressive operatives). And then, to act in a manner they feel best reflects their duty and oath, to support and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

If others disagree, feel free to so advise. And if others have better ideas for restoring the Republic, please communicate them. I have no compelling need to lead this restoration of the Republic… Please someone else step up with a better plan with a greater chance of success, so I can step aside…

Those were my thoughts.

Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

This composition inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker

Resolución de Casos ‘Sobre el Fondo’, Revisada

Resolución de Casos ‘Sobre el Fondo’, Revisada

REVISIÓN DE LA LEY DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE DENVER

Nuestro moderno sistema procesal [judicial] se construyó en gran medida sobre los cimientos de la visión de Roscoe Pound.3 Esa visión, que se implementó por primera vez en las Reglas de Equidad Federal en 1912 y luego se adoptó aún más plenamente en las Reglas Federales de Procedimiento Civil en 1938

  1. Ver Jay Tidmarsh, Pound’s Century, and Ours, 81 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 513, 513 (2006)

407

Roscoe Pound, Decano de Derecho de Harvard 1916-1936

(Roscoe) ‘Principio de libra’ de jurisprudencia


La razón fundamental de la perdurabilidad del paradigma de Pound es su elegante simplicidad: promete resolver cada reclamo y cada problema según su mérito fáctico y legal, sin permitir que los tecnicismos o trampas procesales descarrilen la decisión. Ninguna otra visión, por ejemplo, ‘decidir las reclamaciones por los medios más eficientes’, captura esta aspiración más básica de un sistema de justicia civil ideal. Como cualquier aspiración, la resolución de casos ‘sobre el fondo’ nunca es perfectamente alcanzable.6 Sin embargo, este paradigma ha continuado luchando contra todos los demás objetivos políticos, como lograr la eficiencia, promover acuerdos, evitar la confusión del jurado y equilibrar el control de los partidos con la gestión judicial activa. —En debates sobre la arquitectura de nuestras reglas procesales.


Cuando los darwinistas sociales (década de 1870) se rebautizaron como progresistas en los Estados Unidos (década de 1890), iniciaron una revolución poco convencional mediante una infiltración lenta y encubierta. Como se demuestra aquí, los jueces de élite progresista han estado trabajando para cambiar lentamente las reglas para permitirles arreglar más fácilmente los resultados de los casos, sin dejar de parecer estar actuando en el mejor interés de las masas y de nuestro país. La resolución de casos sobre tecnicismos, juicios sumarios y / o tribunales administrativos, facilita la resolución de casos y elimina la incertidumbre de tener jurados compuestos por las masas supuestamente ignorantes, como parte del proceso.


La mayoría de los esfuerzos de reforma procesal en los últimos treinta años han sido intentos de alejarse o aplastar las consecuencias de la creencia de Pound en un enfoque simple, uniforme y discrecional de “decidir cada caso por sus méritos” del procedimiento legal. 5 Aunque estos esfuerzos pueden asociarse libremente con una perspectiva de derecho y economía (en el sentido de que todos son intentos de controlar los costos excesivos percibidos en el actual sistema de litigios), es justo decir que, mientras estamos en el proceso de rechazar el paradigma de Pound, todavía tenemos que encontrar un paradigma para reemplazarlo.

408

En este caso, nuestro traidor Judicial Progresista aboga por que los asuntos de la Corte sean resueltos por los Jueces en términos de tecnicismo para la eficiencia; en lugar de por el mérito de los jurados compuestos por nuestros pares. El pretexto para este cambio es la Economía (ahorrar dinero). (Permítanme ser claro, por tecnicismo me refiero a violaciones de las reglas y procedimientos judiciales en asuntos civiles, no violaciones de los derechos constitucionales en asuntos penales). Pero, al eliminar el mérito para resolver asuntos judiciales, los jueces progresistas ignoran los derechos naturales y constitucionales inalienables de las personas. al debido proceso y un juicio con jurado. (Aparentemente, los jueces progresistas necesitan un curso correctivo sobre lo que significa “inalienable”). Las élites progresistas tienen un historial de promover su agenda malvada e inconstitucional al hacer parecer que están actuando en el mejor interés de las masas. [Por ejemplo, el salario mínimo fue concebido originalmente como un instrumento de racismo. Las élites progresistas razonaron que los inmigrantes, las minorías y las mujeres menos productivas serían excluidos del mercado laboral. Las élites progresistas creían sinceramente que solo los hombres blancos podían producir un valor superior al salario mínimo más alto. (Página 140, Capítulos 5, 7-10, “Reformadores iliberales”, 2016, Thomas Leonard.). Eventualmente, las empresas optarían por contratar solo a hombres blancos propios, por esta razón].


La mayor parte de este pensamiento se deriva de las afirmaciones de la élite progresista de supuesta superioridad sobre las masas (páginas 51-52, ibid.) Algunas, pero NO todas las otras cosas inconstitucionales que creen las élites progresistas, incluyen que el concepto de derechos del individuo es “ tonterías ”(página 25, ibid.), las masas son demasiado ignorantes para gobernarse a sí mismas (pág. 52,) y que los controles y balances de la Constitución están desactualizados y deben ser ignorados (página 66, ibid.).


Bajo el presidente demócrata progresista Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921), los progresistas crearon una cuarta rama del gobierno. Este Estado Administrativo fue creado para encabezar la Agenda Progresista, en su mayoría inconstitucional, y para reducir la rendición de cuentas del gobierno a las masas al ser insertado entre NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO y las 3 ramas originales del gobierno. En el momento en que las élites progresistas tomaron medidas para hacer realidad sus pensamientos inconstitucionales, sus acciones se convirtieron en Sedición (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2384), Insurrección (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2383) y TREASON (Artículo III, Sección 3 de USC; y Código 18 de EE. UU. 2381). .


Lo que nos lleva al asunto del Fraude Electoral 2020. Como hemos demostrado, la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista comenzó en serio alrededor de 1913. Como presentamos anteriormente, el plan premeditado de los Globalistas Progresistas era derrocar a nuestro gobierno a través de una revolución no tradicional mediante una infiltración lenta y encubierta sobre generaciones para que ninguna generación se diera cuenta de los cambios suficientes para resistir, rebelarse o montar una contrarrevolución. Más de 100 años después, la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista evaluó que se había infiltrado en suficientes posiciones clave del gobierno y consolidado suficiente poder como para poder manipular con éxito una elección sin que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO nos diera cuenta, o al menos NO nos diera cuenta lo suficiente para montar una contrarrevolución. Y así es como se ha desarrollado hasta ahora esta toma de poder final y concluyente.

El asunto del Fraude Electoral 2020, se resolvió de manera inconstitucional, sin el debido proceso ni un jurado, en violación del juramento de cada uno de los jueces de SCOTUS de apoyar y defender la Constitución de todos los enemigos, extranjeros y nacionales. El fraude electoral 2020 se resolvió erróneamente por tecnicismo en lugar de méritos. Y, la apariencia de que esto era ‘legal’ solo fue posible gracias a décadas de cambios premeditados, engañosos y criminales en las Reglas de la Corte y la Jurisprudencia para hacer que tal decisión pareciera ‘legal’. Este cambio lento, premeditado y engañoso en las Reglas de la Corte y La jurisprudencia reemplazó el ‘Estado de derecho’ por el ‘Estado del hombre’ progresivo y ‘Podría hacer lo correcto’. Estos cambios evidencian aún más el caso de que el hecho de que la Corte Suprema de los EE. UU. No haya escuchado los asuntos de Fraude Electoral 2020 fue / fueron / son actos de conspiración contra los derechos (Código 18 de los EE. UU. 241), Privación de derechos bajo el color de la ley (Código 241 de los EE. UU. 18), Sedición (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2384), Rebelión e insurrección (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2383) y TREASON (Artículo III de la USC, Sección 3; y Código de EE. UU. 18 2381).


EN POCAS PALABRAS, NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, ESTAMOS EN MEDIO DE UNA REVOLUCIÓN NO CONVENCIONAL POR LA INFILTRACIÓN LENTA Y CUBIERTA DE LA PROGRESIVA INSURGENCIA GLOBALISTA QUE HACE MÁS DE 100 AÑOS. POR LA PRUEBA PRESENTADA AQUÍ, HEMOS PROBADO QUE NUESTRO PODER JUDICIAL HA AYUDADO Y APOYADO DICHA INSURGENCIA.


¡Prueba que estoy equivocado!


AL MISMO TIEMPO, SEGÚN LA HOJA DE RUTA PARA TRATAR CON LA TIRANÍA QUE NOS PROPORCIONARON NUESTROS FUNDADORES, NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, DEBEMOS DOCUMENTAR EL AGOTAMIENTO DE NUESTROS RECURSOS PACÍFICOS ANTES DE CONTEMPLAR LOS RECURSOS ALTERNATIVOS. AFIRMO QUE EL FRAUDE DE LAS ELECCIONES 2020 Y EL FALLO DEL GOBIERNO Y DE LOS TRIBUNALES DE RESOLVER ADECUADAMENTE LOS PROBLEMAS CON LAS ELECCIONES 2020 DEMOSTRARON QUE LAS ELECCIONES COMO REMEDIO PACÍFICO SE HAN PERDIDO PARA NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO. AÚN, DEBEMOS SEGUIR DOCUMENTANDO TODOS LOS REMEDIOS PACÍFICOS RESTANTES ANTES DE CONTEMPLAR LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE REMEDIOS ALTERNATIVOS. ALGUNOS OTROS REMEDIOS PACÍFICOS RESTANTES SON ‘GRANDES JURADOS CIUDADANOS’ Y UN NUEVO DECLARACIÓN DE CAUSAS ”COMO LO HIZO EL FUNDADOR EL 6 DE JULIO DE 1775. (Aquí aparece un ejemplo de cómo podría verse).


Creo que con la reciente serie de artículos que he escrito, he demostrado de manera irrefutable que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO ya no podemos seguir con nuestras vidas como si todo fuera “normal”, o incluso será normal si y cuando esta falsa crisis de COVID-19. se acaba para siempre. NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO debemos comenzar a actuar para contrarrestar este despotismo creciente ahora … Ahora, mientras las pequeñas acciones de muchos ciudadanos actuando al unísono brindan una buena oportunidad de restaurar nuestra República con la menor perturbación en cada una de nuestras vidas.

Si bien algunos sugieren remedios alternativos más tradicionales, yo recomiendo lo contrario. Sugiero que antes de que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO consideremos remedios alternativos, debemos adaptarnos a este nuevo método de revolución que está utilizando la insurgencia globalista progresista. Fundamentalmente, postulo que deberíamos comenzar por: 1) Crear la unidad de las masas, para contrarrestar la división fomentada por los progresistas; 2) Restaurar los primeros principios de nuestra República representativa, constitucionalmente limitada, que han sido borrados por la educación progresiva de “núcleo común” y los medios progresivos convencionales. Además de restaurar nuestras tradiciones y valores; 3) Debemos contrarrestar la infiltración de los progresistas en el liderazgo de las instituciones que se supone que “apoyan y defienden la Constitución de todos los enemigos, extranjeros y domésticos”. Inicialmente, creo que deberíamos concentrarnos en las fuerzas del orden y las fuerzas armadas. Quizás los posibles miembros de la familia más efectivos se comunican con miembros de base en las fuerzas del orden y las fuerzas armadas durante las funciones familiares, como las vacaciones. Por ejemplo, discusiones sobre los valores y expectativas de la familia si los miembros de la familia en las fuerzas del orden y / o el ejército reciben la orden ILEGAL de disparar contra civiles. Además, pedir a los miembros de la familia que se aseguren de establecer la verdad por sí mismos y que no confíen ciegamente en las representaciones de los superiores (que pueden ser agentes progresistas comprometidos). Y luego, actuar de la manera que consideren que mejor refleja su deber y juramento, de apoyar y defender la Constitución de todos los enemigos, extranjeros y nacionales.


Si otros no están de acuerdo, no dude en avisarnos. Y si otros tienen mejores ideas para restaurar la República, comuníquenlas. No tengo una necesidad imperiosa de liderar esta restauración de la República … Por favor, alguien más dé un paso adelante con un plan mejor con una mayor probabilidad de éxito, para que pueda hacerme a un lado …

Esos fueron mis pensamientos.

Gracias por tu tiempo.

En libertad
Don Mashak
El patriota cínico

Esta composición inspirada en Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker

决定法院案件’根据案情’;重访

司法背叛

决定法院案件’根据案情’;重访

[繁體中文放在簡體中文之後]

丹佛大学法律评论


我们现代的[司法]程序系统很大程度上建立在Roscoe Pound的愿景的基础上。3这一愿景最初于1912年在《联邦股权规则》中得以实施,然后在1938年的《联邦民事诉讼规则》中得到了更全面的体现。

3.参见庞德的世纪Jay Tidmarsh和我们的《 Notre DAME L. REV》 81。 513,513(2006)
407

(Roscoe Pound) 罗斯科·庞德,哈佛法学院院长,1916-1936年

(罗斯科)美国法理学的’磅原则’

庞德范式之所以能够长久,根本原因是其优雅的简单性:它承诺根据其事实和法律价值解决每一项索赔和每个问题,而不会让程序技术性或陷阱破坏决策。 没有其他的愿景——例如,’用最有效的手段决定索赔’——抓住了理想民事司法系统的这一最基本的愿望。与任何愿望一样,’根据案情’解决案件是永远无法完全实现的。 然而,这种模式继续与所有其他政策目标作斗争——例如提高效率、促进和解、防止陪审团混乱、平衡政党控制与积极司法管理——在关于我们程序规则架构的辩论中。

当社会达尔文主义者(1870年代)在美国被重新命名为进步派(1890年代)时,他们通过缓慢的、秘密的渗透开始了一场非常规的革命。正如这里所证明的,进步精英法官一直在努力改变规则,使他们能够更容易地解决案件结果,同时似乎仍然以最符合群众和国家的利益行事。解决技术性案件、即决判决案件和/或行政法院案件,使案件更容易解决,并消除了由据称无知的群众组成的陪审团作为程序的一部分的不确定性。

过去三十年来,在程序改革方面,大多数努力都是试图摆脱或淡化庞德相信一种简单、统一、自由裁量、’根据案情决定每个案件’的法律程序方法的后果。 虽然这些努力可以松散地与法律和经济观点联系在一起(从某种意义上说,它们都是试图控制目前诉讼制度中感知到的超额成本),但可以公平地说,虽然我们正在拒绝庞德的范式,但我们尚未提出一个范式来取代它。(第408页)

在本案中,我们的叛徒进步司法机构主张由法官就效率的技术性问题解决法院事项:而不是由我们的同龄人组成的陪审团的功绩。这种变化的借口是经济学(省钱)。(让我说清楚,从技术上来说,我指的是民事事项中违反法院规则和程序的行为,而不是刑事事项中侵犯宪法权利的行为。 但是,进步法官在取消解决法院事务的功绩时,忽视了个人不可剥夺的正当程序自然和宪法权利以及陪审团审判。(显然,进步法官需要就’不可剥夺’的含义进行补救课程。进步精英们有推进其邪恶、违宪议程的历史,他们似乎在为群众的最佳利益行事。[例如,最低工资最初被设想为种族主义的工具。进步精英们认为,生产率较低的移民、少数民族和妇女将被排除在劳动力市场外。进步精英们真诚地相信只有白人才能创造超过更高最低工资的价值。(第140页,第5章,第7-10章,’自由改革者’,2016年,托马斯·伦纳德)。最终,企业会选择只雇用自己的白人,为此。

这种想法大多来自进步精英声称对群众的优越性 (第 51 – 52 页, 同上) 。进步精英们认为,一些,但不是所有其他违宪的事情,包括个人权利的概念是’无稽之谈’(第25页,同上),群众太无知,无法管理自己(第52页),宪法的制衡已经过时,应该忽略(第66页,同上)。


在进步民主党总统伍德罗·威尔逊(1913-1921)的领导下,进步党设立了政府第四分部。建立这个行政国家是为了领导大部分违宪的进步议程,并通过在人民和原来的3个政府部门之间插入来减少政府对群众的责任。在进步精英采取行动使他们的违宪思想成为现实时,他们的行为变成了煽动叛乱(美国18号法典2384)、起义(美国18号法典2383)和叛国(USC第三条,第3节;&US 18法典2381)。

这让我们想到了 2020 年选举舞弊的问题。正如我们所证明的,进步的全球主义叛乱开始于1913年左右。正如我们前面所介绍的,进步的全球主义者有预谋的计划是通过非传统革命推翻我们的政府,通过几代人缓慢、秘密的渗透,这样没有一代人会注意到足够的变化来抵抗、反抗或发动反革命。100多年后,进步的全球主义叛乱组织评估说,它已经渗透到足够的关键政府职位,并巩固了足够的权力,它能够在没有我们人民注意到的情况下成功地操纵选举,或者至少没有注意到足以发动反革命的选举。这就是这场最终决定性的权力争夺战迄今所发挥的。


2020年选举舞弊问题以违宪方式作出,没有正当程序,也没有陪审团,这违反了每个SCOTUS法官支持和捍卫宪法免受国内外所有敌人的伤害的誓言。2020年选举舞弊案是因技术性而非优点而错误地解决的。而且,只有几十年的有预谋、重复的、刑事对《法院规则》和《判例法》的修改才有可能使这一决定看起来’合法’。法院规则和案例法的这种有预谋的、重复的缓慢变化,用渐进式的’人治’和’可能使权利’取代了’法治’。这些变化进一步证明,美国最高法院未能审理2020年选举舞弊案是/现在/是阴谋侵犯权利的行为(美国第18号法典第241条),根据法律颜色剥夺权利(美国 18 法典 241)、煽动叛乱(美国 18 代码 2384)、叛乱和叛乱(美国 18 代码 2383)和叛国(USC 第三条,第 3 节: •美国18代码2381)。

明智的做法是,我们的人们正处于缓慢的,秘密的,由渐进的全球主义煽动渗透的非常规革命的中间状态。它已经进行了100多年。通过此处提供的证据,我们已经证明我们的司法机构已协助和教BET了所述的保险。


证明我是错的!


在同一时间,按照我们的创始人提供给我们的处理暴政的路线图,我们人们必须在考虑其他补救措施之前,先废除我们的和平补救措施!我断言,选举2020的欺诈行为以及政府的失败和法院适当地减少了选举2020的问题;证明选举作为一种和平的补救措施已经失去了“我们为人民服务”的能力。 “我们人民”是美国的主权。此外,在我们考虑实施其他补救措施之前,我们必须继续记录所有剩余的和平补救措施。其余的一些和平的补救措施是“普通法大陪审团”和新的“因果宣告”,以我们的创始人于1775年7月6日为例。 (处显示了一个示例。)

我相信,在我最近撰写的系列文章中,我无可辩驳地表明,“人民”不再能够像一切正常一样继续我们的生活,甚至在这种假冒COVID-19危机发生时,也将是正常的永远结束了。现在,我们人们必须开始采取行动来应对这种日益加剧的专制主义……现在,尽管许多公民齐心协力地采取了小小的行动,却为恢复我们的共和国提供了很好的机会,对我们的生活造成的破坏最小。


尽管有些人建议使用更传统的替代疗法,但我建议不这样做。我建议,在我们人们考虑其他补救办法之前,我们必须适应渐进的全球主义叛乱正在利用的这一新的革命方法。最根本的是,我认为我们应该从以下几点开始:1)建立群众团结,以对抗渐进式分裂。 2)恢复渐进的“共同核心”教育和渐进的主流媒体所抹去的代表宪法限制的共和国的第一原则。以及恢复我们的传统和价值观; 3)我们必须制止进步派渗透到应该“支持和捍卫宪法,使其不受国内外敌对者”的机构的领导下。首先,我认为我们应该集中精力于执法和军事。在家庭活动(例如假期)期间,也许最有效的可能是家庭成员与执法和军方中的普通成员进行沟通。例如,如果在执法和/或军人家庭成员被勒令非法向平民开枪的情况下,关于家庭的价值观和期望的讨论。此外,要求家庭成员确保自己为自己建立真理,而不是盲目依赖上级的代表(上级可能是妥协的进步特工)。然后,以一种他们认为最能体现自己的责任和誓言的方式行事,支持和捍卫宪法,免受国内外敌人的侵害。

如果其他人不同意,请随时提出建议。如果其他人对恢复共和国有更好的主意,请告知他们。我没有必要带领这场共和国的恢复……请其他人以更大的成功机会制定更好的计划,这样我就可以退一步……

那是我的想法。

感谢您的时间。

在自由中
唐·马萨克(Don Mashak)
愤世嫉俗的爱国者

此作品的灵感来自Richard Kovacevich,David Lillehaug,NA,Wells Fargo Bank和William Bunker

司法背叛

決定法院案件「根據案情」;重訪

抱歉,僅提供文字,這裡沒有圖片進行繁體中文翻譯。

丹佛大學法律評論


我們現代的[司法]程序系統很大程度上建立在Roscoe Pound的願景的基礎上。3這一願景最初於1912年在《聯邦股權規則》中得以實施,然後在1938年的《聯邦民事訴訟規則》中得到了更全面的體現。


3.參見龐德的世紀Jay Tidmarsh和我們的《 Notre DAME L. REV》 81。 513,513(2006)

407

(羅斯科)法理學的’磅原則’

龐德範式之所以能夠長久,根本原因是其優雅的簡單性:它承諾根據其事實和法律價值解決每一項索賠和每個問題,而不會讓程序技術性或陷阱破壞決策。沒有其他願景(例如“以最有效的方式決定主張”)能夠抓住理想的民事司法制度的最基本願望。像任何抱負一樣,解決案情是永遠無法完全實現的。6然而,這種範例仍在與所有其他政策目標作鬥爭,例如實現效率,促進和解,防止陪審團混亂以及在積極的司法管理與政黨控制之間取得平衡—在關於我們的程序規則架構的辯論中。

當社會達爾文主義者(1870年代)在美國(1890年代)更名為進步主義者時,他們通過緩慢的秘密滲透開始了一場非常規的革命。如此處所示,進步精英法官一直在努力慢慢改變規則,以使他們能夠更輕鬆地解決案件結局,同時似乎仍在為廣大人民和整個國家謀求最大利益。解決有關技術性,簡易判決和/或行政法院的案件,可以更輕鬆地解決案件,並消除了由所謂的無知群眾組成的陪審團作為程序的一部分的不確定性。

過去三十年來,程序改革的大多數努力都是試圖擺脫或減少龐德對簡單,統一,可酌情決定的“根據案情決定案件”方法的信念的信念。 5儘管這些努力可以與法律和經濟學的觀點鬆散地聯繫在一起(從某種意義上說,它們都是試圖遏制當前訴訟系統中超額成本的嘗試),但可以公平地說,關於否定龐德的範式,我們還沒有想出一個範式來代替它。

408

在這種情況下,我們的叛徒進步司法機構主張法院的事項應由法官解決,以提高效率為目的;而不是由我們的同行組成的評審團的功績。此更改的藉口是經濟學(省錢)。 (讓我清楚一點,從技術上講,我的意思是在民事事項上違反法院的規則和程序,而不是在刑事事項上違反憲法的權利。)但是,在消除解決法院事項的優點時,進步法官無視個人不可剝奪的自然權利和憲法權利正當程序和陪審團審判。 (顯然,進步法官需要對“不可剝奪”的含義進行補救課程。)進步精英們有通過使自己看起來符合群眾的最大利益而推進其邪惡的,違憲的議程的歷史。 [例如,最低工資最初被認為是種族主義的工具。進步精英認為,生產力較低的移民,少數民族和婦女將被排除在勞動力市場之外。進步精英真誠地相信,只有白人才能創造出高於最低工資標準的價值。 (第140頁,第5章,第7-10頁,“自由改革者”,2016年,托馬斯·倫納德。)最終,由於這個原因,企業最終會選擇只僱用自己的白人。]


這種想法大部分來自進步精英聲稱所謂的高於群眾的主張(同上,第51-52頁。)進步精英認為,但並非所有其他違反憲法的東西都包括個人權利的概念是“廢話”(同上,第25頁),群眾太無知以致無法自拔(第52頁),《憲法》的製衡制度已經過時,應予以忽略(同上,第66頁)。

在進步民主黨總統伍德羅·威爾遜(Woodrow Wilson)(1913-1921)的領導下,進步黨建立了政府的第四分支。成立這個行政州的目的是帶頭將大多數違憲的進步議程帶入世界,並通過在WE THE PEOPLE和政府的最初三個分支之間插入政府來減少對群眾的問責制。在進步精英採取行動使違憲思想變為現實的時候,他們的行動變成了煽動叛亂(美國18法規2384),暴動(美國18法規2383)和叛國罪(美國法規第3條第3款;美國18法規2381)。 。


這使我們進入了2020年選舉欺詐問題。正如我們所證明的那樣,漸進的全球主義叛亂始於1913年左右。正如我們早先介紹的那樣,漸進的全球主義者的有預謀的計劃是通過非傳統的革命,通過緩慢的,秘密的滲透來推翻我們的政府。世代相傳,所以沒有哪個世代會注意到足以抵抗,反抗或發動反革命的變化。 100多年後,漸進式全球叛亂組織評估說,它已經滲透了足夠的政府重要職位並鞏固了足夠的權力,以至於在沒有WE THE PEOPLE注意到或至少沒有引起反革命的注意的情況下,它可以成功地進行選舉。到目前為止,這就是最後的決定性權力爭奪的方式。

2020年選舉欺詐問題是在沒有正當程序或陪審團的情況下以違反憲法的方式做出的,違反了每位SCOTUS法官宣誓支持和捍衛憲法,免受國內外敵人攻擊的問題。選舉舞弊2020錯誤地解決了技術性而不是優點。而且,只有數十年來對《法院規則》和《判例法》進行了有預謀性的,雙重性的,刑事性的修改,才使這一決定看起來“合法”,才使這種看起來“合法”的事情成為可能。判例法將“法律規則”替換為漸進的“人的規則”和“力量決定權利”。這些變化進一步證明了以下情況:美國最高法院未能審理2020年選舉欺詐案是/是共謀侵犯權利行為(US 18 Code 241),法律色彩下的權利剝奪(US 18 Code 241),煽動叛亂。 (US 18 Code 2384),叛亂和叛亂(US 18 Code 2383)和叛國罪(USC第三條第3節;以及US 18 Code 2381)。


明智的做法是,我們的人們正處於緩慢的,秘密的,漸進的全球主義不公正滲透的非常規革命的中間。它已經進行了100多年。通過此處提供的證據,我們已經證明我們的司法機構已經過援助,並被認為具有上述不確定性。


證明我是錯的!


在同一時間,按照我們的創始人向我們提供的處理暴政的路線圖,我們人們必須在考慮其他補救措施之前,先廢除我們的和平補救措施!我聲明,選舉2020的欺詐行為以及政府的失敗和法院適當地減少了選舉2020的問題;證明選舉作為一種和平的補救措施已經失去了“我們為人民服務”的能力。 “我們人民”是美國的主權。此外,在我們考慮實施其他補救措施之前,我們必須繼續記錄所有剩餘的和平補救措施。其餘的一些和平的補救措施是“普通法大陪審團”和新的“因果宣告”,以我們的創始人於1775年7月6日為例。 (此處顯示了一個示例。)

我相信,在我最近撰寫的系列文章中,我無可辯駁地證明,“人民”不再能夠像一切正常一樣繼續我們的生活,甚至在這種假性COVID-19危機發生時,甚至將是正常的永遠結束了。現在,我們人們必須開始採取行動來應對這種日益加劇的專制主義……現在,儘管許多公民齊心協力地採取了小小的行動,卻為恢復我們的共和國提供了很好的機會,對我們的生活造成的破壞最小。


儘管有些人建議使用更傳統的替代療法,但我建議不這樣做。我建議,在我們人們考慮其他補救辦法之前,我們必須適應漸進的全球主義叛亂正在利用的這一新的革命方法。最根本的是,我認為我們應該從以下幾點開始:1)建立群眾團結,以對抗漸進式分裂。 2)恢復漸進的“共同核心”教育和漸進的主流媒體所抹去的代表憲法限制的共和國的第一原則。以及恢復我們的傳統和價值觀; 3)我們必須制止進步派滲透到應該“支持和捍衛憲法,使其​​不受國內外敵對者”的機構的領導下。首先,我認為我們應該集中精力於執法和軍事。在家庭活動(例如假期)期間,也許最有效的可能是家庭成員與執法和軍方中的普通成員進行溝通。例如,如果在執法和/或軍人家庭成員被勒令非法向平民開槍的情況下,關於家庭的價值觀和期望的討論。此外,要求家庭成員確保自己為自己建立真理,而不是盲目依賴上級的代表(上級可能是妥協的進步特工)。然後,以一種他們認為最能體現自己的責任和誓言的方式行事,支持和捍衛憲法,免受國內外敵人的侵害。

如果其他人不同意,請隨時提出建議。如果其他人對恢復共和國有更好的主意,請告知他們。我沒有必要帶領這場共和國的恢復……請其他人以更大的成功機會制定更好的計劃,這樣我就可以退一步……


那是我的想法。

感謝您的時間。

在自由中
唐·馬薩克(Don Mashak)
憤世嫉俗的愛國者

此作品的靈感來自Richard Kovacevich,David Lillehaug,NA,Wells Fargo Bank和William Bunker

FELLOW AMERICANS: PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND & AMERICANOS: POR FAVOR AYUDENME A ENTENDER

PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH
APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS

FELLOW AMERICANS: PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND

View Post

FELLOW AMERICANS: PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND

So, my fellow citizens, some of you are all good with trying to redress the injustices of Election 2020, by waiting until the 2022/2024 elections to vote again?  Did I get that right?

And that’s without redressing the specific issues that caused the injustices in ELECTION 2020… Some of you are just going to wait until 2022/2024 and hope same/similar injustice does NOT occur again? Really?

TO PUT A FINE POINT ON IT, MULTIPLE LAYERS OF GOVERNMENT, WHO TOOK OATHS TO EITHER ENSURE ELECTION INTEGRITY AND/OR SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION, FAILED TO ADHERE TO THEIR OATHS. And, some of you are just fine with letting that ride without consequence to the perpetrators? How can that be?

Progressive Election Administrators ignored or flaunted the rules. Law Enforcement failed to investigate and charge. Government Attorneys failed prosecute. SCOTUS used technicality to avoid hearing the issue on the merits. And Congress failed to Constitutionally “Check and Balance” SCOTUS for failing to do its job. Again, all of these government employees took oaths that their actions/inactions violated.

And then they all said, “See, inaction by Law Enforcement, SCOTUS and Congress is proof of 2020 Election Integrity”. What part of this non sequitur logic did I miss?  It seems our Progressive-usurped Government thinks WE THE PEOPLE are so ignorant that we won’t recognize a seditious and treasonous conspiracy when we see one. Personally, I feel justified in being angry to the point of being moved to action, regardless of whether the rest of you want to roll over and take it, or not.

To wit, Government should consider this my exercise of my Natural Right to Petition Government for Redress as reduced to writing in the First Amendment. And, I formally demand Government act to redress said injustices immediately. If I am wrong in my Establishment of Truth and my resultant course of action, tell me how and why, publicly and in writing.

My fellow citizens, it seems clear that the actions of government described above, combined with Mainstream Media Propaganda, Social Media Censorship, Common Core Indoctrination and COVID-19 Lockdowns, exacerbated by multiple layers of Government officials failing to uphold their oaths to support and defend the Constitution constitute a a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evincing a design to reduce WE THE PEOPLE under absolute Despotism” (US Declaration of Independence 1776).

Once again, if I am wrong, someone tell me how I am wrong.  Government does NOT get to commit crimes against WE THE PEOPLE, and then escape accountability by essentially saying, “because we say so, it wasn’t a crime”. Natural Law and the Constitution make WE THE PEOPLE the Sovereigns, and our public servants accountable to WE THE PEOPLE. Calling those of us who try to hold our government accountable for its crimes, “Domestic Terrorists”, and then holing up behind guns and barb wire (put in place on false pretexts), while failing to address and redress these issues are acts and attitudes of tyrannical Despots who assert unaccountability to anyone.

That said, my fellow citizens, behind closed doors, Progressive RINOs and DINOs in government say you are too ignorant to understand what they have done and are doing. Progressives say they are superior to the ignorant masses and not accountable to them. (Pages 51 & 52) I have personally heard this and I have personally told Progressive Government RINOs and DINOs they are wrong. However, each of you must establish truth for yourselves and act accordingly.

My fellow citizens, what these New World Order Progressives seek is beyond evil. Rather than humanity being comprised of self-Determinant individuals, Progressives say Humanity is a single “Social Organism”. (Pages 101-102) Like a colony of Honeybees, Progressive RINOs and DINOs view the masses as expendable worker bees, with no rights(Page 25), who exist only to serve the Progressive Hive Community as ordered by the Progressive Elite King and Queen bees. (I encourage you to read the entire book, “Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era” 2016 by practicing, hardcore, Progressive Professor, Thomas Leonard <> Borrow at your local library or buy here)

Ladies, please forgive in advance for my breach of political correctness decorum while I attempt to motivate others to fight this injustice. If one of you women want to step up, I am more than happy to step aside. That said, the nature of men to protect those they care about has insured the survival of humanity for thousands of years. American men, if you let this injustice stand and be inflicted on your women, children and the infirm, you are not Real Men nor Patriots; you are cowards and political cuckolds.  If you choose to be cowards and cuckolds, “Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.” ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803).

In closing, It is clear government will not redress this injustice, unless WE THE PEOPLE apply enough pressure. If you wish our grievances with Election 2020 to be redressed, WE THE PEOPLE must remain focused on our goal, to the exclusion of almost all other goals. The Progressive Globalist Insurgency traitors are betting that if they can stall long enough, you will just give up and accept your new status as ignorant slaves. If you do not want that for your children and future generations of Americans, Do NOT let them distract you with new issues and new crises. Everyday, contact your oath-breaking traitor elected officials and demand redress on this issue until they comply.

Did I mention I hate politics as much as the next person, but these acts of despotism by our government requires WE THE PEOPLE to hold our government accountable.

Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.

Keep fighting the good fight, fellow patriots.

In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

This document inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker

AMERICANOS: POR FAVOR AYUDENME A ENTENDER

AMERICANOS: POR FAVOR AYUDENME A ENTENDER

Entonces, mis conciudadanos, ¿algunos de ustedes están bien tratando de reparar las injusticias de las elecciones de 2020, esperando hasta las elecciones de 2022/2024 para volver a votar? ¿Entendí bien?

Y eso sin corregir los problemas específicos que causaron las injusticias en las ELECCIONES 2020 … ¿Algunos de ustedes simplemente van a esperar hasta 2022/2024 y esperan que NO vuelva a ocurrir la misma injusticia o una injusticia similar? ¿En serio?

PARA PONER UN PUNTO FINO, MÚLTIPLES CAPAS DE GOBIERNO, QUE HICIERON JURAMENTOS PARA ASEGURAR LA INTEGRIDAD DE LAS ELECCIONES Y / O APOYAR Y DEFENDER LA CONSTITUCIÓN, NO CUMPLIMOS CON SUS JURAMOS. ¿Y algunos de ustedes están bien con dejar que eso pase sin consecuencias para los perpetradores? ¿Como puede ser?

Los administradores de elecciones progresivas ignoraron o hicieron alarde de las reglas. La policía no investigó ni presentó cargos. Los abogados del gobierno no procesaron. SCOTUS utilizó tecnicismos para evitar escuchar la cuestión sobre el fondo. Y el Congreso falló en “Controlar y equilibrar” constitucionalmente a SCOTUS por no hacer su trabajo. Una vez más, todos estos empleados del gobierno tomaron juramento de que sus acciones / inacciones violaron.

Y luego todos dijeron: ‘Mira, la inacción de las fuerzas del orden, SCOTUS y el Congreso es una prueba de la integridad de las elecciones de 2020’. ¿Qué parte de esta lógica incongruente me perdí? Parece que nuestro Gobierno usurpado progresista piensa que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO somos tan ignorantes que no reconoceremos una conspiración sediciosa y traidora cuando la veamos. Personalmente, me siento justificado en estar enojado hasta el punto de ser movido a la acción, sin importar si el resto de ustedes quiere darse la vuelta y tomarlo o no.

Es decir, el gobierno debería considerar que este es mi ejercicio de mi derecho natural a solicitar una reparación al gobierno, como se reduce a escrito en la Primera Enmienda. Y exijo formalmente que el gobierno actúe para reparar dichas injusticias de inmediato. Si me equivoco en mi Establecimiento de la Verdad y mi curso de acción resultante, dígame cómo y por qué, públicamente y por escrito.

Mis conciudadanos, parece claro que las acciones del gobierno descritas anteriormente, combinadas con la propaganda de los principales medios de comunicación, la censura en las redes sociales, el adoctrinamiento básico común y los cierres de COVID-19, exacerbados por múltiples capas de funcionarios del gobierno que no cumplen con sus juramentos de apoyar y defender la Constitución constituye una ‘larga serie de abusos y usurpaciones, que persigue invariablemente el mismo Objeto que evidencia un diseño para reducir NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO al Despotismo absoluto ”(Declaración de Independencia de los Estados Unidos 1776).

Una vez más, si me equivoco, alguien me diga en qué me equivoco. El gobierno NO puede cometer crímenes contra NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO, y luego escapar de la rendición de cuentas diciendo esencialmente, ‘porque nosotros lo decimos, no fue un crimen’. La Ley Natural y la Constitución hacen que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO sean los Soberanos, y nuestros servidores públicos rindan cuentas ante NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO. Llamar a aquellos de nosotros que intentamos hacer que nuestro gobierno rinda cuentas por sus crímenes, ‘terroristas domésticos’, y luego escondernos detrás de armas y alambre de púas (implementado con pretextos falsos), mientras no abordamos y reparamos estos problemas son actos y actitudes de déspotas tiránicos que afirman no rendir cuentas a nadie.

Dicho esto, mis conciudadanos, a puerta cerrada, los RINO progresistas y los DINO en el gobierno dicen que son demasiado ignorantes para comprender lo que han hecho y están haciendo. Los progresistas dicen que son superiores a las masas ignorantes y no les rinden cuentas. (Páginas 51 y 52) Personalmente he escuchado esto y personalmente les he dicho a los RINO y DINO del Gobierno Progresista que están equivocados. Sin embargo, cada uno de ustedes debe establecer la verdad por sí mismo y actuar en consecuencia.

Mis conciudadanos, esta búsqueda de los progresistas del Nuevo Orden Mundial está más allá del mal. En lugar de que la humanidad esté compuesta por individuos autodeterminantes, los progresistas dicen que la humanidad es un único “organismo social”. (Páginas 101-102) Como una colonia de abejas, los RINO progresivos y los DINO ven a las masas como abejas obreras prescindibles, sin derechos (Página 25), que existen solo para servir a la Comunidad de la colmena progresiva según lo ordenado por el Rey y la Reina de élite progresiva. abejas. (Le animo a leer el libro completo, ‘Reformadores iliberales: raza, eugenesia y economía estadounidense en la era progresiva’ 2016 por el profesor practicante, incondicional y progresista, Thomas Leonard <> Pida prestado en su biblioteca local o compre aquí)

Señoras, por favor perdonen de antemano mi incumplimiento del decoro de la corrección política mientras intento motivar a otros a luchar contra esta injusticia. Si una de ustedes, las mujeres, quiere dar un paso al frente, estoy más que feliz de hacerme a un lado. Dicho esto, la naturaleza de los hombres para proteger a sus seres queridos ha asegurado la supervivencia de la humanidad durante miles de años. Hombres estadounidenses, si permiten que esta injusticia permanezca y sea infligida a sus mujeres, niños y enfermos, no son Hombres de Verdad ni Patriotas; sois cobardes y cornudos politicos. Si eliges ser cobardes y cornudos, “Agáchate y lame las manos que te alimentan. Que tus cadenas se pongan livianas sobre ti y que la posteridad olvide que eras nuestro compatriota. ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803).

Para terminar, está claro que el gobierno no reparará esta injusticia, a menos que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO apliquemos suficiente presión. Si desea que se resuelvan nuestras quejas con las Elecciones 2020, NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO debemos mantenernos enfocados en nuestro objetivo, con exclusión de casi todos los demás objetivos. Los traidores de la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista están apostando a que si pueden detenerse el tiempo suficiente, simplemente te rendirás y aceptarás tu nuevo estado de esclavos ignorantes. Si no quiere eso para sus hijos y las futuras generaciones de estadounidenses, NO permita que lo distraigan con nuevos problemas y nuevas crisis. Todos los días, comuníquese con los funcionarios electos traidores que rompen el juramento y exija una reparación sobre este tema hasta que cumplan.

¿Mencioné que odio la política tanto como cualquier otra persona, pero estos actos de despotismo por parte de nuestro gobierno requieren que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO hagamos responsable a nuestro gobierno?

Esos fueron mis pensamientos.
Gracias por tu tiempo.

Sigan peleando la buena batalla, compañeros patriotas.

En libertad
Don Mashak
El patriota cínico

Este documento inspirado por Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker



2020 US Election Fraud Facts & Datos sobre el fraude electoral en EE. UU. 2020

PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH
APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS
Sorry, but many sources don’t have Spanish version/subtitles <> Lo siento, pero muchas fuentes no tienen subtítulos o versión en español

2020 US Election Fraud Facts

2020 US Election Fraud Facts

Pillow Man, Mike Lindell, reveals the Election 2020 Fraud Facts that traitor SCOTUS Scehmed to avoid hearing on technicality rather than ruling upon the merits.

VIDEO: http://rebrand.ly/2020ElectionFraudFacts
https://www.brighteon.com/e798c41d-f583-4c2e-a9fe-294a63675db2
More Sources: http://rebrand.ly/BFIN2020ElectionFraudFacts
https://rumble.com/vdlgcv-mike-lindells-absolute-proof-documentary.html
https://youtu.be/6ai6Ci2Hyas
http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged

PROGRESSIVE ELECTION ADMINISTRATORS DO NOT CARE ABOUT ACTUAL ELECTION INTEGRITY; THEY ONLY CARE ABOUT THE “APPEARANCE” OF ELECTION INTEGRITY SO VOTERS DON’T QUESTION THEIR RIGGED ELECTION RESULTS.
http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged
https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2020/08/12/imho-our-minnesota-elections-are-rigged/
I have been an election judge a decade or more. I wrote this long before the election
I raised the issue of rigged computer code in Electronic Ballot Boxes going
back several elections. I was shut down at every turn.

So many people ask me to provide proof of 2020 US Election fraud. Here is one source. Remember, the US Supreme Court dismissed all of the Election Fraud Lawsuits on a technicality, instead of ruling on the Merits. All US Judges and Lawyers take oaths to support and defend the US Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And longstanding legal tradition favors courts deciding cases on the merits, not technicality. There is no higher legal issue for the courts to decide in a Representative, Constitutionally limited Republic than the integrity of our Elections. Our US Supreme Court aided and abetted the seditious and treason Progressive Globalist Coup in contriving to dismiss these matters on a technicality. Think about it. There are 1.3 million lawyers in America. 335 of the 555 members of Congress are lawyers. How is it that not one single lawyer could draft a lawsuit that could not be tossed out on a technicality? All those who suppress these facts are guilty of aiding and abetting the seditious and treasonous Progressive Globalist Insurgency. Remember, all who conspired in these matters are motivated to suppress the facts to avoid trials for sedition and treason, a conviction for sedition and treason and hanging for sedition and treason. Pillow Man, Mike Lindell’s documentary is a credible source.

Datos sobre el fraude electoral en EE. UU. 2020

Hombre de almohada, Mike Lindell, revela los hechos fraudulentos de las elecciones de 2020 que el traidor SCOTUS Scehmed para evitar escuchar sobre tecnicismos en lugar de pronunciarse sobre los méritos.

el vídeo: http://rebrand.ly/2020ElectionFraudFacts
https://www.brighteon.com/e798c41d-f583-4c2e-a9fe-294a63675db2
Más fuentes: http://rebrand.ly/BFIN2020ElectionFraudFacts
https://rumble.com/vdlgcv-mike-lindells-absolute-proof-documentary.html
https://youtu.be/6ai6Ci2Hyas
http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged

A LOS ADMINISTRADORES DE ELECCIONES PROGRESIVAS NO LE IMPORTA LA INTEGRIDAD REAL DE LAS ELECCIONES; A ELLOS ÚNICAMENTE LE IMPORTA LA ‘APARIENCIA’ DE LA INTEGRIDAD DE LAS ELECCIONES, POR LO QUE LOS VOTANTES NO Cuestionan los resultados de sus elecciones.
http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged
https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2020/08/12/imho-our-minnesota-elections-are-rigged/
He sido juez electoral durante una década o más. Escribí esto mucho antes de las elecciones
Planteé la cuestión del código de computadora manipulado en las urnas electrónicas
Atras varias elecciones. Me cerraron a cada paso.

Mucha gente me pide que proporcione pruebas del fraude en las elecciones estadounidenses de 2020. Aquí hay una fuente. Recuerde, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos desestimó todas las Demandas por Fraude Electoral por un tecnicismo, en lugar de fallar sobre el fondo. Todos los jueces y abogados estadounidenses prestan juramento de apoyar y defender la Constitución estadounidense de todos los enemigos, tanto nacionales como extranjeros. Y la tradición legal de larga data favorece a los tribunales que deciden los casos en función del fondo, no del tecnicismo. No hay un asunto legal más importante para que los tribunales decidan en una República Representativa y constitucionalmente limitada que la integridad de nuestras Elecciones. Nuestra Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos ayudó e instigó al sedicioso y traidor Golpe de Estado Globalista Progresista a intentar desestimar estos asuntos por un tecnicismo. Piénsalo. Hay 1,3 millones de abogados en Estados Unidos. 335 de los 555 miembros del Congreso son abogados. ¿Cómo es posible que ni un solo abogado pueda redactar una demanda que no pueda descartarse por un tecnicismo? Todos aquellos que reprimen estos hechos son culpables de ayudar e incitar a la sediciosa y traidora insurgencia globalista progresista. Recuerde, todos los que conspiraron en estos asuntos están motivados a reprimir los hechos para evitar juicios por sedición y traición, una condena por sedición y traición y ahorcamiento por sedición y traición. Pillow Man, el documental de Mike Lindell es una fuente creíble.

TREASON AND SEDITION; INSURRECTION OR INSURGENCY & TRAICIÓN Y SEDICIÓN; INSURRECCIÓN O INSURGENCIA

DEFINITIVE AND IRREFUTABLE PROOF OF THOSE WHO ARE GUILTY !

TREASON AND SEDITION; INSURRECTION OR INSURGENCY [1 of 2]

While others spout unsubstantiated claims about insurrection, I state truths. My fellow AMERICAN CITIZENS, I SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER with facts and cite credible sources. From the book “Illiberal Reformers” comes irrefutable evidence of Treason, Sedition & Insurgency: Page 25: Concept of Rights of the individual is ‘nonsense’; Page 62: Constitution is antiquated; Page 52: US masses are NOT smart enough to govern themselves; Pages 40-49: Progressives Set up 4th Branch aka “Administrative State” of Government to spearhead this seditious and treasonous Insurgency. This 4th Branch is otherwise known as the Administrative State. City & County Administrators were sent out to advance the unconstitutional, Seditious and Treasonous Progressive Agenda. The FBI & CIA are also part of this 4th Branch are charged with protecting it and its supporters, and destroying its enemies.
This Progressive Globalist Insurgency seeks to overthrow- our government by slow, covert revolution by infiltration. By logical inference, we know the Legal and Judicial fraternity are co-conspirators in this Seditious & Treasonous Insurgency. All Lawyers and Judges take oaths to support and defend the Constitution. Most of the people advocating unconstitutional, Seditious & Treasonous aspects of the Progressive Agenda are Lawyers and Judges. Yet, none of them were disbarred by their fellow Lawyers and Judges. Ipso facto, co-conspirators despite their oaths to the contrary.
Further, all Congressfolks also take oaths to support and Defend the Constitution. Yet, neither Progressive President Woodrow Wilson, nor any other Progressives, were ever impeached for creating the 4th Branch to pursue the seditious, treasonous and unconstitutional Progressive Agenda.
So, after more than 100 years of preparation and infiltration, the Progressive Globalist Insurgency, decided to consolidate its power by rigging elections. Our US Supreme Court & various State Supreme Courts, co-conspirators in this Insurgency, used technicalities &/or clandestinely altered “Rules of Evidence”, to avoid “Ruling on the Merits” of these most serious of matters, election fraud on the National Level.
Congress & Vice President Pence (a lawyer), as co-conspirators in the Progressive Globalist Insurgency, also betrayed their oaths to support and defend the Constriction and the Sovereignty of WE THE PEOPLE. They knew no co-conspirator Lawyer/Judge would point out the difference between a ruling based on technicality as opposed to a Ruling based on Merit. But here I am, Joe Citizen, pointing out that jurisprudence requires lawsuits, especially one as hugely important as this matter, requires it be judged on the merits and not dismissed on Technicality or accumulated, duplicitous “Rules of Evidence” changes. [1 of 2]

DEFINITIVE AND IRREFUTABLE PROOF OF THOSE WHO ARE GUILTY !

TREASON AND SEDITION; INSURRECTION OR INSURGENCY [2 of 2]

The various Supreme Courts counted on the Ignorant masses to just accept their nefarious rulings as Legitimate. Congress, & VP Pence, also Counted on being able to cite or scapegoat the US Supreme Court’s rulings, to defend their actions and Establish a false Truth that the elections were Legitimate. Surprise, WE THE PEOPLE are NOT as ignorant as they thought. WE THE PEOPLE have the Natural Right to Establish Truth for ourselves and hold our Lawyers, Judiciary, Congress and entire government accountable.
Sounds like it is time for the Congress and Supreme Courts to support and defend the Constitution. Or, WE THE PEOPLE can resurrect Citizen Grand Juries and take action ourselves. (US v. Williams, 112 S. Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L. Ed. 2d 352 (1992) From my perspective, it is clear that All lawyers and Judges since the beginning of the Insurgency failed to uphold their oaths to support and defend the Constitution.(Unless they can provide clear and convincing bonafide evidence they they vigorously and repeatedly publicly tried to resist the Progressive Globalist Insurgency and/or any “changes” not consistent with the Constitution, Rule of Law, Natural Law, Bill of Rights and/or the Sovereignty of WE THE PEOPLE before the date of this document.)
Therefore, all lawyers and judges should be tried for Sedition, Treason and Conspiracy Against Rights. Those found guilty should have the maximum sentence executed upon them. Additionally, as a deterrent to future lawyers and judges neglecting their oaths, their families (Spouse, Children, Parents and Siblings) should be asset stripped and forever exiled to North Korea or Iran.
Those Lawyers/Judges who are not convicted of the greater crimes, still violated their Oaths of Office and should be disbarred. Additionally, in keeping with the premise of deterrent sentencing, this group of defendants and their families should also be exiled from America, but for 3 generations. Further, rather than exile to North Korea or Iran, they should be only be prohibited from residing anywhere in the USA and its territories as well as the entire North American Continental Plate. (I kind of like the idea of spouses & children of Lawyers and Judges asking each night, “Did you do anything today that could get us exiled from the greatest country in the world?”.
That should keep them honest a little while longer. And then we start with Congress, past Presidents and other Government Employees who failed to uphold their oaths of office. I suggest our Government fix this to the satisfaction of WE THE PEOPLE before WE THE PEOPLE take it upon ourselves to act unilaterally to hold them accountable.
In closing fellow citizens, ask yourselves, “Why did one, single ordinary citizen have to write this in the midst of so many Lawyers, Judges, Congressfolks and State Legislators who actually took an oath to support & defend our Constitution, & get paid generously to do so?” Your move, traitors. [2 of 2]

¡PRUEBA DEFINITIVA E IRREFUTABLE DE LOS CULPABLES!

TRAICIÓN Y SEDICIÓN; INSURRECCIÓN O INSURGENCIA [1 DE 2]

Mientras que otros lanzan afirmaciones infundadas sobre la insurrección, yo declaro verdades. Mis compañeros CIUDADANOS AMERICANOS, HABLO LA VERDAD AL PODER con hechos y cito
fuentes creíbles. Del libro ‘Illiberal Reformers’ surge una evidencia irrefutable de Traición, Sedición e Insurgencia: Página 25: El concepto de derechos del individuo es ‘una tontería’; Página 62: La Constitución
es anticuada; Página 52: Las masas estadounidenses NO son lo suficientemente inteligentes para gobernarse a sí mismas; Páginas 40-49: Los progresistas establecieron la cuarta rama, también conocida como ‘Estado administrativo’ de gobierno, para encabezar esta insurgencia sediciosa y traidora. Esta cuarta rama se conoce también como Estado administrativo. Se enviaron administradores de la ciudad y el condado para promover la agenda progresista inconstitucional, sediciosa y traidora. El FBI y la CIA también forman parte de esta cuarta rama y se encargan de protegerla a ella y a sus partidarios y de destruir a sus enemigos.
Esta insurgencia globalista progresista busca derrocar a nuestro gobierno mediante una revolución lenta y encubierta mediante la infiltración. Por inferencia lógica, sabemos que la fraternidad Legal y Judicial son co-conspiradores en esta Insurgencia Sedicia y Traidora. Todos los abogados y jueces prestan juramento de apoyar y defender la Constitución. La mayoría de las personas que defienden los aspectos inconstitucionales, sediciosos y traidores de la Agenda Progresista son abogados y jueces. Sin embargo, ninguno de ellos fue inhabilitado por sus compañeros abogados y jueces. Ipso facto, co-conspiradores a pesar de sus juramentos en contrario.
Además, todos los miembros del Congreso también hacen juramento de apoyar y defender la Constitución. Sin embargo, ni el presidente progresista Woodrow Wilson, ni ningún otro progresista, fueron acusados ​​por crear la cuarta rama para perseguir a los sediciosos, traidores y Agenda Progresista inconstitucional.
Entonces, después de más de 100 años de preparación e infiltración, la Insurgencia Progresista Globalista, decidió consolidar su poder manipulando las elecciones. Nuestra Corte Suprema de EE. UU. Y varios tribunales supremos estatales, co-conspiradores en este Insurgencia, tecnicismos usados ​​y / o alterados clandestinamente ‘Reglas de prueba’, para evitar ‘Fallo sobre el fondo’ de estos asuntos más serios, el fraude electoral en el Nivel nacional. Congreso y vicepresidente Pence (abogado), como co-conspiradores en la insurgencia globalista progresista, también traicionaron sus juramentos de apoyar y defender la Constricción y la Soberanía de NOSOTROS LA GENTE. Sabían que ningún abogado / juez co-conspirador señalaría la diferencia entre un fallo basado en tecnicismos y otro basado en mérito. Pero aquí estoy, Joe Citizen, señalando que la jurisprudencia requiere juicios, especialmente uno tan importante como este asunto, requiere que sea juzgado por los méritos y no descartado por tecnicismos o cambios acumulados y engañosos en las “Reglas de evidencia”. [1 de 2]

¡PRUEBA DEFINITIVA E IRREFUTABLE DE LOS CULPABLES!

TRAICIÓN Y SEDICIÓN; INSURRECCIÓN O INSURGENCIA [2 DE 2]

Las distintas Cortes Supremos contaban con las masas Ignorantes para que aceptaran sus nefastos fallos como legítimos. Congreso, y VP Pence, también Contaba con poder citar o ser chivo expiatorio de los fallos de la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos, defender sus acciones y Establecer una Verdad falsa de que las elecciones fueron Legítimo. Sorpresa, NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO NO somos tan ignorantes como pensaban. NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO tenemos el derecho natural de establecer la verdad por nosotros mismos
y responsabilizar a nuestros abogados, el poder judicial, el Congreso y todo el gobierno.
Parece que es hora de que el Congreso y la Corte Suprema apoyen y defiendan la Constitución. O, NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO, podemos resucitar a los Ciudadanos Grandes Jurados y actuar nosotros mismos. (US v. Williams, 112 S. Ct. 1735, 504 US 36, 118 L. Ed. 2d 352 (1992) Desde mi perspectiva, está claro que todos los abogados y jueces desde el comienzo de la Insurgencia no cumplieron con sus juramentos para apoyar y defender la Constitución. (A menos que puedan proporcionar evidencia clara y convincente de buena fe, intentaron enérgica y repetidamente resistir públicamente a la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista y / o cualquier ‘cambio’ que no sea consistente con la Constitución, el Estado de Derecho, la Ley Natural, Declaración de Derechos y / o la Soberanía de NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO antes de la fecha de este documento.)
Por lo tanto, todos los abogados y jueces deben ser juzgados por sedición, traición y conspiración contra los derechos. Los culpables deberían tener la pena máxima ejecutada. Además, como medida disuasoria para futuros abogados y jueces que descuidan sus juramentos, sus familias (cónyuge, hijos, padres y hermanos) deben ser despojadas de sus bienes y exiliadas para siempre a Corea del Norte o Irán.
Aquellos abogados / jueces que no sean condenados por los delitos mayores, aún violaron sus juramentos y deberían ser inhabilitados. Además, de acuerdo con la premisa de la sentencia disuasoria, este grupo de acusados ​​y sus familias también deberían ser exiliados de Estados Unidos, pero por 3 generaciones. Además, en lugar de exiliarse a Corea del Norte o Irán, solo se les debería prohibir residir en cualquier lugar de los EE. UU. Y sus territorios, así como en toda la Placa Continental de América del Norte. (Me gusta un poco la idea de que los cónyuges e hijos de abogados y jueces pregunten cada noche: ‘¿Hiciste algo hoy que podría hacernos exiliados del país más grande del mundo?’.
Eso debería mantenerlos honestos un poco más. Y luego comenzamos con el Congreso, los presidentes anteriores y otros empleados gubernamentales que no cumplieron con sus juramentos en el cargo. Sugiero que nuestro Gobierno arregle esto a satisfacción de NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO antes de que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO nos encarguemos de actuar unilateralmente para hacerlos responsables.
Para cerrar conciudadanos, pregúntense: ‘¿Por qué un ciudadano común y corriente tuvo que escribir esto en medio de tantos abogados, jueces, congresistas y legisladores estatales que realmente hicieron un juramento para apoyar y defender nuestra Constitución, y recibir un pago generoso? para hacerlo? ‘ Tu movimiento, traidores. [2 de 2]

President Donald Trump calls for WE THE PEOPLE to March in DC, 6JAN2021, 7am, The Capital > Congress

#10MinDC, When will it be? Pres @realDonaldTrump asks #WETHEPEOPLE March In DC; 6JAN2021, 7AM, The Capital > Congress http://www.leafblogazine.com/2020/12/president-trump-calls-on-wethepeople-to-protest-in-dc-on-6th-january-2021/

@DrTurleyTalks #electionfraud#QAnon#Miltia#2A#Conservative#MNGOP#MNCD6 @AmyMek @LisaHaven #MAGA @ScottPresler @MNCourts @USSupremeCourt #GenZ#Millennials#GenX#Boomers#YellowVests

IMHO, OUR MINNESOTA ELECTIONS ARE RIGGED

[  lengua española  https://rebrand.ly/SpanishIMHOElectionsRigged ]

You may also like “Pillow Man, Mike Lindell’s 2020 US Election Fraud Facts Documentary

StalinOnCountingVotes

In my humble opinion(IMHO), our Minnesota Elections are rigged. I have been a Minnesota Election Judge for a decade or more now. Many elections ago, I brought up my concerns about the integrity of our elections to Minneapolis MN Election judge officials. For this discussion, I will focus on concerns relating to the Electronic Ballot Boxes.

ProofOfElectionFraudFromHorsesMouth08112020_350x350

Many elections ago I brought up my concerns about fraudulent computer code in Electronic Ballot Boxes that can be used to flip any election 51/49. This was primarily inspired by this video “Proof of Election/Voter fraud in the USA from the Horse’s Mouth” [ http://YouTube/w0-DFw36ALQ ] On numerous occasions I have asked who audits the Electronic Ballot Box (EBB) Computer Code. I have received answers ranging from “We just trust the company”, “The Computer Code is proprietary”, “A small group of top officials audits the code” implying we should just trust corrupt government officials to not rig our elections. America’s entire government is premised on the perspective that the government cannot be trusted. Perhaps the perspective of the nature of humankind held by the Founders is best summarized in the Cato Letters, “ All [people] have free will and are NOT virtuous by nature”. Checks and Balances were the primary means of addressing the non-virtuous nature of humankind. What those in charge of Minnesota Elections suggest in trusting the word of a small group of Progressive Technocrats is diametrically opposed the Constitutional policy of checks and balances. To wit, I proposed ways to audit the EBB Computer Code such as adding computer code line counts and character counts and random physical audits of Electronic Boxes on Election Day. All have been rejected.

What follows of is a series of correspondence on this matter I have had with Minneapolis MN Election Superiors, Hennepin County Election Superiors and the Minnesota Secretary of State’s office. I invite you to judge for yourself if this is the way you think an MN Election Judges trying to ensure the integrity of an election should be treated:

My 05FEB2020 Training Handout & attachment to Letter to Minneapolis Elections 24FEB2020 https://rebrand.ly/My-05FEB2020-Training-Handout

My 24FEB2020 Letter to Minneapolis MN Elections re Electronic Ballot Box Auditing https://rebrand.ly/24FEB2020LetterToMplsElections

Minneapolis MN Elections and Voter Services 26FEB2020 Response To Mashak’s 24FEB2020 Letter https://rebrand.ly/Minneapolis-Elections-26FEB2020-Reply-To-24FEB2020

My 26FEB2020 EMail response to Minneapolis MN Election & Voter Services EMail of 26FEB2020 https://rebrand.ly/MashakResponseToMplsMNElections26FEB2020EMail

My 27FEB2020 Email to hc.vote@hennepin.us: Am I correct in presuming you folks take an oath to uphold the Original Organic US Constitution?
https://rebrand.ly/Mashak27FEB2020LetterToHennepinCountyElections

My Letter to MN Secretary of State 27FEB2020
https://rebrand.ly/Mashak27FEB2020LetterToMNSOS

Minneapolis MN Election and Voter Services 13Mar2020 Response to My 26FEB2020 EMail https://rebrand.ly/Minneapolis-Elections-13MAR2020-Reply-To-26FEB2020

I submit to you the final letter was approved by Hennepin Country Elections and the Secretary of State as I do not recall receiving any separate replies to my correspondences of 27FEB2020 to them.

This is one of the situations where you have to be there to notice the body language and intonations of personal interactions that are not conveyed through the written word. Each election judge’s oath requires they work to ensure the integrity of the election. Yet, my reading of the responses to my Election Integrity concerns seem to state and/or infer my efforts to redress these issues are unwanted and actually interfere with Elections and Election Integrity. I submit the Progressive Globalist Insurgents who have infiltrated our government elections thought they were being clever in their evasive response. Everything they say seems reasonable, but it does not reflect the reality of what is actually transpiring. Election Judges spend all that time and busy-work counting, recounting and initialing ballots, etc., but all means nothing if the Electronic Ballot Box Computer Code is written to allow fraud. Fellow rank and file front line Election Judges, I put it to you that all Election Judges take an oath to enforce the integrity of our elections. Something does not smell right to me, and I wanted to each of you to have the chance to give it the smell test.

While the Minneapolis Elections Leadership were being clever in their responses, I assert the lengths they went to in discouraging me and preventing me from communicating this information to other Election Judges evinces they have something to hide. They refused to let me hand out flyers at Election Judge Training Seminars. They refused to have a meeting of rank and file Election Judges to let us as representatives of WE THE PEOPLE determine if there is any merit to my concerns. They refused to let me have email addresses to send it. They refused to let me give the original handout to other Election judges in a sealed envelope after the polls closed and we are leaving for the night.

IlliberalReformers245x176Edited

Also consider, Progressive Globalist Educated Elites assert they are superior to the masses and should not be accountable to them. Why would they let themselves be accountable to the masses through elections? Progressives assert a right to lie to the allegedly ignorant masses? Recall ‘Keep your Insurance’ and ‘Keep your doctor’ and other lies to pass Progressive Globalist Obamacare? (You may rationalize it as OK because you wanted Obamacare, but what happens the next time they lie to pass legislation you don’t like or want. We must require that our non-virtuous government always provides the masses with the truth in making law, or we are doomed to tyranny) If you doubt this is the true attitude and philosophy of the Progressive Globalist Insurgency please read “Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era” 2016 by Progressive Professor Thomas Leonard (Borrow from the local library for free) and the Progressive Psy-Ops Manual “Rules for Radicals” 1971 by Progressive Marxist Saul Alinsky (WebSearch for free online copies).

The point being, if Progressive Globalists Educated Elite Technocrats think they are superior and assert a right to lie to the allegedly ignorant masses, Why wouldn’t they lie about elections NOT being rigged? IMHO, We are in the middle of a nontraditional revolution by slow, covert, incremental infiltration over generations so no one generation notices enough change to resist, take up arms or mount a counter-revolution. Further, consider that students of history will recognize that many of the tactics the Progressive Globalist Insurgency is using are the same or similar to the tactics Hitler and Goebbels used to bring the NAZIs to power in the 1920s and 1930s.

But back to the issue at hand. By their actions and attitude, I submit to you our Minneapolis Election Hierarchy has something to hide. If you take your oaths seriously, you should demand there be a statewide meeting to discuss this threat/potential threat to the integrity of our Elections weeks before the November Elections. If you fail to do so, you are putting your stamp of approval on election results you do not know with certainty are valid and true. Fellow Election Judges, I am confident I am acting as true Patriot and I ask; How about you? And, for the rest of America, the next time you hear there is no or little evidence of our elections being rigged in any manner, remember the resistance, duplicity, doublespeak and evasiveness you have witnessed here in this Election Judge’s efforts to ensure the integrity of our elections.

As for Election Judges elsewhere in America and the world; be advised there were once more than 15 manufacturers of Electronic Boxes in the world, there are now less than 5. And all but one of these remaining, Billionaire George Soros holds a large or majority interest. As such, it as likely the concerns I have expressed here in Minnesota exist in your corner of the nation/world. Ergo, your oath also requires you to make similar inquiries.

https://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged <> Lengua española http://rebrand.ly/SpanishIMHOElectionsRigged

 

My Responses to President Trump’s “America Speaks Survey”!

AmericaSpeaksSurvey12122017

For comparison, check out WE THE PEOPLETAR’s (Transparency, Accountability, and Reform) 2017 Final Political Resolutions from February of 2017:

2017PoliticalResolutionsFinalDelphi02222017

Stay focused, my fellow Americans. Don’t let Progressive Mainstream Media propaganda make you chase your own tails. Keep your eyes on the prize!

Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.

Keep fighting the good fight!The Cynical Patriot Eagle

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

HON or POS? Is Dakota County MN suspending the Rule of Law in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter?

 

SandraGrazziniRuckiCloseup07252016This writer’s followers on Twitter and other Social Media are familiar with his intention of uniting rank and file Americans under one common Perspective of Reality. A Perspective of reality far truer than the false Perspective of Reality promoted through the divisive propaganda of the Main Stream Media and the two faux major political parties. With this article, this writer intends to build upon creating that truer, common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our government and hold our government officials accountable for their departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) and betrayals of the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE.

Yesterday morning this writer went to the continuing trial of Sandra Grazzini Rucki in Dakota County MN on various criminal charges relating to allegedly wrongfully depriving her ex husband, David Rucki, of parental rights, etc. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s well-founded and well-recognized affirmative defense is that she was acting to protect her children from what she reasonably believed was danger from their father.  Sandra Grazzini-Rucki numerous times went to the appropriate channels to seek the safety of her children, and resorted to helping the girls escape their allegedly abusive father only when the police, the courts and Child Protective Services (CPS) failed her.

This writer does not really know Sandra Grazzini-Rucki from Adam. This writer first became aware of her abuse at the hands of the Dakota County MN Courts and our Government in 2014, through his involvement with the Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) Movement. Judicial TAR is a group of citizens who have sought a hearing before the Minnesota Legislature dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Courts every year from 2005, and every year our requests for said hearing have been denied.  From this, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR believe it is reasonable for all American citizens to conclude that Minnesota Government and Courts, at a minimum have something to hide, and more likely are complicit in the Systemic Corruption of the Minnesota Courts. [Systemic Corruption means that the aspects of government that are supposed to prevent & punish corruption instead are complicit in and cover it up] In 2009, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR came to believe it would be unlikely we would ever have our request for said hearing granted. With victims of the Abuse of Power of the Courts and their advocates  getting frustrated, becoming disheartened, moving away and dying, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR held an Ad Hoc hearing on the Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Courts to preserve our Petitions for Redress for Posterity:

03MAR2009 Ad Hoc MN hearing: Corruption in Judiciary 1/2
http://bit.ly/2009AdHoc1of2

03MAR2009 Ad Hoc MN hearing: Corruption in Judiciary 2/2
http://bit.ly/2009AdHoc2of2

 From this writer’s experience with the Judicial TAR Movement, this writer has learned nuances of the legal profession that most Americans are unaware of.  Add to this, this writer’s own experience in his personal civil litigation and 1 bogus criminal charge (eventually dismissed for lack of Probable Cause), and this writer asserts that he is uniquely qualified to understand how our Courts fix the outcomes of Court cases and educate his fellow rank and file citizens of the true nature of their government and courts.

This writer has written previously on the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Matter in Dakota County Minnesota, but your government has seen fit to scrub those articles from the internet. (Main Stream Media (MSM) has seen fit to not publish this writer’s previous articles on the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter.) In total, almost 200 of this writer’s blogs and several hundred of his posts and articles have been scrubbed from the Internet.  One gets the sense that our government and courts don’t want rank and file Americans to have the information about their corruption, machinations and duplicity that this writer exposes. Yet, rather than try to recreate and reassert all the facts from those censored articles, this writer is going to focus on the mechanics of various allegations of how the Dakota County MN Courts are trying to fix the outcome of the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki litigation from a succinct, common sense legal perspective. (Fellow Minnesotan, Tim Kinley has a much better knowledge of the all the particular facts in the related previous matters under Judge David Knutson and underlying facts and minutia of the Dakota County MN Court departures from the Rule the Rule (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) under Judge Karen Asphaug which have led to this trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki – His Youtube Channel http://bit.ly/SpeechlessMN) This article is written more from a macro-overview and general mechanics perspective.

This writer wanted to attend this trial yesterday because it was alleged that there were/are departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) occurring intended to fix the outcome of the case, and he wanted to confirm their accuracy. At the same time, recent events provide an opportunity for this writer to build upon the American Public’s current familiarity with the departures from the Rule of Law. Specifically, this writer refers to the FBI’s Comey’s and DOJ’s Lynch’s failure to charge Hillary Clinton over her various State Department Email related crimes despite facts in evidence which required Hillary Clinton to be charged (http://usat.ly/29wwvnV; http://cnn.it/29JlQDO) For those not familiar with the concept of the “Rule of Law”;

It is the concept and requirement embodied in our founding documents that there only be one set of laws for all American citizens and that it be enforced equally on all
citizens without regard to status, wealth or government position.

Additionally, this writer will also build upon recent revelations by Wikileaks (and Edward Snowden) which have revealed to all Americans the lengths to which our government will go to conspire against WE THE PEOPLE’s free will and the Democratic Process. In this instance, this writer is specifically referring to a hack of the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer servers. Subsequently, the disclosed emails and documents from the DNC servers revealed that the level of Systemic Corruption extends not just to suspension of the Rule of Law but also to violations and machinations of the Democratic Process. (http://bit.ly/2afaGro)

In the present matter of the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki trial, it has been alleged:

  • The jury was tainted with a Newspaper containing an article placed in the jury holding room prior to jury selection;
  • The Court engaged in jury rigging in that it placed so many biased and/or unqualified potential jurors in the jury pool that the Defense could not eliminate them all with its limited number of “free boots” and Judge Karen Asphaug failed to remove at least two jurors for cause who eventually were empaneled on the jury;
  • The Court did/is engaging in fact shaping.

Now, as a member of the press, this writer went to the trial yesterday with the specific purpose of ascertaining if any of these allegations were true. This writer was denied the opportunity to make said inquiries.

WARNING – DEPARTURE FROM ACCEPTED DECORUM FOLLOWS

This writer asserts the recent revelations of the magnitude of our government’s departures from the Rule of Law and Democratic Process warrant departures from accepted decorum. In some way, this writer feels he must signal to his fellow citizens that recent events require special attention. This writer will use these departures from decorum to signal to our fellow citizens that they can no longer remain calm and just go along with their normal daily routines; Rather our Government has departed so far from Constitutional and Natural Law, that the time has come for every American to question their blind loyalty to our government and actively work to restore our government’s accountability to WE THE PEOPLE. You have been fore-warned…

At the noon lunch break, as Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena walked by where this writer was seated in the Courtroom gallery, this writer took the opportunity to shake her hand and introduce himself as a member of the Press and a member of the Judicial TAR Movement. Ms. Kathryn M. Keena continued toward the door as this writer began to ask her questions about the allegations. With the rudeness and arrogance of those Progressives who think they are better than all the rest of us (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3), Ms. Kathryn M. Keena continued into a conference room without even the professional courtesy of saying she did not want to hear what this writer had to say nor answering any of this writer’s questions. As Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena entered the conference room, this writer turned to leave the foyer of the courtroom but was blocked by the egress of others from the court room and patiently waited his opportunity to exit the door. While this writer was standing their facing the exit door waiting for an opportunity to leave, the lying POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena made a FALSE REPORT to a Bailiff that I tried to follow her into the conference room. Lying POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena ordered the Bailiff to have me removed. This writer protested that POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena was lying, and that the Bailiff himself and others had this writer standing near them patiently waiting to leave the foyer. Others advised me to give up my protest and this writer left the foyer and the building.  Once again, Dakota County MN Courts had succeeded in preventing this writer from verifying the truth of their corruption and publishing it for the world to see.

EXPLAINING THE THREE ELEMENTS OF DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW
ALLEGEDLY USED TO ATTEMPT TO FIX THE OUTCOME OF THE
SANDRA GRAZZIN-RUCKI MATTER

JudgeDrunkonJudicialImmunityNow, lets revisit the various acts of departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) that have been alleged, in a simple, non-legal gibberish way so the average American can understand it. (See also http://bit.ly/SimulatedLitigationDefined and Proposed Election 2012 caucus resolutions for judicial reform(updated) Part 2of2; Resolution 17 http://bit.ly/2012JudicialTARResolutions2of2)

The alleged Court rules require that a Judge not do anything that might give the appearance of impropriety. Further, there is a requirement in the rules that says the “Finder of Fact” (Judge or Jury) allegedly can only consider facts and evidence on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD. (When this writer says alleged, it mean that, in the writer’s opinion, the Courts so frequently ignore them one must question if they actually are adhered to or not.

DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW
ARTICLE IN THE PROSPECTIVE JURY WAITING ROOM

In regard to the matter of the newspaper article about Sandra Grazzini-Rucki being in the jury waiting room before jury selection, shouldn’t there be a member of the staff assigned to ensuring that jury tainting evidence is not permitted in the jury waiting area.  Of course there is, but in this writer’s experience and knowledge, such methods of tainting juries are common in the courts.  To wit, every American has a right to a trial before an IMPARTIAL jury of their peers. To the point, if you were the one on trial how would you feel about a derogatory article about you being made available to potential jurors in the potential jury waiting room, potential jurors admitting they have read it and Judge Karen Asphaug ruling, “Ain’t no big deal”? In your opinion, if you are the Defendant, does Judge Karen Asphaug’s failure to redress this matter in a satisfactory manner give rise to an “appearance of impropriety”? (Untouchables – Switch Jury scene https://youtu.be/5Mbdi_NXweQ)

DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW
ALLEGED JURY RIGGING

Next, we move to the departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in alleged jury rigging.  In jury selection, the judge is supposed to disqualify jurors for a variety of reasons such as they are a friend or relative of one of the parties, that they are already familiar with the case, or they state have already made up their minds as to guilt or innocence, etc. This writer wanted to ask if any of these allegations regarding the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter were true. POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena use the arrogant Progressive tactic (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3) of having reporters not submissive to the Courts, booted. Therefore, it is necessary to say it is alleged  Judge Karen Asphaug failed to remove a person who said they read the article, knew about the case, felt that Sandra Grazzinni-Rucki was guilty and would be surprised if she was not found guilty.  Another allegation is that a potential juror admitted he had recently attended a party of a relative of David Rucki and was familiar with the case. Judge Karen Asphaug failed to disqualify either prospective juror, in the later case Judge Karen Asphaug said the potential juror’s assurances that they could remain impartial were sufficient to prevent her from disqualifying them. If you are the Defendant, “How impartial do you think these two jurors are going to be?” This is your life on the line here, should you be afforded every appearance of neutrality and fairness?

Now, in addition to the judge disqualifying jurors for cause, the Defense and Prosecution are allowed a small number of “free boots” of any juror for any reason.  It is alleged that Dakota County MN Court machinated the jury pool in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case so the Prosecution could get biased jurors on to the final jury panel.  It is alleged that the afore-mentioned two particular jurors should have been disqualified by the judge, but were not. It is alleged that so many biased/unqualified jurors had been machinated into the jury pool (stacked) by Dakota County MN Courts,  that the Defense would not have enough free boots, to get rid of them all. It is alleged that by the time these two particular prospective jurors turn in the jury selection process came up, the Defense had already expended all of its “free boots”.  In an allegedly random process, and with thousands of citizens living in Dakota County MN, what are the chances that 6 or more of about a 25 person jury pool would be biased against the Defense. Now, if you are the Defendant, do you think this was by chance or by deliberate machination of the process by the Dakota County Courts? ]Make sure you factor in your new understanding of your government’s lack of honor and integrity manifests itself in Government’s willingness to manipulate outcomes with recent revelations of its departure from the Rule of Law in the Hillary Clinton State Department Email matter and its willingness to engage in machinations to violate the Democratic Process reveal in the DNC Leaks (http://bit.ly/2afaGro)]

DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW
ALLEGED FACT/EVIDENCE SHAPING

And lastly, there is the allegation in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter that the Court is Fact/Evidence shaping the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case.  As was mentioned earlier, the only facts and evidence the Finder of Fact (in this case the jury) is supposed to use in making its finding is the facts and evidence on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD. Over time our courts have enacted a series of rules and precedents whereby they can include or exclude facts from the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD (let or keep the jury from seeing/hearing). In effect, judges can determine (fix) the outcome of any trial (or any other court proceeding) by only allowing on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD those facts and evidence which support the desired outcome.

In this writer’s long experience with the Judicial TAR Movement, he has became aware of the practice in multiple cases of Judges “telegraphing” to the lawyers on both sides and other court personnel how the Judge would like to rule.  The lawyer fraternity (even the lawyer you paid) and other witness like Guardians Ad Litem and CPS, oblige the judge by only placing on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD facts and evidence that will allow the Finder of Fact (Judge or Jury) to rule in the manner the judge has previously “telegraphed” to them. (Remember these judges and lawyers all go to the same continuing education courses, golf courses, country clubs and other social and professional events and speak their own “Legal-ease version of English – wink, wink; nudge, nudge; meaningful glance)

In the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Matter, there is an allegation that Judge Karen Asphaug has purposely and wrongfully excluded and attempted to exclude facts and evidence from the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD which demonstrate Sandra Grazzini-Rucki reasonably feared for the health and safety of her children from their father David Rucki.

The question to you, if you are the Defendant, if Judge Karen Asphaug in fact acted in this matter, did she act in a way that gives an appearance of impropriety in the trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki? Did you get a fair trial? And, even if you have the money and emotional fortitude to appeal and win on appeal, is not the additional money and time spent amount to unjust punishment? (Progressive Conditioning http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27)

One single event/fact has cemented this writer’s belief in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s representation that she feared for the lives and safety of her children. It has been alleged that at some point in all of this David Rucki gathered the family around a kitchen table. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki alleges that David Rucki threatened to kill all of them and then himself. In the opposing version David Rucki only threatened to kill himself in front of the entire family gathered around the kitchen table. In this writer’s humble opinion, regardless of which version is true, this event also cemented the Parental Alienation of David Rucki’s children towards himself. That some version occurred is a matter of relevant fact. You can hear David Rucki in his own words try to spin the event to his best advantage in this newscast. (https://youtu.be/qVaXS_neu2E at 4m 45s to 5m); http://bit.ly/2aeUHWr 4m 50s to 5m 3s) David Rucki’s admission of some version of this event is what cements in this writer’s mind that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki reasonably believed her children were in danger, and when the legal authorities failed to act in accordance with the Rule of Law, Sandra Grazzini-Rucki was forced to assert her own UNALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE and act to protect her children from her reasonably perceived threat from their father.

It is important to remember went to the Courthouse yesterday and tried to make inquiries and ask these questions so he could assert them as facts rather than allegations. But POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena resorted to Progressive tactics to keep rank and file Americans ignorant of the systemic corruption of the Dakota County MN Courts.

What you also don’t know, are the allegations that Judge David Knutson made decisions in prior litigation related to the Rucki Divorce that also depart from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion).  (In this writer’s humble opinion; think bribe, other consideration or Teddy Kennedy and Chappaquiddick dynamics) As Judge David Knutson is on the Discipline Review Board, its tough to pursue the truth through that avenue.  As the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards is a legal black-hole and essentially a Public Relations firm for Minnesota Judges, no relief is available there either. And, as the Minnesota Legislature for 10+ years has refused to the Judicial TAR Movement a hearing dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of systemic corruption in the Minnesota Courts, no relief will be force coming there. Still, someone should ask Judge David Knutson to explain his departures from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter, and this writer even suggests Judge David Knutson should submit to a polygraph to “avoid the appearance of impropriety”. [Here again, and especially, Tim Kinley has a much better grasp and understanding of the minutia and specifics of the departures from the Rule of Law allegedly committed by Judge David Knutson than does this writer. See his YouTube Channel “Speechless” (http://bit.ly/SpeechlessMN)]

This writer has an additional special qualification in this case of asserting the likely truthfulness of the allegations of departures from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion)  in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter.  Judge Karen Asphaug was one of the Judges in the only criminal matter this writer has ever been charged with (besides minor traffic tickets – No DWIs).  In that matter, this writer was in another Dakota County Courtroom in 2014 investigating allegations that Dakota County MN Law Enforcement was complicit in the local Drug Trade.  A woman complained that her X-husband was getting special treatment from Dakota County Law Enforcement and the Courts because he was the main supplier of these illegal drugs. The matter was eventually dismissed for LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE(meaning it was BS). But along the way, I told Judge Karen Asphaug as I stood before her, “The charge and being forced to defend one’s self is the intended punishment” Our Government brings bogus charges against people to achieve its agenda because it knows the trauma, time and expense is punishment enough to scare people off or cow them into submission. Behind closed doors our government officials often laugh and think its funny to terrorize citizens. (Progressive Conditioning http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27)

Before the case against this writer was dismissed for being bogus, Judge Karen Asphaug ruled from the bench that the case should be heard by a Judge from a different jurisdiction as it involved Bailiff’s who work closely with Judges. This writer alleges that later Judge Karen Asphaug was instructed by former US MN AG and current MN Supreme Court POS Justice David “The Bag Man” Lillehaug (aka Killehaug) to cooperate in fixing the criminal case against this writer for political reasons and in furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy against this writer.  Dakota County lined up 4 Bailiff’s/Sheriff’s Deputies to perjure themselves against this writer by saying he disrupted the Court and was guilty of “Disorderly Conduct”(while they believed no video existed). For months, the POS Prosecutor Dan Fluegel insisted all exculpatory video tape was destroyed. Only when this writer produced written correspondence from the Dakota County Sheriff’s Department confirming this writer demanded the video tape be retained within days of the incident, did some of the exculpatory video tape appear and the 4 Bailiff’s/Sheriff’s Deputies willing to perjure themselves slink away(Yet not fired or punished).  Only this writer’s appeal to the Minnesota Appellate Court along with a copy of the Court transcript forced Judge Karen Asphaug to make sure a Judge from another jurisdiction was administratively assigned to this writer’s case. You can read more about that here: Don Mashak Notice of Claims to Dakota County MN 10_09_2015 (http://bit.ly/2aeZfgy) You can also learn how a Sheriff’s Deputy can “Blow someone’s face off and the Union will have him back on the job the next day”.  So arrogant and above the law is Dakota County MN, that even though they are required by law to perform an investigation and provide a copy of the findings when a Notice of Claims is filed, they simply refused to comply. And apparently no government agency exists to force them to comply.

[With the topics we have covered in this article in mind, let us take a moment for this writer to acknowledge he sympathizes with the underlying causes of action pursued by “Black Lives Matter” (BLM). Though this writer does not agree with their methods, this writer has reached out to the “Black Lives Matter” Movement, offered them advice and asked them to join the Judicial TAR Movement. (http://bit.ly/29Ae8fH)]

So now, you understand why when Dakota County MN Courts and Judge Karen Asphaug are accused of departing from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion), this writer has special qualifications for assessing the validity of those allegations. Really, Judge Karen Asphaug, you are going to put a woman in jail for being forced to protect her children when the police and legal system failed her? Really Judge Karen Asphaug, you don’t think your oath of office requires you to do something regarding Judge David Knutson requiring Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s Lawyer to defend her client handcuffed to a wheel chair without notes or client her client present? When will you act to “avoid the appearance of impropriety”? Judge Karen Asphaug, there are so many other, “Really?” type posits, but in the end Judge Karen Asphaug, Is this what you really want to be known as?

Its up to you, Judge Karen Asphaug; HON or POS?

It is apparent from my one interaction with POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena, she is in the habit of flippantly lying and ignoring her oath of office and should never be known as HON.

In closing, as I believe that WE THE PEOPLE are in fact the equals of the arrogant Progressive POS’s [despite Progressive Educated Elite assertions to the contrary (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3)], I believe WE THE PEOPLE have the right to judge them for their failure to answer our questions and provide documents we request. And, I further assert WE THE  PEOPLE have a right to view these refusals in the manner prescribed by the US Supreme Court.

The Finder of Fact (You and I) may presume that the failure of a person (POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena/Judge Karen Asphaug/Judge David Knutson) to answer questions and/or produce documents may be interpreted as an indication that their truthful responses would have been detrimental to their legal position.

POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena refused to answer my questions and lied, to prevent the Press from exercising its First Amendment Right of Freedom of the Press. This writer never got a chance to query Judge Karen Asphaug. Others have tried to query Judge David Knutson, unsuccessfully.

This writer gives POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena and Judge Karen Asphaug until 6pm CDT 28 JULY 2016 to respond to these allegations or summarily, WE THE PEOPLE may judge them to be accurate and true, in accordance with the rules the US Supreme Court that apply to anyone of WE THE PEOPLE when we appear before them.

Judge Karen Asphaug is aware of my contact information from her previous court related departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion).

My fellow Americans, this writer hopes this article helps you all in forming a truer Perspective of Reality that permits us, as equals, to unite together and make our Government once again accountable to WE THE PEOPLE. Millennials and GenX’rs, as I have promised you elsewhere, you now have a better handle on the true nature of our Government and Courts. Keep fighting the good fight!

“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good [people] do nothing”

~ Edmund Burke

Government and Courts; Please take note, WE THE PEOPLE shall include lack of proper redress of our concerns in this matter, and our future Third Declaration of Causes (http://bit.ly/NewDOCRev1), in determining if and when it is appropriate for WE THE PEOPLE to withdraw our CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED.

This article was written by Don Mashak alone without seeking advice, direction or permission of anyone else. I alone am responsible for the content and publication of this article.

Those were my thoughts.

Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot