Harvard Law Dumps US Constitution & La ley de Harvard Elimina la Constitución de EE UU

PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH
APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS

Harvard Law Dumps US Constitution

PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY HARVARD LAW NO LONGER REQUIRES THE US CONSTITUTION FOR GRADUATION?

Harvard Law Dumps US Constitution

PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY HARVARD LAW NO LONGER REQUIRES THE US CONSTITUTION FOR GRADUATION?

   President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan made several changes as Dean of Harvard Law School. Many commentators have focused on her ban on military recruiting but CNS news reports on another major change — eliminating U.S. Constitutional law as a required course:

    “As dean, Kagan won approval from the faculty in 2006 to make major changes to the Harvard Law’s curriculum.

    “My understanding is that she instituted three new courses to the required curriculum and, in so doing, got rid of a requirement to take constitutional law,” Robert Alt, senior legal fellow and deputy director of the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, told CNSNews.com.

    “Currently, at Harvard, constitutional law is not required for first-year law students, or even for graduation,” Alt added.

    Indeed, according to Harvard documents, constitutional law is NOT listed among the law school’s academic requirements, though the catalogue for 2010-2011 does list more than a dozen elective courses dealing with some form of constitutional law.

    But in a 2006 Harvard news release explaining the changes, Kagan explained the move away from constitutional law was deliberateRead more: https://rebrand.ly/HarvardLawDumpsConstitution

MY TAKE: America was founded upon NATURAL LAW (para 1, Declaration of Independence) & the RULE OF LAW. (The Rule of Law requires one set of laws applied equally to all citizens with no preference for wealth, status or government position) That one set of Laws is our US Constitution. How can you teach the Rule of Law to Lawyers without first teaching them the foundations of the Rule of Law, which is our Constitution? In future CITIZEN GRAND JURY trials [ Read more: https://rebrand.ly/TXCitizenGrandJury ] or conspiracy to commit sedition and treason, and/or in drafting your NEW DECLARATION OF CAUSES [ http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft ] fmake sure to include this chapter of the crime.

This is an example of a battle in the unconventional revolution by slow, covert infiltration by the Progressive Globalist Insurgency, I have long spoken of. As you can see, the Progressives are slowly and covertly infiltrating our Legal System and removing the foundational elements that protect WE THE PEOPLE from the tyranny and despotism of a rogue government.

Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

This document inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker

La ley de Harvard elimina la Constitución de EE. UU.

La ley de Harvard elimina la Constitución de EE. UU.

POR FAVOR EXPLIQUE POR QUÉ LA LEY DE HARVARD YA NO REQUIERE LA CONSTITUCIÓN DE ESTADOS UNIDOS PARA LA GRADUACIÓN

La candidata a la Corte Suprema del presidente Obama, Elena Kagan, hizo varios cambios como decana de la Facultad de Derecho de Harvard. Muchos comentaristas se han centrado en su prohibición del reclutamiento militar, pero las noticias de CNS informan sobre otro cambio importante: eliminar la ley constitucional de los EE. UU. Como un curso obligatorio:
“Como decano, Kagan obtuvo la aprobación de la facultad en 2006 para realizar cambios importantes en el plan de estudios de Harvard Law.

‘Tengo entendido que instituyó tres nuevos cursos para el plan de estudios requerido y, al hacerlo, eliminó el requisito de cursar derecho constitucional’, dijo Robert Alt, investigador jurídico senior y subdirector del Centro de Estudios Legales y Judiciales de la Heritage Foundation, le dijo a CNSNews.com.

“Actualmente, en Harvard, la ley constitucional no es un requisito para los estudiantes de derecho de primer año, ni siquiera para la graduación”, agregó Alt.

De hecho, según los documentos de Harvard, el derecho constitucional NO figura entre los requisitos académicos de la facultad de derecho, aunque el catálogo para 2010-2011 enumera más de una docena de cursos electivos que tratan de alguna forma de derecho constitucional.

Pero en un comunicado de prensa de Harvard de 2006 que explica los cambios, Kagan explicó que el alejamiento del derecho constitucional fue deliberado … Leer más: https://rebrand.ly/HarvardLawDumpsConstitution

MI TOMA: Estados Unidos se fundó sobre la LEY NATURAL (párrafo 1, Declaración de Independencia) y el ESTADO DE DERECHO. (El Estado de derecho requiere que un conjunto de leyes se aplique por igual a todos los ciudadanos sin preferencia por la riqueza, el estatus o la posición gubernamental) Ese conjunto de leyes es nuestra Constitución de los Estados Unidos. ¿Cómo se puede enseñar el Estado de derecho a los abogados sin antes enseñarles los fundamentos del Estado de derecho, que es nuestra Constitución? En futuros juicios del GRAN JURADO CIUDADANO [Leer más: https://rebrand.ly/TXCitizenGrandJury] por conspiración para cometer sedición y traición, y / o en la redacción de su NUEVA DECLARACIÓN DE CAUSAS [http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft] haga asegúrese de incluir este capítulo del crimen.

Este es un ejemplo de una batalla en la revolución no convencional por la infiltración lenta y encubierta de la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista, de la que he hablado durante mucho tiempo. Como puede ver, los progresistas se están infiltrando lenta y encubiertamente en nuestro Sistema Legal y eliminando los elementos fundamentales que protegen a NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO de la tiranía y el despotismo de un gobierno canalla.

Esos fueron mis pensamientos.
Gracias por tu tiempo.

En libertad
Don Mashak
El patriota cínico

Este documento inspirado por Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker

Citizen Grand Jury, Republic of Texas & Gran Jurado Ciudadano, República de Texas

PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH
APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS

Citizen Grand Jury, Republic of Texas

Citizen Grand Jury, Republic of Texas
And, so it begins

As announced by “Administering Your Public Servants”

A group of Texas Citizen-Patriots is convening a Citizen Grand Jury on

Tuesday, 9 March 2020, 11 am CST
307 US Highway 67 Frontage Road Est, Keene Texas 76059
The Republic of Texas 888-656-5515

All people are welcome to participate if they live in the Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW) area

This is an attempt at peaceful remedy intended to put a stop to the corruption.

It is time for “WE THE PEOPLE” to step up and assert our unalienable Natural Rights as the Sovereigns of our Country.

Please RSVP if you plan to attend so I can adjust logistics as necessary.

                Best Regards, Glenn

US Supreme Court Validates People’s Rights to Establish Common Law Grand Jury

In a stunning 6 to 3 decision Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government “governed” and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights. This is the solution to taking back our government county by county . . . state by state! [US vs Williams (1992)]

What Power Does the Common-Law Grand Jury Hold?
“The grand jury is an English institution, brought to this country by the early colonists and incorporated in the Constitution by the Founders. … “to provide a fair method for instituting criminal proceedings against persons believed to have committed crimes.” [Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 (1956),]

Note:
The first American Revolution began with the Samuel Adams’ first Committee of Correspondence in 1772.
Per the US Founders, in regard to dealing with tyranny, WE THE PEOPLE must document exhausting our peaceful remedies before we consider alternative remedies. As a side note: Citizen Grand Juries are an attempt at peaceful remedy that we can easily document. http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft

Gran Jurado Ciudadano, República de Texas

Gran Jurado Ciudadano, República de Texas
Y así comienza

Como lo anunció ‘Administrar a sus servidores públicos’

Un grupo de ciudadanos patriotas de Texas está convocando a un gran jurado ciudadano para

   Martes, 9 de marzo de 2020, 11 a. M. CST
   307 US Highway 67 Frontage Road Est, Keene Texas 76059
   República de Texas 888-656-5515

Todas las personas pueden participar si viven en el área de Dallas / Fort Worth (DFW)

Este es un intento de remedio pacífico destinado a detener la corrupción.

Es hora de que “NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO” intensifiquemos y afirmemos nuestros inalienables Derechos Naturales como Soberanos de nuestro País.

Por favor confirme su asistencia si planea asistir para que pueda ajustar la logística según sea necesario.

                Saludos cordiales, Glenn

La Corte Suprema de EE. UU. Valida los derechos de las personas para establecer un gran jurado de derecho consuetudinario

En una asombrosa decisión de 6 a 3, el juez Antonin Scalia, en representación de la mayoría, confirmó que el gran jurado estadounidense no forma parte de los poderes judicial, ejecutivo ni legislativo del gobierno, sino que pertenece al pueblo. En efecto, es una cuarta rama del gobierno ‘gobernada’ y administrada directamente por y en nombre del pueblo estadounidense, y su autoridad emana de la Declaración de Derechos. Esta es la solución para recuperar nuestro gobierno condado por condado. . . estado por estado! [Estados Unidos contra Williams (1992)]

¿Qué poder tiene el gran jurado de derecho consuetudinario?

“El gran jurado es una institución inglesa, traída a este país por los primeros colonos e incorporada a la Constitución por los Fundadores. … ‘para proporcionar un método justo para iniciar procesos penales contra personas que se cree que han cometido delitos’. [Costello contra Estados Unidos, 350 U.S. 359 (1956),]

Nota: La primera Revolución Americana comenzó con el primer Comité de Correspondencia de Samuel Adams en 1772. Según los fundadores de EE. UU., Con respecto a lidiar con la tiranía, NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO debemos documentar el agotamiento de nuestros remedios pacíficos antes de considerar remedios alternativos. Como nota al margen: Citizen Grand Juries es un intento de remedio pacífico que podemos documentar fácilmente. http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft

FELLOW AMERICANS: PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND & AMERICANOS: POR FAVOR AYUDENME A ENTENDER

PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH
APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS

FELLOW AMERICANS: PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND

View Post

FELLOW AMERICANS: PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND

So, my fellow citizens, some of you are all good with trying to redress the injustices of Election 2020, by waiting until the 2022/2024 elections to vote again?  Did I get that right?

And that’s without redressing the specific issues that caused the injustices in ELECTION 2020… Some of you are just going to wait until 2022/2024 and hope same/similar injustice does NOT occur again? Really?

TO PUT A FINE POINT ON IT, MULTIPLE LAYERS OF GOVERNMENT, WHO TOOK OATHS TO EITHER ENSURE ELECTION INTEGRITY AND/OR SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION, FAILED TO ADHERE TO THEIR OATHS. And, some of you are just fine with letting that ride without consequence to the perpetrators? How can that be?

Progressive Election Administrators ignored or flaunted the rules. Law Enforcement failed to investigate and charge. Government Attorneys failed prosecute. SCOTUS used technicality to avoid hearing the issue on the merits. And Congress failed to Constitutionally “Check and Balance” SCOTUS for failing to do its job. Again, all of these government employees took oaths that their actions/inactions violated.

And then they all said, “See, inaction by Law Enforcement, SCOTUS and Congress is proof of 2020 Election Integrity”. What part of this non sequitur logic did I miss?  It seems our Progressive-usurped Government thinks WE THE PEOPLE are so ignorant that we won’t recognize a seditious and treasonous conspiracy when we see one. Personally, I feel justified in being angry to the point of being moved to action, regardless of whether the rest of you want to roll over and take it, or not.

To wit, Government should consider this my exercise of my Natural Right to Petition Government for Redress as reduced to writing in the First Amendment. And, I formally demand Government act to redress said injustices immediately. If I am wrong in my Establishment of Truth and my resultant course of action, tell me how and why, publicly and in writing.

My fellow citizens, it seems clear that the actions of government described above, combined with Mainstream Media Propaganda, Social Media Censorship, Common Core Indoctrination and COVID-19 Lockdowns, exacerbated by multiple layers of Government officials failing to uphold their oaths to support and defend the Constitution constitute a a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evincing a design to reduce WE THE PEOPLE under absolute Despotism” (US Declaration of Independence 1776).

Once again, if I am wrong, someone tell me how I am wrong.  Government does NOT get to commit crimes against WE THE PEOPLE, and then escape accountability by essentially saying, “because we say so, it wasn’t a crime”. Natural Law and the Constitution make WE THE PEOPLE the Sovereigns, and our public servants accountable to WE THE PEOPLE. Calling those of us who try to hold our government accountable for its crimes, “Domestic Terrorists”, and then holing up behind guns and barb wire (put in place on false pretexts), while failing to address and redress these issues are acts and attitudes of tyrannical Despots who assert unaccountability to anyone.

That said, my fellow citizens, behind closed doors, Progressive RINOs and DINOs in government say you are too ignorant to understand what they have done and are doing. Progressives say they are superior to the ignorant masses and not accountable to them. (Pages 51 & 52) I have personally heard this and I have personally told Progressive Government RINOs and DINOs they are wrong. However, each of you must establish truth for yourselves and act accordingly.

My fellow citizens, what these New World Order Progressives seek is beyond evil. Rather than humanity being comprised of self-Determinant individuals, Progressives say Humanity is a single “Social Organism”. (Pages 101-102) Like a colony of Honeybees, Progressive RINOs and DINOs view the masses as expendable worker bees, with no rights(Page 25), who exist only to serve the Progressive Hive Community as ordered by the Progressive Elite King and Queen bees. (I encourage you to read the entire book, “Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era” 2016 by practicing, hardcore, Progressive Professor, Thomas Leonard <> Borrow at your local library or buy here)

Ladies, please forgive in advance for my breach of political correctness decorum while I attempt to motivate others to fight this injustice. If one of you women want to step up, I am more than happy to step aside. That said, the nature of men to protect those they care about has insured the survival of humanity for thousands of years. American men, if you let this injustice stand and be inflicted on your women, children and the infirm, you are not Real Men nor Patriots; you are cowards and political cuckolds.  If you choose to be cowards and cuckolds, “Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.” ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803).

In closing, It is clear government will not redress this injustice, unless WE THE PEOPLE apply enough pressure. If you wish our grievances with Election 2020 to be redressed, WE THE PEOPLE must remain focused on our goal, to the exclusion of almost all other goals. The Progressive Globalist Insurgency traitors are betting that if they can stall long enough, you will just give up and accept your new status as ignorant slaves. If you do not want that for your children and future generations of Americans, Do NOT let them distract you with new issues and new crises. Everyday, contact your oath-breaking traitor elected officials and demand redress on this issue until they comply.

Did I mention I hate politics as much as the next person, but these acts of despotism by our government requires WE THE PEOPLE to hold our government accountable.

Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.

Keep fighting the good fight, fellow patriots.

In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

This document inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker

AMERICANOS: POR FAVOR AYUDENME A ENTENDER

AMERICANOS: POR FAVOR AYUDENME A ENTENDER

Entonces, mis conciudadanos, ¿algunos de ustedes están bien tratando de reparar las injusticias de las elecciones de 2020, esperando hasta las elecciones de 2022/2024 para volver a votar? ¿Entendí bien?

Y eso sin corregir los problemas específicos que causaron las injusticias en las ELECCIONES 2020 … ¿Algunos de ustedes simplemente van a esperar hasta 2022/2024 y esperan que NO vuelva a ocurrir la misma injusticia o una injusticia similar? ¿En serio?

PARA PONER UN PUNTO FINO, MÚLTIPLES CAPAS DE GOBIERNO, QUE HICIERON JURAMENTOS PARA ASEGURAR LA INTEGRIDAD DE LAS ELECCIONES Y / O APOYAR Y DEFENDER LA CONSTITUCIÓN, NO CUMPLIMOS CON SUS JURAMOS. ¿Y algunos de ustedes están bien con dejar que eso pase sin consecuencias para los perpetradores? ¿Como puede ser?

Los administradores de elecciones progresivas ignoraron o hicieron alarde de las reglas. La policía no investigó ni presentó cargos. Los abogados del gobierno no procesaron. SCOTUS utilizó tecnicismos para evitar escuchar la cuestión sobre el fondo. Y el Congreso falló en “Controlar y equilibrar” constitucionalmente a SCOTUS por no hacer su trabajo. Una vez más, todos estos empleados del gobierno tomaron juramento de que sus acciones / inacciones violaron.

Y luego todos dijeron: ‘Mira, la inacción de las fuerzas del orden, SCOTUS y el Congreso es una prueba de la integridad de las elecciones de 2020’. ¿Qué parte de esta lógica incongruente me perdí? Parece que nuestro Gobierno usurpado progresista piensa que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO somos tan ignorantes que no reconoceremos una conspiración sediciosa y traidora cuando la veamos. Personalmente, me siento justificado en estar enojado hasta el punto de ser movido a la acción, sin importar si el resto de ustedes quiere darse la vuelta y tomarlo o no.

Es decir, el gobierno debería considerar que este es mi ejercicio de mi derecho natural a solicitar una reparación al gobierno, como se reduce a escrito en la Primera Enmienda. Y exijo formalmente que el gobierno actúe para reparar dichas injusticias de inmediato. Si me equivoco en mi Establecimiento de la Verdad y mi curso de acción resultante, dígame cómo y por qué, públicamente y por escrito.

Mis conciudadanos, parece claro que las acciones del gobierno descritas anteriormente, combinadas con la propaganda de los principales medios de comunicación, la censura en las redes sociales, el adoctrinamiento básico común y los cierres de COVID-19, exacerbados por múltiples capas de funcionarios del gobierno que no cumplen con sus juramentos de apoyar y defender la Constitución constituye una ‘larga serie de abusos y usurpaciones, que persigue invariablemente el mismo Objeto que evidencia un diseño para reducir NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO al Despotismo absoluto ”(Declaración de Independencia de los Estados Unidos 1776).

Una vez más, si me equivoco, alguien me diga en qué me equivoco. El gobierno NO puede cometer crímenes contra NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO, y luego escapar de la rendición de cuentas diciendo esencialmente, ‘porque nosotros lo decimos, no fue un crimen’. La Ley Natural y la Constitución hacen que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO sean los Soberanos, y nuestros servidores públicos rindan cuentas ante NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO. Llamar a aquellos de nosotros que intentamos hacer que nuestro gobierno rinda cuentas por sus crímenes, ‘terroristas domésticos’, y luego escondernos detrás de armas y alambre de púas (implementado con pretextos falsos), mientras no abordamos y reparamos estos problemas son actos y actitudes de déspotas tiránicos que afirman no rendir cuentas a nadie.

Dicho esto, mis conciudadanos, a puerta cerrada, los RINO progresistas y los DINO en el gobierno dicen que son demasiado ignorantes para comprender lo que han hecho y están haciendo. Los progresistas dicen que son superiores a las masas ignorantes y no les rinden cuentas. (Páginas 51 y 52) Personalmente he escuchado esto y personalmente les he dicho a los RINO y DINO del Gobierno Progresista que están equivocados. Sin embargo, cada uno de ustedes debe establecer la verdad por sí mismo y actuar en consecuencia.

Mis conciudadanos, esta búsqueda de los progresistas del Nuevo Orden Mundial está más allá del mal. En lugar de que la humanidad esté compuesta por individuos autodeterminantes, los progresistas dicen que la humanidad es un único “organismo social”. (Páginas 101-102) Como una colonia de abejas, los RINO progresivos y los DINO ven a las masas como abejas obreras prescindibles, sin derechos (Página 25), que existen solo para servir a la Comunidad de la colmena progresiva según lo ordenado por el Rey y la Reina de élite progresiva. abejas. (Le animo a leer el libro completo, ‘Reformadores iliberales: raza, eugenesia y economía estadounidense en la era progresiva’ 2016 por el profesor practicante, incondicional y progresista, Thomas Leonard <> Pida prestado en su biblioteca local o compre aquí)

Señoras, por favor perdonen de antemano mi incumplimiento del decoro de la corrección política mientras intento motivar a otros a luchar contra esta injusticia. Si una de ustedes, las mujeres, quiere dar un paso al frente, estoy más que feliz de hacerme a un lado. Dicho esto, la naturaleza de los hombres para proteger a sus seres queridos ha asegurado la supervivencia de la humanidad durante miles de años. Hombres estadounidenses, si permiten que esta injusticia permanezca y sea infligida a sus mujeres, niños y enfermos, no son Hombres de Verdad ni Patriotas; sois cobardes y cornudos politicos. Si eliges ser cobardes y cornudos, “Agáchate y lame las manos que te alimentan. Que tus cadenas se pongan livianas sobre ti y que la posteridad olvide que eras nuestro compatriota. ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803).

Para terminar, está claro que el gobierno no reparará esta injusticia, a menos que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO apliquemos suficiente presión. Si desea que se resuelvan nuestras quejas con las Elecciones 2020, NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO debemos mantenernos enfocados en nuestro objetivo, con exclusión de casi todos los demás objetivos. Los traidores de la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista están apostando a que si pueden detenerse el tiempo suficiente, simplemente te rendirás y aceptarás tu nuevo estado de esclavos ignorantes. Si no quiere eso para sus hijos y las futuras generaciones de estadounidenses, NO permita que lo distraigan con nuevos problemas y nuevas crisis. Todos los días, comuníquese con los funcionarios electos traidores que rompen el juramento y exija una reparación sobre este tema hasta que cumplan.

¿Mencioné que odio la política tanto como cualquier otra persona, pero estos actos de despotismo por parte de nuestro gobierno requieren que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO hagamos responsable a nuestro gobierno?

Esos fueron mis pensamientos.
Gracias por tu tiempo.

Sigan peleando la buena batalla, compañeros patriotas.

En libertad
Don Mashak
El patriota cínico

Este documento inspirado por Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker



US 18 CODE 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection & US 18 CODE 2383 – Rebelión o Insurrección

PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH
APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS

US 18 CODE 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection

US 18 CODE 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection

18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Our Constitution & the settled Metaphysics of Natural Law (Par. 1, Declaration of Independence) are the established civil authority of our Country. Per these, WE THE PEOPLE have inalienable Rights, and as the Sovereigns, have the right to abolish our government if it ignores the Constitution and Natural Law.

FELLOW AMERICANS, YOU HAVE BEEN DECEIVED. THE PROGRESSIVE GLOBALIST ELITES ARE THE REAL INSURRECTIONISTS. And, have been so for 100+ years. Progressives Elites have many unconstitutional beliefs. (eg. concept of rights of the individual is nonsense, Pg 25; Constitution’s Checks & Balances hinder government, Pg 66; & the masses are too ignorant to govern themselves, Pgs 51-52; Progressive Globalist Elites are superior to, & are not accountable to the masses, Pgs 51-52 & many more). The unconstitutional beliefs of the Progressive Elites became Sedition & Treason when they ACTED to make them reality circa 1913. They created the 4th Branch of government aka Administrative State (Pgs 40-49) ) to spearhead their revolution by slow, covert infiltration.

18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

This document inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker

US 18 CODE 2383 – Rebelión o insurrección

US 18 CODE 2383 – Rebelión o insurrección

18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebelión o insurrección
Quien incite, ponga en pie, ayude o participe en cualquier rebelión o insurrección contra la autoridad de los Estados Unidos o sus leyes, o le brinde ayuda o consuelo, será multado bajo este título o encarcelado no más de diez años, o ambos; y será incapaz de ocupar ningún cargo en los Estados Unidos.

Nuestra Constitución y la establecida Metafísica de la Ley Natural (Par. 1, Declaración de Independencia) son la autoridad civil establecida de nuestro País. Por estos, NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO tenemos Derechos inalienables, y como Soberanos, tenemos el derecho de abolir nuestro gobierno si ignora la Constitución y la Ley Natural.

AMERICANOS, HAN SIDO ENGAÑADOS. LAS ELITAS GLOBALISTAS PROGRESIVAS SON LOS VERDADEROS INSURRECCIONISTAS. Y lo han sido durante más de 100 años. Las élites progresistas tienen muchas creencias inconstitucionales. (p. ej., el concepto de los derechos del individuo es una tontería, pág. 25; Los controles y balances de la Constitución obstaculizan el gobierno, pág. 66; y las masas son demasiado ignorantes para gobernarse a sí mismas, págs. 51-52; las élites globalistas progresistas son superiores y no responsable ante las masas, págs. 51-52 y muchas más). Las creencias inconstitucionales de las élites progresistas se convirtieron en sedición y traición cuando ACTUARON para hacerlas realidad alrededor de 1913. Crearon la cuarta rama del gobierno, también conocida como Estado Administrativo (págs. 40-49)) para encabezar su revolución mediante una infiltración lenta y encubierta.

18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy

Si dos o más personas en cualquier Estado o Territorio, o en cualquier lugar sujeto a la jurisdicción de los Estados Unidos, conspiran para derrocar, sofocar o destruir por la fuerza al Gobierno de los Estados Unidos, o para librar la guerra contra ellos, o para oponerse por la fuerza a su autoridad, o por la fuerza para prevenir, obstaculizar o retrasar la ejecución de cualquier ley de los Estados Unidos, o por la fuerza para apoderarse, tomar o poseer cualquier propiedad de los Estados Unidos en contra de la autoridad de los mismos , cada uno será multado bajo este título o encarcelado no más de veinte años, o ambos.

18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprisión de traición

Quien, debiendo lealtad a los Estados Unidos y teniendo conocimiento de la comisión de cualquier traición en su contra, encubre y no divulga y da a conocer, tan pronto como sea posible, lo mismo al Presidente oa algún juez de los Estados Unidos, o ante el gobernador o ante algún juez o magistrado de un Estado en particular, es culpable de delito de traición a la patria y será multado bajo este título o encarcelado no más de siete años, o ambos.

Este documento inspirado en Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker

2020 US Election Fraud Facts & Datos sobre el fraude electoral en EE. UU. 2020

PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH
APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS
Sorry, but many sources don’t have Spanish version/subtitles <> Lo siento, pero muchas fuentes no tienen subtítulos o versión en español

2020 US Election Fraud Facts

2020 US Election Fraud Facts

Pillow Man, Mike Lindell, reveals the Election 2020 Fraud Facts that traitor SCOTUS Scehmed to avoid hearing on technicality rather than ruling upon the merits.

VIDEO: http://rebrand.ly/2020ElectionFraudFacts
https://www.brighteon.com/e798c41d-f583-4c2e-a9fe-294a63675db2
More Sources: http://rebrand.ly/BFIN2020ElectionFraudFacts
https://rumble.com/vdlgcv-mike-lindells-absolute-proof-documentary.html
https://youtu.be/6ai6Ci2Hyas
http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged

PROGRESSIVE ELECTION ADMINISTRATORS DO NOT CARE ABOUT ACTUAL ELECTION INTEGRITY; THEY ONLY CARE ABOUT THE “APPEARANCE” OF ELECTION INTEGRITY SO VOTERS DON’T QUESTION THEIR RIGGED ELECTION RESULTS.
http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged
https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2020/08/12/imho-our-minnesota-elections-are-rigged/
I have been an election judge a decade or more. I wrote this long before the election
I raised the issue of rigged computer code in Electronic Ballot Boxes going
back several elections. I was shut down at every turn.

So many people ask me to provide proof of 2020 US Election fraud. Here is one source. Remember, the US Supreme Court dismissed all of the Election Fraud Lawsuits on a technicality, instead of ruling on the Merits. All US Judges and Lawyers take oaths to support and defend the US Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And longstanding legal tradition favors courts deciding cases on the merits, not technicality. There is no higher legal issue for the courts to decide in a Representative, Constitutionally limited Republic than the integrity of our Elections. Our US Supreme Court aided and abetted the seditious and treason Progressive Globalist Coup in contriving to dismiss these matters on a technicality. Think about it. There are 1.3 million lawyers in America. 335 of the 555 members of Congress are lawyers. How is it that not one single lawyer could draft a lawsuit that could not be tossed out on a technicality? All those who suppress these facts are guilty of aiding and abetting the seditious and treasonous Progressive Globalist Insurgency. Remember, all who conspired in these matters are motivated to suppress the facts to avoid trials for sedition and treason, a conviction for sedition and treason and hanging for sedition and treason. Pillow Man, Mike Lindell’s documentary is a credible source.

Datos sobre el fraude electoral en EE. UU. 2020

Hombre de almohada, Mike Lindell, revela los hechos fraudulentos de las elecciones de 2020 que el traidor SCOTUS Scehmed para evitar escuchar sobre tecnicismos en lugar de pronunciarse sobre los méritos.

el vídeo: http://rebrand.ly/2020ElectionFraudFacts
https://www.brighteon.com/e798c41d-f583-4c2e-a9fe-294a63675db2
Más fuentes: http://rebrand.ly/BFIN2020ElectionFraudFacts
https://rumble.com/vdlgcv-mike-lindells-absolute-proof-documentary.html
https://youtu.be/6ai6Ci2Hyas
http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged

A LOS ADMINISTRADORES DE ELECCIONES PROGRESIVAS NO LE IMPORTA LA INTEGRIDAD REAL DE LAS ELECCIONES; A ELLOS ÚNICAMENTE LE IMPORTA LA ‘APARIENCIA’ DE LA INTEGRIDAD DE LAS ELECCIONES, POR LO QUE LOS VOTANTES NO Cuestionan los resultados de sus elecciones.
http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged
https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2020/08/12/imho-our-minnesota-elections-are-rigged/
He sido juez electoral durante una década o más. Escribí esto mucho antes de las elecciones
Planteé la cuestión del código de computadora manipulado en las urnas electrónicas
Atras varias elecciones. Me cerraron a cada paso.

Mucha gente me pide que proporcione pruebas del fraude en las elecciones estadounidenses de 2020. Aquí hay una fuente. Recuerde, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos desestimó todas las Demandas por Fraude Electoral por un tecnicismo, en lugar de fallar sobre el fondo. Todos los jueces y abogados estadounidenses prestan juramento de apoyar y defender la Constitución estadounidense de todos los enemigos, tanto nacionales como extranjeros. Y la tradición legal de larga data favorece a los tribunales que deciden los casos en función del fondo, no del tecnicismo. No hay un asunto legal más importante para que los tribunales decidan en una República Representativa y constitucionalmente limitada que la integridad de nuestras Elecciones. Nuestra Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos ayudó e instigó al sedicioso y traidor Golpe de Estado Globalista Progresista a intentar desestimar estos asuntos por un tecnicismo. Piénsalo. Hay 1,3 millones de abogados en Estados Unidos. 335 de los 555 miembros del Congreso son abogados. ¿Cómo es posible que ni un solo abogado pueda redactar una demanda que no pueda descartarse por un tecnicismo? Todos aquellos que reprimen estos hechos son culpables de ayudar e incitar a la sediciosa y traidora insurgencia globalista progresista. Recuerde, todos los que conspiraron en estos asuntos están motivados a reprimir los hechos para evitar juicios por sedición y traición, una condena por sedición y traición y ahorcamiento por sedición y traición. Pillow Man, el documental de Mike Lindell es una fuente creíble.

HON or POS? Is Dakota County MN suspending the Rule of Law in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter?

 

SandraGrazziniRuckiCloseup07252016This writer’s followers on Twitter and other Social Media are familiar with his intention of uniting rank and file Americans under one common Perspective of Reality. A Perspective of reality far truer than the false Perspective of Reality promoted through the divisive propaganda of the Main Stream Media and the two faux major political parties. With this article, this writer intends to build upon creating that truer, common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our government and hold our government officials accountable for their departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) and betrayals of the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE.

Yesterday morning this writer went to the continuing trial of Sandra Grazzini Rucki in Dakota County MN on various criminal charges relating to allegedly wrongfully depriving her ex husband, David Rucki, of parental rights, etc. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s well-founded and well-recognized affirmative defense is that she was acting to protect her children from what she reasonably believed was danger from their father.  Sandra Grazzini-Rucki numerous times went to the appropriate channels to seek the safety of her children, and resorted to helping the girls escape their allegedly abusive father only when the police, the courts and Child Protective Services (CPS) failed her.

This writer does not really know Sandra Grazzini-Rucki from Adam. This writer first became aware of her abuse at the hands of the Dakota County MN Courts and our Government in 2014, through his involvement with the Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) Movement. Judicial TAR is a group of citizens who have sought a hearing before the Minnesota Legislature dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Courts every year from 2005, and every year our requests for said hearing have been denied.  From this, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR believe it is reasonable for all American citizens to conclude that Minnesota Government and Courts, at a minimum have something to hide, and more likely are complicit in the Systemic Corruption of the Minnesota Courts. [Systemic Corruption means that the aspects of government that are supposed to prevent & punish corruption instead are complicit in and cover it up] In 2009, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR came to believe it would be unlikely we would ever have our request for said hearing granted. With victims of the Abuse of Power of the Courts and their advocates  getting frustrated, becoming disheartened, moving away and dying, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR held an Ad Hoc hearing on the Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Courts to preserve our Petitions for Redress for Posterity:

03MAR2009 Ad Hoc MN hearing: Corruption in Judiciary 1/2
http://bit.ly/2009AdHoc1of2

03MAR2009 Ad Hoc MN hearing: Corruption in Judiciary 2/2
http://bit.ly/2009AdHoc2of2

 From this writer’s experience with the Judicial TAR Movement, this writer has learned nuances of the legal profession that most Americans are unaware of.  Add to this, this writer’s own experience in his personal civil litigation and 1 bogus criminal charge (eventually dismissed for lack of Probable Cause), and this writer asserts that he is uniquely qualified to understand how our Courts fix the outcomes of Court cases and educate his fellow rank and file citizens of the true nature of their government and courts.

This writer has written previously on the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Matter in Dakota County Minnesota, but your government has seen fit to scrub those articles from the internet. (Main Stream Media (MSM) has seen fit to not publish this writer’s previous articles on the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter.) In total, almost 200 of this writer’s blogs and several hundred of his posts and articles have been scrubbed from the Internet.  One gets the sense that our government and courts don’t want rank and file Americans to have the information about their corruption, machinations and duplicity that this writer exposes. Yet, rather than try to recreate and reassert all the facts from those censored articles, this writer is going to focus on the mechanics of various allegations of how the Dakota County MN Courts are trying to fix the outcome of the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki litigation from a succinct, common sense legal perspective. (Fellow Minnesotan, Tim Kinley has a much better knowledge of the all the particular facts in the related previous matters under Judge David Knutson and underlying facts and minutia of the Dakota County MN Court departures from the Rule the Rule (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) under Judge Karen Asphaug which have led to this trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki – His Youtube Channel http://bit.ly/SpeechlessMN) This article is written more from a macro-overview and general mechanics perspective.

This writer wanted to attend this trial yesterday because it was alleged that there were/are departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) occurring intended to fix the outcome of the case, and he wanted to confirm their accuracy. At the same time, recent events provide an opportunity for this writer to build upon the American Public’s current familiarity with the departures from the Rule of Law. Specifically, this writer refers to the FBI’s Comey’s and DOJ’s Lynch’s failure to charge Hillary Clinton over her various State Department Email related crimes despite facts in evidence which required Hillary Clinton to be charged (http://usat.ly/29wwvnV; http://cnn.it/29JlQDO) For those not familiar with the concept of the “Rule of Law”;

It is the concept and requirement embodied in our founding documents that there only be one set of laws for all American citizens and that it be enforced equally on all
citizens without regard to status, wealth or government position.

Additionally, this writer will also build upon recent revelations by Wikileaks (and Edward Snowden) which have revealed to all Americans the lengths to which our government will go to conspire against WE THE PEOPLE’s free will and the Democratic Process. In this instance, this writer is specifically referring to a hack of the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer servers. Subsequently, the disclosed emails and documents from the DNC servers revealed that the level of Systemic Corruption extends not just to suspension of the Rule of Law but also to violations and machinations of the Democratic Process. (http://bit.ly/2afaGro)

In the present matter of the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki trial, it has been alleged:

  • The jury was tainted with a Newspaper containing an article placed in the jury holding room prior to jury selection;
  • The Court engaged in jury rigging in that it placed so many biased and/or unqualified potential jurors in the jury pool that the Defense could not eliminate them all with its limited number of “free boots” and Judge Karen Asphaug failed to remove at least two jurors for cause who eventually were empaneled on the jury;
  • The Court did/is engaging in fact shaping.

Now, as a member of the press, this writer went to the trial yesterday with the specific purpose of ascertaining if any of these allegations were true. This writer was denied the opportunity to make said inquiries.

WARNING – DEPARTURE FROM ACCEPTED DECORUM FOLLOWS

This writer asserts the recent revelations of the magnitude of our government’s departures from the Rule of Law and Democratic Process warrant departures from accepted decorum. In some way, this writer feels he must signal to his fellow citizens that recent events require special attention. This writer will use these departures from decorum to signal to our fellow citizens that they can no longer remain calm and just go along with their normal daily routines; Rather our Government has departed so far from Constitutional and Natural Law, that the time has come for every American to question their blind loyalty to our government and actively work to restore our government’s accountability to WE THE PEOPLE. You have been fore-warned…

At the noon lunch break, as Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena walked by where this writer was seated in the Courtroom gallery, this writer took the opportunity to shake her hand and introduce himself as a member of the Press and a member of the Judicial TAR Movement. Ms. Kathryn M. Keena continued toward the door as this writer began to ask her questions about the allegations. With the rudeness and arrogance of those Progressives who think they are better than all the rest of us (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3), Ms. Kathryn M. Keena continued into a conference room without even the professional courtesy of saying she did not want to hear what this writer had to say nor answering any of this writer’s questions. As Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena entered the conference room, this writer turned to leave the foyer of the courtroom but was blocked by the egress of others from the court room and patiently waited his opportunity to exit the door. While this writer was standing their facing the exit door waiting for an opportunity to leave, the lying POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena made a FALSE REPORT to a Bailiff that I tried to follow her into the conference room. Lying POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena ordered the Bailiff to have me removed. This writer protested that POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena was lying, and that the Bailiff himself and others had this writer standing near them patiently waiting to leave the foyer. Others advised me to give up my protest and this writer left the foyer and the building.  Once again, Dakota County MN Courts had succeeded in preventing this writer from verifying the truth of their corruption and publishing it for the world to see.

EXPLAINING THE THREE ELEMENTS OF DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW
ALLEGEDLY USED TO ATTEMPT TO FIX THE OUTCOME OF THE
SANDRA GRAZZIN-RUCKI MATTER

JudgeDrunkonJudicialImmunityNow, lets revisit the various acts of departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) that have been alleged, in a simple, non-legal gibberish way so the average American can understand it. (See also http://bit.ly/SimulatedLitigationDefined and Proposed Election 2012 caucus resolutions for judicial reform(updated) Part 2of2; Resolution 17 http://bit.ly/2012JudicialTARResolutions2of2)

The alleged Court rules require that a Judge not do anything that might give the appearance of impropriety. Further, there is a requirement in the rules that says the “Finder of Fact” (Judge or Jury) allegedly can only consider facts and evidence on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD. (When this writer says alleged, it mean that, in the writer’s opinion, the Courts so frequently ignore them one must question if they actually are adhered to or not.

DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW
ARTICLE IN THE PROSPECTIVE JURY WAITING ROOM

In regard to the matter of the newspaper article about Sandra Grazzini-Rucki being in the jury waiting room before jury selection, shouldn’t there be a member of the staff assigned to ensuring that jury tainting evidence is not permitted in the jury waiting area.  Of course there is, but in this writer’s experience and knowledge, such methods of tainting juries are common in the courts.  To wit, every American has a right to a trial before an IMPARTIAL jury of their peers. To the point, if you were the one on trial how would you feel about a derogatory article about you being made available to potential jurors in the potential jury waiting room, potential jurors admitting they have read it and Judge Karen Asphaug ruling, “Ain’t no big deal”? In your opinion, if you are the Defendant, does Judge Karen Asphaug’s failure to redress this matter in a satisfactory manner give rise to an “appearance of impropriety”? (Untouchables – Switch Jury scene https://youtu.be/5Mbdi_NXweQ)

DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW
ALLEGED JURY RIGGING

Next, we move to the departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in alleged jury rigging.  In jury selection, the judge is supposed to disqualify jurors for a variety of reasons such as they are a friend or relative of one of the parties, that they are already familiar with the case, or they state have already made up their minds as to guilt or innocence, etc. This writer wanted to ask if any of these allegations regarding the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter were true. POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena use the arrogant Progressive tactic (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3) of having reporters not submissive to the Courts, booted. Therefore, it is necessary to say it is alleged  Judge Karen Asphaug failed to remove a person who said they read the article, knew about the case, felt that Sandra Grazzinni-Rucki was guilty and would be surprised if she was not found guilty.  Another allegation is that a potential juror admitted he had recently attended a party of a relative of David Rucki and was familiar with the case. Judge Karen Asphaug failed to disqualify either prospective juror, in the later case Judge Karen Asphaug said the potential juror’s assurances that they could remain impartial were sufficient to prevent her from disqualifying them. If you are the Defendant, “How impartial do you think these two jurors are going to be?” This is your life on the line here, should you be afforded every appearance of neutrality and fairness?

Now, in addition to the judge disqualifying jurors for cause, the Defense and Prosecution are allowed a small number of “free boots” of any juror for any reason.  It is alleged that Dakota County MN Court machinated the jury pool in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case so the Prosecution could get biased jurors on to the final jury panel.  It is alleged that the afore-mentioned two particular jurors should have been disqualified by the judge, but were not. It is alleged that so many biased/unqualified jurors had been machinated into the jury pool (stacked) by Dakota County MN Courts,  that the Defense would not have enough free boots, to get rid of them all. It is alleged that by the time these two particular prospective jurors turn in the jury selection process came up, the Defense had already expended all of its “free boots”.  In an allegedly random process, and with thousands of citizens living in Dakota County MN, what are the chances that 6 or more of about a 25 person jury pool would be biased against the Defense. Now, if you are the Defendant, do you think this was by chance or by deliberate machination of the process by the Dakota County Courts? ]Make sure you factor in your new understanding of your government’s lack of honor and integrity manifests itself in Government’s willingness to manipulate outcomes with recent revelations of its departure from the Rule of Law in the Hillary Clinton State Department Email matter and its willingness to engage in machinations to violate the Democratic Process reveal in the DNC Leaks (http://bit.ly/2afaGro)]

DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW
ALLEGED FACT/EVIDENCE SHAPING

And lastly, there is the allegation in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter that the Court is Fact/Evidence shaping the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case.  As was mentioned earlier, the only facts and evidence the Finder of Fact (in this case the jury) is supposed to use in making its finding is the facts and evidence on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD. Over time our courts have enacted a series of rules and precedents whereby they can include or exclude facts from the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD (let or keep the jury from seeing/hearing). In effect, judges can determine (fix) the outcome of any trial (or any other court proceeding) by only allowing on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD those facts and evidence which support the desired outcome.

In this writer’s long experience with the Judicial TAR Movement, he has became aware of the practice in multiple cases of Judges “telegraphing” to the lawyers on both sides and other court personnel how the Judge would like to rule.  The lawyer fraternity (even the lawyer you paid) and other witness like Guardians Ad Litem and CPS, oblige the judge by only placing on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD facts and evidence that will allow the Finder of Fact (Judge or Jury) to rule in the manner the judge has previously “telegraphed” to them. (Remember these judges and lawyers all go to the same continuing education courses, golf courses, country clubs and other social and professional events and speak their own “Legal-ease version of English – wink, wink; nudge, nudge; meaningful glance)

In the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Matter, there is an allegation that Judge Karen Asphaug has purposely and wrongfully excluded and attempted to exclude facts and evidence from the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD which demonstrate Sandra Grazzini-Rucki reasonably feared for the health and safety of her children from their father David Rucki.

The question to you, if you are the Defendant, if Judge Karen Asphaug in fact acted in this matter, did she act in a way that gives an appearance of impropriety in the trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki? Did you get a fair trial? And, even if you have the money and emotional fortitude to appeal and win on appeal, is not the additional money and time spent amount to unjust punishment? (Progressive Conditioning http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27)

One single event/fact has cemented this writer’s belief in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s representation that she feared for the lives and safety of her children. It has been alleged that at some point in all of this David Rucki gathered the family around a kitchen table. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki alleges that David Rucki threatened to kill all of them and then himself. In the opposing version David Rucki only threatened to kill himself in front of the entire family gathered around the kitchen table. In this writer’s humble opinion, regardless of which version is true, this event also cemented the Parental Alienation of David Rucki’s children towards himself. That some version occurred is a matter of relevant fact. You can hear David Rucki in his own words try to spin the event to his best advantage in this newscast. (https://youtu.be/qVaXS_neu2E at 4m 45s to 5m); http://bit.ly/2aeUHWr 4m 50s to 5m 3s) David Rucki’s admission of some version of this event is what cements in this writer’s mind that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki reasonably believed her children were in danger, and when the legal authorities failed to act in accordance with the Rule of Law, Sandra Grazzini-Rucki was forced to assert her own UNALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE and act to protect her children from her reasonably perceived threat from their father.

It is important to remember went to the Courthouse yesterday and tried to make inquiries and ask these questions so he could assert them as facts rather than allegations. But POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena resorted to Progressive tactics to keep rank and file Americans ignorant of the systemic corruption of the Dakota County MN Courts.

What you also don’t know, are the allegations that Judge David Knutson made decisions in prior litigation related to the Rucki Divorce that also depart from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion).  (In this writer’s humble opinion; think bribe, other consideration or Teddy Kennedy and Chappaquiddick dynamics) As Judge David Knutson is on the Discipline Review Board, its tough to pursue the truth through that avenue.  As the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards is a legal black-hole and essentially a Public Relations firm for Minnesota Judges, no relief is available there either. And, as the Minnesota Legislature for 10+ years has refused to the Judicial TAR Movement a hearing dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of systemic corruption in the Minnesota Courts, no relief will be force coming there. Still, someone should ask Judge David Knutson to explain his departures from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter, and this writer even suggests Judge David Knutson should submit to a polygraph to “avoid the appearance of impropriety”. [Here again, and especially, Tim Kinley has a much better grasp and understanding of the minutia and specifics of the departures from the Rule of Law allegedly committed by Judge David Knutson than does this writer. See his YouTube Channel “Speechless” (http://bit.ly/SpeechlessMN)]

This writer has an additional special qualification in this case of asserting the likely truthfulness of the allegations of departures from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion)  in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter.  Judge Karen Asphaug was one of the Judges in the only criminal matter this writer has ever been charged with (besides minor traffic tickets – No DWIs).  In that matter, this writer was in another Dakota County Courtroom in 2014 investigating allegations that Dakota County MN Law Enforcement was complicit in the local Drug Trade.  A woman complained that her X-husband was getting special treatment from Dakota County Law Enforcement and the Courts because he was the main supplier of these illegal drugs. The matter was eventually dismissed for LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE(meaning it was BS). But along the way, I told Judge Karen Asphaug as I stood before her, “The charge and being forced to defend one’s self is the intended punishment” Our Government brings bogus charges against people to achieve its agenda because it knows the trauma, time and expense is punishment enough to scare people off or cow them into submission. Behind closed doors our government officials often laugh and think its funny to terrorize citizens. (Progressive Conditioning http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27)

Before the case against this writer was dismissed for being bogus, Judge Karen Asphaug ruled from the bench that the case should be heard by a Judge from a different jurisdiction as it involved Bailiff’s who work closely with Judges. This writer alleges that later Judge Karen Asphaug was instructed by former US MN AG and current MN Supreme Court POS Justice David “The Bag Man” Lillehaug (aka Killehaug) to cooperate in fixing the criminal case against this writer for political reasons and in furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy against this writer.  Dakota County lined up 4 Bailiff’s/Sheriff’s Deputies to perjure themselves against this writer by saying he disrupted the Court and was guilty of “Disorderly Conduct”(while they believed no video existed). For months, the POS Prosecutor Dan Fluegel insisted all exculpatory video tape was destroyed. Only when this writer produced written correspondence from the Dakota County Sheriff’s Department confirming this writer demanded the video tape be retained within days of the incident, did some of the exculpatory video tape appear and the 4 Bailiff’s/Sheriff’s Deputies willing to perjure themselves slink away(Yet not fired or punished).  Only this writer’s appeal to the Minnesota Appellate Court along with a copy of the Court transcript forced Judge Karen Asphaug to make sure a Judge from another jurisdiction was administratively assigned to this writer’s case. You can read more about that here: Don Mashak Notice of Claims to Dakota County MN 10_09_2015 (http://bit.ly/2aeZfgy) You can also learn how a Sheriff’s Deputy can “Blow someone’s face off and the Union will have him back on the job the next day”.  So arrogant and above the law is Dakota County MN, that even though they are required by law to perform an investigation and provide a copy of the findings when a Notice of Claims is filed, they simply refused to comply. And apparently no government agency exists to force them to comply.

[With the topics we have covered in this article in mind, let us take a moment for this writer to acknowledge he sympathizes with the underlying causes of action pursued by “Black Lives Matter” (BLM). Though this writer does not agree with their methods, this writer has reached out to the “Black Lives Matter” Movement, offered them advice and asked them to join the Judicial TAR Movement. (http://bit.ly/29Ae8fH)]

So now, you understand why when Dakota County MN Courts and Judge Karen Asphaug are accused of departing from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion), this writer has special qualifications for assessing the validity of those allegations. Really, Judge Karen Asphaug, you are going to put a woman in jail for being forced to protect her children when the police and legal system failed her? Really Judge Karen Asphaug, you don’t think your oath of office requires you to do something regarding Judge David Knutson requiring Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s Lawyer to defend her client handcuffed to a wheel chair without notes or client her client present? When will you act to “avoid the appearance of impropriety”? Judge Karen Asphaug, there are so many other, “Really?” type posits, but in the end Judge Karen Asphaug, Is this what you really want to be known as?

Its up to you, Judge Karen Asphaug; HON or POS?

It is apparent from my one interaction with POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena, she is in the habit of flippantly lying and ignoring her oath of office and should never be known as HON.

In closing, as I believe that WE THE PEOPLE are in fact the equals of the arrogant Progressive POS’s [despite Progressive Educated Elite assertions to the contrary (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3)], I believe WE THE PEOPLE have the right to judge them for their failure to answer our questions and provide documents we request. And, I further assert WE THE  PEOPLE have a right to view these refusals in the manner prescribed by the US Supreme Court.

The Finder of Fact (You and I) may presume that the failure of a person (POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena/Judge Karen Asphaug/Judge David Knutson) to answer questions and/or produce documents may be interpreted as an indication that their truthful responses would have been detrimental to their legal position.

POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena refused to answer my questions and lied, to prevent the Press from exercising its First Amendment Right of Freedom of the Press. This writer never got a chance to query Judge Karen Asphaug. Others have tried to query Judge David Knutson, unsuccessfully.

This writer gives POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena and Judge Karen Asphaug until 6pm CDT 28 JULY 2016 to respond to these allegations or summarily, WE THE PEOPLE may judge them to be accurate and true, in accordance with the rules the US Supreme Court that apply to anyone of WE THE PEOPLE when we appear before them.

Judge Karen Asphaug is aware of my contact information from her previous court related departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion).

My fellow Americans, this writer hopes this article helps you all in forming a truer Perspective of Reality that permits us, as equals, to unite together and make our Government once again accountable to WE THE PEOPLE. Millennials and GenX’rs, as I have promised you elsewhere, you now have a better handle on the true nature of our Government and Courts. Keep fighting the good fight!

“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good [people] do nothing”

~ Edmund Burke

Government and Courts; Please take note, WE THE PEOPLE shall include lack of proper redress of our concerns in this matter, and our future Third Declaration of Causes (http://bit.ly/NewDOCRev1), in determining if and when it is appropriate for WE THE PEOPLE to withdraw our CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED.

This article was written by Don Mashak alone without seeking advice, direction or permission of anyone else. I alone am responsible for the content and publication of this article.

Those were my thoughts.

Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

 

 

 

MN Cities consider dumping Progressive Arrogance with return to Citizen Review of Police

CitizenReviewBoard07252016The Progressive Rag, the Minneapolis Star and Sickle, earlier this week wrote an article on the return of citizens to Police Review Committees. Apparently it was so controversial, they have made it extremely difficult to find online.  Lets take a moment to work on creating a truer common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our Government and hold it accountable.

About the time of the American Revolution (1776), the Country’s Founders warned that government must be constructed with the nature of man in mind or it was doomed to failure.

John Locke summed up the nature of man as:

“being tolerance with a tendancy towards reason, but who can be selfish”

The Founders’ perception of the nature of man perhaps is best summed up in the Cato Letters:

“All People[men] have free will and are not virtuous by nature”

Thus our Founder’s constructed our government with “Checks and Balances, Transparency and Accountability”

Enter the Progressives, circa 1900.

Similar to how the “Left” accused the TEA Party Movement of being funded and the brainchild of the Koch Brothers, The Progressive Movement was actually the brainchild of the Wealthy. The Wealthy grew tired of government being transparent and accountable to the masses.  The Media “MuckRakers” of the day, drove the Wealthy Trusts up the wall.

The wealthy trusts had the Progressive Movement promote the idea that:

“The Nature of Man is to be trustworthy and altruistic”

From this pile of manure came the idea that the Progressive educated elite, being trustworthy and altruistic, should be allowed to make decisions on behalf of the masses without accountability to the masses. (See also Social Darwinism)

This began a long trend of removing transparency and accountability to the masses in a wide variety of Government Agencies. The Police, Judges and Lawyers among them.

Of course, in much the same way a dam built on the premise that water runs up hill must fail, so must a government based on some other than actual human nature.

Without the transparency and accountability of citizen oversight, Law Enforcement across the country fell into systemic corruption. Its only human nature to protect those who you work with everyday, especially when one day you might need some “quid pro quo”. See the movies “The Untouchables”, “Lawless” and “Serpico” as evidence of this writer’s assertions.

With tensions rising and the two alleged major political parties using them for political purposes, American Law Enforcement has been forced to consider returning to a large presence of civilians to rebuild trust between Law Enforcement and the Civilian Community.

It just is Common Sense that average citizens, being outside, impartial “Finders of Fact” will most often find the actual truth, rather than cave to politically machinated results.

This writer would just ask you to never forget that it was the Progressives that removed the civilian oversight in the first place. And if the Founders were still around, they would be able to say, “We told you so.”

One last quick comment, shame on the American Main Stream Media not covering this in a color blind manner. And shame to the politicians that try to spin these events for political gain. In each of these events the the only possible results should be right, wrong and honest mistake/human error.

There are good and bad people in every group of people, regardless of what characteristics you use to define it. Once the honest and truthful determination of what happened is determined, the only way the event should be framed is in a colorblind manner of good people against bad people, and/or sadness for tragedy out of honest human error and a resolve to work  to avoid future tragedy.

Those were my thoughts.

Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

 

Melania Trump: Take Heart; Thomas Jefferson was Accused of Plagiarizing Parts of the Most Famous Document in American History

An open letter to Melania Trump.

ThomasJeffersonOathAgainstTyranny300x394Hello Melania Trump:

Nice speech last night. Take heart in allegations that portions of your speech were plagiarized. You are in good company. Thomas Jefferson was accused of plagiarizing John Locke in drafting the American Declaration of Independence, the most famous document in American History. In my estimation, this caused no significant nor lasting damage to his reputation. Nor will similar allegations have any lasting affect on you.

In my opinion, you plagiarized no one, the thoughts were your own.  You were speaking to universal memes of American Culture. Memes of Natural Rights like self-ownership, self-determination and Individualism and traits of American rugged Individualism like self-sufficiency, self-reliance, tenacity and perseverance.

When Jefferson was confronted with the allegation of plagiarizing John Locke, he responded along these lines. There are only so many ways you can state certain absolute truths relating to Natural Rights and Natural Law. (Proof our Country & Constitution founded upon Natural Law http://bit.ly/1PbViKr) The English language is finite and if someone has succinctly well defined and explained a fundamental concept its likely a person approaching the same fundamental concept on their own with a fresh perspective will use some or many of the same English words as those who first broached the topic before.

Further, as a legal immigrant learning “English as a Second Language” (ESL) you may have a smaller working English vocabulary than someone who has a life time of speaking English as a first language. Brains tend to remember “concepts” not words, and convert concept to words to communicate to others. Without 13+ years of cultural immersion on American Memes in American schools, your brain drew upon words it knew and understood, and/or suggested to it by others, to express your thoughts. And experience I am pretty sure is common to all immigrants to America.

Still further, in some instances, its harder or “clunkier” to express universal truths and/or fundamental and/or seminal concepts in different words. Can you imagine the Declaration of Independence (http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/document/) without phrases like

“that all men are created equal…….certain unalienable rights, among these being life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”

Compare that with Locke’s

that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.“.
(http://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/497)

Or compare Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence (#DOI):

long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism

with Locke’s:

long train of abuses, prevarications, and artifices, all tending the same way, make the design visible to the people, and they cannot but feel what they lie under, and see whither they are going, it is not to be wondered that they should then rouse themselves” (http://www.anesi.com/q0033.htm)

The Enlightenment (1650-1800AD), was an attempt to order the metaphysical nature of man. It attempted to do so in much the same way Sir Isaac Newton, and his scholarly contemporaries, attempted to make order out of the natural physical world during the European Renaissance(1300-1600AD). With that in mind, I like to summarize Jefferson’s explanation of the similarities of his writing in the Declaration of Independence to that of Locke’s in his 2nd Treatise of Civil Government with this analogy:

“There simply are a very limited number of ways you can state the Natural Law and absolute truth that the freezing point of pure water at sea level is 32F. Such also are the characteristics of certain unalienable Natural Rights.”

In my humble opinion, the memes of American culture you were discussing (self-ownership, self-determination, self-reliance, self-sufficiency, tenacity and perseverance), being themselves based in Natural Law and Natural Rights, share the same characteristic of having a limited number of ways and words which adequately and/or magnificently express them.

I believe the more important point to be made is that you, as immigrant to America, have embraced them and can express them in a manner all Americans can understand and appreciate.  And we can further extrapolate that since you came to America as a legal immigrant speaking English as a 2nd language your knowledge of these American ideals and memes is largely attributable to those you chose to surround yourself, including and especially your husband Donald Trump and the Americans you two chose to surround yourselves with. Kudos!

If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader

~ John Adams

In my humble opinion you should stand proud in the company of Thomas Jefferson as two people who were merely trying to express their interpretations of various aspects of Natural Law, Natural Rights and American exceptionalism, but whose detractors chose to ungraciously ridicule and/or malign you. I would argue that your and Jefferson detractors should have instead celebrated the aspects of Natural Law, Natural Rights and American Exceptionalism for which you were both expressing your understanding, love and admiration.

This was the object of the Declaration of Independence. Not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take. Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion.

Thomas Jefferson
Letter to Henry Lee
May 8, 1825

It is unfortunate that your detractors chose to divide the country with their criticism for their own personal gain, rather than unite the country and make America Great Again by joining you in your celebration of Natural Law, Natural Rights and American Exceptionalism. In my humble opinion, there are too many people placing their own selfish personal gain above the best’s interests of our county.

Oh No, Did I just Plagiarize JFK?

And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.

~ John F. Kennedy 1961

Good luck with the election.

I think you would make a great First Lady.

Psst, tell you husband I need clarification and more details of his vision before I can switch from being a “Against Killary” voter to a “For Trump” voter.

Those were my thoughts.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

Natural Law: How WE THE PEOPLE got to the 4th of July, 1776 – Part 1 of 2

KingGeorgeIIIAmericanRevolution390X500This article was originally published on Examiner.com on July 3, 2013. (see original print graphic at end of article) This writer’s entire column on Examiner.com was CENSORED within 24-48 hours of this writer submitting a credible petition on 11/06/2015 to the Minnesota Supreme Court to Remove a Minnesota District Court Judge from the bench for conspiring to perpetrate a fraud upon the Court.(An additional almost 200 blogs of this writer have been censored since 2012) The Minnesota Establishment has also taken other unlawful and unconstitutional punitive actions against this writer. I put it to you that your government is trying to erase your knowledge of Natural Law and Natural Rights to make you less able to resist their attempts at enslaving you. This writer leaves it to reader to deduce for themselves who wanted these articles CENSORED, and why the US Government wants this writer silenced.

 

ExaminercomNaturalLawHowWETHEPEOPLEgotto4thofJuly1776DateProofPart1of2_07042013

Natural Law: How WE THE PEOPLE got to the 4th of July, 1776 – Part 2 of 2

EnlightenmentNaturalLaw600x825

This article was originally published on Examiner.com on July 4, 2013. (see original print graphic at end of article) This writer’s entire column on Examiner.com was CENSORED within 24-48 hours of this writer submitting a credible petition on 11/06/2015 to the Minnesota Supreme Court to Remove a Minnesota District Court Judge from the bench for conspiring to perpetrate a fraud upon the Court.(An additional almost 200 blogs of this writer have been censored since 2012) The Minnesota Establishment has also taken other unlawful and unconstitutional punitive actions against this writer. I put it to you that your government is trying to erase your knowledge of Natural Law and Natural Rights to make you less able to resist their attempts at enslaving you. This writer leaves it to reader to deduce for themselves who wanted these articles CENSORED, and why the US Government wants this writer silenced.