No. 20-5255
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
DON MASHAK – Petitioner
VS.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Respondent
MOTION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHT CIRCUIT
Case No. 19-1429
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
THE BIGGER PICTURE
Quite simply, in the worst-case scenario, Respondent IRS should have dismissed this matter for well documented health and financial hardship Petitioner provided them. Next, the IRS cannot be allowed to profit from penalties resulting from its employees failing to timely answer questions taxpayers ask and giving out deliberately fraudulent information. Petitioner Mashak failing to timely file was directly a result of IRS employees not giving timely answers to his questions, and fraudulently telling Mashak no penalty for late filing would accrue, if no tax was due. With these circumstances and this fraudulent information, the IRS provided, Petitioner Mashak reasonably chose to wait until his health improved to file tax forms for year with no income.
Again, any reasonable person can see this matter should have been resolved long before Petitioner was forced to file the initiating litigation. Any reasonable person can see that the decision was not reached pursuant to the “Rule of Law”. Using the reasonable person standard, it is reasonable to conclude that IRS decisions were made for reasons other those falling under the authority of the IRS. Petitioner believes he has the answer. But for the answer to be understood, proper Metaphysical and Legal historical context which has been lost from public knowledge, must be restored so both my fellow citizens comprising “WE THE PEOPLE” and the US Supreme Court Judges can understand it in its proper light.
BACKGROUND METAPHYSICAL AND LEGAL HISTORY
Before I begin, it angers me that I must provide this background. What I am about to write should be common knowledge and form the foundation for the perception and perspective of reality for every American born and raised in America and thus educated in our public schools. I assert that it is by deliberate will of evil people for the evil purpose of enslaving humanity for eternity that great portions of this knowledge have been deliberately not taught to the masses.
That said, we are going to cover about 1544 years of Metaphysical Paradigm shifts in 15 paragraphs – 476ad to present:
America revolted from Great Britain over taxes, they revolted over a Metaphysical Paradigm shift away from Britain’s “Divine Right of Kings” (DRK). The forced Metaphysics of DRK evolved from the fall of Rome, 476ad to circa 1945. (Metaphysics is to Humanity as Physics is to the Physical World – Metaphysics attempts to define the rules which explain Humanities interaction with each other and with the physical world. It’s that simple)
In short, DRK asserted the King/Queen was a God or representative of God here on earth and therefore, no one could question his decision or authority. Because the King/Queen was allegedly divinely inspired, it was asserted they could be trusted to act in the best interests of the community. The King/Queen owned all the land. Subjects had no right, merely permissions and privileges. 90% of the subjects were Serfs and Oafs bound to the land under Feudalism. The King/Queen and church Established Truth. Truth was enforced by conditioning (rewards and punishment). (Consider Galileo who only escaped being burned at the stake for saying the earth was not the center of the universe because of his popularity and fame. But nevertheless, spent the last years of his life under house arrest.)
During the Renaissance (1300-1600ad), people started using their own reasoning to explain the physical world around them. From this began the study of Physics, an attempt to create a rules and laws that would explain how the physical world worked. From this began the study of Physics and an attempt to create a set of rules and laws that would explain how the physical world worked. Settled Physics is known as the “Laws of Physics”.
During the Enlightenment (1650-1800ad), people began thinking about humanity the way folks in the Renaissance thought about Physics. They began to establish a set of rules and laws to explain the nature of how humans interact with each other and their physical world. Settle Metaphysics is known as the “Laws of Nature” aka “Natural Law”. People began to question why is the King, and why can’t the King’s decisions be questioned.
Natural Law asserts all people have unalienable Natural Rights. Governments are formed with the “Consent of the Governed” to give the people more liberty than they would have in the chaos of the Natural State. The primary function of Government is to protect the unalienable Natural Rights of Individuals from the trespasses of others, including government itself. In other words, everyone was free to pursue their own happiness so long as they do not trespass the Natural Rights of others. (Originally the term “Liberal” applied to the belief that the unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual were more important than the rights of government). Natural Law also called for Equity and Equality of the masses and prescribed the “Rule of Law” as foundation of justice and governance. A very important difference between Natural Law and DRK was the Establishment of Truth. Rather than Truth being Established by Government, the Individual has a Natural Right to Establish Truth for themselves using their own observations and reasoning.
The paradigm shift between DRK and Natural Law resulted in a cultural and political revolution in the Western World. The American Revolution in 1776 and the French Revolution in 1789, as examples.
The United States of America [(US) or (America)] was founded upon Natural Law. (Laws of Nature, first paragraph, Declaration of Independence & the Ninth Amendment) The American Constitution made WE THE PEOPLE (All of the citizens) the Sovereigns of the Country; a great departure from the then prevailing Governments of Monarchy under DRK. So widespread and pervasive was the knowledge of Natural Law and Natural Rights at the founding of our country, the Founder’s debated whether a Bill of Rights was even a necessary Amendment to the Constitution. But the US Founders were distrustful of government based on their knowledge of history. The US Founder’s assessment of the Nature of Humankind is perhaps best summarized by that found in the CATO Letters, “All [people] have free will and are not virtuous by nature. The US Founders asserted that government must be constructed with the Nature of Humankind in mind. Knowing the US government would be inhabited by non-virtuous people for generations, the US Founders constructed the Constitution with Checks and Balances; Transparency and Accountability. The US Founders also asserted the Federal Government must be kept very small, so that even if the people who inhabited went rogue, they would lack great power to use upon WE THE PEOPLE. The accountability also came in the form of elections, and the ultimate accountability, “Consent of the Governed”; a diplomatic way to tell those who governed that the masses retained the “Right of Revolution” from the US Declaration of Independence.
In the 1849, the forced Metaphysics of Marxism (Socialism/Communism) paradigm shift occurred. We will not discuss it in depth because it has failed everywhere it has been attempted since its inception. And, the later paradigm shift of Progressivism’s forced Metaphysics mirrors most of Marxism’s forced Metaphysical aspects.
In the 1870s, the Social Darwinist Movement began. It was inspired and sprang from the ideas of Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer. Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life” (1859) was first, followed by Spencer’s “Principles of Biology” (1864), followed by Darwin’s “The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex” (1871) The Social Darwinists of the 1870s believed in 6 Main Tenants: 1) Eugenics; 2) Scientific Racism; 3) That humanity should be bred like livestock; 4) That the rich have the right to exploit the masses because the rich are genetically superior to the masses as allegedly evinced by their superior wealth. (Survival of the Fittest); and 5) That the best interests of the Individual were subordinate to the best interests of Society; 6) That Humanity is a single “Social Organism”. This rather than humanity being comprised of autonomous individuals with unalieanble Natural Rights. Not surprisingly, the masses in America and around the world rejected Social Darwinism over its evil tenants.
But the Social Darwinists were not done. Social Darwinists rebranded as Progressives in America in the 1890s, Fabian Socialists in England circa 1900 and NAZIs in Germany circa 1920 to 1945. But this time, the Social Darwinists would hide their true “Social Darwinist” roots and agenda from the masses.
Aware that the American masses had vehemently rejected Social Darwinism, American Progressive Elites reworded their same evil Social Darwinist tenants in such a way that the evil was not as apparent. While Progressives in America try to deny their evil Social Darwinist roots, they are clear to anyone paying attention. For Example, the index of Appendix D”, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era” (2016) by Progressive Professor Thomas Leonard, references Social Darwinism on more than 20 of its 191 pages thus simultaneously evincing and exposing Progressivisms’ foundations in Social Darwinism. Mindful of not exposing their Social Darwinist intentions, American Progressives would still advance their Social Darwinist agenda, but hide it in legislation that appeared to benefit the masses.
When reading Appendix D (Illiberal Reformers, 2016, Thomas Leonard), Keep in mind it is written by a hardcore, Progressive Professor trying to present the evil that Progressivism is in the best possible light. But if you keep the 6 main tenants of Social Darwinism in mind, you will see they are still embedded in Progressivism. Progressivism really just replaces the “Divinity” of the “Divine Right of Kings” with wealth and education to justify the same forced metaphysics, including the unaccountability of government to the masses. Progressive Elites actually assert that the Progressive Educated Elites, selected from among the wealthy leisure class, should not be accountable to the masses because the masses are too stupid to know what’s best for them.
Progressive Leaders outright call/called for policies and/or made statements antithetical to Natural Law and the Constitution. Progressive elites boldly denounced Natural Law’s “unalienable Rights of the Individual” with assertions that “the concept of rights of the individual is “nonsense”(Progressive Globalist Democrat President Woodrow Wilson, page 25, Appendix D) Progressive Harvard Law School Dean Roscoe Pound’s asserted the American Bill of Rights, “were not needed in their own day [and] are not desired now”(page 25, Appendix D)
And the Progressive Elites opined about the Constitutions’ Checks and Balances, which the Founders had implemented to slow the creation of a run away government. “The US Government, Wilson said, was weak and slow because its power was divided and inefficient (Page 66, Appendix D) Progressives assert the nature of Progressive Elites is to be altruistic and trustworthy and therefore no checks, balances, accountability and transparency is necessary. (Clearly, our own present government demonstrates this is not true.) Progressives also assert humanity is a single “Social Organism” (Appendix D, Pages 101, 102) rather than comprised of autonomous individuals having Unalienable Natural Rights. While I am want to invoke Star Trek’s Borg, I think a better analogy is a colony of Honeybees. Progressive Elites see the masses as expendable worker bees, with no rights, who exist only to serve the Progressive Hive Community as ordered by the allegedly genetically and intellectually superior, and allegedly altruistic and trustworthy Progressive Elite King and Queen bees. More recently, circa 2010, we heard Progressive President Obama, and his right hand man on Obamacare, Progressive Professor Jonathan Gruber assert the Progressive Right to Lie to the allegedly ignorant masses. This assertion is perhaps best evinced by the “You can keep your insurance”, “You can keep your doctor” and, “your insurance will be cheaper” lies as part of the effort to pass Obamacare. Still more recently, the Progressive Elites asserted unaccountability and asserted the right to Establish Truth through “Conditioning” (Rewards and Punishments) was demonstrated. Business owners who opened or reopened their business because they no longer believe what Progressive Educated Elite Technocrats were saying were arrested thereby violating a wide variety of their Natural and Constitutional Rights.
To recap, Progressive Educated Elites, like Kings/Queens under Divine Right of Kings (DRK) assert the following:
- Government is always right, owing to alleged superior intelligence and genetic superiority as opposed to DRK’s assertion of the divinity of Kings/Queens;
- Government accountable to masses, with Progressives invoking wealth, intelligence and genetic superiority as the basis for its unaccountability as opposed to DRK’s alleged divinity of Kings/Queens;
- The Community is more important than the individual;
- Progressives will always work for the best interests of the community and not their own selfish interests because they are altruistic and trustworthy as opposed to DRK’s asserted divine inspiration;
- Individuals have no rights;
- Progressivism has Government Establishing Truth while DRK has Government and Churches establishing Truth.;
- Progressivism is trying to reestablish control of all property through United Nations Agenda 21, while DRK simply asserts the King/Queen owns all the Land;
- Progressivism says Humanity is a single Social Organism like a colony of Honeybees where the allegedly genetically superior and better educated Progressive Elites are the King/Queen Bees guiding the community while the masses are expendible worker bees while DRK says the King/Queen is a spiritual leader appointed by God to manage his Kingdom aka Community.
Aren’t these things exactly what the American Colonists revolted from? Aren’t these things diametrically opposed to the US Constitution and the Natural Law America was founded upon? Aren’t unalienable Natural Rights, unalienable? Isn’t implementation of these Progressive Tenants exactly the definition of Treason and Sedition? Importantly, this is not simple Treason, this is High Treason as it seeks to forcibly remove the Sovereigns, WE THE PEOPLE, and replace Progressive Elites as the Sovereigns of America. And this ends our summary recap of 1544 years of Metaphysical and Legal History. (If you were born after 1980 and you think this information is important to know, go back and ask your teachers and School Board, why they did not teach it.)
Meanwhile, lets resume by going back to the early 1900s. The American Progressives decided to adopt the Fabian-Socialist method of revolution by infiltration. Where the first American Revolution was marked by the “shot heard around the world”, this Progressive revolution was specifically designed to not alert the masses that a revolution had begun. The Progressive Globalist Insurgency would engage in a slow, covert, incremental revolution over generations so no one generation would notice enough change to be moved to resist, take up arms or mount a counter-revolution.
And as you might expect, battles, tactics and strategies in this unconventional, nontraditional warfare are far different than the battles, tactics and strategies of traditional, conventional revolution. Today, a major vector of the Progressive Globalist Insurgency’s unconventional revolution by infiltration is Progressive Common Core Indoctrination. Knowledge of Natural Law and Natural Rights among GenZ is almost completely erased, as intended by Progressive Elites. We can get a feel for what battles, tactics and strategies of the Progressive Globalist Insurgency look like by reading 2 books: The first by Progressive Edward Bernays, “Propaganda” (1928) and the second book, “Rules for Radicals” by Progressive Marxist Saul Alinsky (1971).
Progressive Bernays advocated the manipulation of the masses by the use of emotion and base instinct exploiting propaganda (fear and sex). If you are averse to reading, you can learn more by watching YouTube Videos, “Edward Bernays and the Art of Public Manipulation” and “Edward Bernays: Assassin of Democracy”
Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” (Appendix E) book is essentially a recipe of tactics, strategies and PsyOps to trick a nonmarxist country into Marxism (Socialism/Communism) One of the main premises is that if you subject a society distress, turmoil and chaos, bad enough for long enough, eventually the majority will give up their personal rights, accept any government change and vote for anyone promising to end the distress, turmoil and chaos. (Consider that thus far in 2020 America has been subjected to the distress, turmoil and chaos of near war with Iran, the COVID-19 crisis and now Race Riots.) Of particular interest, is the tactic of usurping the leadership of other groups and redirecting their energies to activities that advance the usurpers agenda. Almost no group is exempt as targets, but as examples are organic, grass roots, political dissent, political parties, Labor Unions, government agencies and community groups. (Related to this tactic is the Progressive Globalist usurping of the leadership of both Antifa and Black Lives Matter to divert their energies to activities that advance agenda of the Progressive Globalist Insurgency – that being to reduce American resistance to giving up some of their personal rights and to government change promising to end the distress, turmoil and chaos.)
Other tactic, strategy and PsyOps of this unconventional, nontraditional revolution by infiltration by the Progressive Globalist Insurgency include FBI Operation COINTELPRO and CIA Project MK Ultra and CIA Operation Mockingbird. (You can read more about these revolution battle strategies here: Final Report of the Senate Church Committee (formally the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities) It was a U.S. Senate Select Committee in 1975 that investigated abuses by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)[especially Operation Mockingbird and Project MK Ultra], National Security Agency (NSA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)[especially Operation COINTELPRO], and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). While it decried the practices it investigated, it followed in the governments often repeated tactic of making a big deal out of a scandal and then really doing nothing to correct it or prevent a repeat of the scandalous activities. (See Peter Strzok)
CIA Operation Mockingbird essentially means taking over the Mainstream Media and acting as Propaganda Ministers comparable to what Joseph Goebbels did as NAZI Propaganda Minister. CIA Project MK Ultra searched for methods of mind control on individuals and the masses in general. They tested drugs on average American citizens at beaches, in bars and at strip clubs, most often without the subject’s knowledge or consent.
FBI Operation COINTELPRO was first used on Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panthers. That darn US Constitution makes it almost impossible to shut up the voices of political dissent. So, what better way to shut them up than to make their followers and fellow citizens not want to listen to and follow them. COINTELPRO sought to marginalize, discredit and demonize the leaders of political dissent so the masses would not listen to them and Mainstream Media would not publish them. If a background check on the targeted person did not yield useful information, then they would just make stuff up. Per then FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, “It is immaterial whether facts exist to substantiate the allegation If the facts are present, they aid in the success of the COINTELPRO Operation, but the FBI believes that the target can be marginalized even without facts”. MLK was accused of being a womanizer and using and dealing drugs. The Black Panthers were accused of far more violent activities than they actually committed and their community service activities were censored from Mainstream Media.
Now if you still are not convinced, we are in the middle of a nontraditional revolution by the Progressive Globalist Insurgency, that seeks to bring about a New World Order under One World Government, here are a few facts and quotes to bring you nearer to that conclusion. Incidentally, that New World Order is the management of humanity as a single “Social Organism” (Honeybees) that we mention earlier (Appendix D, Pages 101 and 102)
The Council on Foreign Relations was founded in 1922 by Wealthy Progressives John Rockefeller, Paul Warburg and JP Morgan. Its purpose is to advance the goal of a New World Order under One World Government.
| Some even believe we [Rockefeller family] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – One World, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it |
David Rockefeller, Memoirs (2002, page 405
We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government. . . . The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.
David Rockefeller, Text from a speech of his in 1991 before the Bilderberg Group [ https://youtu.be/GhZWC-jv9_U ]
The point in this exercise of explaining the Metaphysical Paradigm Shifts for the last 1550 years was this and the further facts and evidence provided thereafter is as follows:
- Without the understanding that America is in the middle of an unconventional revolution, the American masses are predisposed to believe the rulings of its courts and the actions of its government and Law Enforcement were made pursuant to the fair and just “Rule of Law”;
- With the understanding that America is in the middle of a unconventional revolution, the American masses are receptive to the idea the rulings of its courts and the actions of its government and Law Enforcement are made pursuant to the unfair and unjust Progressive “Rule of Man” for the express purpose of aiding and abetting the seditious and treasonous Progressive Globalist Insurgency;
- With the knowledge that America is in the middle of an unconventional revolution, the American masses are awakened to the possibility that many of our courts and divisions of our government have been “weaponized” to protect and defend the seditious and treasonous Progressive Globalist Insurgency;
- Without the traditional signals that alert the masses of a society that a need to resist and take up arms exists (such as the shot heard around the world in the first American Revolution), this forum provides the best opportunity to alert my fellow citizens that we are in the midst of an unconventional, nontraditional revolution so that they are thus signaled the need to resist, take up arms and/or mount a counter-revolution, after first exhausting all of their peaceful remedies before considering alternative remedies.
The Administrative State has been weaponized to support and protect the Progressive Globalist Insurgency and punish those who oppose it.
The IRS has been weaponized to support and protect the Progressive Globalist Insurgency and punish those who oppose it.
Our Courts have become weaponized to support and protect the Progressive Globalist Insurgency and punish those who oppose it.
Every decision in this matter by the IRS has been made for reasons outside of its authority. Respondent IRS is part of the new Fourth Branch Administrative State Progressives created circa 1912 to slowly and covertly advance their unconventional revolution by infiltration. Every decision in this matter by the judiciary has been made for reasons outside the bounds of the Rule of Law. Petitioner Mashak asserts that both the IRS and the judiciary have been “weaponized” and have made their decisions based on the Progressive Rule of Man, to punish Petitioner Mashak for openly opposing the seditious and treasonous Progressive Globalist Insurgency with its end goal of a New World Order under One World Government.
We have arrived at this point due to crimes committed against Petitioner Mashak in the early 1990s. A Criminal Conspiracy, now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA engaged in witness tampering activities against Petitioner Mashak. This witness tampering escalated from threats to destroy Petitioner’s business, to threats to destroy his life, to death threats against him personally and finally, when Petitioner was not intimidated by deaths threats against him personally, death threats towards anyone Petitioner Mashak might care about, friends, family, children, etc.
Petitioner Mashak dutifully reported this information to the FBI. The FBI was at first excited to pursue the matter and even stated that others in the banking industry confirmed Petitioner Mashak’s allegations. But then MN US District Attorney David Lillehaug, campaign finance manager for Senator Paul Wellstone, accepted bribes, campaign contributions and/or other consideration from Norwest Bank, NA. (Wells Fargo Banks, NA former legal name prior to buying Wells Fargo Bank, NA)
Suddenly the FBI was no longer interested. Petitioner doubts that anyone can understand the level of despair having the foundations of your perspective and perception of reality kicked out from underneath you. Petitioner Mashak had cut off contact with all of his friends and family thinking it would only be 2 or 3 years before he and the FBI had put these banksters in jail. Instead, alone, depressed and in despair, Petitioner was left to live with an unrescinded, government sanctioned death threat. (See documentation of Petitioner’s allegations at Minneapolis FBI, and in Hennepin County Court Cases Bank North vs 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA is 27CV88-22383, Citizens State Bank of St. Louis Park vs. 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA 91-002759, Don Mashak vs Norwest Bank 93-016429.) Under duress of a government sanctioned death threat hanging over his head, Petitioner Mashak settled his civil suit against Wells Fargo Bank, NA. for $15,000, far less than his damages. In 1998, the stress of these matters almost killed Petitioner. He was in the hospital for nearly 2 months, with resistant pneumonia, MRSA and Congestive Heart Failure. Petitioner was told he was going to die, etc.
Lest you doubt the evil nature of Wells Fargo Bank, NA. And the willingness of Law Enforcement, Government Attorneys and the Judiciary consider these criminal conspiracies Wells Fargo Bank, NA. engaged in after Petioner Mashak’s interaction with them. Mortage fraud relating to the 2008 financial collapse, Student Loan scam, ID Theft involving creating fake checking accounts by stealing identity information from US US Citizens, Money Laudering for Mexican Drug Cartels. Millions of dollars were stolen from millions of Americans and somehow no one went to jail. (summary meme here XX) What would happen to you if you stole millions of dollars from millions of Americans in multiple criminal conspiracies over the course of about a decade. Now think back to the Progressive Tenant that the rich have the right to exploit the masses. If David Lillehaug had kept his oath of office as US MN District Attorney, Wells Fargo Bank, NA. would have been nipped in the bud and millions of American lives would not have been disrupted by Wells Fargo Bank, NA.
But, continuing, when Petitioner Mashak finally miraculously did not die and healed well enough, circa 2004, he realized Wells Fargo Bank, NA would never leave him alone and Law Enforcement, rather than help Petitioner, would protect Wells Fargo Bank, NA. Thus, began Petitioner Mashak’s quest to understand why and how all of this happened. What you see written here is the condensed summary of the information I gained on that quest. It is important to me that you, the reader, realize nobody explained this to me. This was a long process over more than 25 years. I had to figure this out on my own. After I was hospitalized in 1998 and almost died, I was a broken man. If they had left me alone thereafter, I would have just lived a low-profile life the best I could, and died in anonymity. But the sick, twisted bastards think they are gods and sadistically enjoy torturing all of us as expendable worker bees. Others would commit suicide or go postal; I instead reward their evil acts with this document and more…
Some quick added proofs of my quest for justice and understanding. In 2004, when I was once again healthy enough, I joined a loose coalition of individuals and groups seeking Judicial Reform in Minnesota. I call this Coalition, Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) As I was leery of being seen as a leader of this already established coalition, I was happy to just be a body for events and meetings. Judicial TAR demanded the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees give us a hearing dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Courts. (Appendix I) Soon the leaders of Judicial TAR were complaining of retaliation they were receiving in unrelated matters. The retaliation was so bad some dropped out of the coalition, some moved out of State and at least one one moved to Canada. This was the initial inspiration for the article “Progressive Conditioning” [https://rebrand.ly/ProgressiveConditioning] (Included is Saul Alinsky’s 1971 book, “Rules for Radicals”, so the reader can get a sense of the evil tactics and duplicity the Progressive Globalist Insurgency engages in.) When it became apparent the Minnesota Legislature would not grant us a hearing, I began proposing Platform Resolutions to my political party in 2008 and 2012. (Appendix F & G) At some point I began investigating Progressivism and wrote an article about what I was discovering. [https://rebrand.ly/IsProgressivePCforDRK]
Along the way, Petitioner found himself to be a target of an FBI COINTELPRO style Operation. FOIA Requests, Subpoenas and litigation to find the contents of this FBI COINTELPRO Operation have been fruitless. Why is Petitioner not allowed to know what these allegations against him are? I have no convictions for more than minor traffic tickets. I have never been charged with more than “Disorderly Conduct”. (In Dakota County, MN this Petitioner was investigating corrupt judges when this trumped up charge came along. It was dismissed for “Lack of Probable Cause”) Why do Law Enforcement and others run away when I inquire into the nature of these COINTELPRPO allegations? Why was I never charged? It is because it is all a fabrication and the perpetrators know they face criminal charges if I am ever allowed to know the contents of this COINTELPRO file. For those who doubt the lengths likes of Wells Fargo Bank, NA and the Progressive Globalist Insurgency will go, Petitioner directs you to the fabrication and paid false witnesses against President Donald Trump in the now debunked Trump/Russia Collusion matter. It took Billionaire Trump 3 years to sort that mess out, what chance does an average citizen like Petitioner have in sorting it out. (Emissaries for the CoConspirators the have been sent to tell me I can have my life back if I shut up)
One more thing, one might well ask if this Treason is premeditated in that Congress repealed the death penalty for Treason in 1990. WE THE PEOPLE trust that if one person from that Congress was involved in the present and ongoing conspiracy to commit Treason, that said repeal is null and void.
All that said, From the US Declaration of Independence:
… We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security….
…In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince [Government] whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish [American] brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity….
My life has been destroyed as a result of our government and judiciary abandoning the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights, Natural Law, Natural Rights and the Rule of Law. The destruction of my life was a micro battle in your unconventional, slow, covert, incremental, seditious, treasonous revolution by infiltration which seeks to replace the settled Metaphysics of Natural Law with the forced metaphysics of Progressivism (which is really just Social Darwinism 2.0).
For obvious reasons, this court must grant Petitioners Mashak’s motion for a Writ of Certiorari. If the obvious reasons are not clear, you must grant this Writ of Certiorari to evince to WE THE PEOPLE, the sovereigns of America, that our Judiciary has not become Domestic Enemies complicit with the overthrow of our Constitution, Natural Law and the Sovereignty of WE THE PEOPLE by the Progressive Globalist Insurgency. By your own rules, Petitioner Mashak’s alleged minor procedural and/or technical errors cannot be used as an excuse by this court to prevent a sovereign citizen from holding the IRS, these Courts and the US Government accountable on the charge that they have become Domestic Enemies complicit with the seditious and treasonous Progressive Globalist Insurgency.
If somehow this Motion for a Writ of Certiorari is deficient in lacking information such as Case Cites owing to the continuing closure of MN Supreme Court Law Library in Minnesota, Petitioner Mashak would expect the US Supreme Court to do the following. Since this has happened through no fault of my own, rather than simply deny the Motion, I would expect this US Supreme Court to refer Motion back to me and allow me to submit an amended brief while Petitioner would have access to the MN Supreme Court Law Library and other resources and witnesses.
Don Mashak's Hennepin County MN Free Press News 