This is Don Mashak's Hennepin County Minnesota Free Press Blog to Provide Hennepin County Residents with Full and Fair Citizen Reporting of Local, National and World Events. [Bloomington, Brooklyn, Center, Park, Champlin, Corcoran, Crystal, Dayton, Eden Prairie, Edina, Excelsior, Golden Valley, Hamel, Hopkins, Long Lake, Maple Grove, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Medina, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, Mound, New Hope, Osseo, Plymouth, Richfield, Rogers, Saint Louis Park, Shorewood, Wayzata, city ]
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH <> CHINESE BELOW THE SPANISH * APARECE TEXTO SENCILLO DESPUÉS DE LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS *备忘录后显示纯文本 <> 西班牙语之下的中文 * TEXT VERSION MAY BE LONGER THAN MEME VERSION <> LA VERSIÓN DE TEXTO PUEDE SER MÁS LARGA QUE LA VERSIÓN MEME 文本版本可能比MEME版本更长
US Election 2020 Legal Update
US Election 2020 Legal Update
\\ ELECTION INTEGRITY UPDATE The November 3, 2020 presidential election was challenged in 92 courts. 9 are still pending, 83 have resolved.
Of those 83 resolved: 53 were tossed on technicality (re: standing, moot, filing too early or too late etc.)
30 were resolved “On The Merits”. (evidence) Of those 30 decided On The Merits, Trump won 22 (73%).
This Cynical Patriot has previously written about the complicity of our Judiciary complicity in treason. The Progressive Globalist WEF coup is engaged in a “Gradualism” paradigm of warfare. Gradualism calls for slow, covert infiltration of the target society over generations so no one generation experiences enough change to be moved to resist, revolt or mount a counter-revolution. It specific avoids producing the sights, sounds & smells of traditional warfare. As posted previously, our Judges are rewriting Court rules to make it easier to advance the Seditious & treasonous Progressive Globalist WEF agenda. One of these changes is replacing the “Pound Principle” for heavy predisposition for cases to be resolved “ON THE MERITS” rather than on “technicality”. ( On a related issue, some municipalities are allowing non-citizens to vote & government attorneys do nothing, note that per Gradualism Warfare, this is an incremental step towards non-citizens voting in State, then National Elections.) As posted above, Technicality was the Progressive Globalist WEF method of choice for ruling against Lawsuits challenging the 2020 Election results. Technicality is also use to allow Judges to rule in favor of Progressive Allies & against those who oppose said coup. As an Election Judge in MN for more than a decade, this Cynical Patriot also raised the issue of auditing the computer code of the “Electronic Ballot Boxes” before each election from 2012 to 2020. It was made clear to me by the Minnesota Election hierarchy that this issue did not concern. Further, it was also made clear they didn’t want to hear about it anymore. This Cynical Patriot asserts that election fraud is too important an issue to let corrupt judges dismiss on technicality! Being the very foundation of our Republic, such litigation must be resolved ON THE MERITS by a jury. That said, clearly the oath of office to “support & defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign & domestic”, means nothing to the majority of Judges, Government Attorneys & Lawyers. If it did, the majority of judges, Government Attorneys & Lawyers would meet & organize to restore the Constitution, Rule of Law & our Republic. Who is responsible for holding these folks accountable to their oath? Isn’t failing to uphold their oath, the same as treason? Perhaps when WE THE PEOPLE withdraw our CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED, justice & deterrent sentencing would best be served by exiling all of these folks from America, & requiring those who can prove they actually materially & vigorously did work to support & defend the Constitution, & suffered material retaliation, to apply for readmission to our country & restoration of their US citizenship?
Don Mashak, 612-249-3299 Rt. 1 Box 231, Albertville, MN 55301
This Citizen is a Free Person and State National under the Organic, Original Constitution of the United States of America
This composition inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Jeff Blodgett, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
Actualización legal de las elecciones estadounidenses de 2020
Actualización legal de las elecciones estadounidenses de 2020
\\ ACTUALIZACIÓN DE INTEGRIDAD ELECTORAL Las elecciones presidenciales del 3 de noviembre de 2020 fueron impugnadas en 92 tribunales.
9 aún están pendientes, 83 han resuelto.
De los 83 resueltos: 53 fueron descartados por tecnicismos (re: permanente, discutible, presentación demasiado pronto o demasiado tarde, etc.) 30 se resolvieron ‘Sobre el Fondo’. (evidencia) De los 30 decididos por méritos, Trump ganó 22 (73%).
Este patriota cínico ha escrito anteriormente sobre la complicidad de nuestro poder judicial en la traición. El golpe de Estado Progresista Globalista del FEM está inmerso en un paradigma de guerra de ‘gradualismo’. El gradualismo exige una infiltración lenta y encubierta en la sociedad objetivo a lo largo de generaciones, de modo que ninguna generación experimente suficientes cambios como para verse impulsada a resistir, rebelarse o montar una contrarrevolución. Específicamente evita producir las imágenes, sonidos y olores de la guerra tradicional. Como se publicó anteriormente, nuestros jueces están reescribiendo las reglas de la Corte para que sea más fácil avanzar en la agenda sediciosa y traidora del Globalismo Progresista del FEM. Uno de estos cambios es reemplazar el ‘Principio de la Libra’ por una fuerte predisposición a que los casos se resuelvan ‘BAJO EL FONDO’ en lugar de ‘tecnicismos’. (En un tema relacionado, algunos municipios permiten que los no ciudadanos voten y los abogados del gobierno no hacen nada; tenga en cuenta que, según Gradualism Warfare, este es un paso gradual hacia que los no ciudadanos voten en las elecciones estatales y luego en las nacionales). Como se publicó anteriormente, el tecnicismo fue el globalista progresista. Método elegido por el WEF para dictaminar contra demandas que impugnan los resultados de las elecciones de 2020. El tecnicismo también se utiliza para permitir que los jueces fallen a favor de los aliados progresistas y en contra de quienes se oponen a dicho golpe. Como juez electoral en MN durante más de una década, este patriota cínico también planteó la cuestión de la auditoría del código informático de las ‘urnas electrónicas’ antes de cada elección de 2012 a 2020. La jerarquía electoral de Minesota me lo dejó claro. que este tema no concernía. Además, también quedó claro que no querían saber más sobre eso. ¡Este patriota cínico afirma que el fraude electoral es un tema demasiado importante como para permitir que jueces corruptos lo desestimen por tecnicismos! Siendo el fundamento mismo de nuestra República, dichos litigios deben ser resueltos SOBRE EL FONDO por un jurado. Dicho esto, claramente el juramento de ‘apoyar y defender la Constitución de todos los enemigos, nacionales y extranjeros’ no significa nada para la mayoría de jueces, abogados y abogados del gobierno. Si así fuera, la mayoría de los jueces, abogados y abogados del gobierno se reunirían y organizarían para restaurar la Constitución, el Estado de Derecho y nuestra República. ¿Quién es responsable de hacer que estas personas rindan cuentas de su juramento? ¿No es lo mismo no cumplir su juramento que traición? Quizás cuando NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, retiremos nuestro CONSENTIMIENTO PARA SER GOBERNADOS, la mejor manera de lograr justicia y sentencias disuasorias es exiliar a todas estas personas de Estados Unidos y exigir a aquellos que puedan demostrar que realmente trabajaron material y vigorosamente para apoyar y defender la Constitución, y sufrió represalias materiales, para solicitar la readmisión a nuestro país y la restauración de su ciudadanía estadounidense?
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH <> CHINESE BELOW THE SPANISH * APARECE TEXTO SENCILLO DESPUÉS DE LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS *备忘录后显示纯文本 <> 西班牙语之下的中文 * TEXT VERSION MAY BE LONGER THAN MEME VERSION <> LA VERSIÓN DE TEXTO PUEDE SER MÁS LARGA QUE LA VERSIÓN MEME 文本版本可能比MEME版本更长
US Feds Caught Trafficking Children at US Border in Huge Operations
US Feds Caught Trafficking Children at US Border in Huge Operations
This Muckraker.com Investigation evinces that our US Government is engaged in or complicit in trafficking huge numbers of children each day [http://rebrand.ly/FedsTrafficChildren]. This Cynical Patriot believes this video speaks convincingly & credibly on this matter for itself. The sheer size of this atrocity demands redress. The world judged the German people for allowing the NAZI atrocities. How now will the world judge we Americans for allowing this child trafficking atrocity to continue. Let us resolve to get to the root of the problem?
This Cynical Patriot will build upon this present evidence of government corruption & tyranny. The root cause of this atrocity has important implications WE THE PEOPLE must redress in Restoring our Republic. WE THE PEOPLE must look for the root cause of the declining trajectory of our nation. We must start viewing our country from forest level, rather than individual trees. What do all of these individual tree-level events, problems & issues that are contributing to our moral, cultural, legal, economic, political & defensive decline have in common?
Simply, In this present instance, in order for this volume of child trafficking to occur, & go unreported, & unpunished, Law Enforcement, Government Attorneys, Judges, State Legislators, Congress folks & Mainstream Media must know, & be complicit (or worse) in allowing this to continue. Now if you doubt any government officials would willfully ignore the law & best interests of the American masses, let’s take the case of the 2008 Bank & Real Estate Crash. No bank executives were fired nor went to jail for their fraud. How is this possible?…. Given the overwhelming evidence that these banks deliberately engaged in fraud, they should have gone to jail for a decade or more. Instead, they paid themselves bonuses out of taxpayer bailout money? An ordinary citizen committing these crimes would be found guilty & sentenced to years in jail. How did this happen? WE THE PEOPLE are fools for letting them get away with it.
Next, this Cynical Patriot directs you to the 2018 Documentary, “Inside Lehman Brothers” (https://youtu.be/Mj82-QxN1Ww). In this documentary, employee whistleblowers feared their lives & careers would be destroyed for exposing the crimes. Even when they reported evidence to Law Enforcement, & talked to government attorneys, they were ignored. 10 years later, they still live in fear. Their careers & lives were in shambles for doing the right thing. No agent of Law Enforcement, the DOJ, Judiciary, nor Congress were there to protect them from this witness tampering retaliation. It is important to ask why Mainstream Media declines to publish these facts. Why would all of these government officials allow this to happen?
The effect of witness intimidation & explicit &/or implicit threats to their careers, on the pursuit of justice is obvious. But there is another layer of complexity we need to address. Succinctly, anything that does not get on the “Official Court Record”, is not to be considered in reaching a judgment. Thus, the lawyers of all the parties try to get evidence that proves their legal position, on the Official Court Record. But the reality is this, the political Establishment reaches a consensus on a desired outcome, & the judge & all the lawyers strive to only allow facts & evidence on the Official Court Record that will allow the Judge or Jury to make the desired judgement. (In lesser cases, to honor bribes, political contributions & other consideration, Judges telegraph to the lawyers the desired outcome, & all the lawyers comply by only submitting facts & evidence that will permit that outcome (or suffer retaliation for failure to do so.) Thus, the Government Attorney directs Law Enforcement to only find the facts & evidence necessary to reach the desired outcome. And, Law Enforcement ignores or screens out any facts or evidence that would prevent the desired outcome.
In this next example, this Cynical Patriot presumes most Americans know the current level of drugs entering our country, cannot be occurring without knowledge & complicity of Law Enforcement, Government Attorneys, Judges, State Legislators & Congress folks.
And next, relevant to the original child trafficking, how could all these government officials standby & do nothing when President Biden instructed the FBI to consider Parents protesting “Child Grooming/mutilation”, etc. in Public Schools, terrorists? All of these government officials are still citizens…. Should a majority of Law Enforcement, Judges & Government Attorney feel strongly enough on their own to unite to address this issue?
Lastly, How did Jeffrey Epstein traffic children for decades before being “caught”? How did Jeffrey Epstein die in jail with 2 guards and 24 hours video surveillance, yet there is no evidence of how this occurred? How is it possible that half or more of all Law Enforcement, Government Lawyers, Judges & Mainstream Media could not unite enough government officials to insure bona fide Justice in these matters? Is the answer simple corruption? Or, is the commonality between all of these “tree-level” crimes bribes, political contributions &/or other consideration? Or is it because these practices & outcomes reflect the forced metaphysics & agenda of the worldwide Progressive Globalist WEF Coup? You decide. (http://rebrand.ly/ProgressiveNAZIs)
In any case, both of the major political parties allowed these things to happen. Both major political parties are controlling the political narrative with “Delphi Technique”, [https://rebrand.ly/DelphiConvention]. Ergo, the masses are allowing the political party officers to lead them around by the nose, right past the true root issues that need to be addressed. Mainstream Media & Hollywood are only pumping out lies & deception. And, Big Tech is censoring us on the internet.
The point being neither Mainstream Media, nor Government nor the 2 major political parties are going to fix this. With only a duplicitous Political Establishment & Mainstream Media as information sources, WE THE PEOPLE must find ways to exercise our Natural Right to ESTABLISH TRUTH for ourselves using our own observations & reasoning. Our US Founders believed; full, fair & vigorous debate was necessary for WE THE PEOPLE to ESTABLISH TRUTH for ourselves. Any information you get from politicians & Mainstream Media is filtered & biased. Remember to ESTABLISH TRUTH using facts not feelings. The Progressive Globalists are specifically using Progressive Edward Bernay’s “Emotion & Base-Instinct exploiting propaganda” on the masses. (http://rebrand.ly/ArtManipulation) To defeat them, we must break that bad habit of letting emotions ESTABLISH TRUTH.
If you are serious about Restoring our Republic, you must begin meeting with your friends, neighbors, coworkers and other like-minded folks in person. This creates synergy which will allow the group to quickly distill off the bullroar, and ESTABLISH TRUTH by group Consensus. And with a group consensus, you will have created unity & can begin formulating successful ways to Restore Our Republic.
So, it is up to you: Are you going to make the effort to Restore our Republic, & end the complicity of our corrupt government in child & drug trafficking, Bank Fraud, & the Grooming & Mutilation of children in Public Schools? Or are you going to continue to let yourselves be distracted, divided & conquered by the Progressive Globalist Elites, RINOs, DINOs & the Mainstream Media?
No more going along to get along!
No more party politics because it’s easier than organizing ourselves!
Bonhoeffer ! “To Not Act, is to Act!”
Keep fighting the good fight, fellow patriots!
Those were my thoughts
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak, 612-249-3299 Rt. 1 Box 231, Albertville, MN 55301
Citizen is a Free Person and State National under the Organic Constitution of the United States of America
This composition inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Jeff Blodgett, Wells Fargo Bank, NA & William Bunker
Los federales estadounidenses atraparon a traficantes de niños en la frontera de EE. UU. en enormes
Los federales estadounidenses atraparon a traficantes de niños en la frontera de EE. UU. en enormes
Esta investigación de Muckraker.com demuestra que nuestro gobierno de los EE. UU. está involucrado o es cómplice del tráfico de grandes cantidades de niños cada día.[http://rebrand.ly/FedsTrafficChildren] Este Cynical Patriot cree que este video habla de manera convincente y creíble sobre este asunto por sí solo. La magnitud de esta atrocidad exige reparación. El mundo juzgó al pueblo alemán por permitir las atrocidades nazis. ¿Cómo juzgará ahora el mundo a los estadounidenses por permitir que continúe esta atrocidad de tráfico de niños? ¿Resolvamos llegar a la raíz del problema?
Este Patriota Cínico se basará en la evidencia actual de corrupción y tiranía gubernamental. La causa fundamental de esta atrocidad tiene implicaciones importantes que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO debemos reparar al restaurar nuestra República. NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, debemos buscar la causa fundamental de la trayectoria descendente de nuestra nación. Debemos empezar a ver nuestro país desde el nivel del bosque, en lugar de hacerlo desde árboles individuales. ¿Qué tienen en común todos estos eventos, problemas y cuestiones individuales a nivel de árbol que están contribuyendo a nuestro declive moral, cultural, legal, económico, político y defensivo? Simplemente, en el presente caso, para que se produzca este volumen de trata de niños y no se denuncie ni se castigue, las fuerzas del orden, los abogados del gobierno, los jueces, los legisladores estatales, los miembros del Congreso y los principales medios de comunicación deben saberlo y ser cómplices (o algo peor). ) al permitir que esto continúe.
Ahora bien, si usted duda de que algún funcionario gubernamental ignoraría intencionalmente la ley y los mejores intereses de las masas estadounidenses, tomemos el caso de la crisis bancaria y inmobiliaria de 2008. Ningún ejecutivo bancario fue despedido ni encarcelado por su fraude. ¿Cómo es esto posible?… Dada la abrumadora evidencia de que estos bancos cometieron fraude deliberadamente, deberían haber ido a la cárcel durante una década o más. En cambio, ¿se pagaron bonificaciones con el dinero del rescate de los contribuyentes? Un ciudadano común y corriente que cometiera estos delitos sería declarado culpable y sentenciado a años de cárcel. ¿Cómo pasó esto? NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO somos tontos por dejar que se salgan con la suya.
A continuación, este Cynical Patriot le dirige al documental de 2018, ‘Inside Lehman Brothers’ (https://youtu.be/Mj82-QxN1Ww). En este documental, los empleados denunciantes temían que sus vidas y carreras fueran destruidas por exponer los crímenes. Incluso cuando informaron pruebas a las autoridades y hablaron con abogados del gobierno, fueron ignorados. Diez años después, todavía viven con miedo. Sus carreras y vidas estaban en ruinas por hacer lo correcto. Ningún agente de las fuerzas del orden, el Departamento de Justicia, el poder judicial ni el Congreso estaban allí para protegerlos de estas represalias por manipulación de testigos. Es importante preguntarse por qué Mainstream Media se niega a publicar estos hechos. ¿Por qué todos estos funcionarios del gobierno permitirían que esto sucediera?
El efecto de la intimidación de los testigos y las amenazas explícitas y/o implícitas a sus carreras en la búsqueda de justicia es obvio. Pero hay otra capa de complejidad que debemos abordar. En resumen, todo lo que no conste en el ‘Expediente Oficial del Tribunal’ no debe considerarse para llegar a un fallo. Así, los abogados de todas las partes intentan conseguir pruebas que acrediten su posición jurídica, en el Acta Oficial del Tribunal. Pero la realidad es esta: el establishment político llega a un consenso sobre el resultado deseado, y el juez y todos los abogados se esfuerzan por permitir en el Acta Oficial del Tribunal sólo hechos y pruebas que permitan al juez o al jurado emitir el juicio deseado. (En casos menores, para honrar sobornos, contribuciones políticas y otras contraprestaciones, los jueces telegrafían a los abogados el resultado deseado, y todos los abogados cumplen presentando únicamente hechos y pruebas que permitan ese resultado (o sufren represalias por no hacerlo). ) Por lo tanto, el Fiscal del Gobierno ordena a las autoridades que solo encuentren los hechos y las pruebas necesarias para alcanzar el resultado deseado, y las autoridades ignoran o descartan cualquier hecho o prueba que impediría el resultado deseado.
Lamentablemente, el establishment político estadounidense llegó al consenso de que lo único que quería era que los bancos fueran multados y no encarcelados. Por lo tanto, los hechos y las pruebas fueron manipulados para evitar que los hechos y las pruebas más condenatorios aparecieran en el Acta Oficial del Tribunal. Todos los niveles de nuestro gobierno tenían conocimiento de los hechos verdaderos, pero optaron por ‘arreglar’ el resultado para evitar que los ejecutivos del Banco fueran encarcelados a cambio de sobornos, contribuciones políticas y/u otras contraprestaciones, la mayor parte de las cuales se pagaron con dinero de los contribuyentes. ¿Estás enojado todavía? ¿Lo suficientemente enojado como para hacer algo al respecto?
En el siguiente ejemplo, este Patriota Cínico supone que la mayoría de los estadounidenses conocen el nivel actual de drogas que ingresan a nuestro país y que no puede ocurrir sin el conocimiento y la complicidad de las autoridades, los abogados del gobierno, los jueces, los legisladores estatales y la gente del Congreso.
En el siguiente ejemplo, este Patriota Cínico supone que la mayoría de los estadounidenses conocen el nivel actual de drogas que ingresan a nuestro país y que no puede ocurrir sin el conocimiento y la complicidad de las autoridades, los abogados del gobierno, los jueces, los legisladores estatales y la gente del Congreso. Y a continuación, en relación con el tráfico de niños original, ¿cómo pudieron todos estos funcionarios gubernamentales quedarse quietos y no hacer nada cuando el presidente Biden ordenó al FBI que considerara terroristas a los padres que protestaban por la ‘mutilación/acicalamiento infantil’, etc. en las escuelas públicas? Todos estos funcionarios gubernamentales siguen siendo ciudadanos… ¿Debería una mayoría de las fuerzas del orden, los jueces y los abogados del gobierno sentirse lo suficientemente fuertes como para unirse para abordar este problema? Por último, ¿cómo traficaba Jeffrey Epstein con niños durante décadas antes de ser “atrapado”? ¿Cómo murió Jeffrey Epstein en la cárcel con 2 guardias y videovigilancia las 24 horas, pero no hay evidencia de cómo ocurrió? ¿Cómo es posible que la mitad o más de todos los organismos encargados de hacer cumplir la ley, abogados gubernamentales, jueces y medios de comunicación tradicionales no puedan unir a suficientes funcionarios gubernamentales para garantizar una justicia bona fide en estos asuntos? ¿La respuesta es simple corrupción? ¿O lo que hay en común entre todos estos crímenes ‘a nivel de árbol’ son sobornos, contribuciones políticas y/u otras consideraciones? ¿O es porque estas prácticas y resultados reflejan la metafísica y la agenda forzadas del golpe de estado globalista progresista del WEF en todo el mundo? Tú decides. (http://rebrand.ly/ProgressiveNAZIs) En cualquier caso, los dos principales partidos políticos permitieron que sucedieran estas cosas. Los dos partidos políticos principales están controlando la narrativa política con la ‘Técnica Delphi’, [https://rebrand.ly/DelphiConvention]. Ergo, las masas están permitiendo que los dirigentes de los partidos políticos las guíen por las narices, más allá de las verdaderas cuestiones de raíz que deben abordarse. Los principales medios de comunicación y Hollywood sólo están difundiendo mentiras y engaños. Y las grandes tecnologías nos están censurando en Internet. La cuestión es que ni los principales medios de comunicación, ni el gobierno ni los dos principales partidos políticos van a solucionar este problema. Con sólo un engañoso establishment político y los principales medios de comunicación como fuentes de información, NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, debemos encontrar formas de ejercer nuestro derecho natural a ESTABLECER LA VERDAD por nosotros mismos utilizando nuestras propias observaciones y razonamientos. Nuestros fundadores estadounidenses creyeron; Era necesario un debate completo, justo y vigoroso para que NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, ESTABLECIÉMOS LA VERDAD por nosotros mismos. Cualquier información que obtenga de los políticos y los principales medios de comunicación está filtrada y sesgada. Recuerde ESTABLECER LA VERDAD utilizando hechos, no sentimientos. Los globalistas progresistas están utilizando específicamente la “propaganda explotadora de emociones e instintos básicos” del progresista Edward Bernay contra las masas. (http://rebrand.ly/ArtManipulation) Para derrotarlos, debemos romper con ese mal hábito de dejar que las emociones ESTABLEZCAN LA VERDAD. Si usted toma en serio la restauración de nuestra República, debe comenzar a reunirse en persona con sus amigos, vecinos, compañeros de trabajo y otras personas con ideas afines. Esto crea una sinergia que permitirá al grupo destilar rápidamente el rugido y ESTABLECER LA VERDAD mediante el Consenso del grupo. Y con un consenso grupal, habrán creado unidad y podrán comenzar a formular formas exitosas de Restaurar Nuestra República. Entonces, depende de usted: ¿Va a hacer el esfuerzo de restaurar nuestra República y poner fin a la complicidad de nuestro gobierno corrupto en el tráfico de niños y drogas, el fraude bancario y la preparación y mutilación de niños en las escuelas públicas? ¿O van a seguir dejándose distraer, dividir y conquistar por las élites globalistas progresistas, los RINO, los DINO y los principales medios de comunicación?
¡No más seguir adelante para llevarse bien!
¡Basta de política partidista porque es más fácil que organizarnos nosotros mismos!
¡Bonhoeffer! “¡No actuar es actuar!”
¡Sigan peleando la buena batalla, compañeros patriotas!
esos eran mis pensamientos
Gracias por tu tiempo.
en libertad,
Firmado en el condado de Wright MN Don Mashak, 612-249-3299 ruta 1 caja 231, Albertville, MN USA 55301 ciudadano es un, como persona libre y nacional del estado bajo la Constitución Orgánica de los Estados Unidos de América
Esta composición inspirada en Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Jeff Blodgett, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker
* PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH <> CHINESE BELOW THE SPANISH * APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS *备忘录后显示纯文本 <> 西班牙语之下的中文 * TEXT VERSION MAY BE LONGER THAN MEME VERSION <> LA VERSIÓN DE TEXTO PUEDE SER MÁS LARGA QUE LA VERSIÓN MEME 文本版本可能比MEME版本更长
first posted on Social Media as follows in this meme:
Resolving Cases ‘On The Merits’, Revisited
DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW
Our modern [Judicial] procedural system was built largely on the foundations of Roscoe Pound’s vision.3 That vision, which was first implemented in the Federal Equity Rules in 1912 and then even more fully embraced in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938
3. See Jay Tidmarsh, Pound’s Century, and Ours, 81 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 513, 513 (2006)
407
Roscoe Pound, Harvard Law Dean 1916-1936
(Roscoe) “Pound Principle” of Jurisprudence
The fundamental reason for the endurance of Pound’s paradigm is its elegant simplicity: it promises to resolve each claim and each issue on its factual and legal merit, without letting procedural technicalities or traps derail the decision. No other vision—for instance, “decide claims by the most efficient means”—captures this most basic aspiration of an ideal civil justice system. Like any aspiration, resolving cases “on the merits” is never perfectly achievable.6 Nevertheless, this paradigm has continued to battle all other policy objectives—such as achieving efficiency, fostering settlements, preventing jury confusion, and balancing party control against active judicial management—in debates over the architecture of our procedural rules.
When the Social Darwinists (1870s) rebranded as Progressives in the US (1890s), they began an unconventional revolution by slow, covert infiltration. As evinced here, Progressive Elite Judges have been working to slowly change the rules to allow them to more easily fix case outcomes, while still appearing to be acting in the best interest of the masses and our country. Resolving Cases on Technicalities, Summary Judgement and/or Administrative Courts, makes it easier to fix cases and removes the uncertainty of having juries comprised of the allegedly ignorant masses, as part of the process.
Most of the efforts at procedural reform in the past thirty years have been attempts to walk away from, or tamp down the consequences of, Pound’s belief in a simple, uniform, discretionary, “decide each case on its merits” approach to legal procedure.5Although these efforts can loosely be associated with a law-and-economics perspective (in the sense that they are all attempts to rein in perceived excess costs in the present litigation system), it is fair to say that, while we are in the process of rejecting Pound’s paradigm, we have yet to come up with a paradigm to replace it.
408
In this instance, our traitor Progressive Judiciary argues for Court matters to be resolved by Judges on technicality for efficiency; rather than on Merit by Juries comprised of our peers. The pretext for this change being Economics (saving money). (Let me be clear, by technicality violation my interests is in violations of court rules and procedures in civil matters, not violations of constitutional rights in criminal matters.) But, in removing Merit to resolve court matters, Progressive Judges ignore the individuals unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights to Due Process and a Jury Trial. (Apparently, Progressive Judges need a remedial course on what “Unalienable” means.) Progressive Elites have a history of advancing their evil, unconstitutional agenda by making it appear they are acting in the best interests of the masses. [e.g., The Minimum wage was originally conceived as an instrument of Racism. Progressive Elites reasoned that the less productive immigrants, minorities and women would be priced out of the labor market. Progressive Elites sincerely believed only White Men could produce value in excess of the higher Minimum wage. (Page 140, Chapters 5, 7-10, “Illiberal Reformers”, 2016, Thomas Leonard.). Eventually, business would choose to only hire White Men of their own accord, for this reason.]
Most of this thinking flows from the Progressive Elite’s assertions of alleged superiority over the masses (Pages 51-52, Ibid.) Some, but NOT all of the other unconstitutional things Progressive Elites believe, include that the concept of Rights of the Individual is “nonsense” (Page 25, Ibid.), the masses are too ignorant to govern themselves (Pg. 52,) and that the Constitution’s Checks and Balances are outdated and should be ignored (Page 66, Ibid.).
Under Progressive Democratic President Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921), the Progressives created a 4th Branch of Government. This Administrative State was created to spearhead the mostly unconstitutional Progressive Agenda, and to reduce government accountability to the masses by being inserted between WE THE PEOPLE and the original 3 Branches of Government. At the point where Progressive Elites took actions to make their unconstitutional thoughts a reality, their actions became Sedition (US 18 Code 2384), Insurrection (US 18 Code 2383) and TREASON (USC Article III, Section 3; & US 18 Code 2381).
Which brings us to the matter of Election Fraud 2020. As we have demonstrated, the Progressive Globalist Insurgency began in earnest circa 1913. As we introduced earlier, the Progressive Globalists premeditated plan was to overthrow our government via nontraditional revolution by slow, covert infiltration over generations so no one generation would notice enough change to resist, revolt or mount a counter-revolution. More than 100 years later, the Progressive Globalist Insurgency assessed that it had infiltrated enough key government positions and consolidated enough power that it could successfully rig an election without WE THE PEOPLE noticing, or at least NOT noticing enough to mount a counter-revolution. And this is how this final, conclusive grab for power has so far played out
The matter of Election Fraud 2020, was decided in an unconstitutional manner, without Due Process nor a Jury, in violation of each SCOTUS Judges’ oath to support and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Election Fraud 2020 was wrongfully resolved on Technicality rather than the Merits. And, the appearance that this was “lawful” was only made possible by decades of premeditated, duplicitous, criminal change to the Court Rules and Case Law to make such a decision seem “legal”. This premeditated, duplicitous slow change in Court Rules and Case Law replaced the “Rule of Law” with Progressive “Rule of Man” and “Might Makes Right”. These changes further evince the case that the US Supreme Court’s failure to hear Election Fraud 2020 matters was/were/are acts of Conspiracy Against Rights (US 18 Code 241), Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (US 18 Code 241), Sedition (US 18 Code 2384), Rebellion and Insurrection (US 18 Code 2383) and TREASON (USC Article III, Section 3; & US 18 Code 2381).
TO WIT, WE THE PEOPLE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF AN UNCONVENTIONAL REVOLUTION BY SLOW, COVERT INFILTRATION BY THE PROGRESSIVE GLOBALIST INSURGENCY THAT HAS WENT ON FOR MORE THAN 100 YEARS. BY THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED HERE, WE HAVE PROVEN OUR JUDICIARY HAS AIDED AND ABETTED SAID INSURGENCY.
Prove me wrong!
AT THE SAME TIME, PER THE ROADMAP FOR DEALING WITH TYRANNY PROVIDED TO US BY OUR FOUNDERS, WE THE PEOPLE MUST DOCUMENT EXHAUSTING OUR PEACEFUL REMEDIES BEFORE CONTEMPLATING ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES! I ASSERT THAT THE FRAUD OF ELECTION 2020 AND THE FAILURE OF GOVERNMENT AND THE COURTS TO PROPERLY REDRESS THE PROBLEMS WITH ELECTION 2020 DEMONSTRATED THAT ELECTIONS AS A PEACEFUL REMEDY HAVE BEEN LOST TO WE THE PEOPLE. STILL, WE MUST CONTINUE DOCUMENTING ALL REMAINING PEACEFUL REMEDIES BEORE WE CONTEMPLATE IMPLEMENTING ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES. SOME OTHER REMAINING PEACEFUL REMEDIES ARE “CITIZEN GRAND JURIES” AND A NEW DECLARATION OF CAUSES” AS THE FOUNDER’S DID 6JUL1775. (An example of what that might look like appears here.)
I believe that with the recent series of articles I have written, I have irrefutably demonstrated that WE THE PEOPLE can no longer proceed with our lives as though everything is “normal”, or even will be normal if and when this bogus COVID-19 crisis is ever over. WE THE PEOPLE must begin to act to counter this rising despotism now… Now, while the small actions of many citizens acting in unison provides a good chance of restoring our Republic with the least disruption to each of our lives.
While some suggest more traditional, alternative remedies, I advise otherwise. I suggest that before WE THE PEOPLE consider alternative remedies, we must adapt to this new method of revolution the Progressive Globalist insurgency is utilizing. Most fundamentally, I posit we should begin by: 1) Create unity of the masses, to counter Progressive fomented division; 2) Restore First Principles of our Representative, Constitutionally-Limited Republic that have been erased by Progressive “Common Core” Education and Progressive Mainstream Media. As well as restoring our traditions and values; 3) We must counter the infiltration of Progressives into the leadership of institutions that are supposed to “support and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic”. Initially, I think we should concentrate on Law Enforcement and the Military. Perhaps most effective would-be Family members communicating with rank-and-file members in Law Enforcement and the Military during family functions, such as Holidays. For example, discussions about values and expectations of the family if family members in law enforcement and/or the military are UNLAWFULLY ordered to fire upon civilians. Further, asking family members to make sure they Establish Truth for themselves and not to blindly rely upon the representations of superiors (who may be compromised Progressive operatives). And then, to act in a manner they feel best reflects their duty and oath, to support and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
If others disagree, feel free to so advise. And if others have better ideas for restoring the Republic, please communicate them. I have no compelling need to lead this restoration of the Republic… Please someone else step up with a better plan with a greater chance of success, so I can step aside…
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty, Don Mashak The Cynical Patriot
This composition inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
Resolución de Casos ‘Sobre el Fondo’, Revisada
Resolución de Casos ‘Sobre el Fondo’, Revisada
REVISIÓN DE LA LEY DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE DENVER
Nuestro moderno sistema procesal [judicial] se construyó en gran medida sobre los cimientos de la visión de Roscoe Pound.3 Esa visión, que se implementó por primera vez en las Reglas de Equidad Federal en 1912 y luego se adoptó aún más plenamente en las Reglas Federales de Procedimiento Civil en 1938
Ver Jay Tidmarsh, Pound’s Century, and Ours, 81 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 513, 513 (2006)
407
Roscoe Pound, Decano de Derecho de Harvard 1916-1936
(Roscoe) ‘Principio de libra’ de jurisprudencia
La razón fundamental de la perdurabilidad del paradigma de Pound es su elegante simplicidad: promete resolver cada reclamo y cada problema según su mérito fáctico y legal, sin permitir que los tecnicismos o trampas procesales descarrilen la decisión. Ninguna otra visión, por ejemplo, ‘decidir las reclamaciones por los medios más eficientes’, captura esta aspiración más básica de un sistema de justicia civil ideal. Como cualquier aspiración, la resolución de casos ‘sobre el fondo’ nunca es perfectamente alcanzable.6 Sin embargo, este paradigma ha continuado luchando contra todos los demás objetivos políticos, como lograr la eficiencia, promover acuerdos, evitar la confusión del jurado y equilibrar el control de los partidos con la gestión judicial activa. —En debates sobre la arquitectura de nuestras reglas procesales.
Cuando los darwinistas sociales (década de 1870) se rebautizaron como progresistas en los Estados Unidos (década de 1890), iniciaron una revolución poco convencional mediante una infiltración lenta y encubierta. Como se demuestra aquí, los jueces de élite progresista han estado trabajando para cambiar lentamente las reglas para permitirles arreglar más fácilmente los resultados de los casos, sin dejar de parecer estar actuando en el mejor interés de las masas y de nuestro país. La resolución de casos sobre tecnicismos, juicios sumarios y / o tribunales administrativos, facilita la resolución de casos y elimina la incertidumbre de tener jurados compuestos por las masas supuestamente ignorantes, como parte del proceso.
La mayoría de los esfuerzos de reforma procesal en los últimos treinta años han sido intentos de alejarse o aplastar las consecuencias de la creencia de Pound en un enfoque simple, uniforme y discrecional de “decidir cada caso por sus méritos” del procedimiento legal. 5 Aunque estos esfuerzos pueden asociarse libremente con una perspectiva de derecho y economía (en el sentido de que todos son intentos de controlar los costos excesivos percibidos en el actual sistema de litigios), es justo decir que, mientras estamos en el proceso de rechazar el paradigma de Pound, todavía tenemos que encontrar un paradigma para reemplazarlo.
408
En este caso, nuestro traidor Judicial Progresista aboga por que los asuntos de la Corte sean resueltos por los Jueces en términos de tecnicismo para la eficiencia; en lugar de por el mérito de los jurados compuestos por nuestros pares. El pretexto para este cambio es la Economía (ahorrar dinero). (Permítanme ser claro, por tecnicismo me refiero a violaciones de las reglas y procedimientos judiciales en asuntos civiles, no violaciones de los derechos constitucionales en asuntos penales). Pero, al eliminar el mérito para resolver asuntos judiciales, los jueces progresistas ignoran los derechos naturales y constitucionales inalienables de las personas. al debido proceso y un juicio con jurado. (Aparentemente, los jueces progresistas necesitan un curso correctivo sobre lo que significa “inalienable”). Las élites progresistas tienen un historial de promover su agenda malvada e inconstitucional al hacer parecer que están actuando en el mejor interés de las masas. [Por ejemplo, el salario mínimo fue concebido originalmente como un instrumento de racismo. Las élites progresistas razonaron que los inmigrantes, las minorías y las mujeres menos productivas serían excluidos del mercado laboral. Las élites progresistas creían sinceramente que solo los hombres blancos podían producir un valor superior al salario mínimo más alto. (Página 140, Capítulos 5, 7-10, “Reformadores iliberales”, 2016, Thomas Leonard.). Eventualmente, las empresas optarían por contratar solo a hombres blancos propios, por esta razón].
La mayor parte de este pensamiento se deriva de las afirmaciones de la élite progresista de supuesta superioridad sobre las masas (páginas 51-52, ibid.) Algunas, pero NO todas las otras cosas inconstitucionales que creen las élites progresistas, incluyen que el concepto de derechos del individuo es “ tonterías ”(página 25, ibid.), las masas son demasiado ignorantes para gobernarse a sí mismas (pág. 52,) y que los controles y balances de la Constitución están desactualizados y deben ser ignorados (página 66, ibid.).
Bajo el presidente demócrata progresista Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921), los progresistas crearon una cuarta rama del gobierno. Este Estado Administrativo fue creado para encabezar la Agenda Progresista, en su mayoría inconstitucional, y para reducir la rendición de cuentas del gobierno a las masas al ser insertado entre NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO y las 3 ramas originales del gobierno. En el momento en que las élites progresistas tomaron medidas para hacer realidad sus pensamientos inconstitucionales, sus acciones se convirtieron en Sedición (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2384), Insurrección (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2383) y TREASON (Artículo III, Sección 3 de USC; y Código 18 de EE. UU. 2381). .
Lo que nos lleva al asunto del Fraude Electoral 2020. Como hemos demostrado, la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista comenzó en serio alrededor de 1913. Como presentamos anteriormente, el plan premeditado de los Globalistas Progresistas era derrocar a nuestro gobierno a través de una revolución no tradicional mediante una infiltración lenta y encubierta sobre generaciones para que ninguna generación se diera cuenta de los cambios suficientes para resistir, rebelarse o montar una contrarrevolución. Más de 100 años después, la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista evaluó que se había infiltrado en suficientes posiciones clave del gobierno y consolidado suficiente poder como para poder manipular con éxito una elección sin que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO nos diera cuenta, o al menos NO nos diera cuenta lo suficiente para montar una contrarrevolución. Y así es como se ha desarrollado hasta ahora esta toma de poder final y concluyente.
El asunto del Fraude Electoral 2020, se resolvió de manera inconstitucional, sin el debido proceso ni un jurado, en violación del juramento de cada uno de los jueces de SCOTUS de apoyar y defender la Constitución de todos los enemigos, extranjeros y nacionales. El fraude electoral 2020 se resolvió erróneamente por tecnicismo en lugar de méritos. Y, la apariencia de que esto era ‘legal’ solo fue posible gracias a décadas de cambios premeditados, engañosos y criminales en las Reglas de la Corte y la Jurisprudencia para hacer que tal decisión pareciera ‘legal’. Este cambio lento, premeditado y engañoso en las Reglas de la Corte y La jurisprudencia reemplazó el ‘Estado de derecho’ por el ‘Estado del hombre’ progresivo y ‘Podría hacer lo correcto’. Estos cambios evidencian aún más el caso de que el hecho de que la Corte Suprema de los EE. UU. No haya escuchado los asuntos de Fraude Electoral 2020 fue / fueron / son actos de conspiración contra los derechos (Código 18 de los EE. UU. 241), Privación de derechos bajo el color de la ley (Código 241 de los EE. UU. 18), Sedición (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2384), Rebelión e insurrección (Código 18 de EE. UU. 2383) y TREASON (Artículo III de la USC, Sección 3; y Código de EE. UU. 18 2381).
EN POCAS PALABRAS, NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, ESTAMOS EN MEDIO DE UNA REVOLUCIÓN NO CONVENCIONAL POR LA INFILTRACIÓN LENTA Y CUBIERTA DE LA PROGRESIVA INSURGENCIA GLOBALISTA QUE HACE MÁS DE 100 AÑOS. POR LA PRUEBA PRESENTADA AQUÍ, HEMOS PROBADO QUE NUESTRO PODER JUDICIAL HA AYUDADO Y APOYADO DICHA INSURGENCIA.
¡Prueba que estoy equivocado!
AL MISMO TIEMPO, SEGÚN LA HOJA DE RUTA PARA TRATAR CON LA TIRANÍA QUE NOS PROPORCIONARON NUESTROS FUNDADORES, NOSOTROS, EL PUEBLO, DEBEMOS DOCUMENTAR EL AGOTAMIENTO DE NUESTROS RECURSOS PACÍFICOS ANTES DE CONTEMPLAR LOS RECURSOS ALTERNATIVOS. AFIRMO QUE EL FRAUDE DE LAS ELECCIONES 2020 Y EL FALLO DEL GOBIERNO Y DE LOS TRIBUNALES DE RESOLVER ADECUADAMENTE LOS PROBLEMAS CON LAS ELECCIONES 2020 DEMOSTRARON QUE LAS ELECCIONES COMO REMEDIO PACÍFICO SE HAN PERDIDO PARA NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO. AÚN, DEBEMOS SEGUIR DOCUMENTANDO TODOS LOS REMEDIOS PACÍFICOS RESTANTES ANTES DE CONTEMPLAR LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE REMEDIOS ALTERNATIVOS. ALGUNOS OTROS REMEDIOS PACÍFICOS RESTANTES SON ‘GRANDES JURADOS CIUDADANOS’ Y UN NUEVO DECLARACIÓN DE CAUSAS ”COMO LO HIZO EL FUNDADOR EL 6 DE JULIO DE 1775. (Aquí aparece un ejemplo de cómo podría verse).
Creo que con la reciente serie de artículos que he escrito, he demostrado de manera irrefutable que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO ya no podemos seguir con nuestras vidas como si todo fuera “normal”, o incluso será normal si y cuando esta falsa crisis de COVID-19. se acaba para siempre. NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO debemos comenzar a actuar para contrarrestar este despotismo creciente ahora … Ahora, mientras las pequeñas acciones de muchos ciudadanos actuando al unísono brindan una buena oportunidad de restaurar nuestra República con la menor perturbación en cada una de nuestras vidas.
Si bien algunos sugieren remedios alternativos más tradicionales, yo recomiendo lo contrario. Sugiero que antes de que NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO consideremos remedios alternativos, debemos adaptarnos a este nuevo método de revolución que está utilizando la insurgencia globalista progresista. Fundamentalmente, postulo que deberíamos comenzar por: 1) Crear la unidad de las masas, para contrarrestar la división fomentada por los progresistas; 2) Restaurar los primeros principios de nuestra República representativa, constitucionalmente limitada, que han sido borrados por la educación progresiva de “núcleo común” y los medios progresivos convencionales. Además de restaurar nuestras tradiciones y valores; 3) Debemos contrarrestar la infiltración de los progresistas en el liderazgo de las instituciones que se supone que “apoyan y defienden la Constitución de todos los enemigos, extranjeros y domésticos”. Inicialmente, creo que deberíamos concentrarnos en las fuerzas del orden y las fuerzas armadas. Quizás los posibles miembros de la familia más efectivos se comunican con miembros de base en las fuerzas del orden y las fuerzas armadas durante las funciones familiares, como las vacaciones. Por ejemplo, discusiones sobre los valores y expectativas de la familia si los miembros de la familia en las fuerzas del orden y / o el ejército reciben la orden ILEGAL de disparar contra civiles. Además, pedir a los miembros de la familia que se aseguren de establecer la verdad por sí mismos y que no confíen ciegamente en las representaciones de los superiores (que pueden ser agentes progresistas comprometidos). Y luego, actuar de la manera que consideren que mejor refleja su deber y juramento, de apoyar y defender la Constitución de todos los enemigos, extranjeros y nacionales.
Si otros no están de acuerdo, no dude en avisarnos. Y si otros tienen mejores ideas para restaurar la República, comuníquenlas. No tengo una necesidad imperiosa de liderar esta restauración de la República … Por favor, alguien más dé un paso adelante con un plan mejor con una mayor probabilidad de éxito, para que pueda hacerme a un lado …
Esos fueron mis pensamientos.
Gracias por tu tiempo.
En libertad Don Mashak El patriota cínico
Esta composición inspirada en Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker
在進步民主黨總統伍德羅·威爾遜（Woodrow Wilson）（1913-1921）的領導下，進步黨建立了政府的第四分支。成立這個行政州的目的是帶頭將大多數違憲的進步議程帶入世界，並通過在WE THE PEOPLE和政府的最初三個分支之間插入政府來減少對群眾的問責制。在進步精英採取行動使違憲思想變為現實的時候，他們的行動變成了煽動叛亂（美國18法規2384），暴動（美國18法規2383）和叛國罪（美國法規第3條第3款；美國18法規2381）。 。
這使我們進入了2020年選舉欺詐問題。正如我們所證明的那樣，漸進的全球主義叛亂始於1913年左右。正如我們早先介紹的那樣，漸進的全球主義者的有預謀的計劃是通過非傳統的革命，通過緩慢的，秘密的滲透來推翻我們的政府。世代相傳，所以沒有哪個世代會注意到足以抵抗，反抗或發動反革命的變化。 100多年後，漸進式全球叛亂組織評估說，它已經滲透了足夠的政府重要職位並鞏固了足夠的權力，以至於在沒有WE THE PEOPLE注意到或至少沒有引起反革命的注意的情況下，它可以成功地進行選舉。到目前為止，這就是最後的決定性權力爭奪的方式。
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS
Harvard Law Dumps US Constitution
PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY HARVARD LAW NO LONGER REQUIRES THE US CONSTITUTION FOR GRADUATION?
Harvard Law Dumps US Constitution
PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY HARVARD LAW NO LONGER REQUIRES THE US CONSTITUTION FOR GRADUATION?
President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan made several changes as Dean of Harvard Law School. Many commentators have focused on her ban on military recruiting but CNS news reports on another major change — eliminating U.S. Constitutional law as a required course:
“As dean, Kagan won approval from the faculty in 2006 to make major changes to the Harvard Law’s curriculum.
“My understanding is that she instituted three new courses to the required curriculum and, in so doing, got rid of a requirement to take constitutional law,” Robert Alt, senior legal fellow and deputy director of the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, told CNSNews.com.
“Currently, at Harvard, constitutional law is not required for first-year law students, or even for graduation,”Alt added.
Indeed, according to Harvard documents, constitutional law is NOT listed among the law school’s academic requirements, though the catalogue for 2010-2011 does list more than a dozen elective courses dealing with some form of constitutional law.
MY TAKE: America was founded upon NATURAL LAW (para 1, Declaration of Independence) & the RULE OF LAW. (The Rule of Law requires one set of laws applied equally to all citizens with no preference for wealth, status or government position) That one set of Laws is our US Constitution. How can you teach the Rule of Law to Lawyers without first teaching them the foundations of the Rule of Law, which is our Constitution? In future CITIZEN GRAND JURY trials [ Read more: https://rebrand.ly/TXCitizenGrandJury ] or conspiracy to commit sedition and treason,and/or in drafting your NEW DECLARATION OF CAUSES [ http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft ] fmake sure to include this chapter of the crime.
This is an example of a battle in the unconventional revolution by slow, covert infiltration by the Progressive Globalist Insurgency, I have long spoken of. As you can see, the Progressives are slowly and covertly infiltrating our Legal System and removing the foundational elements that protect WE THE PEOPLE from the tyranny and despotism of a rogue government.
Those were my thoughts. Thank you for your time.
In Liberty, Don Mashak The Cynical Patriot
This document inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
La ley de Harvard elimina la Constitución de EE. UU.
La ley de Harvard elimina la Constitución de EE. UU.
POR FAVOR EXPLIQUE POR QUÉ LA LEY DE HARVARD YA NO REQUIERE LA CONSTITUCIÓN DE ESTADOS UNIDOS PARA LA GRADUACIÓN
La candidata a la Corte Suprema del presidente Obama, Elena Kagan, hizo varios cambios como decana de la Facultad de Derecho de Harvard. Muchos comentaristas se han centrado en su prohibición del reclutamiento militar, pero las noticias de CNS informan sobre otro cambio importante: eliminar la ley constitucional de los EE. UU. Como un curso obligatorio: “Como decano, Kagan obtuvo la aprobación de la facultad en 2006 para realizar cambios importantes en el plan de estudios de Harvard Law.
‘Tengo entendido que instituyó tres nuevos cursos para el plan de estudios requerido y, al hacerlo, eliminó el requisito de cursar derecho constitucional’, dijo Robert Alt, investigador jurídico senior y subdirector del Centro de Estudios Legales y Judiciales de la Heritage Foundation, le dijo a CNSNews.com.
“Actualmente, en Harvard, la ley constitucional no es un requisito para los estudiantes de derecho de primer año, ni siquiera para la graduación”, agregó Alt.
De hecho, según los documentos de Harvard, el derecho constitucional NO figura entre los requisitos académicos de la facultad de derecho, aunque el catálogo para 2010-2011 enumera más de una docena de cursos electivos que tratan de alguna forma de derecho constitucional.
Pero en un comunicado de prensa de Harvard de 2006 que explica los cambios, Kagan explicó que el alejamiento del derecho constitucional fue deliberado … Leer más: https://rebrand.ly/HarvardLawDumpsConstitution
MI TOMA: Estados Unidos se fundó sobre la LEY NATURAL (párrafo 1, Declaración de Independencia) y el ESTADO DE DERECHO. (El Estado de derecho requiere que un conjunto de leyes se aplique por igual a todos los ciudadanos sin preferencia por la riqueza, el estatus o la posición gubernamental) Ese conjunto de leyes es nuestra Constitución de los Estados Unidos. ¿Cómo se puede enseñar el Estado de derecho a los abogados sin antes enseñarles los fundamentos del Estado de derecho, que es nuestra Constitución? En futuros juicios del GRAN JURADO CIUDADANO [Leer más: https://rebrand.ly/TXCitizenGrandJury] por conspiración para cometer sedición y traición, y / o en la redacción de su NUEVA DECLARACIÓN DE CAUSAS [http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft] haga asegúrese de incluir este capítulo del crimen.
Este es un ejemplo de una batalla en la revolución no convencional por la infiltración lenta y encubierta de la Insurgencia Globalista Progresista, de la que he hablado durante mucho tiempo. Como puede ver, los progresistas se están infiltrando lenta y encubiertamente en nuestro Sistema Legal y eliminando los elementos fundamentales que protegen a NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO de la tiranía y el despotismo de un gobierno canalla.
Esos fueron mis pensamientos. Gracias por tu tiempo.
En libertad Don Mashak El patriota cínico
Este documento inspirado por Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS
Citizen Grand Jury, Republic of Texas
Citizen Grand Jury, Republic of Texas And, so it begins
As announced by “Administering Your Public Servants”
A group of Texas Citizen-Patriots is convening a Citizen Grand Jury on
Tuesday, 9 March 2020, 11 am CST 307 US Highway 67 Frontage Road Est, Keene Texas 76059 The Republic of Texas 888-656-5515
All people are welcome to participate if they live in the Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW) area
This is an attempt at peaceful remedy intended to put a stop to the corruption.
It is time for “WE THE PEOPLE” to step up and assert our unalienable Natural Rights as the Sovereigns of our Country.
Please RSVP if you plan to attend so I can adjust logistics as necessary.
Best Regards, Glenn
US Supreme Court Validates People’s Rights to Establish Common Law Grand Jury
In a stunning 6 to 3 decision Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government “governed” and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights. This is the solution to taking back our government county by county . . . state by state! [US vs Williams (1992)]
What Power Does the Common-Law Grand Jury Hold? “The grand jury is an English institution, brought to this country by the early colonists and incorporated in the Constitution by the Founders. … “to provide a fair method for instituting criminal proceedings against persons believed to have committed crimes.” [Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 (1956),]
Note: The first American Revolution began with the Samuel Adams’ first Committee of Correspondence in 1772. Per the US Founders, in regard to dealing with tyranny, WE THE PEOPLE must document exhausting our peaceful remedies before we consider alternative remedies. As a side note: Citizen Grand Juries are an attempt at peaceful remedy that we can easily document. http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft
Gran Jurado Ciudadano, República de Texas
Gran Jurado Ciudadano, República de Texas Y así comienza
Como lo anunció ‘Administrar a sus servidores públicos’
Un grupo de ciudadanos patriotas de Texas está convocando a un gran jurado ciudadano para
Martes, 9 de marzo de 2020, 11 a. M. CST 307 US Highway 67 Frontage Road Est, Keene Texas 76059 República de Texas 888-656-5515
Todas las personas pueden participar si viven en el área de Dallas / Fort Worth (DFW)
Este es un intento de remedio pacífico destinado a detener la corrupción.
Es hora de que “NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO” intensifiquemos y afirmemos nuestros inalienables Derechos Naturales como Soberanos de nuestro País.
Por favor confirme su asistencia si planea asistir para que pueda ajustar la logística según sea necesario.
Saludos cordiales, Glenn
La Corte Suprema de EE. UU. Valida los derechos de las personas para establecer un gran jurado de derecho consuetudinario
En una asombrosa decisión de 6 a 3, el juez Antonin Scalia, en representación de la mayoría, confirmó que el gran jurado estadounidense no forma parte de los poderes judicial, ejecutivo ni legislativo del gobierno, sino que pertenece al pueblo. En efecto, es una cuarta rama del gobierno ‘gobernada’ y administrada directamente por y en nombre del pueblo estadounidense, y su autoridad emana de la Declaración de Derechos. Esta es la solución para recuperar nuestro gobierno condado por condado. . . estado por estado! [Estados Unidos contra Williams (1992)]
¿Qué poder tiene el gran jurado de derecho consuetudinario?
“El gran jurado es una institución inglesa, traída a este país por los primeros colonos e incorporada a la Constitución por los Fundadores. … ‘para proporcionar un método justo para iniciar procesos penales contra personas que se cree que han cometido delitos’. [Costello contra Estados Unidos, 350 U.S. 359 (1956),]
Nota: La primera Revolución Americana comenzó con el primer Comité de Correspondencia de Samuel Adams en 1772. Según los fundadores de EE. UU., Con respecto a lidiar con la tiranía, NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO debemos documentar el agotamiento de nuestros remedios pacíficos antes de considerar remedios alternativos. Como nota al margen: Citizen Grand Juries es un intento de remedio pacífico que podemos documentar fácilmente. http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS
US 18 CODE 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection
US 18 CODE 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection
18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Our Constitution & the settled Metaphysics of Natural Law (Par. 1, Declaration of Independence) are the established civil authority of our Country. Per these, WE THE PEOPLE have inalienable Rights, and as the Sovereigns, have the right to abolish our government if it ignores the Constitution and Natural Law.
FELLOW AMERICANS, YOU HAVE BEEN DECEIVED. THE PROGRESSIVE GLOBALIST ELITES ARE THE REAL INSURRECTIONISTS. And, have been so for 100+ years. Progressives Elites have many unconstitutional beliefs. (eg. concept of rights of the individual is nonsense, Pg 25; Constitution’s Checks & Balances hinder government, Pg 66; & the masses are too ignorant to govern themselves, Pgs 51-52; Progressive Globalist Elites are superior to, & are not accountable to the masses, Pgs 51-52 & many more). The unconstitutional beliefs of the Progressive Elites became Sedition & Treason when they ACTED to make them reality circa 1913. They created the 4th Branch of government aka Administrative State (Pgs 40-49) ) to spearhead their revolution by slow, covert infiltration.
18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
This document inspired by Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA and William Bunker
US 18 CODE 2383 – Rebelión o insurrección
US 18 CODE 2383 – Rebelión o insurrección
18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebelión o insurrección Quien incite, ponga en pie, ayude o participe en cualquier rebelión o insurrección contra la autoridad de los Estados Unidos o sus leyes, o le brinde ayuda o consuelo, será multado bajo este título o encarcelado no más de diez años, o ambos; y será incapaz de ocupar ningún cargo en los Estados Unidos.
Nuestra Constitución y la establecida Metafísica de la Ley Natural (Par. 1, Declaración de Independencia) son la autoridad civil establecida de nuestro País. Por estos, NOSOTROS EL PUEBLO tenemos Derechos inalienables, y como Soberanos, tenemos el derecho de abolir nuestro gobierno si ignora la Constitución y la Ley Natural.
AMERICANOS, HAN SIDO ENGAÑADOS. LAS ELITAS GLOBALISTAS PROGRESIVAS SON LOS VERDADEROS INSURRECCIONISTAS. Y lo han sido durante más de 100 años. Las élites progresistas tienen muchas creencias inconstitucionales. (p. ej., el concepto de los derechos del individuo es una tontería, pág. 25; Los controles y balances de la Constitución obstaculizan el gobierno, pág. 66; y las masas son demasiado ignorantes para gobernarse a sí mismas, págs. 51-52; las élites globalistas progresistas son superiores y no responsable ante las masas, págs. 51-52 y muchas más). Las creencias inconstitucionales de las élites progresistas se convirtieron en sedición y traición cuando ACTUARON para hacerlas realidad alrededor de 1913. Crearon la cuarta rama del gobierno, también conocida como Estado Administrativo (págs. 40-49)) para encabezar su revolución mediante una infiltración lenta y encubierta.
18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy
Si dos o más personas en cualquier Estado o Territorio, o en cualquier lugar sujeto a la jurisdicción de los Estados Unidos, conspiran para derrocar, sofocar o destruir por la fuerza al Gobierno de los Estados Unidos, o para librar la guerra contra ellos, o para oponerse por la fuerza a su autoridad, o por la fuerza para prevenir, obstaculizar o retrasar la ejecución de cualquier ley de los Estados Unidos, o por la fuerza para apoderarse, tomar o poseer cualquier propiedad de los Estados Unidos en contra de la autoridad de los mismos , cada uno será multado bajo este título o encarcelado no más de veinte años, o ambos.
18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprisión de traición
Quien, debiendo lealtad a los Estados Unidos y teniendo conocimiento de la comisión de cualquier traición en su contra, encubre y no divulga y da a conocer, tan pronto como sea posible, lo mismo al Presidente oa algún juez de los Estados Unidos, o ante el gobernador o ante algún juez o magistrado de un Estado en particular, es culpable de delito de traición a la patria y será multado bajo este título o encarcelado no más de siete años, o ambos.
Este documento inspirado en Richard Kovacevich, David Lillehaug, Wells Fargo Bank, NA y William Bunker
PLAIN TEXT APPEARS AFTER THE MEMES <> SPANISH APPEARS BELOW THE ENGLISH APARECE EL TEXTO SENCILLO LOS MEMES <> EL ESPAÑOL APARECE DEBAJO DEL INGLÉS Sorry, but many sources don’t have Spanish version/subtitles <> Lo siento, pero muchas fuentes no tienen subtítulos o versión en español
2020 US Election Fraud Facts
2020 US Election Fraud Facts
Pillow Man, Mike Lindell, reveals the Election 2020 Fraud Facts that traitor SCOTUS Scehmed to avoid hearing on technicality rather than ruling upon the merits.
So many people ask me to provide proof of 2020 US Election fraud. Here is one source. Remember, the US Supreme Court dismissed all of the Election Fraud Lawsuits on a technicality, instead of ruling on the Merits. All US Judges and Lawyers take oaths to support and defend the US Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And longstanding legal tradition favors courts deciding cases on the merits, not technicality. There is no higher legal issue for the courts to decide in a Representative, Constitutionally limited Republic than the integrity of our Elections. Our US Supreme Court aided and abetted the seditious and treason Progressive Globalist Coup in contriving to dismiss these matters on a technicality. Think about it. There are 1.3 million lawyers in America. 335 of the 555 members of Congress are lawyers. How is it that not one single lawyer could draft a lawsuit that could not be tossed out on a technicality? All those who suppress these facts are guilty of aiding and abetting the seditious and treasonous Progressive Globalist Insurgency. Remember, all who conspired in these matters are motivated to suppress the facts to avoid trials for sedition and treason, a conviction for sedition and treason and hanging for sedition and treason. Pillow Man, Mike Lindell’s documentary is a credible source.
Datos sobre el fraude electoral en EE. UU. 2020
Hombre de almohada, Mike Lindell, revela los hechos fraudulentos de las elecciones de 2020 que el traidor SCOTUS Scehmed para evitar escuchar sobre tecnicismos en lugar de pronunciarse sobre los méritos.
A LOS ADMINISTRADORES DE ELECCIONES PROGRESIVAS NO LE IMPORTA LA INTEGRIDAD REAL DE LAS ELECCIONES; A ELLOS ÚNICAMENTE LE IMPORTA LA ‘APARIENCIA’ DE LA INTEGRIDAD DE LAS ELECCIONES, POR LO QUE LOS VOTANTES NO Cuestionan los resultados de sus elecciones. http://rebrand.ly/IMHOElectionsRigged https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2020/08/12/imho-our-minnesota-elections-are-rigged/ He sido juez electoral durante una década o más. Escribí esto mucho antes de las elecciones Planteé la cuestión del código de computadora manipulado en las urnas electrónicas Atras varias elecciones. Me cerraron a cada paso.
Mucha gente me pide que proporcione pruebas del fraude en las elecciones estadounidenses de 2020. Aquí hay una fuente. Recuerde, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos desestimó todas las Demandas por Fraude Electoral por un tecnicismo, en lugar de fallar sobre el fondo. Todos los jueces y abogados estadounidenses prestan juramento de apoyar y defender la Constitución estadounidense de todos los enemigos, tanto nacionales como extranjeros. Y la tradición legal de larga data favorece a los tribunales que deciden los casos en función del fondo, no del tecnicismo. No hay un asunto legal más importante para que los tribunales decidan en una República Representativa y constitucionalmente limitada que la integridad de nuestras Elecciones. Nuestra Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos ayudó e instigó al sedicioso y traidor Golpe de Estado Globalista Progresista a intentar desestimar estos asuntos por un tecnicismo. Piénsalo. Hay 1,3 millones de abogados en Estados Unidos. 335 de los 555 miembros del Congreso son abogados. ¿Cómo es posible que ni un solo abogado pueda redactar una demanda que no pueda descartarse por un tecnicismo? Todos aquellos que reprimen estos hechos son culpables de ayudar e incitar a la sediciosa y traidora insurgencia globalista progresista. Recuerde, todos los que conspiraron en estos asuntos están motivados a reprimir los hechos para evitar juicios por sedición y traición, una condena por sedición y traición y ahorcamiento por sedición y traición. Pillow Man, el documental de Mike Lindell es una fuente creíble.
This writer’s followers on Twitter and other Social Media are familiar with his intention of uniting rank and file Americans under one common Perspective of Reality. A Perspective of reality far truer than the false Perspective of Reality promoted through the divisive propaganda of the Main Stream Media and the two faux major political parties. With this article, this writer intends to build upon creating that truer, common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our government and hold our government officials accountable for their departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) and betrayals of the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE.
Yesterday morning this writer went to the continuing trial of Sandra Grazzini Rucki in Dakota County MN on various criminal charges relating to allegedly wrongfully depriving her ex husband, David Rucki, of parental rights, etc. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s well-founded and well-recognized affirmative defense is that she was acting to protect her children from what she reasonably believed was danger from their father. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki numerous times went to the appropriate channels to seek the safety of her children, and resorted to helping the girls escape their allegedly abusive father only when the police, the courts and Child Protective Services (CPS) failed her.
This writer does not really know Sandra Grazzini-Rucki from Adam. This writer first became aware of her abuse at the hands of the Dakota County MN Courts and our Government in 2014, through his involvement with the Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) Movement. Judicial TAR is a group of citizens who have sought a hearing before the Minnesota Legislature dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Courts every year from 2005, and every year our requests for said hearing have been denied. From this, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR believe it is reasonable for all American citizens to conclude that Minnesota Government and Courts, at a minimum have something to hide, and more likely are complicit in the Systemic Corruption of the Minnesota Courts. [Systemic Corruption means that the aspects of government that are supposed to prevent & punish corruption instead are complicit in and cover it up] In 2009, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR came to believe it would be unlikely we would ever have our request for said hearing granted. With victims of the Abuse of Power of the Courts and their advocates getting frustrated, becoming disheartened, moving away and dying, WE THE PEOPLE of Judicial TAR held an Ad Hoc hearing on the Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Courts to preserve our Petitions for Redress for Posterity:
From this writer’s experience with the Judicial TAR Movement, this writer has learned nuances of the legal profession that most Americans are unaware of. Add to this, this writer’s own experience in his personal civil litigation and 1 bogus criminal charge (eventually dismissed for lack of Probable Cause), and this writer asserts that he is uniquely qualified to understand how our Courts fix the outcomes of Court cases and educate his fellow rank and file citizens of the true nature of their government and courts.
This writer has written previously on the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Matter in Dakota County Minnesota, but your government has seen fit to scrub those articles from the internet. (Main Stream Media (MSM) has seen fit to not publish this writer’s previous articles on the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter.) In total, almost 200 of this writer’s blogs and several hundred of his posts and articles have been scrubbed from the Internet. One gets the sense that our government and courts don’t want rank and file Americans to have the information about their corruption, machinations and duplicity that this writer exposes. Yet, rather than try to recreate and reassert all the facts from those censored articles, this writer is going to focus on the mechanics of various allegations of how the Dakota County MN Courts are trying to fix the outcome of the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki litigation from a succinct, common sense legal perspective. (Fellow Minnesotan, Tim Kinley has a much better knowledge of the all the particular facts in the related previous matters under Judge David Knutson and underlying facts and minutia of the Dakota County MN Court departures from the Rule the Rule (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) under Judge Karen Asphaug which have led to this trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki – His Youtube Channel http://bit.ly/SpeechlessMN) This article is written more from a macro-overview and general mechanics perspective.
This writer wanted to attend this trial yesterday because it was alleged that there were/are departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) occurring intended to fix the outcome of the case, and he wanted to confirm their accuracy. At the same time, recent events provide an opportunity for this writer to build upon the American Public’s current familiarity with the departures from the Rule of Law. Specifically, this writer refers to the FBI’s Comey’s and DOJ’s Lynch’s failure to charge Hillary Clinton over her various State Department Email related crimes despite facts in evidence which required Hillary Clinton to be charged (http://usat.ly/29wwvnV; http://cnn.it/29JlQDO) For those not familiar with the concept of the “Rule of Law”;
It is the concept and requirement embodied in our founding documents that there only be one set of laws for all American citizens and that it be enforced equally on all
citizens without regard to status, wealth or government position.
Additionally, this writer will also build upon recent revelations by Wikileaks (and Edward Snowden) which have revealed to all Americans the lengths to which our government will go to conspire against WE THE PEOPLE’s free will and the Democratic Process. In this instance, this writer is specifically referring to a hack of the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer servers. Subsequently, the disclosed emails and documents from the DNC servers revealed that the level of Systemic Corruption extends not just to suspension of the Rule of Law but also to violations and machinations of the Democratic Process. (http://bit.ly/2afaGro)
In the present matter of the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki trial, it has been alleged:
The jury was tainted with a Newspaper containing an article placed in the jury holding room prior to jury selection;
The Court engaged in jury rigging in that it placed so many biased and/or unqualified potential jurors in the jury pool that the Defense could not eliminate them all with its limited number of “free boots” and Judge Karen Asphaug failed to remove at least two jurors for cause who eventually were empaneled on the jury;
The Court did/is engaging in fact shaping.
Now, as a member of the press, this writer went to the trial yesterday with the specific purpose of ascertaining if any of these allegations were true. This writer was denied the opportunity to make said inquiries.
WARNING – DEPARTURE FROM ACCEPTED DECORUM FOLLOWS
This writer asserts the recent revelations of the magnitude of our government’s departures from the Rule of Law and Democratic Process warrant departures from accepted decorum. In some way, this writer feels he must signal to his fellow citizens that recent events require special attention. This writer will use these departures from decorum to signal to our fellow citizens that they can no longer remain calm and just go along with their normal daily routines; Rather our Government has departed so far from Constitutional and Natural Law, that the time has come for every American to question their blind loyalty to our government and actively work to restore our government’s accountability to WE THE PEOPLE. You have been fore-warned…
At the noon lunch break, as Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena walked by where this writer was seated in the Courtroom gallery, this writer took the opportunity to shake her hand and introduce himself as a member of the Press and a member of the Judicial TAR Movement. Ms. Kathryn M. Keena continued toward the door as this writer began to ask her questions about the allegations. With the rudeness and arrogance of those Progressives who think they are better than all the rest of us (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3), Ms. Kathryn M. Keena continued into a conference room without even the professional courtesy of saying she did not want to hear what this writer had to say nor answering any of this writer’s questions. As Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena entered the conference room, this writer turned to leave the foyer of the courtroom but was blocked by the egress of others from the court room and patiently waited his opportunity to exit the door. While this writer was standing their facing the exit door waiting for an opportunity to leave, the lying POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena made a FALSE REPORT to a Bailiff that I tried to follow her into the conference room. Lying POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena ordered the Bailiff to have me removed. This writer protested that POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena was lying, and that the Bailiff himself and others had this writer standing near them patiently waiting to leave the foyer. Others advised me to give up my protest and this writer left the foyer and the building. Once again, Dakota County MN Courts had succeeded in preventing this writer from verifying the truth of their corruption and publishing it for the world to see.
EXPLAINING THE THREE ELEMENTS OF DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ALLEGEDLY USED TO ATTEMPT TO FIX THE OUTCOME OF THE SANDRA GRAZZIN-RUCKI MATTER
Now, lets revisit the various acts of departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) that have been alleged, in a simple, non-legal gibberish way so the average American can understand it. (See also http://bit.ly/SimulatedLitigationDefined and Proposed Election 2012 caucus resolutions for judicial reform(updated) Part 2of2; Resolution 17 http://bit.ly/2012JudicialTARResolutions2of2)
The alleged Court rules require that a Judge not do anything that might give the appearance of impropriety. Further, there is a requirement in the rules that says the “Finder of Fact” (Judge or Jury) allegedly can only consider facts and evidence on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD. (When this writer says alleged, it mean that, in the writer’s opinion, the Courts so frequently ignore them one must question if they actually are adhered to or not.
DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ARTICLE IN THE PROSPECTIVE JURY WAITING ROOM
In regard to the matter of the newspaper article about Sandra Grazzini-Rucki being in the jury waiting room before jury selection, shouldn’t there be a member of the staff assigned to ensuring that jury tainting evidence is not permitted in the jury waiting area. Of course there is, but in this writer’s experience and knowledge, such methods of tainting juries are common in the courts. To wit, every American has a right to a trial before an IMPARTIAL jury of their peers. To the point, if you were the one on trial how would you feel about a derogatory article about you being made available to potential jurors in the potential jury waiting room, potential jurors admitting they have read it and Judge Karen Asphaug ruling, “Ain’t no big deal”? In your opinion, if you are the Defendant, does Judge Karen Asphaug’s failure to redress this matter in a satisfactory manner give rise to an “appearance of impropriety”? (Untouchables – Switch Jury scene https://youtu.be/5Mbdi_NXweQ)
DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ALLEGED JURY RIGGING
Next, we move to the departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in alleged jury rigging. In jury selection, the judge is supposed to disqualify jurors for a variety of reasons such as they are a friend or relative of one of the parties, that they are already familiar with the case, or they state have already made up their minds as to guilt or innocence, etc. This writer wanted to ask if any of these allegations regarding the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter were true. POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena use the arrogant Progressive tactic (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3) of having reporters not submissive to the Courts, booted. Therefore, it is necessary to say it is alleged Judge Karen Asphaug failed to remove a person who said they read the article, knew about the case, felt that Sandra Grazzinni-Rucki was guilty and would be surprised if she was not found guilty. Another allegation is that a potential juror admitted he had recently attended a party of a relative of David Rucki and was familiar with the case. Judge Karen Asphaug failed to disqualify either prospective juror, in the later case Judge Karen Asphaug said the potential juror’s assurances that they could remain impartial were sufficient to prevent her from disqualifying them. If you are the Defendant, “How impartial do you think these two jurors are going to be?” This is your life on the line here, should you be afforded every appearance of neutrality and fairness?
Now, in addition to the judge disqualifying jurors for cause, the Defense and Prosecution are allowed a small number of “free boots” of any juror for any reason. It is alleged that Dakota County MN Court machinated the jury pool in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case so the Prosecution could get biased jurors on to the final jury panel. It is alleged that the afore-mentioned two particular jurors should have been disqualified by the judge, but were not. It is alleged that so many biased/unqualified jurors had been machinated into the jury pool (stacked) by Dakota County MN Courts, that the Defense would not have enough free boots, to get rid of them all. It is alleged that by the time these two particular prospective jurors turn in the jury selection process came up, the Defense had already expended all of its “free boots”. In an allegedly random process, and with thousands of citizens living in Dakota County MN, what are the chances that 6 or more of about a 25 person jury pool would be biased against the Defense. Now, if you are the Defendant, do you think this was by chance or by deliberate machination of the process by the Dakota County Courts? ]Make sure you factor in your new understanding of your government’s lack of honor and integrity manifests itself in Government’s willingness to manipulate outcomes with recent revelations of its departure from the Rule of Law in the Hillary Clinton State Department Email matter and its willingness to engage in machinations to violate the Democratic Process reveal in the DNC Leaks (http://bit.ly/2afaGro)]
DEPARTURE FROM THE RULE OF LAW ALLEGED FACT/EVIDENCE SHAPING
And lastly, there is the allegation in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter that the Court is Fact/Evidence shaping the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case. As was mentioned earlier, the only facts and evidence the Finder of Fact (in this case the jury) is supposed to use in making its finding is the facts and evidence on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD. Over time our courts have enacted a series of rules and precedents whereby they can include or exclude facts from the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD (let or keep the jury from seeing/hearing). In effect, judges can determine (fix) the outcome of any trial (or any other court proceeding) by only allowing on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD those facts and evidence which support the desired outcome.
In this writer’s long experience with the Judicial TAR Movement, he has became aware of the practice in multiple cases of Judges “telegraphing” to the lawyers on both sides and other court personnel how the Judge would like to rule. The lawyer fraternity (even the lawyer you paid) and other witness like Guardians Ad Litem and CPS, oblige the judge by only placing on the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD facts and evidence that will allow the Finder of Fact (Judge or Jury) to rule in the manner the judge has previously “telegraphed” to them. (Remember these judges and lawyers all go to the same continuing education courses, golf courses, country clubs and other social and professional events and speak their own “Legal-ease version of English – wink, wink; nudge, nudge; meaningful glance)
In the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Matter, there is an allegation that Judge Karen Asphaug has purposely and wrongfully excluded and attempted to exclude facts and evidence from the OFFICIAL COURT RECORD which demonstrate Sandra Grazzini-Rucki reasonably feared for the health and safety of her children from their father David Rucki.
The question to you, if you are the Defendant, if Judge Karen Asphaug in fact acted in this matter, did she act in a way that gives an appearance of impropriety in the trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki? Did you get a fair trial? And, even if you have the money and emotional fortitude to appeal and win on appeal, is not the additional money and time spent amount to unjust punishment? (Progressive Conditioning http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27)
One single event/fact has cemented this writer’s belief in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s representation that she feared for the lives and safety of her children. It has been alleged that at some point in all of this David Rucki gathered the family around a kitchen table. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki alleges that David Rucki threatened to kill all of them and then himself. In the opposing version David Rucki only threatened to kill himself in front of the entire family gathered around the kitchen table. In this writer’s humble opinion, regardless of which version is true, this event also cemented the Parental Alienation of David Rucki’s children towards himself. That some version occurred is a matter of relevant fact. You can hear David Rucki in his own words try to spin the event to his best advantage in this newscast. (https://youtu.be/qVaXS_neu2E at 4m 45s to 5m); http://bit.ly/2aeUHWr 4m 50s to 5m 3s) David Rucki’s admission of some version of this event is what cements in this writer’s mind that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki reasonably believed her children were in danger, and when the legal authorities failed to act in accordance with the Rule of Law, Sandra Grazzini-Rucki was forced to assert her own UNALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE and act to protect her children from her reasonably perceived threat from their father.
It is important to remember went to the Courthouse yesterday and tried to make inquiries and ask these questions so he could assert them as facts rather than allegations. But POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena resorted to Progressive tactics to keep rank and file Americans ignorant of the systemic corruption of the Dakota County MN Courts.
What you also don’t know, are the allegations that Judge David Knutson made decisions in prior litigation related to the Rucki Divorce that also depart from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion). (In this writer’s humble opinion; think bribe, other consideration or Teddy Kennedy and Chappaquiddick dynamics) As Judge David Knutson is on the Discipline Review Board, its tough to pursue the truth through that avenue. As the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards is a legal black-hole and essentially a Public Relations firm for Minnesota Judges, no relief is available there either. And, as the Minnesota Legislature for 10+ years has refused to the Judicial TAR Movement a hearing dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of systemic corruption in the Minnesota Courts, no relief will be force coming there. Still, someone should ask Judge David Knutson to explain his departures from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter, and this writer even suggests Judge David Knutson should submit to a polygraph to “avoid the appearance of impropriety”. [Here again, and especially, Tim Kinley has a much better grasp and understanding of the minutia and specifics of the departures from the Rule of Law allegedly committed by Judge David Knutson than does this writer. See his YouTube Channel “Speechless” (http://bit.ly/SpeechlessMN)]
This writer has an additional special qualification in this case of asserting the likely truthfulness of the allegations of departures from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki matter. Judge Karen Asphaug was one of the Judges in the only criminal matter this writer has ever been charged with (besides minor traffic tickets – No DWIs). In that matter, this writer was in another Dakota County Courtroom in 2014 investigating allegations that Dakota County MN Law Enforcement was complicit in the local Drug Trade. A woman complained that her X-husband was getting special treatment from Dakota County Law Enforcement and the Courts because he was the main supplier of these illegal drugs. The matter was eventually dismissed for LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE(meaning it was BS). But along the way, I told Judge Karen Asphaug as I stood before her, “The charge and being forced to defend one’s self is the intended punishment” Our Government brings bogus charges against people to achieve its agenda because it knows the trauma, time and expense is punishment enough to scare people off or cow them into submission. Behind closed doors our government officials often laugh and think its funny to terrorize citizens. (Progressive Conditioning http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27)
Before the case against this writer was dismissed for being bogus, Judge Karen Asphaug ruled from the bench that the case should be heard by a Judge from a different jurisdiction as it involved Bailiff’s who work closely with Judges. This writer alleges that later Judge Karen Asphaug was instructed by former US MN AG and current MN Supreme Court POS Justice David “The Bag Man” Lillehaug (aka Killehaug) to cooperate in fixing the criminal case against this writer for political reasons and in furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy against this writer. Dakota County lined up 4 Bailiff’s/Sheriff’s Deputies to perjure themselves against this writer by saying he disrupted the Court and was guilty of “Disorderly Conduct”(while they believed no video existed). For months, the POS Prosecutor Dan Fluegel insisted all exculpatory video tape was destroyed. Only when this writer produced written correspondence from the Dakota County Sheriff’s Department confirming this writer demanded the video tape be retained within days of the incident, did some of the exculpatory video tape appear and the 4 Bailiff’s/Sheriff’s Deputies willing to perjure themselves slink away(Yet not fired or punished). Only this writer’s appeal to the Minnesota Appellate Court along with a copy of the Court transcript forced Judge Karen Asphaug to make sure a Judge from another jurisdiction was administratively assigned to this writer’s case. You can read more about that here: Don Mashak Notice of Claims to Dakota County MN 10_09_2015 (http://bit.ly/2aeZfgy) You can also learn how a Sheriff’s Deputy can “Blow someone’s face off and the Union will have him back on the job the next day”. So arrogant and above the law is Dakota County MN, that even though they are required by law to perform an investigation and provide a copy of the findings when a Notice of Claims is filed, they simply refused to comply. And apparently no government agency exists to force them to comply.
[With the topics we have covered in this article in mind, let us take a moment for this writer to acknowledge he sympathizes with the underlying causes of action pursued by “Black Lives Matter” (BLM). Though this writer does not agree with their methods, this writer has reached out to the “Black Lives Matter” Movement, offered them advice and asked them to join the Judicial TAR Movement. (http://bit.ly/29Ae8fH)]
So now, you understand why when Dakota County MN Courts and Judge Karen Asphaug are accused of departing from the Rule of Law(aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion), this writer has special qualifications for assessing the validity of those allegations. Really, Judge Karen Asphaug, you are going to put a woman in jail for being forced to protect her children when the police and legal system failed her? Really Judge Karen Asphaug, you don’t think your oath of office requires you to do something regarding Judge David Knutson requiring Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s Lawyer to defend her client handcuffed to a wheel chair without notes or client her client present? When will you act to “avoid the appearance of impropriety”? Judge Karen Asphaug, there are so many other, “Really?” type posits, but in the end Judge Karen Asphaug, Is this what you really want to be known as?
Its up to you, Judge Karen Asphaug; HON or POS?
It is apparent from my one interaction with POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena, she is in the habit of flippantly lying and ignoring her oath of office and should never be known as HON.
In closing, as I believe that WE THE PEOPLE are in fact the equals of the arrogant Progressive POS’s [despite Progressive Educated Elite assertions to the contrary (http://bit.ly/1mvmoB3)], I believe WE THE PEOPLE have the right to judge them for their failure to answer our questions and provide documents we request. And, I further assert WE THE PEOPLE have a right to view these refusals in the manner prescribed by the US Supreme Court.
The Finder of Fact (You and I) may presume that the failure of a person (POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena/Judge Karen Asphaug/Judge David Knutson) to answer questions and/or produce documents may be interpreted as an indication that their truthful responses would have been detrimental to their legal position.
POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena refused to answer my questions and lied, to prevent the Press from exercising its First Amendment Right of Freedom of the Press. This writer never got a chance to query Judge Karen Asphaug. Others have tried to query Judge David Knutson, unsuccessfully.
This writer gives POS Prosecutor Kathryn M. Keena and Judge Karen Asphaug until 6pm CDT 28 JULY 2016 to respond to these allegations or summarily, WE THE PEOPLE may judge them to be accurate and true, in accordance with the rules the US Supreme Court that apply to anyone of WE THE PEOPLE when we appear before them.
Judge Karen Asphaug is aware of my contact information from her previous court related departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion).
My fellow Americans, this writer hopes this article helps you all in forming a truer Perspective of Reality that permits us, as equals, to unite together and make our Government once again accountable to WE THE PEOPLE. Millennials and GenX’rs, as I have promised you elsewhere, you now have a better handle on the true nature of our Government and Courts. Keep fighting the good fight!
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good [people] do nothing”
~ Edmund Burke
Government and Courts; Please take note, WE THE PEOPLE shall include lack of proper redress of our concerns in this matter, and our future Third Declaration of Causes (http://bit.ly/NewDOCRev1), in determining if and when it is appropriate for WE THE PEOPLE to withdraw our CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED.
This article was written by Don Mashak alone without seeking advice, direction or permission of anyone else. I alone am responsible for the content and publication of this article.
The Progressive Rag, the Minneapolis Star and Sickle, earlier this week wrote an article on the return of citizens to Police Review Committees. Apparently it was so controversial, they have made it extremely difficult to find online. Lets take a moment to work on creating a truer common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our Government and hold it accountable.
About the time of the American Revolution (1776), the Country’s Founders warned that government must be constructed with the nature of man in mind or it was doomed to failure.
John Locke summed up the nature of man as:
“being tolerance with a tendancy towards reason, but who can be selfish”
The Founders’ perception of the nature of man perhaps is best summed up in the Cato Letters:
“All People[men] have free will and are not virtuous by nature”
Thus our Founder’s constructed our government with “Checks and Balances, Transparency and Accountability”
Enter the Progressives, circa 1900.
Similar to how the “Left” accused the TEA Party Movement of being funded and the brainchild of the Koch Brothers, The Progressive Movement was actually the brainchild of the Wealthy. The Wealthy grew tired of government being transparent and accountable to the masses. The Media “MuckRakers” of the day, drove the Wealthy Trusts up the wall.
The wealthy trusts had the Progressive Movement promote the idea that:
“The Nature of Man is to be trustworthy and altruistic”
From this pile of manure came the idea that the Progressive educated elite, being trustworthy and altruistic, should be allowed to make decisions on behalf of the masses without accountability to the masses. (See also Social Darwinism)
This began a long trend of removing transparency and accountability to the masses in a wide variety of Government Agencies. The Police, Judges and Lawyers among them.
Of course, in much the same way a dam built on the premise that water runs up hill must fail, so must a government based on some other than actual human nature.
Without the transparency and accountability of citizen oversight, Law Enforcement across the country fell into systemic corruption. Its only human nature to protect those who you work with everyday, especially when one day you might need some “quid pro quo”. See the movies “The Untouchables”, “Lawless” and “Serpico” as evidence of this writer’s assertions.
With tensions rising and the two alleged major political parties using them for political purposes, American Law Enforcement has been forced to consider returning to a large presence of civilians to rebuild trust between Law Enforcement and the Civilian Community.
It just is Common Sense that average citizens, being outside, impartial “Finders of Fact” will most often find the actual truth, rather than cave to politically machinated results.
This writer would just ask you to never forget that it was the Progressives that removed the civilian oversight in the first place. And if the Founders were still around, they would be able to say, “We told you so.”
One last quick comment, shame on the American Main Stream Media not covering this in a color blind manner. And shame to the politicians that try to spin these events for political gain. In each of these events the the only possible results should be right, wrong and honest mistake/human error.
There are good and bad people in every group of people, regardless of what characteristics you use to define it. Once the honest and truthful determination of what happened is determined, the only way the event should be framed is in a colorblind manner of good people against bad people, and/or sadness for tragedy out of honest human error and a resolve to work to avoid future tragedy.
This article was originally published on Examiner.com on July 3, 2013. (see original print graphic at end of article) This writer’s entire column on Examiner.com was CENSORED within 24-48 hours of this writer submitting a credible petition on 11/06/2015 to the Minnesota Supreme Court to Remove a Minnesota District Court Judge from the bench for conspiring to perpetrate a fraud upon the Court.(An additional almost 200 blogs of this writer have been censored since 2012) The Minnesota Establishment has also taken other unlawful and unconstitutional punitive actions against this writer. I put it to you that your government is trying to erase your knowledge of Natural Law and Natural Rights to make you less able to resist their attempts at enslaving you. This writer leaves it to reader to deduce for themselves who wanted these articles CENSORED, and why the US Government wants this writer silenced.
As the day of this Country’s 237th Anniversary of our Declaration of Independence approaches, let us take this opportunity to revisit and discuss the events and circumstances that inspired the subjects of the American Colonies to revolt and declare independence from King George of England.
This won’t be the same old, dull rehash of the enumerated list of grievances the colonists had petitioned King George for relief from and were denied. You know that list from primary and secondary school: the King’s failure to enact laws necessary for the fair and proper governing of the colonies, the King’s failure to listen to and act upon the Colonists Petitions for Redress of Grievances, the King’s punishment and reprisal of those involved in said Petitions, the King’s failure to provide the colonies with adequate protection from external invasion and internal strife, No Due Process and the King’s failure to establish a Colonial Judiciary and his refusal to abide by the Rule of Law, the King forcing American Colonists to quarter large numbers of military troops and failing to adequately supervise them, his cutting off the Colonist’s trade with the rest of the world and inflicting other economic unfairness, taxation without representation, unreasonable searches and seizures and restrictions on free speech, free press and freedom of assembly [(and a host of other grievances). You can view the entire list by reading the Declaration of Independence [http://goo.gl/buq6I]
While these individual trespasses, that partially explain what happened on the 4th of July, 1776, are important to acknowledge, focusing on them obscures the bigger picture of a series philosophical epiphanies, enlightenments and events that would alter the future trajectory of humankind. While you watch fireworks this 4th of July, ponder this: The American Revolution was an intellectual revolution as much as it was a military revolution. The entire oppressive, overwhelming, all consuming Socio-economic-political status quo of the Old World was overthrown and cast off.
The new Socio-economic-political paradigm that replaced the old status quo resulted in the tremendous expansion of individual freedom and liberty as well as great improvement in the quality of life for each individual. On the 4th of July, 1776, 13 American colonies had trembled at the thought of declaring independence from what was then the greatest power in the world. However, these enhancements to the lives of every individual under the new American Socio-Economic-Political Perspective of Reality allowed the 13 American colonies to rise 170 years later as the greatest socio-economic-military power on earth.
The American Declaration of Independence on the 4th of July, 1776 was not just a Declaration of Independence from King George of England. It was also a Declaration of Independence by every American Colonial Subject from King George’s Perspective of Reality on the Nature of Mankind and the proper relationship of the between government and the governed.
“Huh? What the heck is he talking about?”, you are thinking to yourself. Relax and get ready to enjoy the wild ride adventure that led to our American Declaration of Independence and the formation of a new country. A country made up of former subjects, now self proclaimed citizens acting with their own Self-Determination. And, within a newly realized Perspective of Reality regarding the Nature of Mankind and the proper relationship between government and the governed.
This wild ride begins by recalling the fall of the Roman Empire and the descent of the Western World into the “Dark Ages”. Out of the political and economic chaos of the Dark Ages arose a Socio-Economic-Political system known as Feudalism [http://goo.gl/QqbHt] and the institutionalization of a Governance Doctrine known as the “Divine Right of Kings” [http://goo.gl/BHJHt].
The Governance Doctrine of the “Divine Right of Kings” meant that the King/Queen/Head of State (hereafter “King”) was a God or the representative of God here on earth. As such, no earthly being had the right to challenge the King’s authority or decisions, as they were a god or divinely inspired. Quite simply, the King was never wrong. Your parents may have declared to you, “My roof, My rules”, but King’s essentially declared, “My Country, My rules.”
Further, the King owned all the Land. No Person could be upon the King’s Land without the permission of the King or his representatives. No person on the King’s land had any rights, instead they had permissions and privileges; The King’s Permission (and privileges as he so desired). And the King’s permission (and privileges granted), including the permission to simply be on his land, could be revoked at the Kings discretion (whim). And that is why such persons are called subjects (as we shall more dramatically demonstrate later in this good read).
The King allowed certain persons the privilege to manage portions of his lands. These persons had a wide variety of titles, but for our purposes we will just refer to them as “Nobles”, “Lords” or “Aristocrats”. In exchange for being given the privilege to “manage” a portion of the King’s land, the Nobles were required to supply the King with Tax money and soldiers for the King’s Army. In turn, the Nobles collected taxes from anyone who lived upon the land the King had granted to the Noble and paid the King his required portion. And, when necessary the Noble pressed into military service some the subjects, when insufficient volunteers could be found to meet the Kings requirements for soldiers.
And with that foundation laid, the writer entices you to read onward with this teaser. Perhaps you did not notice this writers phrasing of the first paragraph of this writing:
“…that inspired the subjects of the American Colonies to revolt and declare independence from King George of England.”
It is impossible to fully grasp the perspective of reality of a person living under feudalism and the “Divine Right of Kings”. However, to more fully appreciate the scope of change the American Revolution represents, it is important that you try to intimately understand the “Perspective of Reality” of a “subject”. That is to say, a person living under the Socio-Political Governance Doctrine of the “Divine Right of Kings” and the Socio-Economic System of Feudalism. To do so, this writer asks you to participate in the following exercise.
To avoid unnecessarily offending any particular Nationality, you are going to envision yourself as the subject of an unnamed Country whose rules are an amalgamation of the written and unwritten rules that existed in the many countries of Old World Europe and the American Colonies during the Renaissance (1300-1700AD)[Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1492 (AD “discovers islands near America) [http://goo.gl/LSf05] This exercise requires you to “inhabit and visualize the internal pressures, restrictions and constraints subjects living under the Government Doctrine of the “Divine Right of Kings” would have had to place upon themselves at all times in order to survive and avoid consequences”. (For the younger among you, think of this like setting up your character for a computer role-playing game. Your goal here is to survive.) Are you ready to start?
OK? First add each of the following rules to your Feudal Subject Perspective of Reality:
The King’s power is absolute. It cannot be questioned or overturned;
Only the King can own land, you can’t.
You have no rights, You have only the permissions and privileges from the King and/or the King’s designated privileged representatives (Noble or Lord);
It is by the King’s ultimate permission alone that you can do anything in or upon the King’s land, even simply walk. Your family and your friends also are allowed to be on the King’s land only by permission of the King and/or his designated representatives;
You can use some of the King’s land with the kings permission, but only as long as you pay the homage and taxes the king demands to the King and/or his designated representatives;
By the King’s word alone, you, your family and your friends can be thrown off the land upon which you reside and even out of the Country(or worse);
The King is the final arbitrator of justice. The king can search the place where you reside and/or work anytime. The King can detain and/or imprison you anytime. If the King says you are guilty, you are guilty. If the King wants to punish your family and or friends for your crime, they are punished. If the King commands your torture, you are tortured. If the King sentences you to death, you die. There is no Due Process of Law(even more so if you are a serf and not a freeman afforded justice through the “Law of the Land”;
The King can establish a religion and make the practice of any other religion a crime. The King can let a religion punish any person for anything a church calls heresy;
The Printing Press (1439AD) [http://goo.gl/FAIpQ] [http://goo.gl/4amhR] has not been yet been introduced into the Western World, or at least there are not enough of them to have any great impact on society yet. At this time, almost no one goes to school and more than half the population is totally or functionally illiterate. All of your knowledge comes to you from persons with wealth and time to provide you whatever knowledge they care to provide you. And this boils down to the Church, the King and the King’s loyal, privileged Aristocrats and Nobles. If somehow you learn information or form ideas contrary to the beliefs and positions of the Church and/or the King and dare to speak them out loud, you may be charged with treason or heresy. And therefore, the King, the Church, the Nobles and the Aristocrats provide almost all of the information which forms your personal perspective of reality. And this collective Aristocracy only gives you information which ensures the continuity of the status quo.
Now add to this that you and your family are living on the edge of survival. Missing one day’s wages can mean death. You do not have the resources and/or wherewithal to survive moving from here to someplace else within the country, let alone to another country. Being forced to leave where you currently reside will result in great hardship which you and your family may, or may not, survive. And the Black Plague is still strikes fear in the population.
Now that you have immersed yourself in your role as a “Subject” Perspective of Reality, let us take it out for a test drive. Wake up!
Ok, you have just woken up and are setting on the edge of your straw filled mattress… What else would it be filled with, you’re the town thatcher. You fix the lower middle class folk’s flats and huts that have thatched roofs made of straw and mud (or worse). As you sit there, you reflect on your life. You thank God you were born a freeman and not a serf. [In your country’s recent history, 60% of the population were serfs. Serfs were “peasants legally bound to the land. Serfs had to provide labor services, pay rents and be subject to the lord’s control.” – essentially slaves. (http://goo.gl/EGBr4)]
You have your own luxurious 2 room flat/hut. ( no running water, sanitation or refrigeration mind you) You are one lucky man [Sorry, you have to be a man – if you are a woman living in these times statistically you would likely be doing whatever your father or the man who paid the largest dowry for your hand in marriage wanted you to do [At this point in time the invention of the Western Notion of Romantic Love born of the French Troubadours (@1250AD) applies only for aristocratic women and was not practiced in the same way then as it traditionally supposed to be practiced today]
You are a skilled laborer; instead of an oaf or serf bound to the land and only qualified to work as unskilled labor at much lower wages. You are a thatcher because your dad was a thatcher. As a skilled thatcher you make a far better living than a serf or an oaf. Another thatcher tried to move into town but the Sheriff urged him out of town at the Noble’s direction. You are a thatcher because both you and your father have always demonstrated loyalty and respect toward the king and the Noble upon whose land you live and work (and paid your taxes).
You have a wife (who you purchased with a very small dowry) Her appearance is commensurate with your small dowry. She was also was born into the lower class. You have 3 children – 2 boys ages 14 and 5 and a daughter age 13. You would have 6 children, but 3 died of disease before the age of 5 despite the Noble guaranteeing the doctor’s fees. [You are living towards the end of the Renaissance (1300-1699AD) http://goo.gl/q0tKI. It is important to remember that during your lifetime, children of your socio-economic status are considered adults at age 14 (except during the 16th century children did not become adults until their father’s went before a Judge and had them declared adults). [http://goo.gl/nko7U]
You are thankful to your God because the Church, King and Nobles tell you to be. You know the earth is the center of the Universe and that the Sun revolves around the Earth because the Church tells you so. You go to that Church because the King and Nobles tell you to. You know the king is the representative of your God here on earth because the Church, King and Nobles tell you so.
You have all that you have because you know all the written and unwritten rules to obey in order to not have some or all your permissions and/or privileges from your King and your Noble terminated.
What follows is your list of activities for the day. Along the way, you will encounter some “Termination of Permissions/Privileges” Landmines. You must navigate around these landmines to maintain your family’s standard of living and quality of life:
Now that you are awake and your wife and children have served you breakfast. Afterwards you instruct your wife to tend the garden and then to take your daughter and youngest son out to the forest to pick berries to supplement the family’s diet. You do not worry for their safety, because everyone relies upon your trade and they know you are in good standing with the Nobles. Strangers can’t freely come to your area because the Sheriff is enforcing a quarantine as a result of nearby out break of the Black Plague.
You and your oldest son (almost a man himself) are off to your first job of the day. Your son has already loaded your tools and materials on your cart and is ready pull it to your destination.
You tell your son to take the most direct route to the job as you are going to go a couple blocks out of the way to drop off taxes at the Sheriff’s office. (Without your son, you would be pulling the cart yourself.)
At the Sheriff’s office you pay what you can and ask if you can pay 2 chickens to make up the difference. You explain it has been a particularly dry summer with much fewer calls for roof repair. The Sheriff agrees. However, the Sheriff also informs you taxes are going up next month to fund the King’s new war. The Sheriff also warns you that your jealous neighbors have started a rumor that your wife is a witch. Not to worry though; as you are a good, loyal subject the Noble assures you he will see to it the rumors are nipped in the bud.
You rush back to catch up with your oldest son before he reaches the first job. You must catch up to him before your son reaches the job because these folks live next to the Noble’s castle. They are complaining about the repair job your son previously did on his own.
You catch up to your son. He has stopped to flirt with the fruit and vegetable girl. You weigh the pros and cons of that relationship and then you disapprovingly interrupt them. You need to get your son’s botched thatch repair inspected and fixed before a rumor starts and your good reputation is destroyed.
As you continue, your son complains he does not want to be a thatcher; he wants to be a Knight and compete in jousting tournaments. You weigh the pros and the cons, and then tell him it simply is not in his stars. [A Knights Tale http://goo.gl/9fgfg](In your mind you determine that his slight build due to malnutrition, makes wasting a favor from the noble for a dream your son is not well suited for, imprudent)
Your son then mentions to you that the 14 year old daughter of the Noble flirted with him while he was performing the botched repair. In your son’s wild, unbridled naïve exuberance of youth, he speculates that the two might marry allowing him to study and train to be a Knight or even a Noble. Knowing the precarious position this encounter exposes your permissions and privileges to, you scold your son to know his place in the world and never speak to the Noble’s daughter again. You tell him the whole thing was just his imagination. Nobles do not marry commoners, period! You are horrified by the thought of your son being caught having sex with the Noble’s daughter. With the monumental consequences of this landmine in mind you bark at your son, “Do you understand? Tell me you understand the consequences and will have nothing further to do with the Noble’s daughter!” Your son nods yes with that reluctant look of defiance teenage boys emote so well.
You arrive at the job. You greet the home dweller’s wife and ask her to apologize to her husband on your behalf for your son’s lack of craftsmanship. But, you explain, “It’s the only way he will learn”. You and your son climb on the roof and inspect the repair. It’s certainly not as good as one of your own, but it got the job done. You go through the motions of re-repair anyhow for appearances sake. You scold your son in front of the home dweller’s wife again for appearances sake. The home dweller’s wife feels guilty and admits she complained at the Noble’s daughter’s request and with some small compensation. She explains that the Noble’s daughter wanted to see your son again. You spy the Noble’s daughter hiding around a nearby corner. Your son does not see her or pretends not to see her. You and your son leave for your next job.
A short distance away, you run into the Noble riding horseback. After the initial greetings, the noble invites you to lunch with him at a nearby shop. You send your son with the cart ahead and onto the next job. You offer apologies and try to excuse yourself with pressing job demands and inability to pay. The Noble insists and says “my treat”. You know you can’t refuse without risking your permissions and privileges. And off to the local coffee house you go. Over lunch, the Noble informs you that his people advise him that you handled the situation between your son and his daughter to his great satisfaction. The fact that you know, not only your place, but also your son’s place, pleases him greatly. Further, the Noble advises you that the King needs more men for his war. He advises you that he was going to suggest to you that your son might make a good pike-man in the King’s army. However, in light of how you handled this young love situation, he has reconsidered. He notes that as you are getting older, you will come to rely on your son more and more to assist you in your profession. (A none to subtle hint as to part of what will happen should your son forget his place again) Next, in what the Noble intends as good news, the Noble asks what dowry amount you were asking for your daughter. He indicates that the Sheriff’s son has taken an interest in her. Flabbergasted, you reply that you don’t know what a proper amount would be and ask the Noble his advice. (All the while, you feel your 13 year old daughter is too young for such talk but feel trapped by the implied consequences of refusing or not skillfully maneuvering yourself out of the implicit command. Bulkier dresses, no more hair ribbons and more time in church for her you think to yourself) The Noble’s 1st response is, “Wouldn’t it be nice to have an ox or a mule to pull around that cart of yours?” Yet, as you have proven your loyalty to the Noble, he does not press the matter. You thank the Noble for lunch and part on good terms. One Landmine avoided but one still smoldering.
You hurry to catch up with your son, afraid that he is not thinking with his head and has forgotten his place. (No need to worry though; unknown to you the Noble has already had his people pick up his daughter and take her to the local Nun Cloister)
On the way to catch up with your son, you hear the Town Crier announcing the general tax increase, the call for volunteers for the King’s Army, and the new tax and a permit required to hunt deer, trap rabbits and/or pick berry’s in the King’s forest;
You are happy to find that your son has stopped half way up the hill to the next job to rest and not gotten into mischief. You are glad that the steep hill has sapped his energy and dampened his ardor. You help him pull the cart to the top of the hill while thinking to yourself how hard it would be to do this every day by yourself (and how nice it would be to have an ox or a mule). You also think to yourself how lucky you are that the Noble did not force your oldest son to join the king’s army.
You arrive at and finish your second job without much problem. And also your third and fourth job of the day.
Despite how tired you are, you decide you are going to stop by the church to make a contribution, thank God for your good fortune, ask the priest for advice about your son and your daughter and to have the priest talk to your son about his lustful urges and knowing his place in the world.
Outside the Church a group is discussing the fate that awaits some fool by the name of Galileo (1633AD) [http://goo.gl/7hsNr]. The fool is under house arrest for teaching the heretical and ridiculous notion that the Earth is not the Center of the Universe and the Earth revolves around the sun. “Pure heresy” you think to yourself, “If this guy was a nameless commoner they would just draw and quarter him”. Another person commnets, “Kepler got off easy. The Catholic church only made that Protestant bastard keep moving from place to place” for asserting a similar heresy. Meanwhile, someone continues, “Even if you accept his ludicrous proposition, after Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake in Rome (1600AD) [http://goo.gl/HPdKf], only a fool or an idiot would persist”. Everyone agrees that the heretic deserves such a fate for his blasphemy. You scuttle by to avoid the conversation so you won’t have to assess its potential as permission termination landmine. But as you make your way to the Church door you wonder, “Did those men really believe what they were saying or were they hoping to maintain their permissions and/or privileges and/or gain favor by siding with the ruling class position?”;
Inside the Church you make sure a priest sees you make your tithing [(donation) http://goo.gl/OYNOm]. You send your son off to pray while you go speak to the priest about your concerns. The priest says he will talk to your daughter after Sunday Mass but will speak to your son now. He will also make the appropriate inquiries about the situation with your daughter. The priest suggests your daughter could become a nun and join the cloister to avoid the situation, if necessary. But on the other hand, he continues, would it be so bad to be father in law to the Sheriff’s son? While the priest talks to your son, you pray. You thank God for your good fortune, ask for divine guidance in matters of your son and daughter and dare to pray for more rain (so more roofs will need repair).
You leave the church, with your now sullen son. He does not want to speak about his conversation with the priest;
Outside you overhear a group of people talking about the Sheriff running someone out of town. Someone who lived near the Noble’s castle. You see a familiar face. You ask who got run out of town and learn it was the family who claimed your son botched the roof repair so the Noble’s daughter could see your son again. (You recoil at the thought of that particular permissions terminating landmine.)
The group turns to the topic of the King’s new taxes. (You think to yourself, “This is just the reason I don’t join group discussions – This discussion is definitely a Permissions Terminating landmine – Must make excuse to abruptly leave”) Your son starts to speak but you sternly interrupt and send your son home, instructing him to tell your wife you will be home shortly. Meanwhile, from within the group you hear, “Tomorrow, a group known as the “Men of Letter’s” [http://goo.gl/PDGZd] [http://goo.gl/KyNMN] is meeting with the local debating club at the local coffeehouse to discuss the King’s new taxes. (You think to yourself, “Note to self – No Coffeehouse tomorrow – Are these folks all mad? Do they not realize the permissions/privileges termination landmine attending this debate will be?) You announce you must leave because you don’t want to eat your wife’s cooking cold. And then make your exit.
You get home only to find your wife tear-stained and supper not ready. Your wife explains that she and your children just got home a little while ago. They were jailed for picking berries without a permit. Your eldest son interjects that the King is a jerk for raising taxes and tyrant for taxing the natural bounty of the forest. You sternly and forcefully admonish your son to never speak ill of the King again. Your submissive wife, knowing her place, has held her tongue during your tirade against the words of your eldest son. When it seems appropriate, your wife continues. “When the Sheriff came in, he asked his deputies why they had locked us up. When the Sheriff learned I was the thatcher’s wife and these were your children, he flew into a rage and immediately released us. Then the Sheriff made his deputies apologize to all of us. And then he told the Deputies that for any infraction, short of murder, treason or Court order, we were to be allowed to go home while they immediately informed him of the situation. The Sheriff told us he knew the lack of rain had been bad for your business. He told me we could pick berries without a permit until the end of the month, but then even he had to submit to the will of the King and the Nobles.” Your wife continues by admiringly saying, “Husband, I had no idea what a powerful and respected man you are. This entire family and I are lucky to have you as father and husband. Our eldest son can learn from your manly example. I will get a meal on the table just as quick as possible.” “If she knew the truth…” you think to yourself, ”Does a real man let himself be treated like this ?”(but then again, how do you even know there is any different possible reality).
Before supper, you wife says the blessing. She thanks God for the great man and provider you are. During supper you inform your family that no one is to go near the coffee house tomorrow. You regale them with the Noble having bought you lunch today which further enhances your image to them. (Even if their image of you is based on a flawed perception of reality, you still enjoy the feeling.) You edit the conversation greatly. You tell the family the King is looking for Pikeman for his army, in the most discouraging, but not Permission and/or Privilege terminating, way possible. You do not mention the issue of the Sheriff’s son being interested in your daughter because you are waiting to hear back from the Priest. You announce that next Sunday you all will be attending church in your best clothes.
With the Children in bed, you and your wife go to bed. You reject your wife’s amorous overtures motivated by her false perception of your manliness. Today’s hard work and difficult maneuvering through the permissions and privileges terminating minefield has left you exhausted. As you lie in bed, you thank god for the permissions and privileges terminating landmines he helped you to avoid today. But you are tormented by those landmines left smoldering from today and the new landmines you will face tomorrow. You know the precarious reality in which you live. At the King’s, the Noble’s or the Sheriff’s whim, all that you and your family have could be gone. It is with this depressing, distressing Perception of Reality that you fall in to a restless, fitful sleep. “But at least you are a free man”, you console yourself.
Your are awakened by the nightmare of your family being run out of town by the Sheriff. You roll over and spoon cuddle with your wife. And you try to go back to sleep. All the while the truth gnaws at you, “My family sees me as a great and powerful man; How pitiful they do not know my true plight. I can only hope that they never find out that their Perception of Reality of me as a great and powerful man is simply false. It is built upon my pathetic total submissiveness to the King, the Noble, the Sheriff and the rest of the powers that be in this apparently godforsaken country.”
But wait, you cannot have such thoughts because you are unaware that any other form of existence exists. All you know is what the King, the Noble, the Sheriff and the Town Crier tell you… Strike all that enlightened thinking… You have no way of knowing there can be any other Perspective of Reality. You King tells you it is his law and Your Church tells you “It is God’s will”. And with all of your sources of information are controlled by your king or your church, you only know the Perspective of Reality they want you to know.
So instead of thinking of yourself as a pitiful, submissive man you just thank God you are a freeman and a serf or an oaf. You are a lucky man doing the best you can in world of God’s design… You are just happy to be a free man.
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than they who falsely believe they are free”
Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe
Now that we are done with the exercise, “How fun was that?” For you younger folks who viewed this as computer role playing game, how did you like playing the role of a “subject” Is this writer correct in presuming that “subject” character and the choices this “subject” was faced with character weren’t very fun nor exciting? And you were only imagining it, imagine living it. And you only know how enslaved the thatcher subject character was because you have been exposed to the American Perception of Reality based on…. Wait, hold that thought for a while.
WHAT DID YOU LEARN FROM THE “SUBJECT” ROLE PLAY EXERCISE?
With this immersion in the life of a subject through this exercise, you now have an inkling of what it was to be a Subject living under the Governance Doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings. Similarly, you know what a bleak, repressed, restrained, constrained, forlorn, hopeless, resigned, frustrated happiness-stifling Perception of Reality Subjects operated under within such governance doctrine.
Under the Governance Doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings, subjects had little or no control over their own lives:
You had no rights – You had only permissions and privileges that could be revoked upon the whim of the King and/or his privileged Nobles;
There was no right to be “Secure in your person”.
You had no control over your personal destiny. Your social class at birth would most likely be your social class at death; Your occupation would likely be that of your father, if the King and his Noble’s permitted it;
Justice was often arbitrary. Injustice and/or amoral government acts were given the appearance of legitimacy as institutionalized and government sanctioned acts;
There was little freedom of thought. You only knew what the King, Aristocrats and the Church wanted you to know. And any belief or idea that was not sanctioned by the King and/or Church that you dared to utter, or put in writing, was subject to brutal reprisal and/or punishment;
There was no free speech nor freedom of assembly;
There was no government transparency nor accountability;
There was no freedom of Religion;
Your standard of living and quality of life were contingent on your perceived absolute loyalty to the King and his representatives;
And if you were a woman, for most the situation was far worse.
This was the Perception of Reality that inhabited the minds of the American colonist until a relatively short while before they Declared Independence from the King of England. And it is the ability of the American’s colonist to overcome this oppressive Perception of Reality that makes the American Declaration of Independence far more amazing and earth shattering than the mere military fight for Independence that ensued.
And this is where the wild ride to the 4th of July, 1776 really begins. How did the Revolutionary American Colonist overcome this depressing, repressive Divine Right of Kings Perspective of Reality? How did they dare to cast off the only Governance Doctrine they had ever known? How did they create and reduce to writing a Governance Doctrine wholly different from the only one they had ever lived under? How did they cast off a System of Permissions and replace it with a System of Natural Law with individuals having “certain unalienable rights”? How did the Revolutionary American Colonist become the first British Colony to Declare Independence and successfully cast of British rule [http://goo.gl/jchhS]? These points were the “intellectual fireworks” that marked America’s Declaration of Independence on the 4th of July, 1776.
We have already listed and/or referenced the many common complaints of the American colonists in 1776. But now you are about to hear, the rest of the story….
TO CONTINUE READING: Sometime tomorrow a link to part two will appear
If you want to make sure you don’t miss part 2, why don’t you subscribe for free to this writer by email?
If you enjoyed this article, please share it with others. Parents, if this article has enlightened you or has began to inspire a new perception of reality in you, why not share it with your children. Teachers, for the same reasons, why don’t you share this article with your students?
While you are watching the fireworks this 4th of July, why don’t you tell your relatives, friends and neighbors about any change in your perspective of reality that this article may have caused.
(Yes Editor – This writer is exercising his liberty to tell you an article can be both newsworthy and evergreen)
Those were my thoughts.
In Closing:
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
If you seek original thought, read me; If you want the same old, tired false left/right alleged 2 different major political party paradigm propaganda and dogma, read someone else.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph, Declaration of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
The Conundrum: WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy, while our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny.
Critical Thinking Notice – This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author… unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.
This writer’s followers on Twitter and other Social Media are familiar with his intention of uniting rank and file Americans under one common Perspective of Reality. A Perspective of reality far truer than the false Perspective of Reality promoted through the divisive propaganda of the Main Stream Media and the two faux major political parties. With this article, this writer intends to build upon creating that truer, common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our government and hold our government officials accountable for their departures from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) and betrayals of the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE.
Now, lets revisit the various acts of departure from the Rule of Law (aka Abuse of Power and/or Abuse of Discretion) that have been alleged, in a simple, non-legal gibberish way so the average American can understand it. (See also 
The Progressive Rag, the Minneapolis Star and Sickle, earlier this week wrote an article on the return of citizens to Police Review Committees. Apparently it was so controversial, they have made it extremely difficult to find online. Lets take a moment to work on creating a truer common Perspective of Reality so WE THE PEOPLE can unite against our Government and hold it accountable.
This article was originally published on Examiner.com on July 3, 2013. (see original print graphic at end of article) This writer’s entire column on Examiner.com was CENSORED within 24-48 hours of this writer submitting a credible petition on 11/06/2015 to the Minnesota Supreme Court to Remove a Minnesota District Court Judge from the bench for conspiring to perpetrate a fraud upon the Court.(An additional almost 200 blogs of this writer have been censored since 2012) The Minnesota Establishment has also taken other unlawful and unconstitutional punitive actions against this writer. I put it to you that your government is trying to erase your knowledge of Natural Law and Natural Rights to make you less able to resist their attempts at enslaving you. This writer leaves it to reader to deduce for themselves who wanted these articles CENSORED, and why the US Government wants this writer silenced.
Don Mashak's Hennepin County MN Free Press News 