February | 2020 | Don Mashak's Hennepin County MN Free Press News

US FEDERAL COURT OF APPEALS, 8^thDISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Don Mashak

Plaintiff,

APPELLATE CASE NO 19-1429_

Vs. CASE NO. 18CV2635

Commissioner or Internal Revenue,

Defendant,

Clerk of Courts, US Federal Court of Appeals, 8^th District, Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse, 111 South 10^th Street, St. Louis, MO 63102 (314) 244-2400; & Commissioner of Internal Revenue via Beth A. Nunnink 30 E 7^th Street #1130 St. Paul, MN 55101.

Proposed Amended

COMPLAINT

I, Don Mashak, declare from my personal knowledge the following facts are true:

(State the facts in as many number paragraphs as necessary)

OVERVIEW SUMMARY

Congress limited the purpose, scope, power and authority of Defendant Internal Revenue Service, hereafter “IRS”, to activities related to the collection of taxes and related fines;
The First Amendment to the US Constitution States: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”;
Further, though it was implicit at the time of its writing and adoption, the Right to Petition the Government intended that such “Petitions to Government for Redress of Grievances” be made without fear of punishment or retaliation having experienced punishment and retaliation from King George III for their various petitions and pleadings;
Law of the Land – The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succinctly stated as follows: “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) (Exhibit 1);
That in 2007, Plaintiff Mashak was hospitalized for heart events that reduced his heart function to 15% or less (Exhibit 3);
In 2008, Plaintiff Mashak was severely injured as a victim of an attempted Home Invasion, which Plaintiff asserts was actually an attempted assassination;
In January, 2011, Plaintiff Mashak was diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (hereafter “PTSD”)
That in 2011 Plaintiff Mashak heart events that reduced his heart function to 15% or less (Exhibit 4);
These Medical Conditioner were caused by stress from witness tampering against Plaintiff that began in the early 1990s;
That Plaintiff Mashak was the President and sole shareholder of Subchapter S Corporation, First National Repossessors, Inc (hereafter “FNR”) at all times, including the subject years 2009 to 2011;
Based on incorrect information from the IRS (and information the IRS refused to provide) from 2007 to 2013, Plaintiff Mashak did not file taxes for the years in question (2009 – 2011) under the understanding if no tax was due, no penalties would be applied;
FNR had no income for said years in question being 2009-2011;
Don Mashak (Mashak) provided Medical Records to the IRS & at this time requires the IRS to provide said documents to this Court;
Mashak became unable to afford to pay the accountants that had previously prepared the complex statements;
For the filing periods in the relevant tax periods, Mashak was under Doctors orders related to his Congestive Heart Failure (hereafter “CHF”) to avoid stress;
Each year Mashak would call the IRS to ask how to prepare specific areas Relating to depreciation & amortization, etc.
Each year the IRS agents were belligerent, uncooperative & unprofessional;
Various IRS Agents said they were not trained enough, smart enough nor paid enough to answer Plaintiff Mashak’s questions;
The attitude of IRS Agents was very irritating & upsetting to Mashak;
Despite being informed of Plaintiff Mashak’s medical problems, the IRS Agents seemed to enjoy tormenting Plaintiff Mashak;
The IRS told Mashak no penalty accrued as long as no tax was due;
Based on his doctor’s instructions to avoid stressful situations & the continued abuse by IRS Agents along with the IRS representations that no penalty accrued as long as no tax was due, Plaintiff Mashak would give up each filing period upon experiencing what he determined was sufficient stress to compromise his health;
In or about 2013, Plaintiff Mashak felt he was healthy enough to deal with the abuse by the IRS employees, get answers to his questions and complete the subject returns;
At this time, Mashak’s again experienced various taunts, torments and unprofessional behaviors and protestations of lack of training, lack of knowledge & insufficient pay from IRS Agents;
Mashak wrote down the names and ID numbers of various IRS Agents who made such statements. (Exhibit 5)
Mashak contacted superiors and asked these people be disciplined;
To Mashak’s knowledge, none were retrained or disciplined;
As of December 13, 2019, the IRS is charging penalties and interest to First National Repossessors, Inc (FNR) for the years 2009, 2010 and 2011 for late filing. The Amount owed presently is approximately $8594.00;
The IRS has attempted to collected these amounts from Plaintiff Mashak personally, as he is the sole owner and President of First National Repossessors, Inc. (hereafter “FNR”) (Exhibit 6 to 8);
On information and belief, the IRS denied Plaintiff Mashak internal appeals on these matters for reasons not based in facts nor the Rule of Law,
On information and believe the IRS made these decisions for purposes beyond the scope of its authority;
IRS employee’s Unprofessional behavior was part and parcel of Progressive Obama’s weaponization of the IRS against all Political Dissent;
The failure of the IRS to waive these penalties and interest during the internal appeals process based on the facts above alone, evince that the irs has made decisions and taken actions regarding FNR and Plaintiff Mashak outside of its purpose, scope, power and authority. This rogue behavior gives rise to many of the Claims Plaintiff Mashak brings;
These decisions and actions against FNR and plaintiff Mashak go beyond simple error, they were and are deliberate, malicious and conspiratorial in nature;

RESPONSES TO POTENTIAL 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B) ARGUMENTS

PURSUANT TO IRM 5.17.5.11 to 5.17.5.14

Pursuant to IRM 17.5.11 to 5.17.5.14 cites the following in response to any and all 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B) Arguments – the reasons for these illegitimate decisions against FNR and plaintiff Mashak are summarized as follows:

In furtherance of the original bank fraud conspiracy (now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA) to make good on the initial witness tampering threats (Obstruction of Justice, RICO);
To aid and abet then US Attorney Lillehaug in making good on his Quid Pro Quo obligation in accepting a bribe to not prosecute the original bank conspiracy (Obstruction of Justice, RICO);
As an organic response to misinformation assembled and distributed as the result of the use of an outlawed FBI COINTELPRO style operation against Plaintiff Mashak thereby violating Petition Unalienable Natural and Constructional Rights to Due Process and other requirements of Adjudication pursuant to the Rule of Law;
In unlawful and unconstitutional retaliation for Plaintiff Mashak’s involvement with the TEA Party Movement (Freedom of Association and to Petition for Redress of Grievances);
In unlawful and unconstitutional retaliation for Plaintiff Mashak’s attempting to reform the legal system through involvement with the Judicial Transparency, Accountability and Reform Movement (hereafter “Judicial TAR”) (Freedom of Association and to Petition for Redress of Grievances); (e.g. Exhibits 9 and 10)
In unlawful and unconstitutional retaliation and punishment for Plaintiff Mashak’s publicizing concerns over the integrity of the Elections Process and attempting to have reforms to correct those deficiencies put in place; (Exhibit 11)
In unlawful and unconstitutional retaliation and punishment for Plaintiff Mashak’s involvement in attempts to exercise his Unalienable Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of punishment or reprisal, as reduced to writing in the First;
In seditious and treasonous compliance with the Metaphysics of Social Darwinism (1890s) which was rebranded as Progressivism (1890s) when America rejected the intended Metaphysics of Social Darwinism. Among the most egregious being the Progressive assertion that Progressive Government Elites should not be accountable to the allegedly ignorant masses) Exhibit 28 Page 28, “Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era, Thomas Leonard (2016)”
In seditious and treasonous furtherance of the Progressive Insurgency, a covert, undeclared, slow, incremental revolution by “infiltration” as first promoted by the Fabian Socialists.” (Sedition and Treason violate the Social Contract.) (Exhibit 12 and Exhibit 13)
All of these actions, constituting a “Conspiracy Against Rights 18 USC 241” both emanating and evolving within the IRS itself and/or as a conspiracy involving other outside people and/or other government agencies. (violations of the Plaintiffs Unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights, whether advocated by Progressive Social Darwinism or not, constitute another breach of the Social Contract. (Exhibit 25)

ORIGINAL BANK FRAUD CONSPIRACY

WITNESS TAMPERING EFFORTS AGAINST MASHAK

The original Witness tampering bank conspirators were First National Bank of Anoka, NA, (hereafter “FNA”).
When FNA was purchased by Norwest Bank, NA, (hereafter “Norwest”), Norwest took control and leadership of the banking conspiracy including the witness tampering that escalated to death threats against Plaintiff Mashak and then was extended to include anyone he cared about;
Norwest would later acquire, and the later change its name to Wells Fargo Bank, NA. (“Wells Fargo”) in an attempt to escape being associated with this and other crimes;
The crime to which Plaintiff Mashak was witness involved the wrongful repossession of vehicles from hundreds of Minnesota families in the late 1980s and early 1990s in furtherance of a greater bank fraud conspiracy;
Mashak reported the original crime of the Bank Fraud Conspirators to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (hereafter “FBI”) in the early 1990s;
Then MN US Attorney David Lillehaug (hereafter “Lillehaug”) accepted bribes from Norwest, now Wells Fargo, in exchange for the Quid Pro Quo of killing the FBI Investigation;
That Exhibit 2, “DO NOT MAIL” evinces the fact that the original bank conspirators knew they were wrongfully repossessing vehicles from hundreds of innocent Minnesota families;
In Hennepin County Court Cases Bank North vs 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA is 27CV88-22383 and Citizens State Bank of St. Louis Park vs. 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA 91-002759, the Plaintiffs prevailed in large part because of information and documents provided by me;
Plaintiff Mashak visited various State Legislatures believing they certainly would do something on behalf of the hundreds of innocent Minnesota Families who had their vehicles wrongfully repossessed;
Most expressed their regrets at what had happened and what was happening to me, but none did anything to redress the situation;
Plaintiff Mashak was in deep despair as he considered his reward for just wanting to testify truthfully so hundreds of innocent Minnesota families who had their vehicles wrongfully repossessed, made whole;
It was becoming apparent that the Truth, Justice and the American way taught in Highschool Civics Classes was hokum;
For a year or 2, out of fear and depression, Plaintiff rarely left his house;
There was no “meeting of the minds” when Mashak settled for $15,000 while laboring under government sanctioned death threats;
That was in Hennepin County Case: Don Mashak vs Norwest Bank (now Wells Fargo Bank) 93-016429.
With the realization of the systemic corruption aimed at him, the objective there was staying live, and slinking away from the aforementioned banksters;
As a result of the stress Plaintiff Mashak experienced, Plaintiff Mashak was admitted to the hospital in 1998 for resistant pneumonia, MRSA & later found a virus had “chewed on his heart”. Mashak’s heart function dropped to less than 10%. Mashak was told he was not expected to live, Mashak was advised he need a heart transplant & should move to Texas because his lungs would no longer tolerate the Minnesota Cold. Despite the odds, Mashak survived;
Because of those witness tampering death threats, Plaintiff Mashak never married nor had children, fearing the bank conspirators would have them killed or extort his submission through them by threatening their lives;
Angry at his political party, Plaintiff Mashak changed political parties from Democrat (Lillehaug, Jeff Blodgett & the dead Senator were Democrats) check the records;
Having visited various State Legislators about this crime, with no result, Plaintiff Mashak resigned himself to resigned himself to just moving on with his life and hoping the bank conspirators would just forget about him;
These Banksters never forgot, and they used the very Law Enforcement that should have arrested them, to make Plaintiffs life miserable;

ADDITIONAL SUPPORTING FACTS AND RELEVANT INFORMATION

That Mashak’s First Heart Event was in 1998, where Mashak was told his heart function was reduced to less than 10%, that he was not expected to survive, and subsequently upon not dying, Plaintiff Mashak was told that he would need a heart transplant and would need to move to warmer climates to survive;
Plaintiff Mashak is only able to find and produce an Echocardiogram showing his heart function had dropped to 22% (Exhibit 14) taken before he was intubated for nearly 3 weeks (It is the accepted assessment of the medical community that 20% is a severe condition);
Despite not being able to find the medical record showing heart function of less than 10%, Plaintiff Mashak well remembers being told that fact by hospital staff. This when Plaintiff followed up on being told physical therapy had stopped coming because Plaintiff Mashak was expected to die. To the best of my recollection, this was a couple weeks after he was extubated. And then in other conversations about heart transplants and how it would be necessary he move to warmer climate because his heart and lungs would no longer survive the Minnesota cold;
That said Heart Events and PTSD were triggered by the stress resulting from witness tampering that escalated into threats to destroy Petition Mashak’s life if he testified and finally to death threats towards Plaintiff Mashak and then anyone he cared about by agents of the Bank Fraud Conspiracy now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA. ( hereafter ”Wells Fargo”);
Plaintiff Mashak was in deep despaired as he considered his reward for just wanting to testify truthfully so hundreds of innocent Minnesota families who had their vehicles wrongfully repossessed, made whole;
It took several years for Plaintiff to recover from being near death;
In about 2004, Plaintiff Mashak had recovered enough start appearing to live a normal life again.
But the original Bank Conspirators made it clear they were not through with their witness tampering retaliation;
No longer afraid of dying, Plaintiff Mashak decided to turn and fight;

JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORM MOVEMENT

As a result of this experience, Plaintiff Mashak began to seek peaceful remedy at the State Legislature and Federal Level;
When Plaintiff Mashak did not get acceptable responses from the state and federal levels, he began political activities such as presenting Platform resolutions to his Minnesota Political Party Caucus (Exhibit 9 and 10);
Along the way, Plaintiff ran into other groups and people in what he refers to as the Judicial Transparency, Accountability and Reform Movement. (Hereafter “Judicial TAR”)
From 2004 to present, Plaintiff Mashak pressed the Minnesota Legislature Judiciary Committees to hold hearings to receive evidence & testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Courts (Exhibits 15 & 18);

In 2009, Mashak was involved in Ad Hoc Judicial TAR Hearings as the Minnesota Legislature refused to give us a hearing:

Video > 03MAR2009 Ad Hoc MN hearing: Corruption in Judiciary 1/2 http://bit.ly/2009AdHoc1of2

Video: 03MAR2009 Ad Hoc MN hearing: Corruption in Judiciary 2/2 http://bit.ly/2009AdHoc2of2

Persons involved in Judicial TAR were forced to settle for an unofficial Ad Hoc hearing when the Minnesota house and Senate Judiciary Committees refused to hold a hearing dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Courts;
At the same time the Minnesota Legislature was refusing Judicial TAR demands to hold hearings to receive evidence and testimony of systemic corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary, Progressive former MN Governor AL Quie released the bogus Quie Report pronouncing the Minnesota Judiciary among the most honorable and corruption free in America;
The Quie Commission’s clean bill of health was intended to be used push for Merit Selection Retention Elections for Minnesota Judges;
On Information and belief, there are “Judicial Code Red” Rules that prevent Lawyers from bringing before the Courts certain matters that conflict with the aims and goals of the Progressive Insurgency, either out of fear of punishment or in loyal furtherance of the seditious and treasonous Progressive Insurgency;
On Information and belief, the USA Judiciary’s move towards more summary judgments is done to be consistent with the Progressive Elite’s assertion that the Administrative State should be free to make decisions without accountability to the masses;
Plaintiff Cities these 2008 and 2012 Resolutions, Demands for Public hearings and other prior resolutions and activities to reform the Judiciary, as one of the motives and reasons for the IRS’s unlawful and unconstitutional, attitudes and actions toward Plaintiff;

PLAINTIFF MASHAK’S TEA PARTY INVOLVEMENT

Later Plaintiff Mashak would form the WE THE PEOPLE TAR TEA Party and become a leader of the State TEA Party Movement in Minnesota circa 2009;
And political leaders in Minnesota took note in 2011, when Plaintiff Mashak successfully lobbied for the Minnesota State TEA Party to set its goals by Nominal Group Process (Exhibit 11);
Plaintiff Mashak was the one who could turn people out for grassroots organizing for both Judicial TAR and the TEA Party;
Judicial Accountability and Reform became the Top Agenda Item for 2011 for the Minnesota TEA Party during that Nominal Group Process;
But the Progressive RINO Operatives in the group were aligned with Progressive RINO Al Quie, who was not about to let anyone derail “Merit Selection Retention Elections” for Judges;
The entire Progressive Insurgency in Minnesota had its heart set on “Merit Selection Retention Elections” for Judges;
Soon Plaintiff Mashak was thrown out of the State Party and the Progressive RINO Operatives swept aside the Judicial Accountability and Reform the grassroots had voted for;
Many will recall Progressive RINO Senate Majority Leader McConnell’s 2010-2012 calls to “Crush TEA Party Everywhere”;
All will recall the IRS singling out TEA Party and Conservative Groups for greater scrutiny, harassment and delays in an attempt to stifle the political opposition;
Conservatives and Mainstream Media coined and used the termed “weaponization” describe the nature of those activities of the IRS;
And soon the TEA Party was gone at the hands of Progressive Operatives, just as Occupy was done in by Progressive Operatives usurping their movement;
Plaintiff cities his membership and leadership the Minnesota TEA Party Movement as one of the motives and reasons for the IRS’s unlawful and unconstitutional, attitudes and actions toward Plaintiff;

PROGRESSIVE INSURGENCY IN AMERICA

On Information and belief, Plaintiff asserts there has been a paradigm shift in the methods of revolution, insurgency, civil war and general warfare worldwide;
On Information and Belief, Plaintiff this paradigm shift in warfare and revolution can be seen the non-traditional method of revolution and insurgency currently underway in our Country;
On observation and experience, Plaintiff asserts the traditional methods of warfare involve the use of widespread, overwhelming overt use of force through military power to defeat the enemy such as used by in the American Revolutionary and Civil Wars;

Fabian Socialist Tactic of Revolution By “Infiltration” aka “Gradualism”

Plaintiff Asserts the current insurgency in the United States of America (hereafter “USA” or “America”) is using the nontraditional methods of “infiltration” also known as “gradualism” as proposed by the Fabian Socialists (Exhibit 13 and Exhibit 14);
Based on experience and observation, Plaintiff asserts that this new method of revolution, civil war and warfare advocates slow, incremental, covert infiltration of a society over generations so no one generation notices enough change to be moved to revolt;
Plaintiff asserts that in America, no matter how slow or incrementally the actors intend to infringe or overthrow the Constitution, Natural Law and/or WE THE PEOPLE as the sovereigns, it constitutes treason, sedition and/or other High Crimes;
Plaintiff identifies the current insurgents in the USA as the Progressive Elites;
Progressive Elites assert that Progressive Educated Elites in Government should not be accountable to the allegedly ignorant masses (Exhibit 28, pages 24 – 25, 52, 103 – 107, 110 – 128))

Administrative State as A Vector in Progressive Revolution by Infiltration

Plaintiff asserts that the “Administrative State” aka the “Fourth Branch of Government” was created specifically as a vector of battle in its revolution by slow infiltration (Exhibit 28, pages 9-10, 35, 38, 40 – 54, 64, Illiberal Reformers)

IRS Is Part of That Administrative State

By Experience and Observation, Plaintiff asserts the IRS is part of the aforementioned “Administrative State”, ergo an “asset” of the Progressive Insurgency. (Exhibit 28, Page 44 Illiberal Reformers);
The IRS’s actions a few years ago in frustrating and/or denying the applications of TEA Party and other conservative organizations for nonprofit status evinces its wholesale violation of the Unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights of many Americans in furtherance of the goals of the Progressive Insurgency;

Is the Judiciary Part of the Administrative State?

Pursuant to the Constitution, Lawyers and Judges take oaths to uphold the Constitution;
The Failure of various American State and Federal Law Enforcement Agencies, State Attorney Generals and the Department of Justice to vigorously prosecute, what in the best case scenario is a “Conspiracy Against Rights” of all Americans, but more accurately amounts to aiding and abetting the Progressive Insurgency’s seditious and treasonous conspiracy to overthrow the USA Constitution and WE THE PEOPLE as Sovereigns, tends to implicate the USA Legal and Law Enforcement Professions in said conspiracy;
Three resignations of IRS officials are hardly adequate punishment nor reform for the aforementioned crimes of targeting enemies of the Progressive Insurgency;
The volume of Britannica’s 1957 “Annals of America” that covers the period of Progressive Era from 1905 to 1915, refer to the Progressive Era as a “Revolution” (Exhibit 19
Pursuant to the Constitution, Lawyers and Judges take oaths to uphold the Constitution;
Progressive Lawyer and President Woodrow Wilson called the concept of the unalienable rights of the Individual “nonsense” (Exhibit 28, Page 25, Illiberal Reformers)
Progressive Lawyer and President Woodrow Wilson said American Government had to be freed from the outmoded system of Checks and Balances (Exhibit 28, page 66, Illiberal Reformers)
Progressive Lawyer and US President Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921), “The Constitution was founded on the law of gravitation. The government was to exist and move by virtue of the efficacy of “checks and balances.” The trouble with the theory is that government is not a machine, but a living thing. It falls, not under the theory of the universe, but under the theory of organic life. It is accountable to Darwin, not to Newton.”— (cite Wilson’s 1912 “What is Progress?” Campaign Speech, The New Freedom (New York: Doubleday, Page and Company, 1913), pages 33-54 & The U.S. Constitution: A Reader, 1913, page 640)
Progressive Lawyer and Dean of Harvard Law School (1916-1936), Roscoe Pound said in 1913 that the Constitution’s Bill of Rights, the core of American Civil Liberties, “were not needed in their own day, [and] they are not desired in our own.” (Exhibit 28, Illiberal Reformers, Thomas Leonard (2016) Page 25)
Harvard Law School, which Roscoe Pound was Dean of for 20 years, no longer requires “Constitutional Law” as part of its academic studies. “Elena Kagan, President Barack Obama’s choice to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court, is best known for moving Harvard Law School away from the 100-year old “case-law method” of legal study. But in the process, critics say, she moved the nation’s premier law school away from requiring the study of U.S. constitutional law towards the study of the laws of foreign nations and international law” (cite CNSNew.com, “ As Harvard Law Dean, Kagan Did Not Require Study of U.S. Constitutional Law But Did Require Study of International and Foreign Law” 2010 ( Exhibit 20) https://rebrand.ly/HarvardLawNoConstitution2010)
Plaintiff Mashak would assert Harvard Law now not requiring Constitutional Law and instead teaching International Law as evincing another Progressive Globalist goal in its seditious and treasonous conspiracy to subvert the Sovereignty of America to make way for New World Order under One World Government;
That Progressive Elites are Collectivists and view humanity as a single Social Organism, like a colony of honeybees (Exhibit 28, Pages 8, 24 – 25, 101 – 103, 106, 191-192 Illiberal Reformers)
Plaintiff submits that Progressivisms view of humanity as a “Single Social Organism” is diametrically opposed to and incompatible with the USA Constitution’s Individualism and Unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual;
Plaintiff Mashak submits that the New World Order Progressives envision has its foundations in the perspective of humanity as a single Social Organism, like a colony of honeybees;
Based on the fact on the fact that Progressive Lawyer and President Woodrow Wilson was not impeached for espousing and working to realize actions which violate the Constitution, Plaintiff Mashak concludes that during the Progressive Era the Progressive Elites won what Britannica’s “Annals of American History” (1957) identifies as a revolution, or at least, won a major battle in said revolution and that revolution continues to this day;
The failure of Lawyers and Judges, who take an oath uphold the Constitution, to at least disbar Lawyers Wilson and Pound for their unconstitutional thoughts and efforts to implement them further evinces the Progressives won the revolution, or at the very least, a major battle in the revolution that continues today;
That said, it is fair to say that the Legal and Judicial Professions in America are complicit in the Progressive Insurgency’s Seditious and Treasonous Conspiracy;
Exhibit 28, “Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era” (2016) was written by Thomas C. Leonard, a Progressive who quotes the Founders of Progressivism;
As Thomas Leonard remains a Progressive, Plaintiff asserts it is not simply a book written by conservative or other detractor of Progressivism to hamper the Progressive Insurgency’s goals;
Plaintiff boldly submits all of Exhibit 28 “Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era” (2016) as evidence of the Progressive Insurgency; it contains so much information it would be impossible for Plaintiff to cite it all.”;
Plaintiff asserts that any actions that the IRS took toward Plaintiff Mashak, were in its role as an asset of the Progressive Insurgency, or to be consistent with the metaphysics the Progressive Elites, intended to inflict duress on American Citizens opposed them
These actions give rise to give rise to valid claims for which relief can be granted, that are not frivolous nor malicious, and that additionally are not immune to prosecution pursuant to IRM 17.5.11 to 5.17.5.14 [see also 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)];
Plaintiff asserts that Defendant IRS’s previous unconstitutional, malicious and unauthorized actions towards the TEA Party and other Conservative groups, evinces and further bolsters his position that the IRS actions against TEA Party Leader and Conservative Plaintiff Mashak were also done for unconstitutional, malicious and unauthorized purposes;

COINTELPRO

Because of the USA Constitution, in its revolution by infiltration the Progressive Insurgency cannot not use the overt methods of suppression of its opponents, so it must engage in covert alternative methods that achieve the same end;
One vector the Progressive Insurgency uses in this way is COINTELPRO-style operations;
That Progressive Deep State often engages in FBI COINTELPRO Style Activities (cite Final Report Of The Select Committee To Study Governmental Operations With Respect To Intelligence Activities aka The final report of the 1975 US Senate Church Committee, describing the decade-long effort by J Edgar Hoover and the FBI to discredit, demonize, marginalize and “neutralize” the Rev Dr Martin Luther King Jr and other voices of political dissent)
Of the Federal Bureau of Investigations (hereafter “FBI”) COINTELPRO Operation, then FBI Direct J. Edgar Hoover (1935-1972) said, “It is immaterial whether facts actually exist to substantiate the allegation. If fact is present, they aid in the success of the COINTELPRO Operation, but the FBI believes the target can be marginalized even without facts.” (Exhibit 21)
Plaintiff translates that to mean the FBI can lie and make stuff up in its COINTELPRO operations in its efforts to discredit, demonize, marginalize and neutralize opponents of the Progressive Insurgency;
So while it would be unconstitutional to silence political opposition in conventional overt ways used in say the Former USSR, China or former NAZI Germany, the Progressive Insurgency effects much the same result by discrediting and demonizing the champions and would-be champions of the masses by causing the masses abandon or reject them with rumor and inuendo;
Plaintiff Mashak asserts, that though much of the FBI COINTELPRO Operation was found to be illegal and unconstitutional, an FBI COINTELPRO Operation has and continues to be inflicted upon him to punish him for opposing and exposing the Progressive Insurgency and to marginalize and neutralize him in those same efforts;
Interestingly, when Plaintiff inquires about the nature of the information about him resulting from this COINTELPRO operation, no one, including police and government officials, will tell Plaintiff what it his. Plaintiff is forced to speculate and infer, rather than simply be informed of his alleged crimes, as required by the Bill of Rights;
Plaintiff wonders aloud, “Why if whatever these things are government says about me are true, why wouldn’t you want to go to court and put them on the record rather than skulk around and worry about me finding out?”
Plaintiff has no criminal record save for minor traffic tickets;
Plaintiff has only ever been charged with gross misdemeanor “Disorderly Conduct” relating to either to witness tampering and/or his reporting news of the alleged corruption of a Judge in Dakota County MN (which was “dismissed for Lack of Probable Causes: meaning it was a fabrication to prevent my reporting)
Plaintiff asks further, surely some top gun lawyer can dispatch a rube like me in a court of law, can’t they? What is the government afraid of? Let’s get it all on the official record. If no one in government has done anything wrong and the disparaging things this COINTELPRO operation says are true, lets get it all on the record so everyone can no it is fact and not rumor;
After all, doesn’t the Bill of Rights guarantee every American the right to know what they are accused of, the name of their accusers and the evidence against them?

Progressive Conditioning

Another plausibly deniable vector Progressive use to get around the USA Constitution to control and manipulate the masses, and/or silence dissent is Progressive Conditioning (Exhibit 22);
Some examples of Progressive Conditioning are:

Praise vs scolding and time outs;
Community Recognition vs Social Shunning;
Standard Progressive Education reeducation;
Work Raises, Promotions and Recognition vs No raises, No Promotions, Firing and Black listing;
Standard Surveillance vs invasive Surveillance;
Left alone, warnings, special consideration vs Bogus Tickets/charges, Flagging, Red Listing, and other criminal charges;
Favorable Civil, Family, Administrative and Criminal Court Rulings vs Unfavorable Rulings >
Granted vs Denied Zoning Variances;
Normal vs Increased Property Taxes;
No IRS harassment vs IRS harassment;
Coverup ups of unflattering person information vs fabrication and dissemination of negative person information, etc. like COINTELPRO operations rising to blackmail and extortion to oppress political dissent type behaviors;
CIA Project MK Ultra – Mind Control
CIA Operation Mockingbird – Government control of Mainstream Media to subject the American masses to Fake News Propaganda, Censorship and Indoctrination, very similar to what Hitler and Goebbels’ did in bring the NAZIs to power in Germany in the 1930’s to 1945. (Exhibit 25)
16 Ways to Break a Person; [ https://rebrand.ly/16WaysToBreakAPerson ]
1. “Seize the victim and take them away.” Dr. Hatcher, “a sudden unexpected abduction, followed by isolation as soon as possible.” “Refuse to answer questions, place them in a cell-like environment and begin humiliation and degradation.” “These magnify the feeling of vulnerability.”
2. “Isolate the victim and make them totally dependent on you for survival.” Dr. Hatcher, “the second step in breaking someone, is to physically abuse the person, to expose the captive’s vulnerability and shock him or her, to illustrate just how exposed and vulnerable they really are, in which there is no perceived way of escape.”

“Dominate the victim and encourage them to seek your recognition and approval.” Dr. Hatcher, “you must get permission for every major reason.”

“Instruct the victim and reeducate them to think and act in terms of our (captor’s) ideology.” Dr. Hatcher, “commenting on the captive being allowed to do new activities in new settings where other people are present. The fact that these situations do not result in discovery or anyone interfering begins to reinforce, in the majority of captive’s minds, that this is the way life is, and they are going to have to accept that.”
“Coerce the victim and provide them with a new value system.” Dr. Hatcher, “basically, what you want to do here is destroy a person’s sense of privacy.”
“To punish for no apparent rhyme or reason.” Dr. Hatcher, “Initially the victim tries to figure out some rationale to the intermittent punishment, but, finding none, eventually has to simply accept that punishment will occur with no reason.”

“Require the victim to constantly ask permission for anything or any behavior.” Dr. Hatcher, “this is a type of training procedure.”
“Getting a person to realize things have changed in a permanent sense.” “If you displease me, (the government) I can remove any shred of personal privacy or personal identity, with the exception of what I have chosen as your slave designation.”

“Continue to isolate the person.” Dr. Hatcher, “The captor has now become the source of food, water, and human contact as well.”
“Use of the media to accomplish this goal impart”
“Is to present a goal or model of future behavior, a model of how to please the captor.” Dr. Hatcher, “It was common to have the captive victim echo the captors (government) belief system.”

“Is to threaten family and relatives with a similar fate.”
“Is to threaten to sell or give the captive to an even worse master.”
“Continue to punish at irregular intervals.”

“irrelevant leniency,” Dr. Hatcher, “this is to allow small privileges for no reason, making the captive more confused and more pliant.”

“to obtain further confessions and signed documents,” Dr. Hatcher, “thus having the captive give over more and more control in writing.”;

US Judicial Control & Persecution [ http://www.intmensorg.info/judges5.htm%5D;
Progressive Common Core Education – Indoctrinating and conditioning children to be submissive, conforming sheople willing to submit to authority;
Progressives sometimes refer to this as Engineering Consent. [ https://youtu.be/F7HmFH-Wo1s ] ‘In 1947, Sigmund Freud’s nephew Progressive Edward Bernays published an essay entitle “The Engineering of Consent.” Bernays defined “the engineering of consent” as the art of manipulating people, specifically Americans, whom Bernays described as “fundamentally irrational” and not to be trusted.’ That means manipulating the masses into doing what the Progressives want or intimidating the masses into silence and then asserting, “Your silence is your consent”. (Exhibit 23]

Plaintiff Mashak submit that most of Defendant IRS’s actions towards Plaintiff are in its role as a Progressive Insurgency Asset attempting to Condition Plaintiff to shut up and stop exercising his Constitutional Rights;
Plaintiff asserts that the just actions Defendant IRS and the Progressive Insurgency in Paragraphs 12 and 27 constitute a “Conspiracy Against Rights” (18 USC 241)
Plaintiff asserts that the government’s actions against Plaintiff Mashak, including Defendant IRS, in this matter are in fact a skirmish or minor battle in the Progressive Insurgency’s Fabian Socialist style revolution by slow infiltration.
As Plaintiff Mashak formalized and escalated his attempts to exercise his Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of punishment or reprisal, as reduced to writing in the First Amendment, in an attempt to write the wrongs he suffered from aforementioned witness tampering, Plaintiff learned of and was subject to retaliation by, first the original Bank Fraud Conspirators, then the RICO conspiracy involving the original conspirators and government and judicial coconspirators and finally the Progressive Insurgency when Plaintiff pushed for reforms of the Judiciary which conflicted with the Progressive Insurgency’s Agenda;

METAPHYSICAL PARADIGM SHIFTS OF THE WESTERN WORLD

476AD TO PRESENT

By experience and observation, Plaintiff asserts that another major vector of this new, nontraditional Fabian Socialist styled form of revolution is Disinformation through Propaganda, Censorship and Indoctrination;
By experience and observation, Plaintiff asserts coordinated Mainstream Media “Fake News” Propaganda, Social Media Censorship of Free Speech and Progressive Common Core’s Indoctrination Infused Education evince a seditious and treasonous conspiracy against the Constitution, and WE THE PEOPLE as Sovereigns of America;
As a result, Plaintiff is compelled to inform the American history of their history and tradition in order to restore a common perspective of reality to his fellow American Citizens and any jury who will hear this litigation, by way of summarizing the Major Metaphysical Paradigm shifts and their characteristic differences that have occurred in the Western World since the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476AD.
Before we begin, let us first dispel the air of mystery of what exactly Metaphysics is; Quite simply, Metaphysics are the Laws and Rules which describe the way humankind interacts with the physical world and each other;
During the Renaissance (1300AD – 1600AD), some people we now call scientists and scholars believed they could identify laws to explain how the physical world worked and began to reduce said laws to writing (Physics) [e.g. Copernicus’ and Galileo’s work on the concept of a Heliocentric Solar System]
Borrowing from the thought process of the Renaissance, the “Men of Letters” of the Age of Enlightenment (1650AD – 1800AD) began to reduce to writing the Laws and Rules that govern the interaction of humankind with their physical world and each other (Metaphysics);
The Men of Letters called these laws, which had always existed and were merely reduced to writing by them, Natural Law;
Just as Settled issues of Physics are referred to as the “Laws of Physics”, so are settled issues of Metaphysics referred to as “Laws of Nature or” “Natural Law”.
America is founded upon Natural Law (See “Laws of Nature”, First Paragraph of the Declaration of Independence Exhibit 24);
America revolted from the British due to the tensions caused by the new perspective created by the paradigm shift from the forced tyrannical Metaphysics of the “Divine Right of Kings” to the “organic” Metaphysics of Natural Law, not by taxes, mercantilism nor the French and Indian War;
The 6 major Metaphysical paradigm shifts since 476AD are as follows:

Divine Right of Kings (476AD to circa 1945) (Thomas Hobbes’ “Leviathan” 1651);
Natural Law (1650 to present) (Exhibit 27 John Locke’s “Second Treatise of Civil Government 1689);
Marxism (1848 to present), includes branches of Communism and Socialism (Karl Marx’s & Friedrich Engels’ “Communist Manifesto”, 1848);
Social Darwinism (1871 to 1890s) (Charlies Darwin’s “Descent of Man” 1871) rebranded as Progressivism (1890s) and Nazism (1920s to 1945)
Progressivism (1890s to present) “(Exhibit 28, Illiberal Reformers, Thomas Leonard, 2016)
NAZIs (1920s to 1945) (Adolph Hitler, “Mein Kompf”, 1925; Charlies Darwin’s “Descent of Man” 1871, Progressive Edward Bernays’ “Propaganda”, 1929)

Both Thomas Hobbes (hereafter “Hobbes”) and John Locke (hereafter “Locke”) agreed that Governments must be created and constructed with the nature of humankind in mind;
“DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS” 476AD to circa 1930;
Best Single Read – Thomas Hobbes’ “Leviathan” 1651AD

Leviathan – A metaphor for the state, the Leviathan is described as an artificial person whose body is made up of all the bodies of its citizens, who are the literal members of the Leviathan’s body. The head of the Leviathan is the sovereign. The Leviathan is constructed through contract by people in the state of nature in order to escape the horrors of this natural condition. The power of the Leviathan protects them from the abuses of one another.

Overview – The heyday of the Divine Right of Kings grew out of the chaos and political vacuum left by the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in 476AD. During the Dark Ages, strong men aligned with the monotheist religion of Christian Churches to become Kings. Without the division caused by the worship of multiple deities, it was easier for these Kings to unite people and acquire and maintain power.

Divine Right of Kings was political doctrine in defense of monarchical absolutism from which it followed that “Rebellion is the worst of political crimes”. The King/Queen is deemed a God or Representative of God here on earth. As such, no earthly-being can question their authority or decisions. Therefore, the King/Queen is not subject to the will of the people, the aristocracy nor any other estate of the realm. Only God can Judge an unjust King/Queen and any attempt to depose, dethrone or limit the King/Queen’s powers is contrary to the will of God and constitutes a sacrilegious act.

The King/Queen owns all land. The King/Queen’s subjects have no rights, only permissions and privileges granted and extinguished by the King/Queen. The King/Queen is thus not subject to the will of his people, the aristocracy, or any other estate of the realm. The vast majority of the King/Queen’s subjects were slaves “bound to the land” (Feudalism).

The King/Queen & Church Establish Truth. (Enforced by physical punishment or admonitions of eternal damnation. (e.g. The Earth is Flat & the center of the center of universe; Such words led to the house arrest of Galileo for the last years of his life; Galileo only being spared being burned at the stake because his fame & respect)

The Divine Right of Kings was an afterthought to justify an already existing system of government and Feudalism. The theory was developed by King James I of England (1603 -1625AD) It was promoted by Bishop Jacques-Benigne Bossuet (1627-1704). It was formally defined by Thomas Hobbes in his book “Leviathan” (1651). It arose out of increasing questions from the masses questioning “Why is the King the King?” And, “Why is the King unaccountable to the people?”

The much-celebrated Magna Carta of 1215 really just applied to a small percentage of subjects, those being Aristocrats & a very few Free Men. It is important to note the concept of Natural Rights was lost for the first nearly 500 years of the Divine Right of Kings. St. Thomas Aquinas revisited the concept of Natural Law in the 1200s, drawing on the writings of Aristotle and Plato. But, the concept of Unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual did not gain wide audience until John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (1689) owing greatly to the proliferation and upgrading of the Printing Press, invented in China and introduced to Europe circa 1439.

For our purposes, the most important imposed Metaphysical Characteristics of the Divine Right of Kings are as follows:

Nature of Man in the Natural State – Chaos and perpetual war. Hobbes described the Nature of Man as being “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short… a constant state of war of all against all.” Divine Right of Kings asserted the nasty, brutish, violent nature of humankind could be suppressed through fear, pain and punishment;
Purpose of Government – Therefore Government must be constructed with the purpose to restrain humankind from its nature to be evil, chaotic, violent and in a constant state of war;
Considerations in the Creation and structure of Government – As the King/Queen is God or a Representative of God here on earth, they can be trusted to act in the best interests of the community. Therefore, in designing government there is a unilateral need to construct the government to end the chaos and war of the Natural State and Maintain the peace, with a reliance on mutual fear.
Type of Government – Collectivism
Social Contract – Although war may be necessary for self-preservation—and often is, in the state of nature—reason dictates that the first of all-natural laws must be that humans seek peace to fulfill their right and obligation to preserve their own lives.

Building on the first law of nature, Hobbes elucidates other natural laws that he says can be discerned through reason. The second law states that in the state of nature “all men have a natural right to all things.” However, to assure peace, men must give up their right to some things. The individual’s transfer of some of his rights to another is offset by certain gains for himself. The mutual transfer of rights is called a contract and is the basis for all social organization and collective moral order. Although by contract we may give up all sorts of rights we possess in the state of nature—such as renouncing the right to kill another in exchange for not being killed—we may never give up our natural right to self-preservation, which is the basis for any contract.;

Accountability and Transparency of Government to the Masses – None;
Elections – Not in the first seven (7) centuries of the Divine Right of Kings. Kings/Queens believed themselves to be unaccountable to the masses. Only with the Magna Carta (1215), did Kings/Queens begin to lose power. Even then, Elections were more or less single party affairs, or very limited before 1695. Elections became more competitive and relevant during and after The Enlightenment (1650 to 1800);
Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances (Aka Criticize Government) – No, Criticizing Government was seen as questioning the will of God;
Right to Revolt Aka Consent of The Governed – No, Rebellion was referred to as the worst political crime because criticizing the King was seen as questioning the will of God. Who is going to declare war on God? (e.g. King George III initially refused to receive William Penn who was sent to deliver the American Colonists’ Declaration of Causes (6JUL1775). Instead, King George drafted a Proclamation urging his ministers to declare the American Colonists in a “State of Rebellion”);
Establishment of Truth: By Who and How? – Establishment of Truth was by the King/Queen and Church through conditioning (rewards and punishments such as privileges and permissions or “burning at the stake” and “eternal damnation”;
Rights of the Individual – The only right of the individual is Self-Preservation, there are no other rights of the individual, only permissions and privileges granted by the King/Queen, at their whim.
Self Defense – This is the only right of the individual Subject under Divine Right of Kings and, even then, it was subject to the interpretation of the King/Queen pursuant to the “Rule of Man”;
Gun Rights [Right to Bear Arms) – Only by permission of the King/Queen;
Self-Ownership – The Kings/Queens charges were subjects not citizens, and the overwhelming majority were Serfs and Oafs bound to the Land under Manorial Feudalism or Indentured Servants bound to the holders of their debt;
Self-Determination – Very limited, there were no rights, only permissions and privileges, but later evolved to permit some for Aristocrats and the few free men under Magna Carte. Most were bound to their lot in life by class or heredity. (e.g. Slavery, Manorial Feudalism or Indentured Servitude, though some could receive higher status by permission or privilege granted by the King/Queen;
Private Property Rights – None, only permissions and privileges, but later evolved to permit some for Aristocrats and the few free men under Magna Carte.
Equality and Equity – No, does not exist. This is a class system including slaves. Class is determined by heredity or status granted by King/Queen/Church per the “Rule of Man”;
Justice & Equity – “Rule of Man” aka arbitrary. No Right to fair and impartial Due Process, to know your accuser, to know the evidence against you, to know the crimes you are accused of, to be tried by a jury of your peers, to prevent excessive bail, or prevent government from forcing you to testify yourself nor to prevent the use of coercive corporal methods (torture), nor to prevent cruel and unusual punishment, etc. Remember, the primary tool of Divine Right of Kings Government is fear;
Freedom of Speech – None
Freedom of Assembly – None
Freedom of Religion – Usually No, usually must comply with King/Queen’s Religion;
Competition/Free Markets – Competition and Free Markets are ok as long as it does not affect the King/Queen or their favorites;
Education – Most education was an extension of the church and was as much an indoctrination of the masses as it was an education; No free, formal public education was afforded the masses in most instances around the world until the late 1800’s following the lead of the USA;
Healthcare – Not Nationalized; Free Market or charity for the masses;
Peacetime Quartering of Soldiers in Private Homes – As the King/Queen owns all property, it is authorized at the King/Queen’s discretion;
Government Guarantees Against Foreign and Domestic Enemies & The Continuity of The Current Form of Government – Opposition to Invasion and Domestic violence most often occurred in protection of the King/Queen’s personal best interests. The King could change government systems anytime they so desired;

NATURAL LAW 1650AD to Present
Best Single Read – John Locke’s “Second Treatise of Civil Government” 1689 (Exhibit YY)
Overview – Per John Locke, “The natural liberty of [people] is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of nature for his rule.” People leave the chaos of Natural State and join society to have more freedom than they would have in the chaos of the Natural State. As part of this Social Contract, People surrender some of their Natural Rights to government in exchange for the government protecting their own Natural Rights from the trespasses of others, including government itself.
For our purposes, the most important imposed Metaphysical Characteristics of Natural Law are:

Nature of Man in the Natural State – Locke said, “[People] are Social Creatures with a tendency towards reason and tolerance, but who can be selfish.” Perhaps the American Founder’s perspective of Humankind’s nature is best summarized by a passage from the CATO Letters (1720 to 1723), “All people have free will and are NOT virtuous by nature.”;
Purpose of Government – The purpose of government is to protect the Natural Rights of each individual from the trespasses of others, including government itself;
Considerations in the Creation and structure of Government – Because of the Nature of Humankind, a government that will be inhabited by such generations of such persons must Constitutionally-limited with the Unalienable Natural Rights of all protected from takings by a majority. Government must be constructed with Checks and Balances, Transparency and Accountability. The masses must be the Sovereigns and Government officials must be short-term public servants installed by election.

Above all, government must design to and remain small to reduce the power to oppress the masses;

Type of Government – Individualism
Social Contract – John Locke’s version of social contract is striking in saying that the only right people give up in order to enter into civil society and obtain its benefits is the right to punish other people for violating rights.
Accountability and Transparency of Government to the Masses – Is required and built into the structure of government. As Government is predicated on the Social Contract and Consent of the Governed, the Natural Right to revolt is the ultimate Accountability;
Elections – Full, Fair and Free Elections are required per the Social Contract and the USA Constitution;
Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances (Aka Criticize Government) – The Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of reprisal or punishment is required and is reduced to writing in the First Amendment of the USA Constitution;
Right to Revolt Aka Consent of The Governed – The Unalienable Natural Right to Revolt aka Consent of the Government is a vital part of the Social Contract;
Establishment of Truth: By Who and How? – Natural Law provides for the Establishment of Truth by the Individual using their own observations and reasoning;
Rights of the Individual – The Unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual are protected from the trespasses of others, including a majority and/or government itself, pursuant to the Social Contract. In the USA, many of the unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual are reduced to writing in the Bill of Rights. Being too numerous to reduce all to writing, any unalienable Natural Rights not reduced to writing in the Bill of Rights, are still protected under the Ninth Amendment;
Self Defense – The Natural Right of Self Defense is the highest unalienable Natural Right and is protected by the Social Contract with some caveats requiring judgment and punishment being the role of government. Its importance is recognized in the America’s Second Amendment Right to Bear Arms;
Gun Rights [Right to Bear Arms) – The Natural Right to Bear Arms is part of the Social Contract and reduced to writing in the Second Amendment of the USA Constitution;
Self-Ownership – The Natural Right of Self-Ownership is of paramount importance in Natural Law and is part of the Social Contract. Locke included a person’s self and their Natural Rights as “private property”.
Self-Determination – Self-Determination is perhaps no better evinced than by the question often put to young people, “What do you want to be when you grow up?” It is embodied in the USA Declaration of Independence as penned by Thomas Jefferson as, “endowed with certain Rights. Among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”;
Private Property Rights – It has often been said that without property rights, there are no rights. Jefferson built upon Locke’s “Life, Liberty and Estate (property)”. Private Property Rights are part of the Social Contract;
Equality and Equity – There is to be no multi-class system. All people are to be equal and ruled and judged on one set of laws common to all. This is part of the Social Contract;
Justice & Equity – “Rule of Law” means One Set of Laws for all persons, enforced equally without regard to government position, wealth or status. Adjudication to be made with Due Process and judgment based the relevant facts pursuant to the Rule of Law;
Freedom of Speech – Guaranteed as part of the Social Contract and reduced to writing in the First Amendment of the US Constitution;
Freedom of Assembly – Guaranteed as part of the Social Contract and reduced to writing in the First Amendment of the US Constitution;
Freedom of Religion –– Guaranteed as part of the Social Contract and reduced to writing in the First Amendment of the US Constitution;
Competition/Free Markets – Are necessary in a land of Equality and Equity. They are part of the Social Contract;
Education – Free Public Education in America was pioneered in the USA in the late 1900s. It is now part of the Social Contract in most developed countries;
Healthcare – Was not part of the original American Social Contract;
Peacetime Quartering of Soldiers in Private Homes – Part of the Social Contract and reduced to writing in the Third Amendment;
Government Guarantees Against Foreign and Domestic Enemies & The Continuity of The Current Form of Government – Opposition to Invasion and Domestic violence the highest duty of government. It is the largest inducement for the Individual to enter into the Social Contract. In America, US Government cannot be changed internally by Amendment of the Constitutional, by intentionally hard methods. Further, Unalienable Natural Rights are just that, unalienable. The Government cannot be changed in anyway that alienates or infringes the inalienable Natural Rights of the Individual.

MARXISM (COMMUNISM AND MARXISM) 1848 to Present
Best Single Read – Karl Marx’s & Friedrich Engels’ “Communist Manifesto”, 1848);
Overview – Marxism is based on the theory that a never-ending cycle of increasing wealth disparity leads to the enslavement and exploitation of the masses by the wealthy;
For our purposes, the most important imposed Metaphysical Characteristics of Marxism are:

Nature of Man in the Natural State – Marx criticizes the traditional conception of human nature as a species which incarnates itself in each individual, instead arguing that the conception of human nature is formed by the totality of social relations. Thus, the whole of human nature is not understood, as in classical idealist philosophy, as permanent and universal: the species-being is always determined in a specific social and historical formation, with some aspects being biological. The inflicted Metaphysics of Marxism require the assessment that the Nature of Man can be changed to adapt to that Socio-Economic System via education, indoctrination and conditioning (punishments and rewards);
Purpose of Government – According to Marx, the purpose of government is to prevent counter-revolution and then administer the total re-organization of society in the interests of the vast majority.
Considerations in the Creation and structure of Government – The wealthy will always seek to corrupt government, retake power and exploit the masses so government must be constructed to prevent counter-revolution by the wealthy and always advance the best interests of the vast majority;
Type of Government – Collectivism
Social Contract – Each produce according to their ability, each receives according to their need and the common defense of the vast majority;
Accountability and Transparency of Government to the Masses – In theory, the workers run everything, and therefore government has total transparency and accountability. In reality, the government becomes another social class and feels justified in hiding things from the masses.
Elections – In theory, workers elect other workers to represent them in free elections. In reality, Elections are mostly for show with no real competition and are often rigged;
Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances (Aka Criticize Government) – Criticism of Government is discouraged and is often punished;
Right to Revolt Aka Consent of The Governed – Workers have a right to revolt until the revolt is complete and the “workers’” government is installed. On the other hand, the wealthy never have the right to counter-revolution;
Establishment of Truth: By Who and How? – Truth established by government through conditioning (rewards and punishments);
Rights of the Individual – The Rights of the individual are always subordinate to the best interests of the community as determined by the elected representatives;
Self Defense – The masses have the right to self-defense against other individuals from among the masses but not against government or government officials;
Gun Rights [Right to Bear Arms) – No, only government has the right to bear arms;
Self-Ownership – The individual belongs to the collective;
Self-Determination – Government determines how an individual can best contribute to the collective;
Private Property Rights – All property is owned by the collective;
Equality and Equity – In theory, everyone is equal and treated the same. In reality, the Government becomes a higher Social Class and gets better treatment than the masses;
Justice & Equity – A few iterations of logic reveals that Marxism is the “Rule of Man”. To begin with, there are 2 or more sets of rules for government officials and the masses. And, though in theory it is rule by the workers, the government, Law Enforcement and Judiciary work to maintain their special status resulting in Rule of Man geared to Protected the Government Class from the masses;
Freedom of Speech – In theory, yes. In reality, No. Criticizing government is often or always punished;
Freedom of Assembly – In theory, yes. In reality, No. Criticizing government is often punished;
Freedom of Religion – It depends on the country, but most Marxism discourages or punishes the practice of any religion;
Competition/Free Markets – No, the whole premise of Marxism is that Capitalism is unfair and results in wealth disparity and the exploitation of the masses;
Education – Yes, but as much for indoctrination and training in the menial trades as it is for genuine education;
Healthcare – Often Nationalized Healthcare but often rationed and substandard for the masses as opposed to the Government Class;
Peacetime Quartering of Soldiers in Private Homes – Whatever the government decides, the rights of the individual are subordinate to the needs of the community;
Government Guarantees Against Foreign and Domestic Enemies & The Continuity of The Current Form of Government – Governments subscribing to Marxism, vehemently strive to maintain power; always on the guard for counter-revolution driven by the wealthy;

SOCIAL DARWINISM 1871 TO 1890S, THEN REBRANDED AS PROGRESSIVISM
Best Single Read: Charles Darwin, “Descent of Man” 1871
Overview: Was based on applying the concept of Natural Selection to humanity. Some even condemned government for not controlling the mating of people as farmers controlled the mating of livestock by showing preference for mating superior stock and culling inferior stock. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. Social Darwinist subscribed to Eugenics and Scientific Racism. (e.g. Web Search Social Darwinism skull size measurements) Social Darwinists also asserted the rich were genetically superior to the masses and therefore had the right to exploit the masses (Survival of the Fittest). The Metaphysics of Social Darwinism was all focused on improving the human race. As you might suspect, the masses rejected Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism went on to rebrand as Progressivism in the USA in the 1890s and Nazism in Germany 1920s to 1945;
For our purposes, the most important imposed Metaphysical Characteristics of Social Darwinsim are:

Nature of Man in the Natural State – The persons who survived the Natural State represent an improvement of humanity because those who reproduced were the most successful at surviving in the Natural State.
Purpose of Government – Is to improve the quality of the human social organism through Natural Selection. In the Social Organism (1860), Herbert Spencer compares society to a living organism and argues that, just as biological organisms evolve through natural selection, society evolves and increases in complexity through analogous processes.
Considerations in the Creation and structure of Government – Government should be structured to promote the genetic improvement of the best specimens of humankind. Government Leaders should be chosen from among the wealthy leisure class should be educated for roles as Government leaders. Because they are genetically superior, as evinced by their greater wealth, the rich have the inherent right to exploit the masses (Survival of the Fittest);
Type of Government – Collectivism
Social Contract – Survival of the Fittest
Accountability and Transparency of Government to the Masses – None to the nonhealthy, vigorous debate and competition among the wealthy intellectuals;
Elections – Voting Limited to the wealthy and only the genetically superior wealthy should be educated for and elected to office;
Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances (Aka Criticize Government) – Not for the inferior, less wealthy masses;
Right to Revolt Aka Consent of The Governed – No Right of Revolt in favor of the allegedly inferior masses;
Establishment of Truth: By Who and How? – Only by the Wealthy and Wealthy Educated Government Elites; In fact, Social Darwinist Educated Elites asserted a right to lie to the allegedly ignorant masses;
Rights of the Individual – Rights of the Individual were relative to their relative wealth;
Self Defense – None, except for wealthy individuals;
Gun Rights [Right to Bear Arms) – Only for the wealthy and government officials charged with protecting the wealthy;
Self-Ownership – The Rights of the Individual are subordinate to the best interests of the Social Organism;
Self-Determination – The eternal struggle for Survival of the Fittest, yet Government elites would make policies in the best interests of the Social Organism, so the rights nonhealthy individuals was subordinate to the best interests of the Social Organism as determined by the Educated Government Elites selected from among the wealthy leisure class;
Private Property Rights – The wealthy have the right to exploit the masses and government policy is aimed at promoting the improvement of the Social Organism;
Equality and Equity – None, the wealthy get superior treatment;
Justice & Equity – Rule of Man in favor of improvement of the Social Organism;
Freedom of Speech – Greater Wealth, Greater Free Speech;
Freedom of Assembly – Greater Wealth, Greater Freedom of Assembly;
Freedom of Religion – Only to the extent it was believed it improved the quality of the Social Organism;
Competition/Free Markets – Yes, but with the rich allowed to exploit the masses;
Education – As the Wealthy, Government Elite determined was necessary for the improvement of the Social Organism;
Healthcare – Survival of the Fittest, healthcare on a case by case basis evaluated in terms of likely improvement of the Social Organism;
Peacetime Quartering of Soldiers in Private Homes – At the whim of the wealthy Government Elites as it related to the improvement of the Social Organism;
Government Guarantees Against Foreign and Domestic Enemies & The Continuity of The Current Form of Government – As Social Darwinists viewed society as a Single Social Organism, survival of the Social Organism would be paramount unless change would result in improvement of the Social Organism;

PROGRESSIVISM 1890s to present:
Best Single Read:” Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era” (2016) Thomas Leonard
Overview: An overview of Progressivism is difficult because there are two factions, the Academic Economists and the Politicians vying for control of the Movement. (Exhibit 28, Page 35, Illiberal Reformers) The Academics Economists hold themselves out as Altruistic and Trustworthy, and therefore not requiring accountability. But Cash and the Politicians run the Progressive Show, so they jump on the unaccountability bandwagon, but with an eye toward being able to engage in corruption without getting caught. Because of this, what you read here will be a blend of the ideal and reality.

Progressives began as Social Darwinists. (You just read about them) Social Darwinists practiced Eugenics, Scientific Racism and asserted the rich had the right to exploit the masses (Survival of the Fittest) alleging they were genetically superior as evinced by their greater wealth. When America rebranded as Social Darwinism, the Social Darwinists rebranded as Progressives but decided to keep their worst beliefs secret.(If you doubt Progressives began as Social Darwinists, read the titles of the last 5 chapters (or the whole chapters) of Exhibit 28, Illiberal Reformers) So Progressive veil their Social Darwinist agenda in the form of politics and legislation pretending to help the masses, while all the while intending to enslave the masses.

The Founders of Progressivism went to Germany for their graduate studies at German Universities. (Exhibit 28, Page 17) There they were learning the ideas of the German Historical School of Political Economy. (They were being taught by the same Professors that controlled German education while Hitler was a School boy and young man. They were being taught by the same Educators that gave rise to NAZI Germany, 25 years later. Yes, the same people that produced Hitler.)

Progressives assert the Progressive Educated in Government (Administrative State), selected from the wealthy, leisure class, shouldn’t be accountable to the masses alleging they are altruistic and trustworthy scholars. Progressive Elites also assert a right to lie to the masses because the masses are too stupid to know what’s best. (If you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance)

Progressives say humanity is a single social organism, like a colony of bees. Progressives assert the masses are expendable worker bees with no rights who exist only to serve the hive community. The problem is that in a honeybee colony, the queen bee runs the show, she is the community. When Progressives say community, they don’t mean the dictionary definition, they mean Progressive Elites, Corporations and the rich. This is what Progressive Elites are working toward.

Progressive Elites subscribe to the Fabian Socialist method of revolution by infiltration. Change is implemented slowly, covertly and incrementally over generations so no one generation notices enough change to be moved to resist.

The Founders of Progressivism defined White Protestant Men as the Superior race circa 1908. They did not include White women in the superior race because women were considered merely chattel property.

For our purposes, the most important imposed Metaphysical Characteristics of Progressivism are:

Nature of Man in the Natural State – Progressive Elites say the Progressive Elites are Altruistic and Trustworthy. At the same time, they say the masses are ignorant and genetically inferior, but the masses can be “conditioned” to change their nature. By “conditioning” they mean punishments, rewards, education and indoctrination, like Pavlov’s Dog.
Purpose of Government – The purpose of government under Progressivism is to have each individual serve the community in a way that best benefits the community. (Remember what community they are talking about)
Considerations in the Creation and structure of Government – Since the elites are trustworthy and altruistic, there is no need for government to be transparent or accountable to the masses.
Type of Government – Collectivism
Social Contract – The Social Contract is that as long you obey and serve the community as the Progressive Elites decide, the community will care for you.
Accountability and Transparency of Government to the Masses – None
Elections – For now, there are rigged elections, merely to give the appearance of elections. As Progressive Elites say the masses are too ignorant to know what is best for the community, why would they let them vote to decide who runs the community. Elections continue today in the USA only because that pesky Constitution requires it and it keeps the masses thinking they are free.
Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances (Aka Criticize Government) – None, the Progressive Educated Elites are above being accountable to the ignorant masses. They may pretend to listen, but that’s just to keep the masses from revolting before the Progressives have consolidated power.
Right to Revolt Aka Consent of The Governed – No, the Progressives despise Natural Law, Individualism, the unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual and the Constitution.
Establishment of Truth: By Who and How? – By the Progressive Elites of course. This is the purpose of Mainstream Media Fake News, Propaganda, Progressive Common Core Education and Social Media Censorship.
Rights of the Individual – The Rights of the Individual are always subordinate to the best interests of the community as determined by the Progressive Educated Elites in government select from among the wealthy leisure class because only, they have the time to study governance;
Self Defense – No, you defense is the job of the Progressive Government.
Gun Rights [Right to Bear Arms) – No, the ignorant masses can’t be trusted with guns and Progressive elites are altruistic and trustworthy.
Self-Ownership – No, you are an expendable member of the Progressive Hive Community.
Self-Determination – No, the Progressive Elites determine how best you can serve the community. No more, “What do you want to be when you grow up?”
Private Property Rights – No absolute property rights, the rich have the right to exploit the masses.
Equality and Equity – No, at a minimum 2 classes of people governed by 2 unequal sets of laws and rules. Progressive Elites vs. the masses.;
Justice & Equity – Arbitrary Progressive “Rule of Man” replaces Natural Law’s “Rule of Law” – No, decisions based on what is in the best interests of the Progressive Social Organism;
Freedom of Speech – Only if you don’t criticize the Progressive Agenda and the Progressive Elite. Be a happy worker be, quit your complaining
Freedom of Assembly – No
Freedom of Religion – Once Progressives consolidate power, no.
Competition/Free Markets – Progressives despise competition and free markets; Go research the Cartels they tried to set up that were struck down as unconstitutional from 1910 through the 1930s;
Education – When Progressivism has fully consolidated power, your education and future will be determined by a test you take in second grade. Then Progressive Elites will confer with corporations to see what their projected need will be when you are expected to graduate. Once the Progressive Elites assign you a career, your education will be devoted to that. No sense wasting time discovery who you are by sampling different classes. And the children of the rich will get the cushy jobs and your children will be designated as ditch diggers and crap shovels.
Healthcare – Obamacare is the first step towards the Progressives Eugenics program. This generation may not see it, but in 3 or 4 generations, your grandchildren and great grandchildren will.
Peacetime Quartering of Soldiers in Private Homes – For now it is forbidden, but once Progressives consolidate power, you can be certain harboring Soldiers in private homes during peacetime will again become possible.;
Government Guarantees Against Foreign and Domestic Enemies & The Continuity of The Current Form of Government – Once Accountable Progressive Educated Elites selected from among the wealthy, leisure class have consolidated power, you can be sure the form of government will change in whatever way they so desire.

NAZIs 1920s to 1945;
Best Reads: “Mein Kompf”, Adolph Hitler (1925), “The Pursuit of the Nazi Mind”, Daniel Pick (2012), “Mass Psychology”, Sigmund Freud, (1927), “Mass Psychology of Fascism”, William Reich, (1980), “The Black Notebooks”, Martin Heidegger, (1931 -1941)
Overview: “Ein Volk, eon Reich, eon Führer”, meaning “One People, One Nation, One Leader”, An individual’s worth and value were to be determined functionally and materialistically. While Social Darwinism of the 1870s rebranded as Progressivism in America in the 1890s, it became the NAZIs in the 1920s. In Germany, again arose the idea that the masses existed to serve the State. Like the Progressives, Hitler and Goebbels used Propaganda, Censorship and Indoctrination to rise to power. However, it is clear from history that the NAZIs also followed the traditional methods revolution, civil war and warfare rather the new Fabian Socialist methods of slow, covert infiltration. And the Germans practiced Eugenics and Scientific Racism openly and viciously.
For our purposes, the most important imposed Metaphysical Characteristics of Nazism are:

Nature of Man in the Natural State – Irrelevant, Survival of the Fittest Foundation of Social Darwinism yields ‘an individual’s worth and value were to be determined functionally and materialistically’.
Purpose of Government – creation of a Volk Community (Volksgemeinschaft)—a society which would, in theory, transcend class and religious differences;
Considerations in the Creation and structure of Government –
Type of Government – Collectivism
Social Contract – None, the rights of the Individual are subordinate to the interests of the NAZI government;
Accountability and Transparency of Government to the Masses – None
Elections – Rigged elections to give the appearance of participation
Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances (Aka Criticize Government) – None, dissenters were punished from losing jobs to being sent to NAZI Concentration Camps;
Right to Revolt Aka Consent of The Governed – NONE
Establishment of Truth: By Who and How? – By Government through Hitler and NAZI Propaganda Minister Goebbels. Research “the big lie”.
Rights of the Individual – None for the masses, rights of the individual are subordinate to the interests of the NAZI party;
Self Defense – You can protect yourself from others but not the NAZI Government.
Gun Rights [Right to Bear Arms) – NO
Self-Ownership – No
Self-Determination – No
Private Property Rights – Nazi ideology held entrepreneurship in high regard, and “private property was considered a precondition to developing the creativity of members of the German race in the best interest of the people. The Nazi leadership believed that “private property itself provided important incentives to achieve greater cost consciousness, efficiency gains, and technical progress.” Adolf Hitler used Social Darwinist arguments to support this stance, cautioning against “bureaucratic managing of the economy” that would preserve the weak and “represent a burden to the higher ability, industry and value;
Equality and Equity – No, ‘an individual’s worth and value were to be determined functionally and materialistically’
Justice & Equity – No, Rule of Man with decisions based on what is in the best interests of the NAZI Government;
Freedom of Speech – No
Freedom of Assembly – No, before the NAZIs consolidated power there was suppose to be by law, but even then, the Hitler “Brownshirts” would show up to disrupt rallies of political dissenters and worse;
Freedom of Religion – No, Jews persecuted otherwise Christian religions were acceptable
Competition/Free Markets – Yes and No,
Education – Yes, Education included Indoctrination, Research “Hitler Youth”
Healthcare – Yes, but requiring euthanizing defective and undesirable persons per Social Darwinism’s Natural Selection and Survival of the Fittest;
Peacetime Quartering Of Soldiers In Private Homes – The Nazis believed in war as the primary engine of human progress, and argued that the purpose of a country’s economy should be to enable that country to fight and win wars of expansion;
Government Guarantees Against Foreign and Domestic Enemies & The Continuity of The Current Form of Government – The NAZIs believed “Survival of the Fittest” extended to countries also. Therefore, they resisted threats from foreign and domestic more as a matter of self-preservation of the NAZI ideology than as a matter of protecting the German masses;

With that restoration of perspective completed, the reader can now us their own Natural Right to establish their own truth for themselves about what is happening in America using their own observations and reasoning;
And, as you reread the first 140 paragraphs of this complaint, the reader should be established for themselves if this is consistent with the Metaphysics of Natural Law and Constitution America was Founded upon, or the imposed Metaphysics of Progressivism;
And, when Plaintiff asserts we are in the middle of an undeclared, covert, slow, incremental war by infiltration over generations so no one generation realizes enough change to be moved to be resist, you can simply compare the metaphysics of Natural Law outlined above (paragraphs 157 to 159) with the metaphysics of the other paradigm shifts outlined from paragraphs 141 to 171 and establish truth for yourselves.
And when Plaintiff Mashak asks you if the Defendant IRS acted in accordance with Plaintiff’s unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights you can use your own observations and reasoning to establish that truth for yourself also;
The Contents of Chapters 6 to 10 of Illiberal Reformers (Exhibit 28) clearly show that the Foundation of Progressivism is Social Darwinism and evince Plaintiffs assertion that American Social Darwinists of the 1870s merely rebranded as Progressives in the 1890s;
The titles of the aforementioned chapters are 6. “Darwinism in Economics”, 7. “Eugenics and Race in Economic Reform”, 8. “Excluding the Unemployable”, 9. “Excluding Immigrants and the Unproductive”, 10. “Excluding Women”;
Now Plaintiff has heard Progressive Elites and their paid political operatives trying to say, “That was the old Progressivism, now we have the New Progressivism.” But, in response I suggest that ploy should be responded in the same manner the vast majority would respond to someone making this suggestion, “We are start a new NAZI Movement, but we got rid of all the bad stuff”. If that is not enough, remember the foundation of both American Progressivism and German Nazism is Social Darwinism. (Make the comparisons yourself);
PLAINTIFF MASHAK asserts that only Divine Right of Kings, Natural Law and Social Darwinism began organically without malevolent original intent nor hidden motives. Petitioner Mashak also believes that Divine Right of Kings became corrupted by corruption that unquestioned power brings and coopting by wealthy persons.
Plaintiff further asserts his belief that Marxism, Progressivism and Nazism were artificial and machinated attempts bathe rich and powerful who flourished under Divine Right of Kings, to restore to Government the same type of Might Make Right Power Government had under Divine Right of Kings. On information and belief, Plaintiff asserts Social Darwinism began as a spontaneous academic debate resulting from the New Theory of Evolution, but was also coopted by the rich and powerful for their own evil purposes.
Plaintiff asserts that his is a casualty of the war being waged by the Progressive Insurgency;
That the seditious and treasonous Progressive Insurgency sent agents to tell Plaintiff Mashak that if he shut up he could have his life back in an attempt to black mail his silence;
Plaintiff asserts that his injuries are the result of our government’s failure to exercise its highest duty, that being its duty protect him and all other American Citizens from the trespass of his unalienable Natural Rights by others, including government;
Plaintiff asserts his damages and injuries are at the hands of seditious and treasonous conspiracy being led by the Progressive Elites;
Plaintiff asserts his damages and injuries by the IRS were done its role as a coconspirator in the Progressive Insurgency;
Plaintiff asserts that his damages and injuries were caused by Progressive Insurgency replacing the Metaphysics of Natural Law and the US Constitution, with the metaphysics of Progressivism;
Plaintiff asserts that the Progressive Metaphysical assertion that the “Rich have the right to exploit the masses” (Survival of the Fittest) was among the most egregious factors in the destruction of his life and greatest cause of his damages and injuries;
Plaintiff asserts that the IRS, as a coconspirator in this seditious and treasonous conspiracy is jointly and severally liable for the damages and injuries he suffered;
Plaintiff asserts Exhibit 2 documents the beginning of Plaintiff’s journey to first discover and then fight the Progressive Insurgency;

CLAIMS, DAMAGES AND INJURIES

ACTUAL DAMAGES

Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 to 194;
Plaintiff has suffered most of his life with decreased heart and lung function owing to the stress of being a victim of the seditious and treasonous Progressive Insurgency;
Plaintiff places a value of $500,000,000 on the damages, injuries and Medical Expenses relating to his diminished health and likely decreased lifespan caused by the stress caused by the Progressive Insurgency’s violations of his unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights and the violation of the Social Contract of the USA Government in not protecting said unalienable rights from the trespasses of others;
Plaintiff Mashak has forgone being married and having children to avoid them also becoming victims of the original Bank conspiracy only made possible through the wrongful usurpation of the metaphysics of Natural Law by the Progressives insurgency’s Progressive Metaphysics;
Plaintiff places a value of $500,000,000 on his inability to get married, have children and loss of Consortia due to the original bank conspirators witness tampering death threats only made possible and effective because of the unlawful replacement of my unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights by the Progressive Insurgency and our USA Government’s failure uphold the Social Contract by protecting my unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights from the trespasses of the Progressive Insurgency;
Plaintiff Mashak estimates he would have earned and accumulated $100,000,000 over the past 30 years if not for wrongfully imposed Metaphysics of Progressivism and our Government failure to uphold the USA Constitution and its Social Contract obligations to protect Plaintiff’s unalienable Natural Rights from the trespasses of others;
Defendant IRS’s actions were on behalf of the Progressive Insurgency and only cause Plaintiff more stress, damages and injury;
Plaintiff Mashak has suffered even more damages and injuries since rightly actively opposing the Progressive Insurgency;
Our USA Government violated the Social Contract when it not only failed to protect Plaintiff’s Unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights from the trespasses of others, it aids, abetted and co-conspired with the Progressive Insurgency’s overthrow of Natural Law, the USA Constitution and WE THE PEOPLE as Sovereigns;
Defendant IRS joined the original bank conspiracy and aided and abetted its goals in inflicting its various actions upon Mashak and FNR and is therefore equally responsible for the damages inflicted on Mashak by their Coconspirators;
That Progressive Insurgency Co-Conspirator Defendant IRS is jointly and severally liable for the claims, damages and injuries of Plaintiff Mashak
As a jointly and severally liable co-conspirator, Defendant IRS should pay all these damages and then seek remuneration from their other Coconspirators;
The subtotal for Actual Damages is One Billion, One Hundred Million Dollars;

PAIN AND SUFFERING

Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 to 207;
Plaintiff asserts, it is impossible to adequately to adequately describe the anguish and depth of despair Plaintiff has suffered;
What price to you place on the pain and suffering of witness tampering that escalated to threats to destroy your life and finally assassination by the original bank conspirators;
What price do you put on the pain and suffering caused by diminished health caused by the witness tampering of the original bank conspirators?
What price do you put on cutting off ties to your friends to save them from being assassinated if you testified against them, and then you did in fact, expose them to Law Enforcement and the FBI?
What price do you put on the loss of Consortia because the Original Bank Conspirators threatened to kill anyone you cared about if you testified?
What price do you put on the pain and suffering of not being able to get married or have children due to the witness tampering threat of the original bank conspirators?
What price do you put on the stress, pain and suffering of being alone for 25+ years out of fear anyone you care about will be killed?
What price do you put on the pain and suffering cause by living in fear of an unrescinded, government-sanctioned witness tampering death threat for 25+ years?
What price do you put on the pain and suffering caused by informing law enforcement of these threats of assassination, and even actually attempts of assassination and having Law Enforcement do little or nothing about them?
What price to you put on the exasperation of all of the above caused by finding out your government has not only abandoned the Social Contract in not protecting your unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights from the trespasses of others, but instead is aiding, abetting and Co-Conspiring with the Progressive Insurgency to replace the Metaphysics of Natural Law and the Constitution with the Metaphysics of Progressivism?
The Medical Records showing I almost dies from the stress, pain and suffering of enduring these torments evince the level of pain and suffering.
Plaintiff has almost died 4 times, in 1998, 2007, 2011 and 2018.
Plaintiff heart ejection fraction dropped to less than 15% on 3 different occasions and recovery from the first took years.
Plaintiff contemplated suicide on multiple occasions as a result of this stress, pain and suffering;
Plaintiff was diagnosed with Post Traumatic stress syndrome in in 2010;
Plaintiff doesn’t know how you measure it, but Plaintiff Mashak will tell you he would trade it all to just go back and live the last 30 years under the metaphysics of Natural Law rather than the metaphysics of the Progressive Insurgency;
Defendant IRS joined the original bank conspiracy and aided and abetted its goals in inflicting its various actions upon Mashak and FNR and is therefore equally responsible for the damages inflicted on Mashak by their Coconspirators;
That Progressive Insurgency Co-Conspirator Defendant IRS is jointly and severally liable for the claims, damages and injuries of Plaintiff Mashak
As a jointly and severally liable co-conspirator, Defendant IRS should pay all these damages and then seek remuneration from their other Coconspirators;
Plaintiff applies a figure of One Billion Dollars for his pain and suffering;

Conspiracy, Aiding and Abetting, Obstruction of Justice and RICO

Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 to 222;
Defendant IRS conspired and aided and abetted Making Good on MN US Attorney Lillehaug’s quid pro quo for accepting at least a $50,000 bribe to not prosecute the original aforementioned bank conspirators;
All of the acts of Defendant IRS unprofessional, uncooperative and stressful acts towards Mashak were part and parcel of the weaponization of the IRS by the Social Darwinist Progressives;
Defendant IRS joined the conspiracy and aided and abetted its goals in inflicting its various actions upon Mashak and FNR and is therefore equally responsible for the damages inflicted on Mashak by their Coconspirators;
Defendant IRS joined the original bank conspiracy and aided and abetted its goals in inflicting its various actions upon Mashak and FNR and is therefore equally responsible for the damages inflicted on Plaintiff Mashak by their Coconspirators;
That Progressive Insurgency Co-Conspirator Defendant IRS is jointly and severally liable for the claims, damages and injuries of Plaintiff Mashak
As a jointly and severally liable co-conspirator, Defendant IRS should pay all these damages and then seek remuneration from their other Coconspirators;
Defendant IRS should pay all these damages and then seek remuneration from their other Coconspirators;
Plaintiff assigns a value of One Billion Dollars for this Claim;

Conspiracy Against Rights 18 USC 241

Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 to 237;
Plaintiff asserts all of the following constitute a self-evident conspiracy against the rights of Plaintiff Mashak;
Defendant IRS joined the original bank conspiracy and aided and abetted its goals in inflicting its various actions upon Mashak and FNR and is therefore equally responsible for the damages inflicted on Plaintiff Mashak by their Coconspirators;
That Progressive Insurgency Co-Conspirator Defendant IRS is jointly and severally liable for the claims, damages and injuries of Plaintiff Mashak
As a jointly and severally liable co-conspirator, Defendant IRS should pay all these damages and then seek remuneration from their other Coconspirators;
Defendant IRS should pay all these damages and then seek remuneration from their other Coconspirators;
Plaintiff assigns a value of One Billion Dollars for this Claim;

Punitive Damages

Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 to 244;
Defendant IRS should further pay Punitive Damages to Plaintiff Mashak to ensure future same and similar activities by IRS Agents do not occur again;
That Progressive Insurgency Co-Conspirator Defendant IRS is jointly and severally liable for the claims, damages and injuries of Plaintiff Mashak
As a jointly and severally liable co-conspirator, Defendant IRS should pay all these damages and then seek remuneration from their other Coconspirators;
Defendant IRS should pay all these damages and then seek remuneration from their other Coconspirators;
Plaintiff assigns a value of One Billion Dollars for this Claim;

BILL TO USA GOVERNMENT FOR DOING ITS JOB TO DATE

Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 to 250;
The Social Contract states that the purpose of government is to protect the Unalienable Natural Rights of Individual Citizens from the Trespasses of others, including government itself;
The US Government not only failed to fulfil its obligations to Plaintiff under the Social Contract, it actively aided, abetted and Co-Conspired with the Progressive Insurgency in violated Plaintiffs Unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights;
Defendant IRS is part of said government;
Defendant IRS is part of the Administrative State set up by the Progressive Insurgency in 1913 as part of its Fabian Socialist-style of revolution by slow, incremental revolution;
No matter how slowly sedition and sedition occur it is still sedition and treason;
That Progressive Insurgency Co-Conspirator Defendant IRS is jointly and severally liable for the claims, damages and injuries of Plaintiff Mashak
As a jointly and severally liable co-conspirator, Defendant IRS should pay all these damages and then seek remuneration from their other Coconspirators;
Defendant IRS should pay all these damages and then seek remuneration from their other Coconspirators;
Plaintiff assigns a value of One Billion Dollars for this Claim;

PENALTIES TO IRS NULL AND VOID

Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 to 260;
Defendant IRS did deliberately and maliciously refuse to give Plaintiff information necessary to complete the subject tax filings which delayed Plaintiff’s filing;
Defendant IRS did knowingly on multiple occasions give Plaintiff Mashak bad information which Plaintiff reasonably relied upon;
Defendant IRS did then penalize Plaintiff for late filing directly related to its refusal to timely provide information Plaintiff requested and when it did give some information it was deliberately false;
Defendant IRS cannot be allowed to profit from its own fraudulent and malicious actions by then penalizing Plaintiff for the late filing and errors it caused by its own bad faith actions;
Therefore, all taxes, penalties and interest allegedly owed to Defendant IRS by Plaintiff at this time must be declared null and void;

SUMMARY

Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 to 260;
Defendant IRS clearly did not abide by the Rule of Law and Facts in evidence in charging Plaintiff FNR & Mashak penalties, fees and interest for the subject years;
Mashak provided Defendant sufficient records to substantiate that health and crimes committed against Mashak in 2007, 2008 and 2011 adequately excused the late filing;
Defendant IRS further gave Mashak false information that no penalty accrued if no tax was due;
Defendant IRS further refused to give Mashak the information he needs to complete the returns since Mashak could no longer afford an accountant;
Defendant IRS Agents’ unprofessional and unhelpful demeanor each year further prevented Mashak’s timely filing of said returns;
In his mind, Plaintiff is still 29, the past decades a blur of punishments and retaliation by the bank conspirators. All goals and dreams are smashed, Marriage and children, success and fortune are lost. As such, I am past the point of caring about being assassinated.
The Founders provided that Americans had to exhaust their peaceful remedies before they could withdraw their consent to be governed;
This document is yet one more document evincing that Mashak and other Americans have exhausted their peaceful remedies;
Mashak prays this court quash all the penalties, fees and interest Defendant IRS and its co-conspirators have inflicted upon him and award Plaintiff One Billion Dollars, Tax Free and such other remedy as this Court finds just and equitable.

I declare under penalty that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on December 19, 2019.

_____________________________________

Don Mashak

Rt 1, Box 231

Albertville MN 55301

612-249-3299

s/ Don Mashak

	US Election 2020 Leg… on US Election 2020 Legal Update;…
	DISTRESS AS A WEAPON… on DISTRESS AS A WEAPON OF WAR;…
	Laser Focus on WEF!;… on Laser Focus on WEF!; & Enf…
	Propaganda, Social D… on Propaganda, Social Darwinism,…
	HOW PROGRESSIVE GLOB… on PROGRESSIVE GLOBALIST ELITES A…

Don Mashak's Hennepin County MN Free Press News

Don Mashak's Hennepin County MN Free Press News

Month: February 2020

Don Mashak Vs. IRS – Appellate Case 19-1429

Minnesota Election Integrity Concerns

1/? LA #ILUMINACIÓN 2.0

1/? THE #ENLIGHTENMENT 2.0

Día de San Valentín y almas gemelas:alimento para el pensamiento

#ValentinesDay& #Soulmates: Food for Thought

Free Speech is the ultimate sign of freedom in a society