Mashak Vs. IRS – Appellant Mashak’s Response to US MN District Court 28FEB2019 Memorandum, Order and Judgement.

Preliminary Notes & Observations

With this Litigation posting, I incorporated a lot of my prologue in the actual Pleading so it will be a part of the Official Court Record permanently. Nevertheless, How Appropos that that the Prosecutorial Misconduct of Jussie Smollett having all charges related to his fabricated Race Crime and his subsequent false police report have become headlines in the days since this was filed. The 24MAR2019 pleading begins after the next graphic.

Here are some links to some Political Caucus Resolutions For Judicial Reform from 2012
https://rebrand.ly/ResolutionsJudicialReform1of2_2019
https://rebrand.ly/ResolutionsJudicialReform2of2_2019

WhatDoJussieSmollettHillaryClintonRichardKovacevich&WellsFargoBankHaveInCommon03282019
>>>> NOTE TO READERS – DUE TO A WORDPRESS ISSUE, RETURN FROM EXHIBITS RETURNS YOU 4 – 6 LINES BELOW WHERE YOU LEFT OFF READING – SORRY <<<<

[Programmers Note to Self – Point from Code (& return anchor)]
(Exhibit 2) Test

BEGIN PLEADING HERE

US FEDERAL COURT OF APPEALS, 8th DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

First National Repossessors, Inc, (FNR)
And Don Mashak, personally, and
As President of FNR,
Plaintiffs, Mashak as Appellant

  APPELLATE CASE NO 19-1429

Vs.                                                   US MN DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 18CV2635

Commissioner or Internal Revenue (IRS),
Defendants, Respondents.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Clerk of Courts, US Federal Court of Appeals, 8th District, Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse, 111 South 10th Street, St. Louis, MO 63102 (314) 244-2400; Clerk of Courts, United States District Court, District of Minnesota, 316 N Robert Street #100, St. Paul Minnesota 55101-1460 and Commissioner of Internal Revenue via Beth A. Nunnink 30 E 7th Street #1130 St. Paul, MN 55101.

APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF MASHAK’S RESPONSE
TO US DISTRICT COURT 28FEB2019 ORDER

PROLOGUE

Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak asserts his Cover Letter accompanying his original Notice of Appeal filed 19FEB2019, responding to the US MN District Courts 18JAN2019 Order (Exhibit 15)
, correctly anticipated and addressed the further fraud again perpetrated by the District Court in its 28FEB2019 Order (Exhibit 9)
. Yet, Appellant Mashak submits this pleading as an opportunity to further expound on the merits of this appeal and inform his fellow citizens as to the true circumstances leading to this litigation.

Following the simple and direct proof of fraud being perpetrated by the US MN District Court, Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak will take the time to explain to his fellow American Citizens, and any future jury, the background leading to this litigation within the context of Unalienable Natural Rights and Constitutional Rights. Appellant Mashak is angered, dismayed and his health adversely effected by the fraud perpetrated by the US MN District Court in this matter. However, at the same time, he recognizes it as an opportunity to share with his fellow citizens proof of the true nature, of minimally, the

Page 1/30

Minnesota Courts & Legal system. (The handling of this matter by the Appellate Courts may indicate how far the corruption goes up the Judicial ladder) It is quite one for a citizen to say the Courts are corrupt; However, it rises to a whole new level of proof and credibility when fellow citizens can see and understand irrefutable proof of said deliberate, malicious and prejudiced acts of fraud by the Judiciary for themselves.

Appellant Mashak will share some personally embarrassing events and observations, but believes it is necessary to do so, as our Courts and Government rely to a large degree, upon the propensity of individuals to avoid embarrassment to keep the Courts and Government’s malfeasance and injustice from becoming widely known. Further, the COINTELPRO operation against President Trump known as the Fake Trump/Russia Dossier, has been debunked. (Exhibit 17)
However, in the process, America has been made away that our Government does indeed engage in such nefarious and unjust operations. And then there was the contemptuous, arrogant testimony of FBI Agent Peter Strzok (Exhibit 16)
. The widespread knowledge among the American public and the resulting adverse public opinion of our Government and legal system that these two caused, bolster the credibility to my assertions beyond that of being an average citizen making such allegations for the first time.

CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE

The Constitutional issue of:

“Did President Obama’s directing the IRS to act against his political  enemies and political dissent violate the Constitution?”

demands this matter be fully heard. There may be other Constitutional issues to be considered, but they require further research to determine their legitimacy and appropriateness in the context of this matter.

Page 2/30

FACTS AND ARGUEMENT

While the US MN District Court tries to hide its fraud with a lot of boiler plate discussion about Natural persons vs. Corporations, etc. & attempt to bury the fraud in this long legal mumbo jumbo Order, the facts speak for themselves.

With great disappointment, Appellant Mashak must now refer to past misrepresentations of the US MN District Court that he previously referred to as errors or lies, “misrepresentation”, “deliberate malice”; by dropping the mitigating context of possible simple error and asserting deliberate, malicious and calculated fraud intended to deny Mashak full and fair adjudication of this matter pursuant to the Rule of Law as is required by the Constitution and Natural Law [upon which America is founded (First Paragraph, Declaration of Independence)] .

Appellant Mashak believes this matter evinces the systemic corruption in our government and Courts. Simply, the US MN District Court has perpetrated a fraud as clearly demonstrated herein. Directly from Mashak’s Written Objections (Exhibit 6)
:

[Directly from the Order of September 27, 2018: (Exhibit 1)

“…IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:…

2) Plaintiff’s must pay the $400 filing fee for this action within 20 days of this order or, alternatively, Mashak must voluntarily dismiss First National Repossessors, Inc. from this action, failing which it will be recommended this matter be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.”

From Plaintiffs’ correspondence to Court October 11, 2018: (Exhibit 2)

“I respectfully request an extension of time to respond and/or comply with the 20-day deadline from the date of the Court’s Order of September 27, 2018. I request to extend that deadline to November 8, 2018.

 I would like that time to raise the funds required, retain council and/or to research further my options and consequences to dropping the corporation from the suit, before doing so”

Page 3/30

From Plaintiffs’ correspondence to Court October 11, 2018: (Exhibit 2)

“If the Court does not extend the deadline, Plaintiff Mashak requests that First National Repossessors, Inc be removed from this litigation because, at this time, he lacks the funds to pay the $400.00. If said request for additional time is granted, this request is rescinded.”

Per Text Order of October 18, 2018: (Exhibit 3)

“TEXT ORDER ONLY granting [6] Motion for Extension of time: Plaintiffs have 30 days from date of this order to comply with the Court’s Order filed on 9/27/2018

From the November 19, 2018 (Exhibit 4)
(because the deadline fell on a weekend) Pleading:

“Failing this Courts granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to rescind FNR being represented by council, Plaintiff Mashak directs the Court to remove FNR from this litigation without prejudice to avoid this Court dismissing the matter without Prejudice and revoking Petitioner Mashak IFP status.”]

 These excerpts are evinced in Exhibits 1 through 4 & 6, of this pleading.

Following up on the voluntary removal of the Corporation FNR, in Mashak’s 12/18/2019 letter (Exhibit 5)
Mashak wrote:

Plaintiffs again request that First National Repossessors, Inc be removed from this litigation. If there is some special form required to do this, please provide it. Plaintiff Mashak has been unable to find any such required document in the Rules.

 The Court has erroneously stated in its Report and Recommendation that First National Repossessors, Inc. remains a Plaintiff in this matter.”

Clearly Appellant Mashak complied with the 9/27/2018 order and the court perpetrated fraud in denying Mashak had complied and insisting the Court only said payment of the fees was ordered. The Court denied Appellant Mashak complied so it could dismiss the matter for “Failure to Prosecute.” As such, as the order is based on deliberate fraud, the Lower Court’s findings and dismissal are null and void. The General Public should take note, Appellant Mashak has proven a Judge has perjured himself and perpetrated frauds upon the Court. You now know, fact certain, that the Courts lie. The police and other law enforcement take their lead from the Courts. (FBI Agent Strzok’s behavior in his Congressional testimony attests to Law Enforcement not working for folks to believe themselves to be Public Servants & Representatives of WE THE PEOPLE, but rather that

Page 4/30

smug, arrogant demeanor was a person employed by tyrants he knew would share the same attitude toward WE THE PEOPLE. The failure of corrective action being taken against this Magistrate and Judge will evince to the American Public that America’s Courts are systemically corrupt. WE THE PEOPLE’s confidence in the honor and integrity of our Courts, now should now fall greatly, barring swift & commensurate rebuke and corrective action, of the Magistrate & Judge for this infraction. (For the General Public, you will be interested in knowing why the Court would lie and we will address that later in this Pleading.) Clearly, the Lower Court is perpetrating this fraud to create the pretext that Mashak cannot appeal because he does not have an attorney to represent the Corporation and Mashak does not qualify for IFP if the Corporation is included.

Again, this assertion of “Failure to Prosecute” is pretexted upon deliberate fraud. It is therefore is null and void. Therefore, Appellant Mashak asserts the 8th Appellate Court must reverse the order of the Lower US MN District Court. Clearly Mashak timely removed FNR as a party in accordance with the US MN District Courts Instructions and Mashak should be able to proceed with IFP status in District Court. Further, Appellant Mashak asserts the actions of the US MN District Court demonstrates overwhelming bias & prejudice against Mashak. Therefore, the 8th Appellate Court should remand to matter back to both another magistrate and another judge. In fact, the level of corruption in Minnesota rises to such a level that the 8th Appellate Court should consider moving that matter to another jurisdiction, such as Wisconsin or Iowa. Mashak & other Minnesotans have asked for a hearing before the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary every year since 2004 (Exhibit 14)
. The purpose of these requests being for a hearing dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Courts. Every year since 2004, the request has been denied.

Page 5/30

In closing his facts and argument, Clearly Appellant Mashak timely complied with every requirement the US MN District Court established with the 9/27/2018 order. It is just that simple.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION INCLUDING NATURAL LAW,
UNALIEANBLE NATURAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
CONTEXT, FOR MY FELLOW AMERICAN CITIZENS

(Conclusion appears just before signature at end of this pleading)

This litigation begins with a group of bankers’ making witness tampering threats towards Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak, that escalated to death threats against him and any one he cared about. More details on this and related matters will be provided later in this section of this pleading. Before we continue, Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak finds it necessary to lay some groundwork for understanding of what has and is transpiring in this litigation.

“The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by those who resist it.”

~ John Hay (1872), Private Secretary to Abraham Lincoln

Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak has found most of the American Public to be unaware of the founding principles of Natural Law, Natural Rights and the Rule of Law, as the Founder’s and Constitution intended. Further, most American’s are caught up in the daily activities necessary to survive and prosper, they lack the time, interest or desire in learning about such matters. Still further, in the humble opinion of Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak, it appears our Government has instructed schools to not give sufficient attention to Founding principles via the Federal Progressive Common Core Education curriculum. Even still further, our Mainstream Media seems to deliberately present news and information in the context of the Constitution, Natural Law, Natural Rights and the Rule of Law (CIA Operation Mockingbird). Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak has even heard that

Page 6/30

some Law Schools have stop teaching “Constitutional Law” Therefore, for the American Public & any jury to understand Appellant/Plaintiff’s Mashak’s legal and Metaphysical perspective, it is necessary to educate the public and any jury as to these Founding principles and elements.

Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak will address or incorporate the following topics, philosophies and concepts in these pleadings:

  • Natural Law (Upon which America is founded > First Paragraph, Declaration of Independence);
  • Unalienable Natural Rights;
  • Divine Right of Kings;
  • FBI COINTELPRO style operations;
  • Bill of Rights, First Amendment and Fourth through Seventh Amendments;
  • Rule of Law Vs. Rule of Man;
  • Establishment of Truth.

Since the Schools and Mainstream Media are not educating the American masses upon these matters, Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak finds it necessary to start educating the American masses to refamiliarize them with their rights and duties in dealing with tyranny. Also, to familiarize them wit the fact the “Rule of Man” is being unconstitutionally and in violation of Natural Law, for the “Rule of Law”. (Rule of Law is the concept and the American Founder’s intended principle that there be 1 set of laws applied equally to all American Citizens without consideration of wealth, social status or government position.) Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak provides this information on the record to restore a “Common Metaphysical Perspective of Reality) among the American Public. Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak also provides this information on the record, because he is unable to restore Natural Law, the Rule of Law, our Constitution and the Republic on his own. Mashak needs the understanding and aid of his fellow American Citizens to do so. How can you defend your Unalienable Natural Rights if you don’t know what they are?

Page 7/30

A quick, history of metaphysics (What is Metaphysics? (Exhibit 18)
in the Western World seems the best way to quickly and efficiently cover a lot of ground to restore to American the same or similar metaphysical perspective of reality that the American Founder’s shared…

SKELETON METAPHYSICAL HISTORY OF THE WESTERN WORLD 476AD TO PRESENT

476 to 1940AD – Divine Right of Kings & Feudalism. (Collectivism)

The King/Queen is deemed a God or Representative of God here on earth. As such, no earthly-being can question their authority or decisions. The King owns all land. The King’s subjects have no rights, only permissions and privileges granted and extinguished by the King. The vast majority of the King’s subjects were slaves “bound to the land” (Feudalism). The King & Church Establish Truth. (Enforced by physical punishment or admonitions of eternal damnation. (The Earth is Flat & the center of the center of universe; the house arrest of Galileo for the last years of his life, spared being burned at the stake only because his fame & respect)
Read: Thomas Hobbes – “Leviathan” (1651)
Individual Rights – No Individual Rights, only permissions and privileges
Establishment of Truth – By the Government
Justice – Rule of Man aka Arbitrary

1650-1800AD The Enlightenment (aka Age of Reason) and
Natural Law (Individualism)

Following the Renaissances’ attempts to reduce to writing the rules that apply to the physical world, the “Men of Letters” began reducing to writing the rules that apply to the interactions of humans (metaphysics) They established that all people have certain unalienable Natural Rights, like the Rights to Life, Liberty (Self-Determination) and private property ownership. They began to ask why is the King the King? And, why can’t the King’s decision be questioned. This change in metaphysics led to the American (1776) and French (1791) Revolutions. Per Locke and the American Founders – Governments must be constructed with the Nature of Man in the Nature State in Mind. Perhaps the American Founder’s perception of the Nature of Man is best summed up from the Cato Letters: “All [People] have freewill and dare not virtuous by nature.” Hence, the US Constitution was created with Checks and Balances, Transparency and Accountability)

Page 8/30

The main purpose of Government is to protect the Unalienable Natural Rights of all Individual Citizens from the trespasses of others. American was founded on Natural Law! (See “Laws of Nature”, Declaration of Independence, First Paragraph) [The United States of America is a Representative, Constitutionally-Limited, Republic guaranteeing Unalienable Natural Rights to the Individual that can not be taken away by the majority (except as punishment for crimes found guilty of after Due Process pursuant to the Rule of Law.) The USA is NOT a Democracy]
Read: John Locke – “2nd Treatise of Civil Government” (1689), “Declaration of Causes” (1775), Thomas Jefferson – “Declaration of Independence” (1776), Thomas Paine “Common Sense” (1776), “Anti-Federalist Papers” (1787), “The Federalist Papers” (1788), “US Constitution” (1789), Alex De Tocqueville “Democracy in America” (1835)
Individual Rights – Unalienable Natural Rights except for as punishment after Due Process pursuant to the Rule of Law.
Establishment of Truth – Truth Established by the Individual using their own observations and reasoning
Justice – Rule of Law: All persons judged by 1 standard set of laws applied equally without regard to wealth, Social Status or Government Position.

“The Natural Liberty of Man is to be free from any Superior Power on Earth, and not to be under the will or Legislative Authority of Man, but to have only the Law of Nature for his Rule”

~ John Locke (Second Treatise of Government 1689)

1859 – Marxism (Collectivism)

Written by the lazy, drunk Karl Marx (though much was ghostwritten by a rich man’s son, Engels), this Government and Economic philosophy is focused on the alleged unending cycle of disparate wealth distribution and exploitation of the masses by the wealthy. The individual’s rights are subordinate to the best interests of the community as determined by the leaders. The Russians later came up with the concept of “Dialectical Materialism”. They needed to address the need to “change the nature of humans” by “reeducation”, the Siberian Labor Camps and the Gulags. It has failed everywhere it has

Page 9/30

been tried and resulted in the deaths of millions, by both execution and violence and starvation.  America rejected Marxism 1.0. Marxism was the wealthy class first attempt to restore the power and authority to government that government and the wealthy had enjoyed under Divine Right of Kings.
Read: Karl Marx – “Communist Manifesto” (1847) & Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” (1971)
Individual Rights – Individual Rights subordinate to the best interests of the Community as determined by the Leadership.
Establishment of Truth – By the Government
Justice – Rule of Man aka Arbitrary

1870’s Social Darwinism (Collectivism)

Inspired by Darwin’s “Descent of Man” in 1871, Social Darwinism applies Natural Selection to humankind. It embraces Eugenics and Survival of the Fittest. It espoused the rich have the right to exploit the masses as they are genetically superior as evinced by their superior wealth. It proposes the Wealthy Elites should not be accountable to the masses because the Wealthy Elites are intellectually superior to the masses. For this same reason, Social Darwinism asserts Wealthy Government Elites have the right to lie to the masses. The individual’s rights are subordinate to will of the wealthy under Social Darwinism. Social Darwinists also subscribed to “Scientific Racism” as an extension of their Eugenics beliefs. America rejected Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism went on to become Progressivism in America and the NAZIs in Germany.
Read: Charles Darwin – Descent of Man (1871)
Individual Rights – Individual Rights subordinate to those of the wealthy
Establishment of Truth – By the wealthy
Justice – Rule of Man – How much justice can you afford?

Circa 1905 – Progressivism (Collectivism)

When the American masses rejected Social Darwinism, the Social Darwinists rebranded as Progressivism using the pretext of helping the masses while continuing to advance the Social Darwinist Agenda. (For example, while addressing many of the injustices the “Muck Rakers” and Citizen Grand Juries exposed, the Progressives surreptitiously did away with the Muck Rakers and Citizen Grand Juries, so the trespasses of wealthy would be less likely to be exposed.) Progressive President Woodrow Wilson took America off the “Constitution-Based Law” standard (Rule of Law) and replaced it with the “Case-Law Based” standard (Rule of Man) in 1913. Progressives do not like Unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual nor the Constitution.  Simply, Progressives (like the Social Darwinists they are), think they are superior to the masses and therefore should not be accountable to the masses. For that same reason, Progressives assert a right to lie to the masses. Further, they require the Rights of the individual be subordinate to the rights of the Community as determined by the Progressive elites.

Page 10/30

Progressivism’s Founders assert to the masses that the exploitation of the masses is caused by human traits acquired after the invention of Government. Some of these allegedly undesirable traits being Individualism, Creativity, Competition and Free Markets. Progressivism’s Founders falsely asserted that these human traits didn’t exist in the Pre-Government Utopian Tribal Natural State. Progressivism’s Founders said in the Tribal State everyone bowed to the wisdom of the Elders and all was love and concord. Built upon this false foundation, The Progressive Founders then asserted the evils of Individualism, creativity, competition and free markets could be driven out of human kind with time and effort.

The Progressives allege that the nature of humankind can be changed by “conditioning”. By this they mean punishment and rewards. (see Progressive Conditioning http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27 ) But constrained by a world in which individuals have unalienable Natural Rights, Progressives are unable to openly engage in the most over acts of punishment as the Kings did under the Divine Right of Kings. Progressives must be covert and more subtle in their punishments… For example, denied raises, denied promotions, firings, denied Zoning variances and adverse court decisions.  Under Progressivism, loyalty to Progressivism becomes the highest consideration for advancement in employment and society. Under Progressivism, loyalty to Progressivism replaces honor, integrity and qualifications as the highest consideration in advancement in Politics. For these, and other reasons, Progressivism is often referred to as “Marxism 2.0)

Consistent with their Social Darwinist philosophical foundation, Progressives declared “White Men” the superior race, circa 1908. They did not include White Women, because women were considered merely “Chattel Property.” Please further note, American Progressives declared White men the superior race 20+ years before NAZI Hitler’s “Master Aryan Race”. Progressive President Woodrow Wilson cited Social Darwinism’s “Scientific Racism” as his basis for “Jim Crow Laws”, Segregation and open endorsement of the KKK. American Progressives supported NAZI Hitler’s Eugenics Programs.

Page 11/30

Progressivism is the current attempt to restore to government the power government and the wealthy had under Divine Right of Kings and to strip the American masses of their unalienable Natural Rights.
Read: Charles Darwin – “Descent of Man” (1871), Edward Bernays “Propaganda” (1928), Saul Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals” (1971), “Cloward-Piven Strategy” (1966), Karl Marx – “Communist Manifesto” (1847), David Noble “The Progressive Mind” (1981), Page Smith – “America Enters the World – A People’s History of the Progressive Era and World War I” (1985), Britannica – “The Annals of America [1895 – 1904] Volume 12 Populism, Imperialism and Reform” (1965), Britannica – “The Annals of America [1905 – 1915] Volume 13 The Progressive Era” (1965)
Individual Rights – Individual Rights subordinate to best interest of the community as determined by the Progressive Elites.
Establishment of Truth – By the Government
Justice – Rule of Man aka Arbitrary

Synopsis – Metaphysical History of the Western World

The wealthy resent the power they lost to Natural Law. They are trying to restore to government the power it had under the Divine Right of Kings and strip the masses of their unalienable Natural Rights. The latest iteration of these attempts in America is called Progressivism. The Progressive Strategy is to make changes adverse to the will of WE THE PEOPLE, slow and incrementally over generations, so no one generation notices enough change to revolt. The efforts of the Progressive elites have accomplished so much of their Agenda, it is now better referred to as the Progressive Globalist Establishment Insurgency. Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak refers to the Progressive Globalist Establishment as ProgDogs, because the name belies their intent; Progressives are actually regressive seeking to strip the individual of Unalienable Natural Rights and rescind the American Constitution. Opposition to this ProgDog Insurgency is the cause Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak seeks to rally his fellow American citizens to.

Page 12/30

RETURNING TO THE BACKGROUND OF THIS LITIGTION

As you read this, remember this saga begins with a group of bankers, now led by Richard Kovacevich & Wells Fargo Bank, NA. making witness tampering threats toward Appellant/Plaintiff Don Mashak; threats that would escalate to death threats to Mashak and then to anyone he cared about.  Then MN US District Attorney, David Lillehaug (then also Campaign Finance Manager for a now dead Senator) accepted bribes, Campaign Contributions & other consideration to not prosecute the bank conspirators.

Rather than lash out of anger, Don Mashak calmly & rationally sought to exercise his Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of punishment or reprisal as reduced to writing in the US Constitution’s, First Amendment.  When Law Enforcement and the Judiciary refused to redress this problem, Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak attempted to bring this matter to the attention of the Minnesota Legislature, first in the 1990s and then later, when the Internet made connecting with like-minded folks easier and cost effective.  From 2004 to present, a loose affiliation of persons and organizations seeking Judicial Reform, which Mashak refers to as Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) have asked for and been denied a hearing before the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary (Exhibit 14)
(*). Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak’s reward for controlling his anger and proceeding in logical manner within the confines of accepted decorum was blacklisting, attempted assassination and a COINTELPRO operation against him coming from areas of government one would never suspect… The Respondent/Defendant IRS being one of them.

This particular litigation deals with the weaponized IRS’s involvement in punishing Mashak for exercising his Natural & Constitutional Rights. Wells Fargo Bank, NA has stolen millions of dollars from millions of Americans. (see the partial list in the litigation (Exhibit 10)
, yet no one has gone to jail. Don Mashak asserts that the witness tampering, bribes & Progressive “Rule of Man” injustice he experienced were utilized in these other Wells Fargo Bank, NA. crimes in which no one went jail.

Page 13/30

Part of the necessity of Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak educating the reader “metaphysical” background to this litigation is caused by the need to expose and mitigate the COINTELPRO operation the Government has engaged in against Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak. By creating a common metaphysical perspective of reality, Mashak can now provide the background for this litigation in this context and have the reader come to ESTABLISH TRUTH FOR THEMSELVES using their own observations and reasoning. Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak’s deeper understanding of metaphysics and Progressive Globalism arose from the necessity of learning the Truth, Justice and American Way he learned about during his Public Education was not serving him well in his quest for justice.  Mashak asserts that educating the masses as he has in this pleading, and other venues, will help the American masses understand the dire straights Progressive Globalists have us in, and the evil they intend to inflict upon WE THE PEOPLE once the Progressive Globalists consolidate power.

Now back to informing the General Public as to why the US MN District Court Magistrate & Judge would lie: Have you ever wondered how the high level of systemic corruption in America has managed to last so long?  It is because the Progressive Globalist Establishment have developed tactics to undermine transparency, accountability and the voices of political dissent. (We used to refer to the folks in government or with connections in government, and constantly got away with nefarious activities as the “Good Ole Boys.”)

Page 14/30

One of these tactics is to inflict the aforementioned FBI COINTELPRO-style Operations on the leaders of political dissent. The purpose of FBI COINTELPRO-style operations is to demonize, discredit and Marginalize the leaders of political dissent making these leaders less or totally ineffective in pursuing their political agenda (Exhibit 8)
. Additionally, Progressive (Social Darwinist) Globalists also believe in Progressive Conditioning [ http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27 ] (punishment & reward) to condition the masses to not question their authority and behave as the Progressive Globalist Elites require. Blacklisting of a person or business, such as was the case with me, is an example of Progressive Conditioning. (All of this of course being Unconstitutional, a violation of Mashak Natural Rights and not in accordance with the Rule of Law)

A few short years ago, alleging a COINTELPRO style operation would have seemed absurd and unbelievable to most Americans. Yet, we have since seen a COINTELPRO-style operation carried out against Billionaire President Donald Trump. Most Americans know it as the fake Trump/Russia Dossier. (Exhibit 17)
And after more than 2 years and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, the COINTELPRO-compiled evidence in the fake Trump/Russia Dossier  has finally been debunked. For more than 2 years, Billionaire Trump was terrorized by the contents of a Fake COINTELPRO-style Dossier about him paid for by the Democratic National Committee (DNC). {The most infamous target of COINTELPRO was Civil Rights Leader Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (Exhibit 8)
https://www.scribd.com/document/290593748/FBI-COINTELPRO-and-Martin-Luther-King-Jr-1of3-Intro-Sections-1-and-2-of-Senate-Report-01-20-2014 } If a Billionaire President has this much trouble with a Bogus COINTELPRO operation against him, what chance does the average citizen have against a COINTELPRO Operation against them by the likes of Wells Fargo Bank, NA or the Government itself?

Page 15/30

In the present litigation, the evidence Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak seeks, and/or seeks to make public, is so damning, a Magistrate and a Judge have lied under oath to make sure no jury ever hears these matters. Efforts to unseal court records are crushed. Although it is every citizen’s right to know the charges, witnesses & evidence against them (4th through 7th Amendments), Mashak hasn’t been charged nor allowed to see the fabricated Fake COINTELPRO Dossier against him because they know Mashak would dispatch them in short order… The rumors serve their purpose, they discredit Mashak as a leader of political dissent, punish him for petitioning for redress of grievances thereby embarrassing judges and unlike actual charges, Mashak never has the chance to see the evidence, confront his accusers know the charges or impeach the credibility of any evidence fueling the rumors. (Don Mashak has never been charged with anything more than minor traffic tickets & a bogus “Disorderly Conduct” by a judge trying to prevent Mashak from reporting on the judge’s corruption… & that was dismissed for lack of probable Cause) [Dakota County, MN 19HA-CR-14-1019] On information and belief, Mashak asserts a major flaw exists in the fabricated fake COINTELPRO-style Dossier against him. That flaw being attributing to Mashak allegations of crimes and deeds Mashak was not physically and/or mentally capable of committing from 1998 to 2004, do to the severe health issues Mashak suffered at the time due to the stress of the witness tamper death threats previously and later discussed in this pleading.

As you see in this litigation, Mashak has asked to see these COINTELPRO records to know the evidence against him, to know his accusers and what he is accused of as is his Unalienable Natural Right as reduced to writing in the Constitution’s 4th through 7th Amendments, which are part of what is commonly referred to as the Bill of Rights. & Law Enforcement Agencies have refused FOIA requests and now this US MN District Court has killed has the case rather than risk my forcing these records to be produced. Should you come across any adverse information about Don Mashak, Please Contact Don Mashak with names & sources of any such persons and/or websites so Mashak can exercise his unalienable Natural Right to know the alleged crimes he is accused of, his alleged accusers and the alleged evidence against him, as is his Natural and Constitutional Right. It is also of interest to note that, from time to time, your government

Page 16/30

has people contact me to remind me their COINTELPRO operation against me will end, if I just shut up. This is the true nature of our current Progressive Globalist government and Judiciary.

A judge lying under oath, is just a small taste of the criminal acts of government to protect bankers & the wealthy from accountability for their criminal acts. This case would lay open the layer upon layer of lies, fraud & deceit our government engaged in to protect this particular banking conspiracy now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA. In short, the Magistrate and the Judge perpetrated a fraud upon the court for one or more of the following reasons: 1) To prevent the revelation that the fake COINTELPRO-style Dossier on Mashak is a fabrication filled with lies; 2) To make good on the original Bank Conspiracy, now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA., witness tampering threats; 3) To punish Mashak for his involvement in embarrassing the Judiciary by Petitioning the Government for redress of grievances (First Amendment) by means of requesting hearings dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony in the Courts 4) In furtherance of the Seditious and Treasonous Progressive Globalist Insurgency Conspiracy. Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak hastens to add that while these judges perpetrating a fraud upon the Court is itself criminal, the 4 motives for doing so are even more seriously criminal and unconstitutional.

Per Thomas Jefferson, from the US Declaration of Independence:

“In every stage of these Oppressions we have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble Terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated Injury. A Prince (‘Progressive Globalist Elites’), whose Character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is (are) unfit to be Ruler(s) of a free People.”

Page 17/30

To recap and expand, Appellant Mashak did not intend to be a leader of political dissent. Mashak was a victim of witness tampering by a group of bankers now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA, that escalated to threats to destroy his life and finally, threats to kill Mashak and anyone he cared about. Appellant Mashak, took their threats seriously. For their safety and protection, Mashak terminated his involvement in several volunteer and nonprofit organizations. For their safety and protection, Mashak severed his friendships with friends and family. Mashak naively believed that with the help of Law Enforcement, the bank conspirators would be in jail within 2 or 3 years and he would be able to reunite with his friends and family and explain what had happened. Mashak also never got married nor had children, to prevent them from being killed or used to blackmail or extort his silence. As you will learn, the criminal bankers were protected, rather than prosecuted by Law Enforcement and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Mashak provided this information to Mainstream media but they wouldn’t report. The Minnesota attorney General’s office wasn’t interested. Finally, Mashak reported this to the FBI. A few weeks later the FBI Agent called and said others in the banking industry had confirmed the majority of his allegations.  Would I wear a wire? Could I get them to repeat the death threats?

But then, MN US Attorney Lillehaug of the DOJ, accepted bribes and/or campaign contribution of $50,000 to not prosecute the matter. It is unknown at this time what other consideration Lillehaug accepted.  (More details regarding this incident appear in the original complaint and Plaintiffs Written Objections (Exhibit 6)
One of the motivations for perpetrating this fraud is Appellant Mashak requests to unseal related Court records [Hennepin County Court Cases Bank North vs 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA is 27CV88-22383, Citizens State Bank of St. Louis Park vs. 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA 91-002759] Wells Fargo Bank, NA went on to steal millions of dollars from millions of American with no one going to jail. (Exhibit 10)
Don Mashak was in possession of collection documents which evinced the bank’s conspiracy knowledge of repossessions that it denied it was aware of. Because the bankers had failed to “Charge off” the

Page 18/30

repossessions, the computer continued sending late notices to the debtors of vehicles that had already been repossessed. To deal with this, they changed the address to “Do Not Mail” (Exhibit 7)
so the “Courtesy Late Notice” letters never got sent to the debtors. Since only the Banker’s had access to the Banks computers, this proved the bankers in fact knew the vehicles had been repossessed.

In the Course of pursuing justice, Appellant Mashak attempted to exercise his Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of retaliation or punishment, as reduced to writing in the mid-1990s and then again, every year from 2004 to present… (Exhibit 14)
Don Mashak was involved with various groups seeking Judicial Reform he refers to collectively as Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform). These groups sought a hearing before the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota judiciary.

Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak doubts that anyone can appreciate the level of despair experienced when a citizen reports crime to the FBI that include witness-tampering death threats to themselves, only to find the Justice Department has sanctioned the said death threats. Who do you turn to at that point?

After the initial attempts to seek redress through the MN State Legislature were fruitless, Mashak resigned himself to getting on with his life, thinking and hoping if he shut up for a few years, the players in the original bank conspiracy (now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA), would forget about him. They did not. It became clear they were going to make good on some or all of their witness tampering threats.

Not only was Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak blacklisted personally, as well as his business, but Law Enforcement refused to investigate and follow up on Mashak’s reports of being stalked nor his concerns about being assassinated. They usually refused to even take reports.

Page 19/30

In late 1998, Mashak’s health collapsed from the stress of this situation. Mashak spent nearly 3 weeks on life support and nearly 2 months in the hospital. Mashak was admitted with resistant pneumonia. While in the hospital, Mashak contracted MRSA and was told a “virus chewed on his heart. Mashak suffered brain damage and his heart function dropped to less than 10%. Mashak was told that 95% of the people that were afflicted with the combination of health problems he had, die. Mashak was told he was expected to die. Miraculously, Mashak survived. Mashak was released homeless and in a deep state of despair. Mashak had no reason to believe his heart would ever recover. It took until 2010 for Mashak’s heart to recover to 30%-35% function. Any attempt to state the depth of despair resulting from having his health and future prospects destroyed for simply being willing to testify truthfully against the bank conspirators, would be insufficient to convey the anger and anguish Mashak felt at this point. Nevertheless, most people are unaware Mashak had any of these health issues. Mashak’s will power and force of character were able compensate for these health issues, once his heart function improved somewhat about four years after the late 1998 health crisis. (This is one of the more embarrassing revelations Mashak makes to reveal to the American public the true nature of our Progressive Globalist Government. The Progressive Elites are literally laughing about the damage they have inflicted upon their enemy. Remember, they think of themselves as superior to the masses. In the same way slave owner’s rationalized slavery by saying slaves were sub-human, so do Progressives think the same way of their rank and file Cult victim followers. Behind closed doors, Progressive Globalist elites refer to the masses as sheep, and/or their livestock. Mashak’s cringes at the thought of giving his Progressive detractors the satisfaction, but regards making the American public aware of the true nature of their government as the higher consideration)

Page 20/30

Which brings us back to the “FBI Agent Peter Strzok attitude” of Law Enforcement we all witnessed during his sworn Congressional Testimony. It has long been asserted the purpose of Law Enforcement no longer is to protect WE THE PEOPLE from criminals, rather Law Enforcement exists to protect the wealthy and Bankers from WE THE PEOPLE.  WE THE PEOPLE only don’t know this to be true because Government covers it up and Mainstream Media doesn’t report it. Appellant/Respondent Mashak’s experiences prove this to be true. After Mashak was released from the hospital in January of 1999, he was unable to perform the most difficult work of his business himself. Mashak was forced to hire employees. Unfortunately, one of these employees was a criminal and the relative of another employee was a hardened criminal. Estranged from his support network, now with 10% – 20% heart function, Mashak lack the physical ability nor mental strength to force them out of his life. Mashak waited to the opportunity arose, and reported an upcoming criminal activity of these folks that he had overheard. He reported this to the local police, believing this would remove these persons from his life. Instead, Law Enforcement told the employee Mashak had informed them. Said employee retaliated against Mashak. Said employee was never arrested for the criminal activity I had informed the police of. The subject employees’ retribution was gruesome.  Mashak asserts it was the intent of the Law Enforcement to have said employee kill me to make good on the original bank conspirators Witness Tampering death threats. It was not until 2003 or 2004, when Mashak’s health sufficiently recovered, that Mashak was able to force said criminal employees out of his life. (Note it was also about this time frame of 2004, that Mashak health had improved enough to return to seeking justice via the Judicial TAR Movement.)

Page 21/30

After partially recovering from the 1998 health crisis, Mashak was determined to escape the stress and move to another country to live and get married.  However, the original bank conspirators and your Progressive Globalist Government, Judiciary and Law Enforcement were still not done with Mashak. Mashak was unable to move out of the country, and forced to turn and fight. Hence, his involvement in the Judicial TAR movement circa 2004.

In early 2006, while Mashak was on vacation out of the country, his office manager quit and stole thousands of dollars of government and personal property. 3 different times, she told Mashak she had stolen and had no company nor personal property.  3 different times, stolen company and personal property were returned to Mashak by said former office manager; Once with the police present, Once to Mashak’s Lawyer and once anonymously at night in a company mail box. Law Enforcement refused to charge said thief. Even after 3 different returns of company and personal property, Mashak came to believe said thief still had more of his company and personal possessions in here possession. Mashak sued her in MN State Court. Progressive Globalist Minnesota state judges seized upon the opportunity to retaliate against Mashak for being involved in the Judicial TAR Movement, causing them great anger and embarrassment. In Mashak humble opinion, the Progressive Globalist MN State Judiciary offered to not charge her with the crimes, if she contributed to the fabrication of the fake COINTELPRO-style Dossier against Mashak. Even a lawyer Mashak paid thousands of dollars boated to Mashak after the case that the Judge, the Office Manager’s lawyer and he had conspired to throw the case out. And, as is to now be anticipated by the very Nature of the Progressive Globalist Judiciary, Mashak’s ethics complaints about the lawyer went no where with the Minnesota Lawyers’ Professional Responsibility Board. (In a side note, the depth of corruption is evinced in an unpublished 2010 MN Appellate court ruling (A10-1205) conclusion stating “the Minnesota “Code of Professional Conduct are not an

Page 22/30

implied covenant in a legal services contract between a Minnesota Lawyer and Client”. Unpublished means it’s a bad “Rule of Man” ruling and that don’t want it published so the public doesn’t find out and other Lawyers can’t use it as a case site else be subjected to “Judicial Code Red” – see movie “A Few Good Men”)

The continuing making good on the original witness tampering threats conspiracy &/or unconstitutional retaliation for Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak exercising his Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances as reduced to writing in the First Amendment, continued and escalated. In 2018, Mashak was again admitted to the hospital for health problems caused by the stress these unlawful acts against him caused. In prior pleadings, Mashak has expressed his intentions to file an Amended Complaint because Mashak was just shortly out of the hospital and on Prednisone at the time the original complaint was filed. Mashak filed the original complaint when he did, under the belief that some legal deadline was involved. Mashak later learned that Prednisone has the side effect of decreasing concentration and mental agility.

Two other activities of Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak, besides unconstitutional retaliation for Mashak exercising his unalienable Natural Right to Petition for Redress and/or as furtherance of the original banker witness tampering threats conspiracy, may also have given rise to the IRS retaliatory acts towards Mashak. When Mashak’s attempts for simple justice in the above described manners failed, Mashak began to seek different venues for seeking justice and to understand how what had transpired. Besides researching and writing about the History of Metaphysics in the Western World, Mashak engaged in the following 2 activities; 1) TEA Party and 2) Elections Judge.

Page 23/30

TEA Party and the IRS

As is the intent of the Progressive Globalist strategy, the Judicial TAR Movement began to wear down after a few years of being rebuked and rebuffed by the Minnesota Legislature. At about this same time, Appellant/Plaintiff Don Mashak also becoming involved in pursuing Judicial Reform through the TEA Party from 2009 to 2011 (Exhibit 12)
. As you will recall, President Obama instructed the weaponized IRS to retaliate against his political adversaries. Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak opposed President Obama and is diametrically opposed to the Progressive Globalist insurgency. Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak plainly asserts that a portion of this litigation is based on Mashak’s affiliation with the TEA Party and President Obama’s directive to the IRS to retaliate against his political adversaries in general, and the TEA Party in particular.

Mashak as Election Judge Expressing Concerns about Election Integrity

          Don Mashak also attempted to promote election integrity as an election judge by reporting a source of election fraud (Exhibit 13)
. The Evidence seems to indicate that Election Fraud was part and parcel of the Seditious and Treasonous, failed 2016 Progressive Globalist Election Coupe by Hillary Clinton with the assistance of then President Obama and other. In this context, it seems likely this would also constitute a reason for the IRS to retaliate against Mashak per the instruction of President Obama.

Appellant Mashak believes 1) the US MN District Court believes No one will see this injustice, so no one will know about this injustice. 2) the US MN District Court believes its COINTELPRO operation against Mashak has been so effective that without the American Public knowing their true motivations, they can act with impunity 3) The US MN District Court believes Mashak won’t take the initiative to make sure the Masses know the true reasons why the Courts perpetrated.

Page 24/30

Therefore, Appellant Mashak has included this Background and has posted this pleading, “APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF MASHAK’S RESPONSE TO US DISTRICT COURT 28FEB2019 ORDER on the internet also at:  https://rebrand.ly/MashakVsIRSResponseTo28FEB2019USMNDistrictOrder  Or,
https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2019/03/24/mashak-vs-irs-appellant-mashaks-response-to-us-mn-district-court-28feb2019-memorandum-order-and-judgement/

PLAINTIFF’S WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDING AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF DECEMBER 4, 2018 can be found here: https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2019/01/19/how-progressive-rule-of-man-fbi-cointelpro-work-a-real-life-example/

The posting for Appellant Mashak’s Notice of Appeal and Cover Letter (Exhibit 11)
can be found at: https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2019/02/19/don-mashak-vs-the-irs-how-the-progressive-social-darwinist-assertion-the-rich-have-the-right-to-exploit-the-masses-manifests-itself-in-our-courts-and-politics-a-continuing-real-life-exam/

This fraud results in manifest injustice to Appellant Mashak and failure of this matter to be fully heard will severely and adversely impact the American Public’s view of the honor and integrity the American Judicial System.  Appellant Mashak asserts that what has transpired as described herein and elsewhere rises to the level of Sedition and Treason; and thus, the necessity of American Citizens withdrawing their CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED if and when their peaceful remedies are exhausted.

Page 25/30

For the General Public reading this document, you will find the motivation for this Court perpetrating this fraud being one or more of the following: 1) In furtherance of a criminal RICO conspiracy to Obstruct Justice, 2) That such litigation will reveal fabrication of evidence in a COINTELPRO operation against Appellant Mashak, and/or, 3) acts of Sedition and Treason by various Government and Judicial Officials.

Wells Fargo Bank, NA did attempt to make good on the original bank conspirators death threats. Mashak reported this attempts and suspicions but Law Enforcement refused to act. In the one incident where the assassin was captured, the County Attorney let the convicted felon out on parole off with 6 months additional time, so the assassin would not roll on those who hired him.

So devasting have these events been, that Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak was diagnosed with PTSD in 2010. Pursuant to the American’s with Disabilities Act. (ADA), Mashak has asked for Accommodation under the ADA. So corrupt are the Minnesota Courts been, that in later litigation, they directed Mashak’s medical providers to refuse to reaffirm his PTSD diagnosis and thus denied Mashak Accommodation under the ADA. Clearly, the facts in this pleading provide sufficient grounds for any Court to find Mashak suffers from PTSD and make Accommodation for him pursuant the ADA, sans the findings of any Medical Provider, given the circumstances. In fact, Mashak is no longer able to obtain any medical treatment at any Twin Cities medical facilities. Mashak warned against Obamacare foreseeing that denial of medical treatment would one day be used against the voices of political dissent. And, now, here it is as predicted by Mashak. The necessity of writing these briefs re-inflames Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak’s PTSD. Mashak is now being forced to confront new injustice by the Courts in the form of this perpetration of a fraud upon the Court by a Magistrate and a Judge, and, just as overwhelming, being forced to admit to himself at this point in his life that the original bank conspirators and Wells Fargo Bank, NA have made good on the original Witnesses tampering threats to destroy Mashak’s life.  It has taken me weeks to write what would normally in the past taken days.

Page 26/30

Clearly what has happened to Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak constitutes a Conspiracy Against Rights; 18 U.S. Code § 241. Clearly, none of what has transpired is in accordance with the Rule of Law. Mashak handed the FBI and Justice Department the smoking gun to take down the original bank conspirators and Wells Fargo Bank, Na. Instead of being punished, Wells Fargo continued in its criminal ways stealing from and/or defrauding millions of Americans from Millions of Dollars (Exhibit 10)
. Clearly, some kind of Quid Pro Quo exists between Wells Fargo Bank, NA and America’s Government, consistent with Progressive “Social Darwinist” thinking. Meanwhile, for daring to testify against Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Mashak’s life has been destroyed by the very Government, Judiciary and Law Enforcement FBI Agent Strzok’s demeaner in testifying before Congress (Exhibit 16)
is understandable with this understanding of the Social Darwinist perspective of reality that actually exists in our Government. If the Rule of Law truly exists, Government would have prosecuted the original bank conspirators and Wells Fargo Bank, NA and made Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak whole. Justice delayed is justice denied. At this late date, given all the “street justice” inflicted on Mashak without Due Process pursuant to the Rule of Law, it would seem politically feasible that the Legal System would, at a minimum quietly tell Progressive Globalist Judge David Lillehaug to resign or not run for reelection. Further, that fully within the constitutional rights of Wells Fargo Bank, NA, that the Government would revoke its charter and licenses for stealing/defrauding millions of Americans of millions of Dollars in 5 major crimes in little more than a decade.  Such revocation being analogous to the revocation of Driver’s licenses after 3 drunk driving convictions on the basis the driver’s driving is inimical to the public safety. Wells Fargo Bank, NA’s crime spree (Exhibit 10)
demonstrates behavior inimical to the Public Policy and incorrigible to Public Policy. Appellant/Plaintiff cannot

Page 27/30

be made whole. 25+ years of his life cannot be restored. The happiness and satisfaction of simple goals of marriage and children are no longer obtainable. Again, Justice delayed is justice denied.

My fellow American Citizens, in Mashak’s humble opinion, your Progressive Globalist Government and Judiciary are trying to ESTABLISH TRUTH for you, despite the facts to the contrary. In the present litigation, your Progressive Globalist US MN District Court Magistrate and Judge are trying to ESTABLISH TRUTH contrary to facts by saying Mashak failed to follow the Court’s Order’s and therefore they are within their rights to dismiss the matter for “Failure to Prosecute.” In the greater scheme of things, Your Progressive Government and Judiciary want to ESTABLISH TRUTH as being the original wealthy Bank Conspirators and wealthy Wells Fargo Bank, NA. did nothing wrong and Don Mashak is the bad guy. While on the other hand, Mashak wants you to use your own NATURAL RIGHT TO ESTABLISH TRUTH FOR YOURSELF using your own observations and reasoning. The question is, “Who are you going to believe?” The Official Progressive Globalist Government ESTABLISHED TRUTH or your own lying eyes?

Per Thomas Jefferson, from the US Declaration of Independence:

“…when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government…”

The American Revolution began with the formation of Committees of Correspondence, Inspection & Safety [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committees_of_safety_(American_Revolution) ]. These Committees eventually led to the Declaration of Causes, July 6, 1775. In that vein, these links are provided: https://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft-844cf Or, https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2015/10/11/second-declartion-of-causes-first-rough-draft-05172015/

Page 28/30

CONCLUSION

          Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak will limit his conclusion to the narrow requirements of the Courts February 28, 2919 Memorandum, Order and Judgement. Clearly Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak has provided irrefutably proof that the US MN District Court Magistrate and Judge in this matter are trying to perpetrate a fraud up the Courts, inclusive of the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals itself. Appellant/Plaintiff did not “Fail to Prosecute” this matter. Appellant/Plaintiff complied with every requirement of the US MN District Court Orders at issue. Disgustingly, rather than at least admit error when confronted with the irrefutable facts, the US MN District Court Magistrate double down on its injustice to Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak and their “Perpetration of Fraud” upon the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals. In Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak’s humble opinion, the 8th Circuit Appeals Court has no choice but to overrule the US MN District Court Magistrate and Judge and refer this matter back to the lower court.

Still further, the Perpetration of Fraud by the Court in the face of irrefutable evidence of the facts evinces unacceptable Bias & Prejudice of the Magistrate and Judge toward Mashak. Ergo, the 8th Circuit US Appellate Court should also minimally require the matter be assigned to a new Magistrate and Judge. In fact, Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak ask the 9th Circuit Appellate Court to consider the following: Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak & others have requested hearings before the Minnesota House and Senate Judicial Committees dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary since 2004 and have been denied every year since then. Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak would suggest that this and other facts evince the fact the Minnesota Courts are systemically corrupt. Appellant/Plaintiff Mashak would there for request the 8th US Circuit Appellate Court consider changing the venue to Wisconsin or Iowa.

Page 29/30

In summary, the US MN District Court’s dismissal for “Failure to Prosecute” is predicated upon fraud and refuted by facts on the record. The reasons for the Lower Court’s fraud are even more disturbing. As said order is the product of fraud, it must be struck down, and the matter at a minimum be remanded to the Lower Court.

Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,

 ____________________________________ Dated: 03/24/2019
Don Mashak
Personally, and as President of FNR (612)XXX-XXXX
Rt 1 Box 231, Albertville MN 55301

Exhibit 1 –US MN District Court’s September 27, 2018 Order;
Exhibit 2 – Plaintiff’s October 11, 2018 Correspondence to Court;
Exhibit 3 – US MN District Court’s October 18, 2018 Text Order Only;
Exhibit 4 – Plaintiff’s November 19, 2018 Motion to Court;
Exhibit 5 – Plaintiff’s December 18, 2018 Correspondence to Court;
Exhibit 6 – Plaintiff’s Written Objections 12/18/2018;
Exhibit 7 – “Do Not Mail” Example of Proof the Bank Conspirators knew vehicles
had been repossessed;
Exhibit 8 – Hoover on FBI COINTELPRO Post;
Exhibit 9 – US MN District Court’s February 28, 2019 Order;
Exhibit 10 – Wells Fargo Crime Spree Meme;
Exhibit 11 – Notice of Appeal Cover Letter (without Exhibits as they appear
as Exhibits 1-8 here);
Exhibit 12 – 2011 TEA Party – Judicial Reform – It should be noted original article
was censored from internet);
Exhibit 13 – Election Judge Concern about Election Integrity Meme;
Exhibit 14 – Annual Judicial TAR Letter – Request for Hearing by MN House and
Senate Judiciary Committees;
Exhibit 15 – US MN District Court’s January 18, 2019 Memorandum and Order.
Exhibit 16 – Peter Strzok Meme
Exhibit 17 – Trump/Russia No Collusion Meme
Exhibit 18 – What is Metaphysics?

Page 30/30

[Programmers Note to Self – Point from Code (& return anchor)]
(Exhibit 2)Test
(*)

EXHIBIT 1
(return)

PDF File 1_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourtCT27SEP2018Order27SEP2018

1_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourtCT27SEP2018Order27SEP2018-page-001

1_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourtCT27SEP2018Order27SEP2018-page-002

EXHIBIT 2
(return)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
__________________________________________________________________________________________

First National Repossessors, Inc,
And Don Mashak, personally, and
As President of FNR,
Plaintiffs,                                                                                                                 
                                                                             CORRESPONDANCE REGARDING COURT’S S                                                                               SEPTEMBER 27, ORDER REQUESTING
V.                                                                          EXPIDITED PROCESSING OF PLAINTIFFS’
                                                                             REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO
                                                                             RESPOND TO SAID ORDER

Commission or Internal Revenue,
                    Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Clerk of Courts, United States District Court, District of Minnesota, 316 N Robert Street #100, St. Paul Minnesota 55101-1460 and Commissioner of Internal Revenue via Beth A. Nunnink 30 E 7th Street #1130 St. Paul, MN 55101

Hello:

I respectfully request an extension of time to respond and/or comply with the 20-day deadline from the date of the Court’s Order of September 27, 2018. I request to extend that deadline to November 8, 2018.

I would like that time to raise the funds required, retain council and/or to research further my options and consequences to dropping the corporation from the suit, before doing so.

Am I correct in presuming that even if Plaintiff Mashak raises said funds, the Court would then force Mashak to hire a lawyer to represent the Corporation, or remove the Corporation or have the matter dismissed? I am the sole owner of First National Repossessors, Inc.

Thank you for your Expedited attention and response to this matter.

In Liberty,

 ____________________________________ Dated: 10/11/2018
Don Mashak
Personally, and as President of FNR (612)XXX-XXXX
Rt 1 Box 231, Albertville MN 55301

EXHIBIT 3
(return)

3_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourt18OCT2018Order10182018-page-001

EXHIBIT 4
(return)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

____________________________________________________________________________________________
First National Repossessors, Inc,
and Don Mashak, personally, and
as President of FNR
,
Plaintiffs,

 Vs.                                                                                                CASE NO. 18CV2635

 Commission or Internal Revenue,
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Clerk of Courts, United States District Court, District of Minnesota, 316 N Robert Street #100, St. Paul Minnesota 55101-1460 and Commissioner of Internal Revenue via Beth A. Nunnink 30 E 7th Street #1130 St. Paul, MN 55101

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR COURT TO USE ITS WIDE DISCRETION IN THE FACE OF EXTRORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO RECEIVE PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S ORDER OF OCTOBER 18, 201

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, Plaintiffs will move this court to waive the requirement of an attorney for First National Repossessors, Inc (FNR) & allow this suit to move forward with Informa Pauperis (IFP) status in light of the Extraordinary circumstances involved involving Obstruction of Justice, Witness tampering that escalated to Death Threats, Systemic Corruption, Sedition, Treason, other High Crimes and the unlawful and unconstitutional weaponization of the Internal Revenue Service and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (IRS) to be used for political purposes, to punish enemies of President Barack Obama and opponents of the Progressive Movement, now turned Progressive Insurgency.

PRELUDE

The Court previously ordered Plaintiff Mashak to remove First National Repossessors, Inc (FNR) from this litigation without prejudice or obtain retain an attorney for FNR and forfeit In Forma Pauperis status. The deadline to respond fell on the weekend so Mashak submits this Motion and response on the first business day after the deadline.

E4 Page 1 0f 25

OVERVIEW

A group of bankers, now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA (Wells Fargo), conspired to wrongfully repossess vehicles from hundreds of Minnesota families. Plaintiff Mashak’s testimony and “smoking gun” evidence would unravel their conspiracy. Said group of bankers (hereafter “bank conspirators”), engaged in witness tampering to prevent Petition Mashak from testifying. These witness tampering threats began with threats to destroy Plaintiff Mashak’s business, life, etc. and escalated to death threats. In the early 1990s, Plaintiff Mashak first asked a now dead Senators office to provide the smoking gun evidence to the FBI. After a month or more, Mashak took the evidence and met with the FBI himself. Only after Plaintiff Mashak met with the FBI, did  the now dead Senators office allegedly forward the document Mashak had left with them to the FBI.

After a couple of weeks, the Seasoned FBI Agent assigned to the case said other bank industry officials confirmed Plaintiff Mashak’s allegations. Said seasoned FBI Agent asked Mashak if he would wear a wire and asked if Mashak could get them to repeat the death threats. Mashak agreed.

Soon thereafter a young FBI agent, about six months out of the FBI academy, replaced the seasoned FBI Agents. This FBI agent seemed to do nothing. A few months later the Junior FBI Agent called to say the US Attorney was not interested in pursuing the matter. That US Attorney was David Lillehaug. David Lillehaug was the dead Senators Campaign Finance Manager at the time. A year later, Norwest Bank, NA., Now Wells Fargo, made a $50,000 campaign contribution to the now dead Senator. One can only speculate what other bribes and other consideration occurred “under the table”. Mashak testified in a related Civil Matter, but the increasingly dire witness tampering threats prevented him from testifying in the criminal matters. Since this time, Mashak has lived with an unrescinded, government sanctioned witness tampering death threat.

E4 Page 2 0f 25

Plaintiffs pursuit of justice through the Minnesota Attorney General’s and with Minnesota State Legislators was unfruitful. The Internet was in its infancy at the time and there was no cost and time effective way to find like minded individuals concerned about corruption in the Minnesota Courts.

In 1998, the stress of living with this witness tampering death threat caused Mashak’s health to collapse. Mashak was hospitalized for 2 months with resistant Pneumonia, MRS and was told a virus had “chewed” on his heart. Mashak’s heart function dropped below 10% and Mashak was told he wasn’t expected to make it. It took until about 2010 for Mashak’s heart to recover to about 30%.

In the early 2000s, the Internet came to life. By 2004, Mashak had found many groups independently pursuing what Mashak refers to under the umbrella of Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform). (Otherwise known as the Unalienable Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of punishment or reprisal as reduced to writing in the First Amendment) From 2004 to present, the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees refused to hold hearings dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Courts from individuals in the Judicial TAR Movement. To this day, Mashak has not been afforded the opportunity to testify before the Minnesota House or Senate Judiciary Committees about what happened to him. Instead of being rewarded for controlling his anger over the injustice he suffered; Wells Fargo, Chad Latvaaho, the Minnesota Judiciary and Legislature, and the Minnesota Republican Party conspired to authorize a fake COINTELPRO Dossier about Mashak to be created to marginalize, discredit and demonize Mashak as a leader of political dissent. (Just as the FBI had done to Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Hillary Clinton and the DNC did to now President Donald

E4 Page 3 0f 25

Trump) Mashak has never been allowed to see or know the contents of this fake COINTELPRO Dossier on him despite repeated requests to Law Enforcement, including FOIA requests.

At some point about this time, Chad Latvaaho begins creating a fake COINTELPRO Dossier on Mashak at the request of Wells Fargo’s Kovacevich or an agent of Kovacevich.

Chad Latvaaho has a long history of Obstruction of Justice and Witness tampering. Mashak read litigation involving Latvaaho. Mashak’s recollection is the Plaintiff alleged a Police Officer in Latvaaho’s employee (Repossessors, Inc) used the “Color of Law” to accomplish a repossession. The Plaintiff alleged Latvaaho came to his home, and threatened the Plaintiff to drop the lawsuit and drew a knife in the course of the interaction. (efforts to recover that litigation are in progress)

Latvaaho also was charged with Securities fraud involving Golden State Bank. Latvaaho instructed his coconspirators to concoct a story about developing their own reasons for making the trades that did not involve Insider Trading. (Exhibit 3)

And, then of course, is Latvaaho’s involvement in attempting to make good on the original bank conspiracy’s (Now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA) death threats by hiring the 2008 attempted assassins who came to Mashak’s home in the guise of a home invasion.

In or about 2008, Chad Latvaaho hires an assassin at the Request of Wells Fargo’s Richard Kovacevich or agents acting on behalf of Kovacevich. Said assassin is unsuccessful in his attempt to kill Mashak in the guise of a Home invasion.

E4 Page 4 0f 25

From 2009 to 2011, Plaintiff Mashak was a Leader in the Minnesota TEA Party Movement. In 2011, Plaintiff Mashak suggest the “Nominal Group Process” methodology that led to the Minnesota NorthStar TEA Party Patriots (MNTPP) making Judicial Reform and Accountability its highest priority. Unknown to Mashak, Progressive RINO Randy Liebo and Progressive RINO former Governor Al Quie (of the bogus Quie Commission) had Mashak kicked out of the MNTPP without notice, hearing, knowing the allegations or an opportunity to defend himself. (Liebo was infatuated with being invited to be on the Republican cocktail circuit by Mr. Quie, and so did his bidding) Mr. Quie’s bogus Quie Commission declared there was little or no corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary. This was a precursor to taking away the Right of Minnesotans to vote for Judges by forcing through “Merit Retention Selection Elections” (MRSE pronounced Misery) Quie and the corrupt Minnesota Legislature and Judiciary couldn’t have Mashak mucking up their consolidation of power by forcing the Minnesota Legislature to have testimony and evidence of corruption in the Minnesota Courts, contrary to the Quie Commissions bogus findings, that there was/is systemic corruption in the Minnesota Courts. Anyone honest about the MNTPP Movement will tell you Mashak is the one who could draw the crowds and make things happen.

Somehow, this fake COINTELPRO Dossier apparently purports Mashak was on some crime spree during this same time period. It failed to take into account Mashak’s heart condition and hospitalizations for same. At 10% to 30% heart function from 1998 to 2010, Mashak was hard-pressed to earn a living and pursue justice through the Judicial TAR movement. It is incongruous with his health and his political pursuits for Judicial TAR that Mashak was also involved in some crime spree.

E4 Page 5 0f 25

In about 2008, having experienced the duplicity of the Minnesota Legislature in preventing hearing testimony and receiving evidence of corruption in the Minnesota Courts, I began trying to find a plausible explanation of what was happening. There was a total disconnect between what Mashak learned about government in school and what was transpiring in practice. Over the next few years I began studying the Founding of our Country, Natural Law, Natural Rights, Consent of the Governed and the Progressive Movement.

In 2013, Mashak late files the subject FNR Tax Returns based on bad information and the refusal of the IRS to provide critical information. In 2007 and 2011 Mashak was hospitalized for heart issues. In 2008, Mashak was the victim of assassination attempt by the bank conspirators in the guise of a home invasion. Due to financial problems, Mashak was no longer to pay an accountant to do his extensive taxes. The doctors ordered Mashak to avoid stress. Once each year before the deadline Mashak would call and ask specific tax questions of the IRS. The IRS agents advised Mashak if no tax was due, no penalty accrued. The IRS agents turned unprofessional and became mean-spirited. They would tell Mashak they weren’t paid enough, not trained enough, not smart enough to answer his questions. Based on Mashak’s orders not to get stressed out and the what later turned out to be bad information about no tax due, no taxes; each year after Mashak had enough jerking around, Mashak would give up to avoid health complications. In 2013 Mashak was healthy enough to be a jerk and demand the IRS connect him to someone who could answer his questions. In response, the Defendant IRS assessed FNR and Mashak late filing fees.

E4 Page 6 0f 25

Before we continue, Mashak points out that a person with a healthy heart couldn’t be a leader in the Judicial TAR Movement, Leader in the TEA Party Movement, earn a living in an unrelated field and go on a crime spree. Further, it should be needless to say a person with an unhealthy heart function of less than 10% in 1998 gradually rising to about 30% circa 2010 couldn’t physically nor mentally do all these things Mashak has done nor is being on a crime spree (in the non-government sense) congruous with working for Judicial Reform simultaneously. Only Mashak’s “lion-heartedness” prevented him from dying in late 1998 and allowed him to accomplish as much as he did despite his limitations. But that lion-heartedness came at a cost, and Mashak fears he as 2 years or less to live. (All for testifying over the wrongful repossession of vehicles from a few hundred innocent Minnesota families) Clearly, the US MN Attorney David Lillehaug didn’t give a rat’s butt for those injured innocent Minnesota families.

There are multiple reasons why Hennepin County Court Cases Bank North vs 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA is 27CV88-22383 and Citizens State Bank of St. Louis Park vs. 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA 91-002759 are sealed files which Plaintiffs seek to unseal. And don’t forget about the evidence Mashak filed with the FBI. With this litigation we will prove the old saying, “Law Enforcement doesn’t exist to protect WE THE PEOPLE from criminals, but rather to protect the bankers, the wealthy and the politicians from the rest of us” is true.

Plaintiffs expect this Motion to be decided on Natural and Constitutional Law and violations of Plaintiffs Unalienable Natural Rights. Therefore, before Mashak continues to explain the extraordinary circumstances that merit, and even require this court, to waive the requirement of FNR to be represented by an attorney, and rescind Mashak’s IFP status sans the removal of FNR, Mashak feels compelled to explain the history and metaphysics of our country that have been lost.  Plaintiff asserts it is necessary to restore to this Court and his Fellow American Citizen Readers (so they can establish for themselves the validity of this Court’s Ruling), the relevant historical and metaphysical knowledge that the Progressive Common Core Schools and Mainstream Media have purposely omitted and/or given short shrift to.

E4 Page 7 0f 25

BRIEF HISTORY OF NATURAL LAW & THE FOUNDING OF THE UNITED STATES

Natural Law was reduced to writing during The Enlightenment, (1650AD – 1800AD). America was Founded on Natural Law (See First Paragraph, “Laws of Nature” and Second Paragraph “Consent of the Governed”, Declaration of Independence 1776AD). The American Revolution was a clash between the Metaphysics of Collectivist Divine Right of Kings Versus the Metaphysics of Natural Law and Consent of the Governed. The best summary of Natural Law, Natural Rights and Consent of the Governed may be John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (circa 1689AD)

Under the Collectivist Divine Right of Kings, no earthly-being could question the authority or decisions of the King/Queen on the premise the King/Queen were Gods or representatives of God here on earth, and therefore, would act in the best interests of the Community. Subjects had no rights under the Divine Right of Kings, only permissions and Privileges. The King/Queen owned all land. Truth was also established by the King/Queen and/or the Church. If subjects ignored the Kings Established Truth and they could lose their permissions and privileges or worse maybe “burned at the stake” or “drawn and quartered” or “suffer eternal damnation”. (Think “World is flat” & “Earth is Center of Universe” – Trial of Galileo)

Natural Law and Consent of the Governed (reduced to writing during the Enlightenment aka Age of Reason) made protecting the Unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual Citizen from trespasses of others the primary purpose of government. Per Natural Law, the Founders were Individualists. Property Rights, not only included physical property ownership and wages, but also Self-Ownership, Self-Determination and every individual citizens other Unalienable Natural Rights. Establishment of the Truth by the individual citizen using their own observations and reasoning is also an Unalienable Natural Right. All Unalienable Natural Rights not specifically delineated in the Constitution are protected under the Ninth Amendment.

In accordance with Locke’s instructions, the Founders constructed American Government with the Nature of Humankind in mind. The Cato Letters perhaps best state the Founders’ perspective of the Nature of Humankind in the Natural State,

“All [People] have free will and are not virtuous by nature”

E4 Page 8 0f 25

Therefore, the Founder’s constructed the American government with checks and balance, transparency and accountability. The Founders’ also split up the power among 3 jealous branches to avoid concentrating too much power in too few hands and admonished that government must always remain small to further limit its power. The concentration of power was further diluted by divesting to all individual citizens comprising WE THE PEOPLE, the power of the vote.

BRIEF HISTORY OF THE SEDITION AND TREASON OF

THE PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT

Following Darwin’s “Origin of Species (1859)” and “The Descent of Man (1871)”, group of people became Social Darwinists (1870s). Social Darwinist embraced Eugenics. Social Darwinists asserted the rich had the right to exploit the poor and middle class as they were genetically superior as allegedly evinced by their wealth. As you might expect, that thinking did not go over well with the masses (WE THE PEOPLE).

Social Darwinism morphed into Progressivism (circa 1905) in America and the NAZIs (circa 1930s) in Germany. (American Progressives declared White Men the superior race 25+ years before Hitler’s Master Aryan Race.) To conceal their evil intent the Progressive Social Darwinists drew upon elements of Marxism & described their Collectivism as acting in the best interests of the Community. In unconstitutional opposition to Natural Law, Progressives asserted the Unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual were subordinate to the best interests of the Community. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

Progressive Elites asserted themselves to be superior to the masses. Progressives Elites asserted that Government leaders should be selected from the wealthy, leisure class as only they had the intellectual ability and time to study governance. Because Progressive Elites considered themselves to be superior to WE THE PEOPLE, they chaffed at being accountable to WE THE PEOPLE as prescribed by the American Constitution.

E4 Page 9 0f 25

To circumvent the harsh provisions for amending the Constitution contained in the Constitution, Progressive President Woodrow Wilson changed the US Legal System from Constitution-Based Law (Rule of Law) to Case Law-based Law (Progressive Social Darwinist Rule of Man). Prior to this, all lawyers and judges had to look to the Constitution to determine the outcome of litigation. After this, judges could look to the rulings and opinions of other judges to justify their rulings in various litigation matters. Thus, over many succeeding Case Law Rulings, the Constitution is being Amended without having to meet the harsh requirements formally required within the Constitution itself. (Sedition and Treason Against WE THE PEOPLE) Over time, the checks and balances, transparency and accountability required by the Founders in the Constitution have seditiously and treasonously been written out by Judges and by Congressional Legislation and Bureaucratic Rules. (Sedition and Treason Against WE THE PEOPLE) Freed from these constraints, the Progressive DINOs and RINOs in government have went rogue (and now Progressives (DINOs & RINOs) constitute the true majority in Congress]. Plaintiffs assert that since the change from Constitution-Based Law to Case Law, Judges have begun adjudicating matters to the Rule of Man, often using Progressive philosophy as a pretext for ruling on certain matters when the reality is the ruling is a quid pro quo for bribes, campaign contributions or other consideration. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE).

Progressives Rothschild and Rockefeller founded the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in 1922. The specific intent of the CFR is to prepare America to accept submission to the New World Order. The Progressive Movement/Insurgency is a front for the New World Order Agenda. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

E4 Page 10 0f 25

To avoid revolt and revolution, Progressives a strategy of implementing change incrementally over generations. Progressives disguise their Agenda by naming it in a way that the masses would perceive their proposed changes as good rather than evil. For example, the Federal Reserve System proposal was sold to Populists as addressing their concerns about the manipulation of the dollar and markets by the Banking Trusts. The Federal Reserve Bank is neither Federal nor does it have any reserves. In reality, the proposal that would become the Federal Reserve Bank of 1913 was actually written by the Banking Trusts and actually expanded their power. The Populists were betrayed and they were stuck with Debt Based Fiat Money that steals value from every dollar every American makes and gives it to private banksters. The Federal Income Tax of 1913 was necessary to create to pay the interest to the private banksters who owned the Federal Reserve Bank. (Just to preserve the matter for appeal, both the Federal Income Tax and the Federal Reserve System are unconstitutional – Some Sources even cite the 16th Amendment failed to meet its required numbers for passage) The Federal Reserve System’s Debt Based Money violates the Natural Property Rights of every American. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

Another example of evil sold as being something good is Obamacare. Obamacare is the precursor to the Progressive Eugenics and Depopulation Program that will be incrementally rolled out over the next few generations. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

And future generations will come to know the duplicity of free education. Progressive Common Core education intends to give everyone a test in Second Grade from which Progressive Bureaucrats will assign each student a career based on the projected needs of Corporations and Government. No more “What do you want to be when you grow up”. This violates the Natural Rights of Self-Determination and Self-Ownership.  (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE) Back to the duplicity of free college… In a few generations, Progressives will declare a budget crisis. To address the budget crisis, Progressives will say it’s necessary to limit enrollment at colleges, etc. And the true goal of the Progressives via Free Education will be realized, Progressive Elites will begin choosing who does and does not get to go to college, etc.

E4 Page 11 0f 25

METAPHYSICS OF ALLEGED CAUSE OF THE EXPLOITATION OF THE MASSES AS PROFERRED BY PROGRESSIVE ELITES FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION

In attempting to explain their philosophy, Progressives tried to emulate the logical reasoning of Hobbes in “Leviathan (1651)” to explain the Metaphysics of the Divine Right of Kings, and John Locke in his “Second Treatise of Government (1689)” in disemboweling Hobbes’ position and explaining “Consent of the Governed” and “Natural Law”. As bizarre as what I am about to relate to you sounds, this truly is the purported essence of a large portion of Progressive Metaphysics.

Progressives purport that in the pre-government tribal Natural State of Mankind, all was love and concord. The tribe was run by elders and everyone accepted the decisions of the elders. Progressives further assert, there was no competition, no individualism and everyone in the tribe conformed to tradition and the decisions of the elders. In essence, Progressives assert pre-government humans lived in Collectivist Utopias.

Progressives then assert the exploitation of the masses occurs because of the evil human traits of competition, creativity, individualism and free markets which did not exists before government. As ridiculous as this sounds, this is the cornerstone of the metaphysical philosophy Progressive elites publicly espouse. (You are encouraged to research it yourself in old physical books written from 1900 to 1980, given Progressives propensity to rewrite history effectively they version of NAZI book burning)

E4 Page 12 0f 25

Progressive Elites casts themselves in the role of the pre-government tribal elders, with the masses just accepting their rule and decisions. Based on the afore-mentioned metaphysical pretext, Progressives assert that these evil traits of Individualism, Competition, Creativity and Free Markets can be erased from the individual through Progressive Conditioning [https://donmashakspoliticaldissentdefinitions.wordpress.com/2015/04/25/progressive-conditioning-definition-by-don-mashak/ ]. This Progressive Conditioning being such things as Education, Indoctrination, Punishment and Rewards. It can also be physical and mental bullying and intimidation. The Indoctrination often comes in the form of Progressive Common Core Education. The punishment comes in the form of losing jobs, blacklisting of businesses, not getting promotions or raises, Social Shunning, bullying, adverse court rulings (Progressive Judge Rule of Man) Denial of Zoning Variances or Conditional use permits, hyper enforcement of regulations, etc.) (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

Clearly, Progressive Elites intend to strip from the masses the unalienable natural rights of every individual. Conformity and submission will be indoctrinated or beat into the masses and WE THE PEOPLE will become the livestock/sheep of the Progressive Elite. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

PROGRESSIVE ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUTH

Progressive Elites, asserting themselves to be superior to the masses, (playing the role of pre-government tribal leaders) also want to Establish Truth in a manner similar as occurred under the “Divine Right of Kings” (world is flat, earth is center of universe). Hamstrung by public opinion, Progressive Social Darwinists are constrained from such practices as “burning at the stake”, and “drawing and quartering” of their detractors as was practiced by Kings/Queens under the Divine Right of Kings. Instead, punishment for refusing to accept the “TRUTH” established by the Progressive Elite comes in other forms.

E4 Page 13 0f 25

Before the punishment phase occurs, Progressives will first try to outlast or frustrate their detractor. Simple derision & Social Out-casting is often enough to get some to accept the “Truth” established by the Progressive Elites. For those who seek to have their own elected officials deviate from the Established Truth of the Progressive Elite, there is the “run you around until you give up” strategy. Your first appointment goes will, and your elected official sounds interested in sponsoring and promoting your legislation. By the second or third meeting you are told hold long and convoluted the legislative process is. If you are still around after a year, it gets harder to make appointments. And that’s when you realize you were wrong to observe decorum and be polite, all you did was waste your time, money and energy. You should have spent your time organizing a large following. But now you are exhausted, and give up. This is what Progressive Elites Count on.

Before the punishment phase begins, Progressive Elites are also trying “Establishing Truth” in a manner similar to that used by the Kings/Queens and Churches under the Divine Right of Kings. Before the widespread existence of the Printing Press, the Church and Kings Court were the primary means of disseminating information. Therefore, it was quite easy to control the flow of information and the “Truth that was disseminated” (The proliferation of the Printing Press caused the Kings/Queens and Church to lose control of the flow of information. The Printing Press allowed the “Men of Letters” to disseminate contrary Truths (ideas) that would become the Natural Law of The Enlightenment (1650-1800AD).

The actual Punishment phase is the Progressive Conditioning (punishment and rewards) previously described. As we have seen in our own time, Punishment can come in the form of fake COINTLEPRO Dossiers such as occurred with Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and now President Donald Trump and the fake Clinton/DNC Trump-Russia Dossier.

E4 Page 14 0f 25

Progressives also Establish Truth via the Official Record. Congress, Legislatures, Courts and other Government Entities have what they call the “Official Record”. Anything that does not get on the official record is not to be considered in making the final decision. The problem lies in Progressives gaming what gets on the official record. Especially in Courts adhering to the Progressive Rule of Man, Judges telegraph to both the lawyers how they want to rule. The lawyers then only permit on the OFFICIAL RECORD, evidence that will allow the Judge (or Jury) to Rule the way the Judge telegraphed.  The same goes for Congress and State Legislatures. Mashak’s experience pursuing Judicial TAR is that the Minnesota Legislature would hide hearings, move hearings, cancel hearings and other duplicitous tactics to prevent any Judicial TAR folks from testifying and offering evidence on the OFFICIAL RECORD. The rest of America doesn’t know this “gaming” occurred so they accept as Established Truth what occurred on the Official Record. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

Progressives also try to Establish truth by having people just become so frustrated they can’t tell the difference between Truth & lies. An example most American can relate to is Progressive Common Core math. Common Core proposes to solve math problems in a way that is so convoluted, many Americans just give up trying to understand it. Not being able to figure out the answer for themselves, they must look to the Progressive Elite Teacher for the answer. If you doubt this Progressive Establishment of Truth methodology, here is a sworn statement by Former CIA Director, William Casey: “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

E4 Page 15 0f 25

Today Progressives are attempting to “Establish Truth” by enlisting the owners and managers of American Mainstream Media in their Progressive Insurgency. (See CIA Operation Mockingbird) Today’s Mainstream Media is full of Propaganda and heavily censored to comply with the Progressive Narrative. This Progressive Establishment of Truth has even extended to the Internet. The posts of persons on Social Media Platforms whose thoughts and ideas do not comply with the Progressive narrative are heavily censored. And while the “Men of Letters” of The Enlightenment were aligned with the best interests of the masses, Today’s Academics have sold out to the Progressive Insurgency in exchange for money, positions and creature comforts. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

Comey and Lynch are excellent examples of Progressive Elites establishing Truth. WE THE PEOPLE know that Hillary Clinton’s private email serve and emails violated Federal Law. Yet, Lynch and Comey have declared otherwise. WE THE PEOPLE know that Election and Voter fraud is rampant yet the Progressive Secretaries of State, Election Officials, Major Party Leaders, Government Attorneys and Judges have declared this to simply not be so. Finally, WE THE PEOPLE know that the failed attempted 2016 Election Coupe was an act of Sedition and Treason. However, not only are Government officials not charging Hillary Clinton, George Soros and Members of the Committee of Foreign Relations and Deep State with these crimes, they have created their own TRUTH in the form of the fake Trump/Russia COINTELPRO Dossier. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE) (The Progressive propensity to rewrite history is another example of Progressive Elites “Establishing Truth”.)

Progressive Edward Bernays Emotion and Based-Instinct Exploiting Propaganda ( https://youtu.be/qiKMmrG1ZKU ), Marxist Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” ( https://archive.org/details/RulesForRadicals/page/n1 ) & the CIA Project MKUltra represent other PsyOps operations used against American Citizens to manage and manipulate WE THE PEOPLE. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

E4 Page 16 0f 25

BRIEF HISTORY OF THE SEDITION AND TREASON OF

THE PROGRESSIVE INSURGENCY

Mashak could argue the transition of the Progressive (Social Darwinist) Movement to that of a Seditious and Treasonous Progressive Insurgency as beginning in 1913 with the change from Constitution-Based Law to Case Law and the Progressive Betrayal of the Populists by letting the Banking Trusts write the Law that would become the Federal Reserve Bank of 1913. However, the majority of Americans will agree that the failed 2016 Election coupe morphs the Progressive Movement to Progressive Insurgency, and its coconspirators and those that aided and abetted it as guilty of Sedition and Treason. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

Others would argue that Progressive Movement transformed to Progressive Insurgency with the Bank Bailout 2007 & 2008 with Progressives Presidents Bush 2 and Barack Obama. They both argued that bailing out the banks were in the best interests of community because they were “Too Big To Fail”. (Note Consistency with Social Darwinism – The rich have right to exploit the poor and middle class) This as opposed to the 1929 Crash when bankers lost everything and the “Survival of the Fittest” Capitalism was supposed to produce, actually was allowed to happen. Instead of losing their jobs or going to jail, the bankers of 2007/2008 were bailed out and given bonuses with Tax Payer Money. How is that fair, just or equitable? (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

Some are the Progressives became an insurgency when they promoted open border policies that led to refugee and illegal immigrant invasions. It is reasonably foreseeable to all that when a nation/society loses control of their borders, it is doomed to eventual collapse. Just ask the Romans, American Indians and the NAZIs. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

E4 Page 17 0f 25

Mashak asserts that President Obama weaponizing the IRS against his enemies and the opponents of Progressivism definitively marks the transformation from the Progressive Movement to the Progressive Insurgency. The Act was nothing less than Sedition and/or Treason. (Sedition and Treason against WE THE PEOPLE)

Finally, Mashak asserts the majority of American Citizens would agree that the failed Progressive 2016 Election Coupe transformed the Progressive Movement into a Progressive Insurgency. The Electronic Surveillance of the opposition Presidential Candidate by the sitting president is something right out of third-world tyranny. The payment by Hillary Clinton and the DNC of fake COINTELPRO Trump/Russia Dossier is just over the top. And then there was President Obama on Mainstream Media encouraging Illegal Immigrants to vote. Mashak asserts the vast majority of Americans agrees the activities related to the failed Election Coupe of 2016 mark the transformation of the Progressive Movement to a Seditious and Treasonous Progressive Insurgency.

For Respondent IRS to try to represent this matter as just a typical Tax Court litigation is preposterous. Respondent IRS was acting as a coconspirator in the Progressive Insurgency to overthrow the Constitution and WE THE PEOPLE. Mashak’s activities as a leader in the TEA Party made him a specific target of the weaponized IRS. Mashak’s activities as a leader in the Judicial TAR Movement Made him a target of the weaponized IRS. Mashak’s activities attempting to expose the election fraud of the Progressive Insurgency made him a target of the weaponized IRS. Mashak’s attempts to expose Progressive US MN Attorney David Lillehaug’s and Wells Fargo’s Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice through a quid pro quo bribe/campaign contribution arrangement made Mashak a target of the weaponized IRS. Mashak’s refusal to accept the Established Truth of Progressive Elites by exercising his Unalienable Natural Rights of Free Speech, Freedom of Association and the Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances as reduced to writing in the First Amendment made him a target of the weaponized IRS. The fake COINTELPRO Dossier on Mashak is intended just to provide Plausible Deniability and make unconstitutional actions towards Mashak seem reasonable.

E4 Page 18 0f 25

ARGUMENT

As every Judge takes an oath of office to uphold the Constitution, the absolutely undeniable unconstitutional decision to weaponize the IRS against American Citizens peacefully voicing dissent should have been pro-actively addressed and struck down by the courts and American Legal System. The failure to the Courts to do so seems to evince the American Legal Systems Complicity with the Progressive Insurgency. (Sedition and Treason Against WE THE PEOPLE)

To the Point, Plaintiffs FNR and Mashak were unconstitutionally denied redress through Mashak’s attempts to exercise his UNALIENABLE Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances for more than 15 years(Original Complaint Exhibits 3-6), through Voting in fraudulent Elections 6+ years (Exhibits 4 -6) Because of this, Mashak was wrongfully denied opportunities for remedy with minimal costs and without the need of an attorney. If the Government had not unconstitutionally denied Plaintiffs these other methods, Mashak would have had his day to speak his peace in a forum that didn’t require big cash and a lawyer. Plaintiffs would not now be in a forum requiring great expense and an attorney, had government not ignored their Natural and Constitutional Rights. Having ignored all the Natural and Constitutional Laws the Government is required to abide by, the Courts can not now allow the Progressive Insurgency to avoid exposure by requiring Plaintiffs to abide by Court rules far subordinate to the Natural Law and the Constitution America is founded upon.

E4 Page 19 0f 25

          Mashak, having never been convicted of any crime greater than a minor traffic ticket, and only having ever been charged for “Disorderly Conduct” (which was dismissed for lack of “Probable Cause”) because a judge didn’t want Mashak writing about Judicial Corruption in Dakota County, has had his entire life destroyed because he ignored witness tampering threats from a criminal conspiracy led by Wells Fargo Bank. Mashak’s business, health, reputation and finances are destroyed without ever knowing his accusers, the evidence against him, the charges against him, nor the right to confront his accusers. Mashak has not nor likely will ever get married and have children because the Progressive Social Darwinist Courts let Wells Fargo Run wild and instead punish Mashak for testifying in their courts.

This Court directed Mashak to the Pro Se Project and heard nothing back in a timely manner. Only when Mashak emailed and called the Pro Se Project was Mashak told they would even put it out to any of their volunteer lawyers. When asked for an explanation, none was provided. Were the explanation legitimate and legal, it would have been provided. However, Mashak asserts the explanation lies in the publicly passed “fake COINTERLPRO Dossier” or as known to the “Progressive Elite Inner Circle” conditioning submission of those resisting the Progressive Insurgency. Please read Plaintiffs’ brief addressing the Pro Se Project for details on the matter.

ACTS OF THE AFOREMENTIONED IRS EMPLOYEES VIOLATED PLAINTIFFS’ UNALIENABLE NATURAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, THE CONSTITUTION IN GENERAL AND CONSTITUTE SEDITION AND TREASON, IT WOULD BE A GROSS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE TO ALLOW THESE FOUNDATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL TREASPASSES TO GO UNREDRESS THROUGH IMPOSITION OF VASTLY INFERIOR LAWS AND COURT RULES

Barack Obama weaponized the IRS to be used against his enemies and the enemies of the Progressive Insurgency. Based on his interactions with various IRS employees in the relevant time period, Mashak asserts the IRS was wrongfully using their position to retaliate against him:

E4 Page 20 0f 25

  • For being a Leader in the TEA Part Movement; (Exhibit 1)
  • For being a Leader in the Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) Movement along with many other Minnesotans seeking a hearing before the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Courts. (Better known as the Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of punishment and reprisal as reduced to writing in the First Amendment); (Exhibit 1) (Original Complaint Exhibits 3-6)
  • To aid and abet the bank conspiracy now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA make good on its various escalating witness tampering threats to destroy Mashak’s business, life and reputation; (Original Complaint Paragraphs 35-122)
  • To punish Mashak based on false accusations contained in a fake COINTELPRO Dossier created on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, NA & their coconspirators to retaliate for Mashak’s testimony;
  • In retaliation for Mashak’s efforts to expose election fraud (Exhibit 4-6);
  • As part of unconstitutional Progressive Conditioning (Explained earlier in this brief)

As much as Progressives disdain Unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights, they are the supreme law of the land. THE COURTS SHOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY STEPPED IN TO REDDRESS AND STOP THIS GOVERNMENT BREACH OF THE CONSTITUTION. INSTEAD OUR COURTS LEFT IT TO EVERY INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN TO DEFEND THEMSELVES FROM THE GOVERNMENT. The acts of the aforementioned IRS employees were intended to either unconstitutionally and illegally 1) punish Mashak as a voice of political dissent &/or 2) to punish Mashak for crimes contained in a fake COINTELPRO Dossier. It is an unacceptable gross miscarriage of Justice to allow the Government and IRS to allow the Founding Laws enshrined in our Unalienable Natural and Constitutional Rights to be not be redressed because far inferior rules and laws are invoked to protect said unconstitutional transgressions.

E4 Page 21 0f 25

To fail to do uphold the Constitution and allow Plaintiffs Unalienable Natural and Connotational Rights to be trampled would not only be a gross injustice to Plaintiffs, but also allow Respondent IRS to inflict this treatment on other American Citizens. Justice Delayed, is justice denied. To the best of Mashak’s Knowledge, Respondent IRS never fired, disciplined or retrained its employees documented in Original Plaintiff Exhibit 8. Given the extraordinary circumstances of this matter, this Court cannot allow the limitations of its Charter to trump its obligations to uphold the Constitution in the oath it took.

More importantly, the failure to allow this litigation to go forward as is would be viewed by, WE THE PEOPLE as the courts failure to uphold its duty under its oath of office to uphold the Constitution, especially in light of the failure of the Courts and legal system to address and stop this unconstitutional act, of their own volition. No matter how slowly and incrementally the Progressive elite implement their Agenda, it is still Sedition, Treason, High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Further, for the purpose of noting the matter for appeal, Plaintiffs assert any basis for ruling based on only case law and not the Constitution are unconstitutional and thus null and void and without affect. They are noted as a basis for appeal. It is truly sad that the education of new generations of Americans have so neglected the root causes and basis of the American Revolution, that Mashak had to summarize it in this brief so all Americans can fairly judge the rulings of this court.

E4 Page 22 0f 25

Mashak asserts Mean-spirited excuses and misinformation by employees of Respondent were meant only to create plausible deniability for the true unconstitutional and illegal motives and reasons for mistreating Mashak. In summary, Mashak asserts the motivations of the weaponized Respondent IRS were several or all of the following reasons 1) retaliation for his leadership in the TEA Party Movement, 2) retaliation for being a Leader in the Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) Movement in organizing his fellow Minnesota to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances regarding Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary;  3) To aid and abet the bank conspiracy now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA in making good on its various escalating witness tampering threats to destroy Mashak’s business, life and reputation if he testified; 4) to punish Mashak based on false accusations contained in a fake COINTELPRO Dossier created on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, NA & their coconspirators; 5) In retaliation for Mashak’s efforts to expose election fraud; 6) As part of routine unconstitutional Progressive Conditioning.

As Mashak’s business, life, health, finances and reputation have been destroyed without any charged being filed, without any trial, without knowing what he is accused of, without the right to confront accuser, with no right to know the evidence against him, without the presumption of innocence, it would seem fair just and equitable that those who Mashak has actually provided true and factual irrefutable evidence against be judged in the same manner.  And, as Mashak has been forced to forego the simplest goals of life of marriage and children, to spare them retaliation from persons protected by the Progressive, Social Darwinists insurgencies, the harshest of deterrent penalties should be exacted against all the perpetrators. Deprived of the opportunity for a legacy of his own children, Mashak intends to make the dismantling of the Progressive Insurgency his legacy.

E4 Page 23 0f 25

 For himself, Mashak would feel partially satisfied to see the punishment of Supreme Court Injustice David Lillehaug, Richard Kovacevich, Jeff Blodget, William Bunker, Chad Latvaaho, Al Quie and Randy Leibo and others begin now with forced resignations, blacklisting and social shunning. But in the end, Mashak’s personal interest would be best served if they were all convicted in short order for Sedition, Treason, High Crimes, Betrayals of Oath of Office, Witness Tampering that escalated to death threats, attempted assassination and Obstruction of Justice so WE THE PEOPLE can watch them do the short drop, quick stop jig.

The Founders prescribed a method for dealing with tyranny and injustice. It begins with documenting exhausting of all peaceful remedies. (Their words, not mine) It requires a final act toward peaceful remedy of presenting the government with a “Declaration of Causes (06JUL1775)” This litigation is amongst the last of the peaceful remedies available to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs will receive failure of this matter to be adjudicated and failure of Plaintiffs to be made whole as further evidence that one of the last peaceful remedies available to them has been exhausted. When Plaintiffs deem all peaceful remedies exhausted, Plaintiffs will properly withdraw their “Consent to be Governed” and use these and other injustices and denials of Peaceful Petition for Redress, to move other of his fellow citizens to withdraw their consent to be governed and draft their own Declaration of Causes reflecting what now moves WE THE PEOPLE to oppose the tyranny and injustice of our present Government and Judiciary. https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2015/10/11/second-declartion-of-causes-first-rough-draft-05172015/

E4 Page 24 0f 25

CONCLUSION

So egregious have the trespasses of Natural Law, the Constitution and the Rule of Law been, it would be an unacceptable injustice to allow the Government and IRS escape accountability by invoking much lower ranking laws and Court rules. The American Courts and Legal System were required to uphold the Constitution by their oaths of office and failed to do so. For the Courts to give a blind pass to the Government for ignoring Natural Law and the Constitution by choosing to invoke some low-ranking laws and rules is the definition of Sedition and Treason. It would be wrong to allow the Progressive Insurgency in the guise of the IRS prevail because they exacted retribution on FNR knowing the technicalities that would prevent accountability. Plaintiff Mashak asserts the Court Must Honor his Motion to avoid a gross miscarriage of justice.

Given these extraordinary circumstances, Plaintiffs pray the Court rescind the requirement that FNR be represented by an attorney and allow this matter to go forward with IFP status in affect. Plaintiff Mashak is Plaintiff FNR’s only shareholder. There is no one else to be injured by FNR proceeding without an attorney. Clearly, Mashak has been an instrument of exposing a Progressive Insurgencies plot to over throw the Constitution and WE THE PEOPLE. Clearly the Progressive Social Darwinist majority in government have unconstitutionally and unlawfully retaliated against Petitioners in furtherance of their seditious and treasonous Progressive Social Darwinist conspiracy to force America to give up her sovereignty and join the New World Order.

Failing this Courts granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to rescind FNR being represented by council, Plaintiff Mashak directs the Court to remove FNR from this litigation without prejudice to avoid this Court dismissing the matter without Prejudice and revoking Petitioner Mashak IFP status.

Please advise.

Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,

 ____________________________________ Dated: 11/17/2018
Don Mashak
Personally, and as President of FNR (612)XXX-XXXX
Rt 1 Box 231, Albertville MN 55301

Attachments:

Copies of these Exhibits not included here – refer to Court Record
Exhibit 1 – TEA Party Nominal Group Process Meeting 2011
Exhibit 2 – Smoking Gun “Do Not Mail” Report Evidence against Bank Conspiracy
Exhibit 3 – SEC Article on Latvaaho Obstruction of Justice in Securities Trade
Exhibit 4 – Mashak First Meme as Election Judge Regarding Election Fraud
Exhibit 5 – Mind Blowing Meme as Election Judge regarding Election Fraud
Exhibit 6 – Mashak NSA Report Meme Regarding Election Fraud

E4 Page 25 0f 25

EXHIBIT 5
(return)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

____________________________________________________________________________________________
First National Repossessors, Inc,
and Don Mashak, personally, and
as President of FNR
,
Plaintiffs,

 Vs.                                                                           CASE NO. 18CV2635

 Commission or Internal Revenue,
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Clerk of Courts, United States District Court, District of Minnesota, 316 N Robert Street #100, St. Paul Minnesota 55101-1460 and Commissioner of Internal Revenue via Beth A. Nunnink 30 E 7th Street #1130 St. Paul, MN 55101

LETTER AGAIN REASSERTING DIRECTION TO REMOVE FIRST NATIONAL REPOSSESSORS, INC AS A PLAINTIFF IN THIS LITIGATION.

Plaintiffs again request that First National Repossessors, Inc be removed from this litigation. If there is some special form required to do this, please provide it. Plaintiff Mashak has been unable to find any such required document in the Rules.

The Court has erroneously stated in its Report and Recommendation that First National Repossessors, Inc. remains a Plaintiff in this matter.

From the last sentence in Plaintiffs’ November 19, Pleading”

“Failing this Courts granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to rescind FNR being represented by council, Plaintiff Mashak directs the Court to remove FNR from this litigation without prejudice to avoid this Court dismissing the matter without Prejudice and revoking Petitioner Mashak IFP status.”

In Liberty,

 ____________________________________ Dated: 12/18/2018
Don Mashak
Personally, and as President of FNR (612)XXX-XXXX
Rt 1 Box 231, Albertville MN 55301

EXHIBIT 6
(return)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

____________________________________________________________________________________________
First National Repossessors, Inc,
and Don Mashak, personally, and
as President of FNR
,
Plaintiffs,

 Vs.                                                                                                CASE NO. 18CV2635

 Commission or Internal Revenue,
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Clerk of Courts, United States District Court, District of Minnesota, 316 N Robert Street #100, St. Paul Minnesota 55101-1460 and Commissioner of Internal Revenue via Beth A. Nunnink 30 E 7th Street #1130 St. Paul, MN 55101

PLAINTIFF’S WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDING AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF DECEMBER 4, 2018

To begin with, Plaintiff should not even be in the position of writing this Opposition to the Magistrates Report and Recommendation. (The document though titled Report and Recommendations, is later referred to as “Finding and Recommendations” in a footnote citing rules.) To wit, either by error or deliberate malice to torpedo litigation which will be embarrassing to the Courts and the American Legal system, the proposed Finding and Recommendation is full of errors and misrepresentations. (Though dated December 4, 2018, the envelope was postmarked December 7th, 2018 and not received by Plaintiff’s until December 11th, 2018)

Before Plaintiff’s go any further, Plaintiff’s again request that First National Repossessors, Inc be removed from this litigation. If there is some special form required to do this, please provide it. I have been unable to locate anything in the rules to that effect.

That having been said:

Directly from the Order of September 27, 2018:

“…IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:…

2) Plaintiff’s must pay the $400 filing fee for this action within 20 days of this order or, alternatively, Mashak must voluntarily dismiss First National Repossessors, Inc. from this action, failing which it will be recommended this matter be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.”

E6 Page 1 of 11

From Plaintiffs’ correspondence to Court October 11, 2018:

“I respectfully request an extension of time to respond and/or comply with the 20-day deadline from the date of the Court’s Order of September 27, 2018. I request to extend that deadline to November 8, 2018.

 I would like that time to raise the funds required, retain council and/or to research further my options and consequences to dropping the corporation from the suit, before doing so”

From Plaintiffs’ correspondence to Court October 11, 2018:

“If the Court does not extend the deadline, Plaintiff Mashak requests that First National Repossessors, Inc be removed from this litigation because, at this time, he lacks the funds to pay the $400.00. If said request for additional time is granted, this request is rescinded.”

Per Text Order of October 18, 2018:

“TEXT ORDER ONLY granting [6] Motion for Extension of time: Plaintiff’s have 30 days from date of this order to comply with the Court’s Order filed on 9/27/2018

From the November 19, 2018 (because the deadline fell on a weekend) Pleading:

“Failing this Courts granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to rescind FNR being represented by council, Plaintiff Mashak directs the Court to remove FNR from this litigation without prejudice to avoid this Court dismissing the matter without Prejudice and revoking Petitioner Mashak IFP status.”

     Now Plaintiff’s really shouldn’t have to write any more to successfully oppose the December 4, 2018 Report and Recommendations, but the Court seems hell-bent to prevent the facts that will be embarrassing to the Judiciary and American legal System from coming being made public on the official record. It is attitudes and practices like this that will bring Europe’s Yellow Vest Revolt to America.

POINT BY POINT

Mashak has addressed the issues in the Report and Recommendations Physical Paragraph by Physical paragraph because that was the easiest way to keep track of the errors and misrepresentations.

Paragraph 1 of the Report and Recommendation is almost entirely in error or a malicious

lie.

“See ECF No. 5. “Plaintiffs were giving 20 days to pay the required $400.00 filing fee, falling which, it would be recommended this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.”

E6 Page 2 of 11

It is hard to see how that is a simple error and not a deliberate and malicious lie:

Directly from the Order of September 27, 2018:

“…IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:…

2) Plaintiff’s must pay the $400 filing fee for this action within 20 days of this order or, alternatively, Mashak must voluntarily dismiss First National Repossessors, Inc. from this action, failing which it will be recommended this matter be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.”

I trust that to a jury this is BLACK LETTER LAW and PRIMA FACIA EVIDENCE of the error/lie.

This makes Paragraph 2 moot, as it is based on upon the error/lie.

While the Paragraph 3 is again moot as it predicated upon the demonstrated error/lie, it reiterates another error/lie, it also asserts:

“Mashak’s motion for an extension to pay the filing fee was granted”

What Mashak motion of October 11, 2018 actually said was:

I would like that time to raise the funds required, retain council and/or to research further my options and consequences to dropping the corporation from the suit, before doing so”

I trust we don’t have to parse the meaning of the logical operand “and/or” as most of WE THE PEOPLE understand its meaning.  Again, the Report and Recommendation is based upon an error/lie.  While in the course of researching the issue, Plaintiff Mashak discovered that the additional fees would go far beyond the filing fees, but would require paying a lawyer and “motion fees” etc. Plaintiff Mashak determined, that sans the Court believing Unalienable Natural and Constitution Right issues merit using its wide discretion to make provisions consistent with upholding its oath to protect and defend the Constitution, removing the corporation from the litigation was the best course of action. To repeat, the Report and Recommendation is predicated on yet another error/lie.

With regard to Paragraph 4, I will put this in terms the masses will understand. The primary purpose of American government is to protect the UNALIENABLE NATURAL & CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS of the Individual from trespasses by others.

E6 Page 3 of 11

The Court asserts that “The Court is not free to disregard the plain language of the IFP statute”. It is common knowledge that President Obama weaponized the IRS, (represented by Defendant Commission of Internal Revenue) to retaliate and punish those who opposed him and the Progressive Insurgency. Clearly, the Natural Rights to Free Speech and particularly to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of punishment or reprisal, as reduced to writing in the First Amendment, are UNALIENABLE RIGHTS that the government and these Courts are bound by oath and Constitution to protect.

Apparently, the Court is arguing the Government is free to use the IRS is free to punish Plaintiff Mashak for exercising his Natural Rights reduced to writing in the First Amendment, by attacking his corporation thus requiring Mashak to spend huge amounts of money. Such an argument is folly and promotes injustice. The Progressive Insurgency, for example, will attack their opponents through their opponents’ corporations creating great hardship to the individual to protect his UNALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHTS. Protecting every Individuals Unalienable Rights is the obligation of the government and the Courts. [Mashak was a Cofounder of the MN NorthStar TEA Party Patriots (Exhibit 1), a Leader in the Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) Movement which sought hearing before Judiciary Committees of the Minnesota House and Senate (Exhibit 4), And tried to expose election fraud as an election Judge in the Relevant time frame(Exhibit 5),] What the Courts are saying essentially is that the Court Rules or Directions from the Supreme Court can in fact alienate the Unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual. This just isn’t so. Plaintiffs remind the Court that they took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

E6 Page 4 of 11

This brings us to, “Which takes higher precedent, the Court’s oath to defend the Constitution or Court Rules and Supreme Court Rulings that allow the Government and Courts to subvert the Unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual? Plaintiffs assert the Courts oath to uphold the Constitution is the higher precedent. Plaintiffs assert the failure of the Courts and American Legal system to prevent the IRS from being used to punish and retaliate those who exercise their Unalienable Right to dissent makes this matter a Constitutional issue and evinces Plaintiff Mashak assertion of a seditious and treasonous Progressive Insurgency/Conspiracy. Again, this Court took an oath to uphold the Constitution, but allows this gross violation of the Constitution to occur citing far subordinate rules and rulings as reasons and/or excuses.

At the bottom of Page 2, the Court slides in a footnote:

“Even if Plaintiff’s were eligible for IFP status, this Court would recommend dismissal of the action. See 28 USC $ 1915(e)(2)(B). The complaint filed in this action is nearly impossible to follow, full of irrelevances and invective and in many respects frivolous.

First, error/lie: Mashak is in fact eligible for IFP status. Secondly, this is a Constitutional matter regarding the alienation of Mashak’s and the masses Unalienable Natural Rights to Free Speech and to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of punishment or reprisal, as reduced to writing in the First Amendment. It is common knowledge Obama weaponized the IRS against those who opposed him and the Progressive Insurgency. This is clearly unconstitutional yet no one in government or the Courts took action to uphold the Constitution.

Further, from the original complaint, Paragraphs 260 – 262:

260) “Mashak spent most of the last four months in the hospital revisited by the health conditions the stress caused in 1998;

261) Mashak was in the hospital for a week in May, 2 months from the end of May to about July 24, 2018 and 3 days being released August 22, 2018;

262) As a result, Mashak was unable to fully proof read and Exhibit this Petition and will likely submit an Amended Petition to fix typos, add facts and include more exhibits;”

E6 Page 5 of 11

The stress of dealing with this Conspiracy Against Rights these past 25+ years takes its toll on those who dare speak truth to power. Plaintiff Mashak was hospitalized with “Self-Organizing Pneumonia” in May, June and July of this year. Part of the treatment for said ailment is Prednisone. Plaintiff Mashak recently found out that a side of effect of Prednisone in many persons is inference with mental abilities and the ability to concentrate. Plaintiff Mashak has only been off the Prednisone for about a month now, and it takes some time for the side effects to dissipate. Further, this Conspiracy against Rights and attempts against his life, cause Mashak to suffer from PTSD, which further interferes with his ability to concentrate, especially when dealing directly with matters related to the cause of his PTSD. Plaintiff Mashak filed the Complaint to comply with deadlines he believed existed. It would be improper and unjust to dismiss this matter until Plaintiff had Amend it as he indicated in the original complaint, without being adversely affected by Prednisone.

Continuing regarding the footnote, it makes sense to summarize what this lawsuit is against, since this Court seems determined to say it is “full of irrelevancies, invective and in many ways frivolous”

  • A bank conspiracy, now led by Richard Kovacevich and Wells Fargo Bank, Inc, engaged in witness tampering toward Mashak that escalated to death threats and anyone Mashak cared about and actual attempts against Mashak;
  • Mashak reported the crime to, first a now dead Senators office, and then to the FBI;
  • Then US MN Attorney General and then Campaign Finance Manager for a now dead Senator, David Lillehaug, now MN Injustice Lillehaug accepted bribes and other consideration to not prosecute the Conspiracy;
  • Rather than react through violence, Mashak contained his anger and attempted to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances with little success.
  • With the maturity of the Internet, in or about 2004 Mashak found others interested in Judicial Reform;

E6 Page 6 of 11

  • From 2004 to present (14 years) the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees have refused to hold a hearing dedicated to allowing Minnesotans to give evidence and testimony of systemic corruption in the Minnesota Courts.
  • While denying Mashak the opportunity to testify before the MN House and Senate Committees, the powers that be became so concerned by Mashak’s effectiveness, evidence and allegations, that they engaged in creating a FBI COINTELPRO fake Dossier on Mashak to marginalize, demonize and discredit Mashak as a leader of political dissent. This Dossier was created by Master Obstruction of Justice Concoctor, Chad Latvaaho (Exhibit 3)
  • From about 2008 to 2011, Mashak was a Cofounder of the Minnesota NorthStar Tea Party Patriots and led them to declare “Judicial Accountability and Reform” as their number one action item in 2011.
  • From 2010 to about 2018 Mashak served as an election judge and attempted to have his concerns about possible rigged elections addressed;
  • Mashak asserts that the weaponized IRS was instructed to punish and retaliate against Mashak for his TEA Party involvement, his Judicial TAR efforts and Election reform attempts;
  • Mashak asserts that this punishment and retaliation for exercising his Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of punishment or reprisal, as reduced to writing in the First Amendment, violates his unalienable Natural Rights and constitutes a Conspiracy against his Rights.
  • The Obama weaponized IRS purposely have Mashak bad information, and refused to answer his questions so he could timely file the Corporations taxes.

E6 Page 7 of 11

  • Having been advised if the Corporation owed no tax, there would be no penalty for late filing, conjoined with his Doctors orders to avoid stress, Mashak would try each year to obtain the information, but would cease when the attempts became too stressful. The IRS then slapped First National Repossessors, Inc with fines and penalties for late filing.

Plaintiff asserts that none of this summary of his case is irrelevant, invective nor frivolous. Mashak asserts that the Court labeling it such is merely an attempt to prevent the facts and truth from become widely known as part of the official record thus embarrassing many in government and the Judiciary and revealing the true nature of our government and Judiciary.

Simply, the Court is also trying to avoid the unsealing of the Court records > Hennepin County Court Cases Bank North vs 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA is 27CV88-22383, Citizens State Bank of St. Louis Park vs. 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA 91-002759, because they corroborate the Mashak’s original allegations and motivations of Mashak and the Bank Conspirators. Clearly, this Court has reviewed those files and realize what a bomb shell they represent. Clearly, MN US Attorney General Lillehaug departed from the Rule of Law and substituted the Rule of Man induced by bribes and other consideration.

E6 Page 8 of 11

Let us summarize some of Mashak’s losses as a result of this conspiracy to obstruct justice, just to put in all in perspective.

  • In late 1998, A few years after US MN Attorney General Lillehaug accepted bribes and other consideration to fix the case, the stress of living with a government sanctioned death threat cause Mashak’s health to collapse. Mashak was on life support for almost 3 weeks and hospitalized for nearly 2 months. Mashak was admitted with resistance Pneumonia, caught MRSA and was told a “virus chewed on his heart”. Mashak’s heart function dropped to less than 10% function and Mashak was told the hospital staff did not think Mashak would survive. Mashak did not recover to 30% heart function until about 2010;
  • Mashak dropped almost all his friends to prevent them from being killed and/or retaliated against by the bank conspirators;
  • Mashak never got married nor had children because he was not going to subject them to the hell he had lived through, nor have them be used to blackmail nor extort Mashak’s silence;
  • Mashak’s business, health, life and reputation have been savaged for 1 or more of the following reasons (for a jury to decide)
  1. Furtherance of the original bank conspiracy by making good on the witness tampering threats;
  2. Mashak’s Judicial TAR efforts attempting to make sure what happened to Mashak would not happen others again;
  3. Mashak’s involvement in the TEA Party Movement and his success in promoting the Judicial Reform issue through that platform.
  4. Mashak’s attempts to bring attention to Election fraud as an election judge.

Clearly, each of these represent legal activities of Mashak in seeking Redress of Grievances from the Government. There is no legal, legitimate nor constitutional reason for anyone seeking to punish and retaliate Mashak for engaging in these pursuits. The fact of the matter is that some of the crimes committed against Mashak constitute Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice, Conspiracy against Rights, Sedition and Treason.

E6 Page 9 of 11

Which brings us to paragraph 5, the Court Pontificates about why they have no right nor obligation to ask the Federal Bar Association why it failed to even make its pool of volunteers aware of Mashak’s litigation. The long and the short of it is that the government has fabricated a fake COINTELPRO Dossier against Mashak. Yet repeated requests to government agencies for the content of this fake COINTELPRO Dossier go unanswered or denied. As Mashak has alleged it, a Judge in keeping with their oath to uphold the Constitution would make inquiries into such matters. Mashak can only presume to infer from this failure to take action that the Court does not place a priority on the Unalienable Natural Rights of Citizens, protecting witnesses that testify in their courts despite witness tampering that has escalated to death threats and their oath of office to uphold the Constitution.

With regard to physical paragraph 6, we have partially covered this previously. But to reiterate, Mashak asserts the Court looked at the sealed files. Mashak asserts that the Court Found the sealed litigations reflect Mashak’s allegations and demonstrated that a gross injustice occurred. Mashak asserts those sealed files provide the motive for the witness tampering that escalated to death threats that were directed at Mashak. Mashak asserts the Court does not want these records made public because it will prove Mashak’s case and be extremely embarrassing to the conspirators.

Using the reasonable man standard, any average citizen can look at Wells Fargo Bank, NA stealing millions of dollars from millions of citizens and no one going to jail and realize that justice was not done. (Exhibit 2) Any average citizen sitting on a jury will come to the conclusion that the witness tampering, bribes and other consideration that happened to Mashak likely also occurred in those other Wells Fargo Bank, NA crimes for which no one went to jail.

Finally, since the Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute is fabricated on lies or omissions, it was a fabrication to dismiss the case and prevent Mashak from appealing. Therefore, if this dismissal is upheld, Mashak will in fact appeal to the Eighth District Court of Appeals arguing that the dismissal was based on considerations other than “Failure to Prosecute and the rule of Law, and therefore actually is an appealable order and/or judgement. Virtually every finding relevant to “Failure to Prosecute” was an error, lie or misrepresentation, therefore the dismissal “For Failure to Prosecute” is itself an error, lie or misrepresentation.  The lies/errors now dispatched, the only remaining “reason for dismissal” is the Courts footnote on page 2 is, in fact, the only remaining basis for dismissal and it constitutes a judgement and/or order of the Court. That footnote required the judge to weigh the facts, a duty reserved for the jury and therefore, what remains is this Report and Summary is order and/or judgement.

E6 Page 10 of 11

CONCLUSION

As Plaintiff Mashak has dispatched the basis for the dismissal for “Failure to Prosecute” as wholly founded on errors and/or lies, if this Court subscribes to the Rule of Law, it has no choice but to allow this litigation to proceed sans First National Repossessors, Inc, with Mashak the sole litigant and qualified for IFP status. Equity, Justice and the Courts’ oath of office demand that this litigation be allowed to proceed no how embarrassing it may be to the conspirators. Mashak is confident that if this dismissal is not rescinded, it will form a basis for other citizens to move to withdraw their Consent to be Governed, perhaps in the form of joining Europe’s Yellow Vest Movement.

“Wherever law ends, tyranny begins” ~ John Locke

Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,

 ____________________________________ Dated: 12/18/2018
Don Mashak
Personally, and as President of FNR (612)XXX-XXXX
Rt 1 Box 231, Albertville MN 55301

Attachments:

Copies of these Exhibits not included here – refer to Court Record
Exhibit 1 – TEA Party Nominal Group Process Meeting 2011
Exhibit 2 – Wells Fargo Bank, NA steal millions of dollars from millions of Americans but noone goes to jail;
Exhibit 3 – SEC Article on Latvaaho Obstruction of Justice in Securities Trade
Exhibit 4 – Example of letters sent to Minnesota house and Senate Judiciary Committees requesting hearings dedicated to receiving evidence and corruption in the Minnesota Courts;
Exhibit 5 – Mashak Meme as Election Judge Regarding Election Fraud

E6 Page 11 of 11

EXHIBIT 7
(return)

DONOTMAILREPORTREDACT2

EXHIBIT 8
(return)

8_FBIJEdgarHooverCOINTELPROYellowVestWarning02132019

EXHIBIT 9 (3 pages)
(return)

PDF File 9_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourt28FEB2019Order02282019

9_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourt28FEB2019Order02282019-page-001

9_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourt28FEB2019Order02282019-page-002

9_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourt28FEB2019Order02282019-page-003

EXHIBIT 10
(return)

10_ThinkSocialDarwinistPhilosophyDoesntAffectYouModernHistoryProofsSocialDarwinismRulesAmericaWellsFargoBank09032018

EXHIBIT 11
(return)

US FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL, 8th DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
___________________________________________________________________________________________

First National Repossessors, Inc, (FNR)
And Don Mashak, personally, and
As President of FNR
,
Plaintiffs, Mashak as Appellant

                                                                    APPELLATE CASE NO [19-1429]

Vs.                                                                 CASE NO. 18CV2635

Commissioner or Internal Revenue,
Defendants, Respondents.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Clerk of Courts, US Federal Court of Appeals, 8th District, Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse, 111 South 10th Street, St. Louis, MO 63102 (314) 244-2400; Clerk of Courts, United States District Court, District of Minnesota, 316 N Robert Street #100, St. Paul Minnesota 55101-1460 and Commissioner of Internal Revenue via Beth A. Nunnink 30 E 7th Street #1130 St. Paul, MN 55101.

COVER LETTER TO NOTICE OF APPEAL

THIS COVER LETTER IS NOT INTENDED AS A FULL BRIEF TO THE ISSUES FOR APPEAL. That brief will be submitted in accordance with the briefing schedule when received.

This Cover letter is included in anticipation of issues related to FNR wrongfully remaining party to this litigation and Mashak’s request for IFP status. Appellant Mashak hopes the District Court will reconsider its position when confronted with the facts herein.

With great disappointment, Appellant Mashak must now refer to past misrepresentations of the Court that he previously referred to as errors or lies, “misrepresentation”, “deliberate malice”; by dropping the mitigating context of possible simple error and asserting deliberate, malicious and calculated fraud intended to deny Mashak full and fair adjudication of this matter pursuant to the Rule of Law as is required by the Constitution and Natural Law [upon which America is founded (First Paragraph, Declaration of Independence)] .

Appellant Mashak believes this matter evinces the systemic corruption in our government and Courts. For the General Public reading this document, you will find the motivation for this Court perpetrating this fraud being one or more of the following: 1) In furtherance of a criminal RICO conspiracy to Obstruct Justice, 2) That such litigation will reveal fabrication of evidence in a COINTELPRO operation against Appellant Mashak, and/or, 3) acts of Sedition and Treason by various Government and Judicial Officials. We will further explain these near the end of this Cover Letter.

Simply, the District Court has perpetrated a fraud as clearly demonstrated herein. Directly from Mashak’s Written Objections:

[Directly from the Order of September 27, 2018: [Exhibit 1]

“…IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:…

2) Plaintiff’s must pay the $400 filing fee for this action within 20 days of this order or, alternatively, Mashak must voluntarily dismiss First National Repossessors, Inc. from this action, failing which it will be recommended this matter be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.”

E11 Page 1 of 4

From Plaintiffs’ correspondence to Court October 11, 2018: [Exhibit 2]

“I respectfully request an extension of time to respond and/or comply with the 20-day deadline from the date of the Court’s Order of September 27, 2018. I request to extend that deadline to November 8, 2018.

 I would like that time to raise the funds required, retain council and/or to research further my options and consequences to dropping the corporation from the suit, before doing so”

From Plaintiffs’ correspondence to Court October 11, 2018: [Exhibit 2]

“If the Court does not extend the deadline, Plaintiff Mashak requests that First National Repossessors, Inc be removed from this litigation because, at this time, he lacks the funds to pay the $400.00. If said request for additional time is granted, this request is rescinded.”

Per Text Order of October 18, 2018: [Exhibit 3]

“TEXT ORDER ONLY granting [6] Motion for Extension of time: Plaintiffs have 30 days from date of this order to comply with the Court’s Order filed on 9/27/2018

From the November 19, 2018 [Exhibit 4] (because the deadline fell on a weekend) Pleading:

“Failing this Courts granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to rescind FNR being represented by council, Plaintiff Mashak directs the Court to remove FNR from this litigation without prejudice to avoid this Court dismissing the matter without Prejudice and revoking Petitioner Mashak IFP status.”]

 These excerpts are evinced in Exhibits 1 through 4 of this cover letter.

Following up on the voluntary removal of the Corporation FNR, in Mashak’s 12/18/2019 letter (Exhibit 5) Mashak wrote:

            “Plaintiffs again request that First National Repossessors, Inc be removed from this litigation. If there is some special form required to do this, please provide it. Plaintiff Mashak has been unable to find any such required document in the Rules.

 The Court has erroneously stated in its Report and Recommendation that First National Repossessors, Inc. remains a Plaintiff in this matter.”

Clearly Appellant Mashak complied with the 9/27/2018 order and the court perpetrated fraud in denying Mashak had complied and insisting the Court only said payment of the fees was ordered. The Court denied Appellant Mashak complied so it could dismiss the matter for “Failure to Prosecute.” As such, as they are based on deliberate fraud, the Lower Court’s findings and dismissal are null and void. The General Public should take note, I have proven a Judge has perjured himself and perpetrated frauds upon the Court. You now know, fact certain, that the Courts lie. And the police and other law enforcement take their lead from the Courts. The failure of corrective action being taken against this judge will evince to the American Public that America’s Courts are systemically corrupt. Your confidence in the honor and integrity of our Courts, now should have fallen greatly. (For the General Public, you will be interested in knowing why the Court would lie and we will address that later in this cover letter.)

E11 Page 2 of 4

Clearly, the Lower Court is perpetrating this fraud to create the pretext that Mashak cannot appeal because he does not have an attorney to represent the Corporation and Mashak does not qualify for IFP if the Corporation is included.

Again, this pretext is only made possible by deliberate fraud is null and void. Therefore, Appellant Mashak asserts the District Court should reverse itself, remove FNR as a party and allow Mashak to proceed with IFP status in District Court. Or, the Appellate Court should remove the Corporation, authorize Mashak’s IFP status and take necessary corrective action against the lower Court. Mashak complied with every requirement the Court ordered him to do so in the 9/27/2018 order. It is just that simple.

Now back to informing the General Public as to why the Court would lie. Have you ever wondered how the high level of systemic corruption in America has managed to last so long?  It is because the Progressive Globalist Establishment have developed tactics to undermine transparency, accountability and political dissent. One of these tactics is to inflict FBI COINTELPRO-style Operations on the leaders of political dissent. The purpose of FBI COINTELPRO-style operations is to demonize, discredit and Marginalize the leaders of political dissent making these leaders less or totally ineffective in pursuing their political agenda. Additionally, Progressive (Social Darwinist) Globalists also believe in Progressive Conditioning [ http://wp.me/p4KIHq-27 ] (punishment & reward) to condition the masses to not question their authority and behave as the Progressive Globalist Elites require.

Appellant Mashak did not intend to be a leader of political dissent. Mashak was a victim of witness tampering by a group of bankers now led by Wells Fargo Bank, NA, that escalated to threats to destroy his life and finally, threats to kill Mashak and anyone he cared about. Mashak reported this to the FBI. But then MN US Attorney Lillehaug accepted bribes and/or campaign contribution of $50,000 to not prosecute the matter. It is unknown at this time what other consideration Lillehaug accepted.  (More details regarding this incident appear in the original complaint and Plaintiffs Written Objections [Exhibit 6] One of the motivations for perpetrating this fraud is Appellant Mashak requests to unseal related Court records [Hennepin County Court Cases Bank North vs 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA is 27CV88-22383, Citizens State Bank of St. Louis Park vs. 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA 91-002759] Wells Fargo Bank, NA went on to steal millions of dollars from millions of American with no one going to jail. (Exhibit 2 of Written Objections which appears as Exhibit 6 here) Don Mashak was in possession of collection documents which evinced the bank conspiracy knowledge of repossessions that it denied it was aware of. Because the bankers had failed to “Charge off” the repossessions, the computer continued sending late notices to the debtors of vehicles that had already been repossessed. To deal with this, they changed the address to “Do Not Mail” (Exhibit 7) so the letters never got sent to the debtors. This proved the bankers in fact knew the vehicles had been repossessed.

In the Course of pursuing justice, Appellant Mashak attempted to exercise his Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of retaliation or punishment, as reduced to writing in the mid-1990s and then again, every year from 2004 to present… (Exhibit 4 of Written Objections which appears as Exhibit 6 here) Don Mashak was involved with various groups seeking Judicial Reform he refers to collectively as Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform). These groups sought a hearing before the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota judiciary.

Don Mashak also was involved in pursuing Judicial Reform through the TEA Party from 2009 to 2011 (Exhibit 1 of Written Objections which appears as Exhibit 6 here)

E11 Page 3 of 4

Don Mashak also attempted to promote election integrity as an election judge by reporting a source of election fraud (Exhibit 5 of Written Objections which appears as Exhibit 6 here)

The point being, the indoctrination you learn in High School about America being about Truth, Justice and the American Way is all lies. Our Government uses FBI COINTELPRO Style Operations against the Leaders of Political dissent. There purpose is to demonize, discredit and marginalize these leaders to make them less effective or completely ineffective in pursuing their agenda. The most infamous target of COINTELPRO was Civil Rights Leader Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. [Exhibit 8] https://www.scribd.com/document/290593748/FBI-COINTELPRO-and-Martin-Luther-King-Jr-1of3-Intro-Sections-1-and-2-of-Senate-Report-01-20-2014

Appellant Mashak believes 1) the Court believes No one will see this injustice, so no one will know about this injustice. 2) the Court believes its COINTELPRO operation against Mashak has been so effective that without the American Public knowing their true motivations, 3) The Court believes Mashak won’t take the initiative to make sure the Masses know the true reasons why the Courts perpetrated.

Therefore, Appellant Mashak has included this cover letter with the Notice of Appeal filing and will post this Notice of Appeal and this cover letter on the internet as he did “PLAINTIFF’S WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDING AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF DECEMBER 4, 2018”.

The internet posting for Plaintiff Mashak’s Written Objections can be found here: https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2019/01/19/how-progressive-rule-of-man-fbi-cointelpro-work-a-real-life-example/

The posting for Appellant Mashak’s Notice of Appeal and Cover Letter can be found at: https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2019/02/19/don-mashak-vs-the-irs-how-the-progressive-social-darwinist-assertion-the-rich-have-the-right-to-exploit-the-masses-manifests-itself-in-our-courts-and-politics-a-continuing-real-life-exam/

The Constitutional issue of “Did President Obama’s direct the IRS to act against his political enemies and political dissent violate the Constitution?” demands this matter be fully heard.

This fraud results in manifest injustice to Appellant Mashak and failure of this matter to be fully heard will severely and adversely impact the American Public’s view of the honor and integrity the American Judicial System.  Appellant Mashak asserts that what has transpired as described herein and elsewhere rises to the level of Sedition and Treason; and thus, the necessity of American Citizens withdrawing their CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED if and when their peaceful remedies are exhausted.

Though the deadline for filing the Notice of Appeal is 60 days, Mashak has filed this at 30days (30 days fell on a Sunday, & Monday was a Federal Holiday) to allow time to resolve these issues.

Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,

In Liberty,

 ____________________________________ Dated: 2/19/2019
Don Mashak
Personally, and as President of FNR (612)XXX-XXXX
Rt 1 Box 231, Albertville MN 55301

These Exhibts appear as Exhibits 1 through 8, in the present 3/24/2019 Pleading
Exhibit 1 – 09/27/2018 Order
Exhibit 2 – Plaintiff’s October 11, 2018 Correspondence to Court
Exhibit 3 – Court’s October 18, 2018 Text Order Only
Exhibit 4 – Plaintiff’s November 19, 2018 Correspondence to Court
Exhibit 5 – Plaintiff’s December 18, 2018 Correspondence to Court
Exhibit 6 – Plaintiff’s Written Objections 12/18/2018
Exhibit 7 – “Do Not Mail” Example of Proof the Bank Conspirators knew vehicles had been repossessedExhibit 8 – Hoover on FBI COINTELPRO Post

E11 Page 4 of 4

EXHIBIT 12
(return)

12_NorthStarTEAPartyNSTPPNominalGroupProcess2011Article09222017ShadowProofcom

EXHIBIT 13
(return)

13_SorosElectionFraudPotentialInMinnesotaVoterID700x700

EXHIBIT 14
(return)

Via fax: MN Senate Dem fax 651-296-6511, MN Senate GOP fax 651-296-9441, MN House DFL fax 651-296-8605,

MN House GOP fax 651-296-5378

February 20, 2015

Rep.  Marion O’Neil(RINO),
St. Paul Minnesota

Don Mashak
Rt 1 Box 231
Albertville MN 55301

RE:  First Amendment right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of Punishment or Reprisal Hearing  dedicated to Minnesotans giving testimony and evidence of systemic corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary before Any and All House and Senate Judiciary Committees .

Hello:

More than 10 years have passed since a loose coalition of individuals and groups that I will now refer to as the Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) Movement, asked committees from the Minnesota House and the Senate charged with overseeing the Minnesota Judiciary to hold hearings. Hearings dedicated to receiving evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary. I remind you once again that this is an unalienable Natural Right reduced to writing in First Amendment of the US Constitution.

I once again request said hearing, as a manner of documenting WE THE PEOPLE suffering a long train of abuses and exhausting our peaceful remedies(pursuant to Natural Law and the Declaration of Independence).  In the past, you have been so arrogant as to not even respond to my annual requests and/or the annual requests of others for this hearing.

In fact, in the past year I have been made aware of specific unconstitutional and unlawful acts of punishment and retaliation against me for daring to be seen as one of the leaders of the Judicial TAR movement daring to try to exercise our Unalienable Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances as reduced to writing in the First Amendment.   You have directed and/or authorized various Minnesota Government personnel, Judges and Law Enforcement to engage in an FBI COINTELPRO style operation against me. An operation to demonize, discredit and marginalize me as a leader of Political Dissent by fabricating false negative allegations and rumors against me.  You have succeeded in destroying my business, my life and my health, and apparently laugh about it behind closed doors in a manner only those with a Gruber “Masses too stupid” mindset can appreciate(and make vague references to it to my face) . I further call upon you to also immediately stop and redress your illegal and unconstitutional retaliatory and punitive COINTELPRO operation against me for attempting to exercise my unalienable Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances as reduced to writing in the First Amendment.

Please advise promptly

Those were my thoughts.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
Don Mashak@Yahoo.com

Cc:  Minnesota  Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Senator Ron Latz(D), MN House Civil Law and Data Practices Committee Chair Peggy Scott(R), MN House Public Safety and Crime Prevention Policy and Finance Chair Tony Cornish (R) , Senator Bruce D. Anderson(R)

EXHIBIT 15 (4 pages)
(return)

PDF File 15_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourt18JAN2019OrderMemorandumOpinionOrderJudgement01182019

<&NBSP>
15_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourt18JAN2019OrderMemorandumOpinionOrderJudgement01182019-page-00115_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourt18JAN2019OrderMemorandumOpinionOrderJudgement01182019-page-00215_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourt18JAN2019OrderMemorandumOpinionOrderJudgement01182019-page-00315_MashakVsIRS_US_MN_DistrictCourt18JAN2019OrderMemorandumOpinionOrderJudgement01182019-page-004

EXHIBIT 16
(return)

16_GABStrzokSmirkVsMaGAStudentSmile01222019

EXHIBIT 17
(return)

17_TrumpRussiaCollusionCOINTELPROOperationDebunked03202019

EXHIBIT 18
(return)

18_WhatIsMetaPhysics01012018

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s